RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONG/MA/SPEC/19
21 September 2001
(01-4497)
Committee on Market Access
DRAFT
REPORT (2001) OF THE COMMITTEE ON MARKET ACCESS
1. The Committee on Market Access held three formal meetings (21 March, 15 June1, and [26
September] 2001) and eleven informal meetings (2 February, 26 February, 16 March, 19 March (2),
15 May, 21 May, 8 June, 11 June, 4 July, and [24 September] 2001) thus far this year.  It is foreseen
that an additional formal and informal meeting will be held later this year.  The minutes of the formal
meetings are contained in documents G/MA/M/28 to  [G/MA/M/30].  In addition, two periodic reports
giving an overview of the issues discussed in the Committee and providing factual information related
to the requests for waivers and waiver extensions, both for the introduction of HS96 changes and for
the transposition of schedules into the Harmoni zed System are contained in documents G/MA/112
and [G/MA/113].
2. At its meeting of 21 March 2001, the Committee took note of the nomination of
Mr. Yair Shiran (Israel) as Chairman of the Committee for the current year and elected him by
acclamation.  At that meeting, the Committee elected as Vice-Chairperson for the current year,
Mrs. Lourdes Berrig (Philippines).   After the departure of Mr. Shiran from Geneva in July 2001, the
Vice-Chairperson has served as Chairperson of the Committee.
I. WAIVERS AND SUBMISSION OF HS96 DOCUMENTATION
3. As concerned the introduction on 1 January 1996 of the changes to the nomenclature of the
Harmonized System and the submission of documentation related to these changes, the Committee
examined the situation at its meetings of 21 March, 15 June and [26 September] 2001 on the basis of
updated documents prepared by the Secretariat.
4. On 13 December 1995, several Members were granted individual waivers, for operational
reasons grouped into one single decision, for the introduction of HS96 changes into their schedules.
These waivers presently concern 19 Members and have been extended by successive decisions of the
General Council until 30 April 2002 (WT/L/400).  At the Committee's meeting of 21 March 2001,
certain delegations indicated that they were not prepared to accept another extension of the  waiverthis time, but wished to revert to the practice of individual decisions for waivers and waiver
extensions in the future.  Certain other Members preferred to continue the existing practice of
grouping the waivers into one decision.  In a compromise reached at the time, Members agreed to one
last waiver, on a collective basis, for a period of on e year.  This would not prejudice the rights of any
Member requesting a waiver on an individual basis thereafter.
5. As concerned the submission of the required documentation related to the introduction of
HS96 changes in the respective WTO schedules of concessions on goods, as of 26 September, the
submissions of [21] Members, whether they had requested an extension of waivers or not, remained
pending due to ongoing consultations and/or negotiations.  [Two] Members under waiver had not yetsubmitted the required documentation.
                                                     
1 One agenda item carried forward to 27 June 2001 when the meeting was resumedG/MA/SPEC/19
Page 2
6. In continuing with the practice established in the previous year, the Committee agreed to hold
informal meetings dedicated to the review of the HS96 situation based on the informal list prepared
by the Secretariat.  These meetings were held on 21 May and [24 September] 2001.
7.  The Committee also took note that there were [3] Members under waiver for the transposition
of their schedules into the Harmonized System.
II. HS2002
8. Continuing with its work from 2000, the Committee continued to address the issue of HS2002
during the year, especially focusing on the WTO procedures.  A number of informal meetings were
held to work on new procedures for this process.  At its meeting of 27 June 2000, the Committee
agreed on the proposed procedures and forwarded them to the Council for Trade in Goods and theGeneral Council for ultimate adoption.  The General Council approved the procedures at its meeting
of 18 July 2001in document WT/L/407.  To date, there have been [no] HS2002 submissions.
III. INTEGRATED DATA BASE
9. With reference to the modalities and operation of the Integrated Data Base, the Committee
examined the status of IDB submissions at its meetings of 21 March, 15 June and [26 September]
2001 on the basis of documents G/MA/IDB/2/Rev.10 to 12.  As of 26 September 2000, [...] Members
and [...] acceding countries had provided IDB submissions.
10. Following agreement in the Committee on a programme for a "Multilateral Appraisal of the
Operation of the IDB and Related Technical Assistance Activities" on 18 December 2000, the
Committee commenced with work in this area.  In this respect, there were four meetings held, based
on regional groupings, on 19 March, 15 May, 11 June, and 4 July 2001 with the Secretariat preparing
background notes for each meeting.  Also, as was agreed, a Secretariat document summarizing the
outcome of the four meetings was circulated in G/MA/IDB/W/12.  The Committee further discussedthe outcome of these meetings in an informal meeting on [24 September 2001].
11. The Committee was updated periodically by the Secretariat on the status of processing of IDB
submissions, the status of software development,  use of IDB information, information obtained from
the Trade Policy Review Division, IDB reporting tools, IDB internet analysis facility, and the
technical assistance activities that had been carried out.
IV. CONSOLIDATED TARIFF SCHEDULES (CTS) DATABASE
12. At its meetings of 21 March, 15 June and [26 September] 2001, the Committee was updated
on the status of the consolidated tariff schedules data base by the Secretariat.   This included the status
of the Members' files, software developments, and analytical facilities.
13.  As concerned the files in the database, the Secretariat had processed the tariff concessions of
[…] Members, and the agricultural commitments for those Members where it was applicable.  These
files were sent to Members for their approval.  [As of 26 September, there were still some Members
who required additional time for approval, or who we re in the process of sending in comments on the
submissions.]
14.  In addition to the files processed by the Secretariat, there were eleven
2 WTO Members who
committed to processing their schedules themselves.  [As of 26 September, there were […] Members
who had submitted tariff concessions, and […] who had similarly done so for agricultural
                                                     
2 Including Switzerland for agricultural commitments only.G/MA/SPEC/19
Page 3
commitments.]  [However, there were still […] Members who had not made the necessary
submissions.]
V. OTHER ACTIVITIES
15. At its meeting of 21 March 2001, the Committee took note of the Chairman's summary as
concerned the outcome of the Tariff Seminar which was held on 20 March 2001.  The Committee also
took note of the tariff information available in the Secretariat as contained in document
G/MA/TAR/3/Rev.6.
16.  As concerned the notifications of quantitative restrictions, the Committee agreed to follow the
procedures as outlined in document G/MA/NTM/QR/W/1 in order to accommodate items when
difficulties were encountered in entering the information in the database.  The Committee alsoconducted its review of notifications under the Decision on Reverse Notification of Non-Tariff
Measures on the basis of document G/MA/NTM/W/3/Rev.1.
17. At its meeting of 15 June 2001, the Committee took note of the information in document
G/MA/W/23/Rev.1 as concerned the situation of schedules of WTO Members.
__________