Split (2)

train · 6k rows

Unnamed: 0 int64 29 2.83M	paragraph stringlengths 31 32.8k	event_name stringclasses 146 values	event_summary stringclasses 146 values	answer_impact stringclasses 2 values	answer_eventimpact stringclasses 2 values	prompt_impact stringlengths 1.2k 33.9k	prompt_eventimpact stringlengths 1.35k 35.1k
78,298	Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Announcement of Receipt of Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, Mesabi Trust received the quarterly royalty report of iron ore shipments out of Silver Bay, Minnesota during the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Royalty Report”) from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (“Cliffs”), the parent company of Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”). The Royalty Report indicated that, because of the current and ongoing idling of Northshore, the Trust received no royalty payment.Item 7.01Regulation FD.Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, the Trustees of Mesabi Trust received the Royalty Report from Cliffs, the parent company of Northshore.As reported to Mesabi Trust by Cliffs in the Royalty Report, based on shipments of iron ore products by Northshore during the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was credited with a base royalty of zero dollars ($0.00). For the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was also credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00). No adjustments were taken by Cliffs for the quarter. In addition, because of the current idling of Northshore, a royalty payment of zero dollars ($0.00) was paid to the Mesabi Land Trust. Accordingly, the total royalty payments received by Mesabi Trust on October 28, 2022 from Cliffs was zero dollars ($0.00).The royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on the volume of iron ore pellets produced or shipped during the quarter and the year to date, the pricing of iron ore product sales, and the percentage of iron ore pellet shipments from Mesabi Trust lands rather than from non-Mesabi Trust lands. In the third calendar quarter of 2022, Cliffs credited Mesabi Trust with zero (0) tons of iron ore shipped, as compared to 1,169,461 tons shipped during the third calendar quarter of 2021.The volume of iron ore pellets (and other iron ore products) produced and shipped by Northshore varies from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors, including, among others, Cliffs’ decisions to idle Northshore operations, the requested delivery schedules of customers, general economic conditions in the iron ore industry, production schedules and weather conditions on the Great Lakes. Based on the above factors, and as indicated by Mesabi Trust’s historical distribution payments, the royalties received by Mesabi Trust, and the distributions paid to Unitholders, if any, in any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of royalties that will be received, or distributions that will be paid, if any, in any subsequent quarter or full year.As previously announced by Cliffs on July 22, 2022, the current idling of Northshore operations was extended until at least April 2023 and maybe beyond.Cliffs’ Royalty Report stated that the reported royalty amounts were based on estimated iron ore pellet prices that are subject to change. It is possible that future negative price adjustments could offset, or even eliminate, royalties or royalty income that would otherwise be payable to Mesabi Trust in any particular quarter, or at year end, thereby potentially reducing cash available for distribution to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders in future quarters.Forward-looking StatementsThis report contains certain forward-looking statements based on Cliffs’ publicly announced plans with respect to Northshore in the future, which statements are intended to be made under the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. The length of the idling of Northshore operations could differ materially from current expectations due to inherent risks and uncertainties such as general adverse business and industry economic trends, uncertainties arising from war, terrorist events, recession, potential future impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and other global events, higher or lower customer demand for steel and iron ore, decisions by mine operators regarding	Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)	Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Announcement of Receipt of Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, Mesabi Trust received the quarterly royalty report of iron ore shipments out of Silver Bay, Minnesota during the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Royalty Report”) from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (“Cliffs”), the parent company of Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”). The Royalty Report indicated that, because of the current and ongoing idling of Northshore, the Trust received no royalty payment.Item 7.01Regulation FD.Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, the Trustees of Mesabi Trust received the Royalty Report from Cliffs, the parent company of Northshore.As reported to Mesabi Trust by Cliffs in the Royalty Report, based on shipments of iron ore products by Northshore during the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was credited with a base royalty of zero dollars ($0.00). For the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was also credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00). No adjustments were taken by Cliffs for the quarter. In addition, because of the current idling of Northshore, a royalty payment of zero dollars ($0.00) was paid to the Mesabi Land Trust. Accordingly, the total royalty payments received by Mesabi Trust on October 28, 2022 from Cliffs was zero dollars ($0.00).The royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on the volume of iron ore pellets produced or shipped during the quarter and the year to date, the pricing of iron ore product sales, and the percentage of iron ore pellet shipments from Mesabi Trust lands rather than from non-Mesabi Trust lands. In the third calendar quarter of 2022, Cliffs credited Mesabi Trust with zero (0) tons of iron ore shipped, as compared to 1,169,461 tons shipped during the third calendar quarter of 2021.The volume of iron ore pellets (and other iron ore products) produced and shipped by Northshore varies from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors, including, among others, Cliffs’ decisions to idle Northshore operations, the requested delivery schedules of customers, general economic conditions in the iron ore industry, production schedules and weather conditions on the Great Lakes. Based on the above factors, and as indicated by Mesabi Trust’s historical distribution payments, the royalties received by Mesabi Trust, and the distributions paid to Unitholders, if any, in any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of royalties that will be received, or distributions that will be paid, if any, in any subsequent quarter or full year.As previously announced by Cliffs on July 22, 2022, the current idling of Northshore operations was extended until at least April 2023 and maybe beyond.Cliffs’ Royalty Report stated that the reported royalty amounts were based on estimated iron ore pellet prices that are subject to change. It is possible that future negative price adjustments could offset, or even eliminate, royalties or royalty income that would otherwise be payable to Mesabi Trust in any particular quarter, or at year end, thereby potentially reducing cash available for distribution to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders in future quarters.Forward-looking StatementsThis report contains certain forward-looking statements based on Cliffs’ publicly announced plans with respect to Northshore in the future, which statements are intended to be made under the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. The length of the idling of Northshore operations could differ materially from current expectations due to inherent risks and uncertainties such as general adverse business and industry economic trends, uncertainties arising from war, terrorist events, recession, potential future impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and other global events, higher or lower customer demand for steel and iron ore, decisions by mine operators regarding [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Announcement of Receipt of Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, Mesabi Trust received the quarterly royalty report of iron ore shipments out of Silver Bay, Minnesota during the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Royalty Report”) from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (“Cliffs”), the parent company of Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”). The Royalty Report indicated that, because of the current and ongoing idling of Northshore, the Trust received no royalty payment.Item 7.01Regulation FD.Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, the Trustees of Mesabi Trust received the Royalty Report from Cliffs, the parent company of Northshore.As reported to Mesabi Trust by Cliffs in the Royalty Report, based on shipments of iron ore products by Northshore during the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was credited with a base royalty of zero dollars ($0.00). For the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was also credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00). No adjustments were taken by Cliffs for the quarter. In addition, because of the current idling of Northshore, a royalty payment of zero dollars ($0.00) was paid to the Mesabi Land Trust. Accordingly, the total royalty payments received by Mesabi Trust on October 28, 2022 from Cliffs was zero dollars ($0.00).The royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on the volume of iron ore pellets produced or shipped during the quarter and the year to date, the pricing of iron ore product sales, and the percentage of iron ore pellet shipments from Mesabi Trust lands rather than from non-Mesabi Trust lands. In the third calendar quarter of 2022, Cliffs credited Mesabi Trust with zero (0) tons of iron ore shipped, as compared to 1,169,461 tons shipped during the third calendar quarter of 2021.The volume of iron ore pellets (and other iron ore products) produced and shipped by Northshore varies from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors, including, among others, Cliffs’ decisions to idle Northshore operations, the requested delivery schedules of customers, general economic conditions in the iron ore industry, production schedules and weather conditions on the Great Lakes. Based on the above factors, and as indicated by Mesabi Trust’s historical distribution payments, the royalties received by Mesabi Trust, and the distributions paid to Unitholders, if any, in any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of royalties that will be received, or distributions that will be paid, if any, in any subsequent quarter or full year.As previously announced by Cliffs on July 22, 2022, the current idling of Northshore operations was extended until at least April 2023 and maybe beyond.Cliffs’ Royalty Report stated that the reported royalty amounts were based on estimated iron ore pellet prices that are subject to change. It is possible that future negative price adjustments could offset, or even eliminate, royalties or royalty income that would otherwise be payable to Mesabi Trust in any particular quarter, or at year end, thereby potentially reducing cash available for distribution to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders in future quarters.Forward-looking StatementsThis report contains certain forward-looking statements based on Cliffs’ publicly announced plans with respect to Northshore in the future, which statements are intended to be made under the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. The length of the idling of Northshore operations could differ materially from current expectations due to inherent risks and uncertainties such as general adverse business and industry economic trends, uncertainties arising from war, terrorist events, recession, potential future impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and other global events, higher or lower customer demand for steel and iron ore, decisions by mine operators regarding [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,087,104	Provision for storm damages- recovered either through securitization or retail rates (Note 2 -Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators)	Western Drought (2014)	Historic drought conditions affected the majority of California for all of 2014 making it the worst drought on record for the state. Surrounding states and parts of Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas also experienced continued severe drought conditions. This is a continuation of drought conditions that have persisted for several years.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Provision for storm damages- recovered either through securitization or retail rates (Note 2 -Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators) [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Western Drought (2014)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Historic drought conditions affected the majority of California for all of 2014 making it the worst drought on record for the state. Surrounding states and parts of Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas also experienced continued severe drought conditions. This is a continuation of drought conditions that have persisted for several years." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Provision for storm damages- recovered either through securitization or retail rates (Note 2 -Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators) [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Drought (2014)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
78,313	rapid adverse changes in markets;	Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)	Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] rapid adverse changes in markets; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] rapid adverse changes in markets; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
874,889	Due to the natural disasters in Japan that occurred in March 2011, the Company was required to assess the preferred shares and premium for other than temporary impairment. The fair value of the collateral which is the equity value of MY Style, declined due to changes in projected revenue growth rates after the natural disasters. As MY Style is highly leveraged, any change in growth rates has a significant impact on fair value. The estimated fair value was negligible as of March 31, 2011. The Company recorded an other than temporary impairment during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 for the carrying value of the preferred shares and premium of $3.9 million (326,700,000 Yen) and $5.3 million (435,000,000 Yen), respectively.	North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)	Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Due to the natural disasters in Japan that occurred in March 2011, the Company was required to assess the preferred shares and premium for other than temporary impairment. The fair value of the collateral which is the equity value of MY Style, declined due to changes in projected revenue growth rates after the natural disasters. As MY Style is highly leveraged, any change in growth rates has a significant impact on fair value. The estimated fair value was negligible as of March 31, 2011. The Company recorded an other than temporary impairment during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 for the carrying value of the preferred shares and premium of $3.9 million (326,700,000 Yen) and $5.3 million (435,000,000 Yen), respectively. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Due to the natural disasters in Japan that occurred in March 2011, the Company was required to assess the preferred shares and premium for other than temporary impairment. The fair value of the collateral which is the equity value of MY Style, declined due to changes in projected revenue growth rates after the natural disasters. As MY Style is highly leveraged, any change in growth rates has a significant impact on fair value. The estimated fair value was negligible as of March 31, 2011. The Company recorded an other than temporary impairment during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 for the carrying value of the preferred shares and premium of $3.9 million (326,700,000 Yen) and $5.3 million (435,000,000 Yen), respectively. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
484,630	During the fourth quarter of 2016, we experienced comparable sales increases in all of our product categories, with comparable sales increases above the company average in Appliances, Kitchens, Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Strong brand and service advantages in Appliances as well as our successful Holiday events drove solid comparable sales during the quarter. Performance in Kitchens was driven by our strategy to focus on the entire Kitchen project, investment in project specialists, and targeted promotions. We experienced strength in several outdoor project categories, including Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Warmer weather, particularly in the South and West, drove strong demand for outdoor projects in Lawn & Garden. Lumber & Building Materials benefited from continued recovery efforts from Hurricane Matthew and Louisiana flooding, as well as strong performance with the Pro customer.	North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)	Extreme drought causes extensive impacts to agriculture in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana. Field crops including wheat were severely damaged and the lack of feed for cattle forced ranchers to sell off livestock. This drought has also contributed to the increased potential for severe wildfires.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] During the fourth quarter of 2016, we experienced comparable sales increases in all of our product categories, with comparable sales increases above the company average in Appliances, Kitchens, Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Strong brand and service advantages in Appliances as well as our successful Holiday events drove solid comparable sales during the quarter. Performance in Kitchens was driven by our strategy to focus on the entire Kitchen project, investment in project specialists, and targeted promotions. We experienced strength in several outdoor project categories, including Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Warmer weather, particularly in the South and West, drove strong demand for outdoor projects in Lawn & Garden. Lumber & Building Materials benefited from continued recovery efforts from Hurricane Matthew and Louisiana flooding, as well as strong performance with the Pro customer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Extreme drought causes extensive impacts to agriculture in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana. Field crops including wheat were severely damaged and the lack of feed for cattle forced ranchers to sell off livestock. This drought has also contributed to the increased potential for severe wildfires." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] During the fourth quarter of 2016, we experienced comparable sales increases in all of our product categories, with comparable sales increases above the company average in Appliances, Kitchens, Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Strong brand and service advantages in Appliances as well as our successful Holiday events drove solid comparable sales during the quarter. Performance in Kitchens was driven by our strategy to focus on the entire Kitchen project, investment in project specialists, and targeted promotions. We experienced strength in several outdoor project categories, including Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Warmer weather, particularly in the South and West, drove strong demand for outdoor projects in Lawn & Garden. Lumber & Building Materials benefited from continued recovery efforts from Hurricane Matthew and Louisiana flooding, as well as strong performance with the Pro customer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
844,971	Fluctuations in customer demand for water due to seasonality, restrictions of use, weather, and lifestyle can adversely affect operating results.	Houston Flooding (April 2016)	A period of extreme rainfall up to 17 inches created widespread urban flooding in Houston and surrounding suburbs. Thousands of homes and businesses were damaged and more than 1,800 high water rescues were conducted. This represents the most widespread flooding event to affect Houston since Tropical Storm Allison in 2001.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Fluctuations in customer demand for water due to seasonality, restrictions of use, weather, and lifestyle can adversely affect operating results. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Houston Flooding (April 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A period of extreme rainfall up to 17 inches created widespread urban flooding in Houston and surrounding suburbs. Thousands of homes and businesses were damaged and more than 1,800 high water rescues were conducted. This represents the most widespread flooding event to affect Houston since Tropical Storm Allison in 2001." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Fluctuations in customer demand for water due to seasonality, restrictions of use, weather, and lifestyle can adversely affect operating results. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Houston Flooding (April 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,574,600	Chile farm asset impairment due to adverse weather conditions	Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)	Multiple days of heavy rainfall averaging 15 to 20 inches led to widespread flooding along the Sabine River basin on the Texas and Louisiana border. This prompted numerous evacuations, high-water rescues and destruction, as more than 1,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Chile farm asset impairment due to adverse weather conditions [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Multiple days of heavy rainfall averaging 15 to 20 inches led to widespread flooding along the Sabine River basin on the Texas and Louisiana border. This prompted numerous evacuations, high-water rescues and destruction, as more than 1,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Chile farm asset impairment due to adverse weather conditions [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
438,381	CPUC-jurisdictional wildfire-related costs related to the 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events are probable of recovery through electric rates.	California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)	Numerous atmospheric rivers in continuous succession caused severe flooding, record snowfall and copious rainfall that significantly reduced drought deficits across California, between late-December and March 2023. Flooding impacted many homes, businesses, levees, agriculture and other infrastructure particularly across central California.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] CPUC-jurisdictional wildfire-related costs related to the 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events are probable of recovery through electric rates. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous atmospheric rivers in continuous succession caused severe flooding, record snowfall and copious rainfall that significantly reduced drought deficits across California, between late-December and March 2023. Flooding impacted many homes, businesses, levees, agriculture and other infrastructure particularly across central California." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] CPUC-jurisdictional wildfire-related costs related to the 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events are probable of recovery through electric rates. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
697,002	use ratiofor corn,as aresult ofweather-relatedshortfalls inproductionand yields,ongoing supplychain disruptionsandthe	Central and Eastern Tornadoes and Hail Storms (May 2023)	Dozens of tornadoes and severe hail storms from the eastern Rockies and across several central states. The most costly severe hail impacts were focused in Colorado while numerous tornadoes also impacted western Kansas, central Oklahoma and eastern Nebraska. Texas and North Dakota were also impacted from combination of high winds, hail and isolated tornadoes with damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, farms and other infrastructure.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] use ratiofor corn,as aresult ofweather-relatedshortfalls inproductionand yields,ongoing supplychain disruptionsandthe [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central and Eastern Tornadoes and Hail Storms (May 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Dozens of tornadoes and severe hail storms from the eastern Rockies and across several central states. The most costly severe hail impacts were focused in Colorado while numerous tornadoes also impacted western Kansas, central Oklahoma and eastern Nebraska. Texas and North Dakota were also impacted from combination of high winds, hail and isolated tornadoes with damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, farms and other infrastructure." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] use ratiofor corn,as aresult ofweather-relatedshortfalls inproductionand yields,ongoing supplychain disruptionsandthe [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Eastern Tornadoes and Hail Storms (May 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
506,295	n June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. On January 18, 2023, the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of the State of Oklahoma and directed the parties to confer in an attempt to reach an agreement on appropriate remedies by March 17, 2023. On March 17, 2023, the parties received a 90-day extension from the district court and continued to confer on appropriate remedies. On June 12, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to mediation. The parties attended an in-person mediation on October 12, 2023, but were unable to reach a resolution. Defendants subsequently filed a post-trial motion to dismiss, which remains pending.	Southern Severe Weather (June 2023)	Numerous southern states including Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Arkansas, South Carolina and Florida were impacted by hail, tornadoes and high winds. These storms caused damage to many homes, vehicles and businesses across several days of severe storm activity.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] n June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. On January 18, 2023, the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of the State of Oklahoma and directed the parties to confer in an attempt to reach an agreement on appropriate remedies by March 17, 2023. On March 17, 2023, the parties received a 90-day extension from the district court and continued to confer on appropriate remedies. On June 12, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to mediation. The parties attended an in-person mediation on October 12, 2023, but were unable to reach a resolution. Defendants subsequently filed a post-trial motion to dismiss, which remains pending. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southern Severe Weather (June 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous southern states including Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Arkansas, South Carolina and Florida were impacted by hail, tornadoes and high winds. These storms caused damage to many homes, vehicles and businesses across several days of severe storm activity." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] n June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. On January 18, 2023, the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of the State of Oklahoma and directed the parties to confer in an attempt to reach an agreement on appropriate remedies by March 17, 2023. On March 17, 2023, the parties received a 90-day extension from the district court and continued to confer on appropriate remedies. On June 12, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to mediation. The parties attended an in-person mediation on October 12, 2023, but were unable to reach a resolution. Defendants subsequently filed a post-trial motion to dismiss, which remains pending. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern Severe Weather (June 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
4,858	On March 25, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“DEC”) reached a partial settlement with the Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “Public Staff”) in connection with DEC’s general rate case filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “NCUC”) on September 30, 2019. In DEC’s initial rate case application, it sought to recover costs related to Hurricanes Florence and Michael and Winter Storm Diego (“Deferred Storm Costs”). Pursuant to the partial settlement, the parties agreed that (1) DEC will remove its request for recovery of its Deferred Storm Costs in the rate case; (2) file a petition for a securitization financing order for its Deferred Storm Costs no later than 120 days from the issuance of an order by the NCUC in the rate case in which the NCUC makes findings and conclusions regarding Deferred Storm Costs and the partial settlement; (3) a recovery rider related to Deferred Storm Costs, initially to be set at $0, will be established in the rate case; and (4) if DEC does not file a petition for a securitization financing order or is unable to recover the Deferred Storm Costs through securitization, DEC may request recovery of Deferred Storm Costs from the NCUC by filing a petition requesting an adjustment to the recovery rider outside a general rate case proceeding. The parties agreed to certain assumptions to demonstrate the quantifiable benefits to customers of a securitization financing. The parties also agreed to certain minor accounting adjustments related to the rate case.	Southeast Tornadoes and Northern Storms and Flooding (January 2020)	More than 80 tornadoes and severe storms caused damage across many southeastern states (AL, AR, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MS, MO, NC, OH, SC, TN, TX, VA, WI). Storms and severe flooding also impacted northern states including Michigan, Wisconsin and New York. Significant damage occurred along the shoreline of Lake Michigan to roads, the foundation of homes and to Port Milwaukee. These powerful waves were generated by high winds and a lack of seasonal ice cover.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On March 25, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“DEC”) reached a partial settlement with the Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “Public Staff”) in connection with DEC’s general rate case filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “NCUC”) on September 30, 2019. In DEC’s initial rate case application, it sought to recover costs related to Hurricanes Florence and Michael and Winter Storm Diego (“Deferred Storm Costs”). Pursuant to the partial settlement, the parties agreed that (1) DEC will remove its request for recovery of its Deferred Storm Costs in the rate case; (2) file a petition for a securitization financing order for its Deferred Storm Costs no later than 120 days from the issuance of an order by the NCUC in the rate case in which the NCUC makes findings and conclusions regarding Deferred Storm Costs and the partial settlement; (3) a recovery rider related to Deferred Storm Costs, initially to be set at $0, will be established in the rate case; and (4) if DEC does not file a petition for a securitization financing order or is unable to recover the Deferred Storm Costs through securitization, DEC may request recovery of Deferred Storm Costs from the NCUC by filing a petition requesting an adjustment to the recovery rider outside a general rate case proceeding. The parties agreed to certain assumptions to demonstrate the quantifiable benefits to customers of a securitization financing. The parties also agreed to certain minor accounting adjustments related to the rate case. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southeast Tornadoes and Northern Storms and Flooding (January 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "More than 80 tornadoes and severe storms caused damage across many southeastern states (AL, AR, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MS, MO, NC, OH, SC, TN, TX, VA, WI). Storms and severe flooding also impacted northern states including Michigan, Wisconsin and New York. Significant damage occurred along the shoreline of Lake Michigan to roads, the foundation of homes and to Port Milwaukee. These powerful waves were generated by high winds and a lack of seasonal ice cover." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On March 25, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“DEC”) reached a partial settlement with the Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “Public Staff”) in connection with DEC’s general rate case filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “NCUC”) on September 30, 2019. In DEC’s initial rate case application, it sought to recover costs related to Hurricanes Florence and Michael and Winter Storm Diego (“Deferred Storm Costs”). Pursuant to the partial settlement, the parties agreed that (1) DEC will remove its request for recovery of its Deferred Storm Costs in the rate case; (2) file a petition for a securitization financing order for its Deferred Storm Costs no later than 120 days from the issuance of an order by the NCUC in the rate case in which the NCUC makes findings and conclusions regarding Deferred Storm Costs and the partial settlement; (3) a recovery rider related to Deferred Storm Costs, initially to be set at $0, will be established in the rate case; and (4) if DEC does not file a petition for a securitization financing order or is unable to recover the Deferred Storm Costs through securitization, DEC may request recovery of Deferred Storm Costs from the NCUC by filing a petition requesting an adjustment to the recovery rider outside a general rate case proceeding. The parties agreed to certain assumptions to demonstrate the quantifiable benefits to customers of a securitization financing. The parties also agreed to certain minor accounting adjustments related to the rate case. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southeast Tornadoes and Northern Storms and Flooding (January 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
873,953	Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods, could materially adversely affect our operations and financial performance. As further discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we expect that the flooding in Thailand will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow, as well as on our ability to meet customer demand for our fiber optics products. We have not yet completely assessed the impact of the flooding and may experience consequences that are even more severe than we currently expect. In addition, our business could be further affected by other natural disasters. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our facilities, the temporary closure of one or more of our facilities or those of our suppliers, a temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, a temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, a temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, and delays in the delivery of goods. Public health issues, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on customer demand. As a result of any of these events, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers. Although we maintain business interruption insurance and other insurance intended to cover some or all of these risks, such insurance may be inadequate, whether because of coverage amount, policy limitations, the financial viability of the insurance companies issuing such policies, or other reasons.	North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)	Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods, could materially adversely affect our operations and financial performance. As further discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we expect that the flooding in Thailand will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow, as well as on our ability to meet customer demand for our fiber optics products. We have not yet completely assessed the impact of the flooding and may experience consequences that are even more severe than we currently expect. In addition, our business could be further affected by other natural disasters. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our facilities, the temporary closure of one or more of our facilities or those of our suppliers, a temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, a temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, a temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, and delays in the delivery of goods. Public health issues, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on customer demand. As a result of any of these events, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers. Although we maintain business interruption insurance and other insurance intended to cover some or all of these risks, such insurance may be inadequate, whether because of coverage amount, policy limitations, the financial viability of the insurance companies issuing such policies, or other reasons. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods, could materially adversely affect our operations and financial performance. As further discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we expect that the flooding in Thailand will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow, as well as on our ability to meet customer demand for our fiber optics products. We have not yet completely assessed the impact of the flooding and may experience consequences that are even more severe than we currently expect. In addition, our business could be further affected by other natural disasters. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our facilities, the temporary closure of one or more of our facilities or those of our suppliers, a temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, a temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, a temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, and delays in the delivery of goods. Public health issues, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on customer demand. As a result of any of these events, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers. Although we maintain business interruption insurance and other insurance intended to cover some or all of these risks, such insurance may be inadequate, whether because of coverage amount, policy limitations, the financial viability of the insurance companies issuing such policies, or other reasons. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
241,015	•Sales Volume– Sales volume was relatively flat due to strong global demand, partially offset by the impacts associated with a challenging labor environment, severe weather in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 and the additional week in fiscal 2020.	Western Wildfires - California Oregon Washington Firestorms (Fall 2020)	A record-breaking U.S. wildfire season burned more than 10.2 million acres. California more than doubled its previous annual record for area burned (last set in 2018) with over 4.1 million acres. Five of the top six largest wildfires on record in California (dating to 1932) burned during August and September. The August Complex was the largest California wildfire, which began as 37 separate wildfires within the Mendocino National Forest, set off after storms caused >10,000 lightning strikes across Northern California. Approximately 10,500 structures were damaged or destroyed across California. Oregon also had historic levels of wildfire damage, as over 2,000 structures burned. These wildfires spread rapidly and destroyed several small towns in California, Oregon and Washington. Colorado also had a severe wildfire season, as its three largest wildfires on record burned during 2020. Dense wildfire smoke also produced hazardous air quality that affected millions of people that also included major cities for weeks. Hundreds of additional wildfires also burned across other Western states.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •Sales Volume– Sales volume was relatively flat due to strong global demand, partially offset by the impacts associated with a challenging labor environment, severe weather in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 and the additional week in fiscal 2020. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Western Wildfires - California Oregon Washington Firestorms (Fall 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A record-breaking U.S. wildfire season burned more than 10.2 million acres. California more than doubled its previous annual record for area burned (last set in 2018) with over 4.1 million acres. Five of the top six largest wildfires on record in California (dating to 1932) burned during August and September. The August Complex was the largest California wildfire, which began as 37 separate wildfires within the Mendocino National Forest, set off after storms caused >10,000 lightning strikes across Northern California. Approximately 10,500 structures were damaged or destroyed across California. Oregon also had historic levels of wildfire damage, as over 2,000 structures burned. These wildfires spread rapidly and destroyed several small towns in California, Oregon and Washington. Colorado also had a severe wildfire season, as its three largest wildfires on record burned during 2020. Dense wildfire smoke also produced hazardous air quality that affected millions of people that also included major cities for weeks. Hundreds of additional wildfires also burned across other Western states." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •Sales Volume– Sales volume was relatively flat due to strong global demand, partially offset by the impacts associated with a challenging labor environment, severe weather in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 and the additional week in fiscal 2020. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Wildfires - California Oregon Washington Firestorms (Fall 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
401,103	Our business is dependent on providing our clients with an exceptional digital experience that is fast, efficient, safe, and reliable, every minute of every day. Our services could be disrupted by numerous events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity or access, failure of our software or global network infrastructure and power losses. In addition, we deploy our servers in third-party co-location facilities, and these third-party co-location providers could experience system outages or other disruptions that could constrain our ability to deliver our services.	Rockies Hail Storms and Central and Eastern Severe Weather (June 2023)	Severe hail storms across Colorado damaged many homes, vehicles and injured approximately 100 people at a large outdoor concert. This multi-day outbreak of severe weather also produced more than 60 tornadoes across portions of Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, Indiana, Kentucky and Arkansas that caused damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, agriculture and other infrastructure.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Our business is dependent on providing our clients with an exceptional digital experience that is fast, efficient, safe, and reliable, every minute of every day. Our services could be disrupted by numerous events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity or access, failure of our software or global network infrastructure and power losses. In addition, we deploy our servers in third-party co-location facilities, and these third-party co-location providers could experience system outages or other disruptions that could constrain our ability to deliver our services. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Rockies Hail Storms and Central and Eastern Severe Weather (June 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe hail storms across Colorado damaged many homes, vehicles and injured approximately 100 people at a large outdoor concert. This multi-day outbreak of severe weather also produced more than 60 tornadoes across portions of Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, Indiana, Kentucky and Arkansas that caused damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, agriculture and other infrastructure." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Our business is dependent on providing our clients with an exceptional digital experience that is fast, efficient, safe, and reliable, every minute of every day. Our services could be disrupted by numerous events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity or access, failure of our software or global network infrastructure and power losses. In addition, we deploy our servers in third-party co-location facilities, and these third-party co-location providers could experience system outages or other disruptions that could constrain our ability to deliver our services. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Rockies Hail Storms and Central and Eastern Severe Weather (June 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
651,409	During the year ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities experienced a flood which resulted in damages to certain property, plant and equipment. This facility was covered under the Company’s property and casualty loss and business interruption insurance policies. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company settled the related insurance claim and received $15,500of business interruption recovery proceeds related to this incident. The amount was recorded as other income within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 2021.	Minnesota Hail Storms (August 2023)	Numerous hail storms caused extensive damage across south-central Minnesota. Golf ball to baseball-sized hail caused damage to the windows, siding and roofs of many homes, vehicles and businesses.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] During the year ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities experienced a flood which resulted in damages to certain property, plant and equipment. This facility was covered under the Company’s property and casualty loss and business interruption insurance policies. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company settled the related insurance claim and received $15,500of business interruption recovery proceeds related to this incident. The amount was recorded as other income within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 2021. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Minnesota Hail Storms (August 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous hail storms caused extensive damage across south-central Minnesota. Golf ball to baseball-sized hail caused damage to the windows, siding and roofs of many homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] During the year ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities experienced a flood which resulted in damages to certain property, plant and equipment. This facility was covered under the Company’s property and casualty loss and business interruption insurance policies. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company settled the related insurance claim and received $15,500of business interruption recovery proceeds related to this incident. The amount was recorded as other income within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 2021. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Minnesota Hail Storms (August 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,160,818	Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million or 9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from $12.7 million to $11.6 million. Legal and consulting fees decreased approximately $2.1 million, attributable to higher legal fees in 2013 associated with various legal matters, including the Bryanston litigation. Additionally, in 2014 we received a one time insurance settlement payment in the amount of $300,000 pertaining to a legal matter. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by an increase in marketing related expenses of $180,000. Other expenses increased $471,000 due to higher outside director compensation, real estate tax expense, insurance expense and an insurance cash receipt received in 2013 for storm damage. Payroll and related benefits costs increased approximately $326,000 largely due to higher bonus accruals, medical, dental, vision and other benefit related costs.	South/Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)	Severe storms across the South and Southeastern states (AL, AR, FL, GA, KS, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX). High winds and severe hail created the most significant damage in Texas.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million or 9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from $12.7 million to $11.6 million. Legal and consulting fees decreased approximately $2.1 million, attributable to higher legal fees in 2013 associated with various legal matters, including the Bryanston litigation. Additionally, in 2014 we received a one time insurance settlement payment in the amount of $300,000 pertaining to a legal matter. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by an increase in marketing related expenses of $180,000. Other expenses increased $471,000 due to higher outside director compensation, real estate tax expense, insurance expense and an insurance cash receipt received in 2013 for storm damage. Payroll and related benefits costs increased approximately $326,000 largely due to higher bonus accruals, medical, dental, vision and other benefit related costs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South/Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across the South and Southeastern states (AL, AR, FL, GA, KS, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX). High winds and severe hail created the most significant damage in Texas." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million or 9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from $12.7 million to $11.6 million. Legal and consulting fees decreased approximately $2.1 million, attributable to higher legal fees in 2013 associated with various legal matters, including the Bryanston litigation. Additionally, in 2014 we received a one time insurance settlement payment in the amount of $300,000 pertaining to a legal matter. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by an increase in marketing related expenses of $180,000. Other expenses increased $471,000 due to higher outside director compensation, real estate tax expense, insurance expense and an insurance cash receipt received in 2013 for storm damage. Payroll and related benefits costs increased approximately $326,000 largely due to higher bonus accruals, medical, dental, vision and other benefit related costs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South/Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
19,144	Prior to the hurricane, the Registrant was receiving aggregate monthly rent in the approximate amount of $67,200 and $81,300 at Arbor Gate and Waverly, respectively. At this time, the Registrant is not able to predict how long the clean-up and construction process will take at these apartments. The Registrant anticipates that it may not receive most, if not all, of these rents for up to the next several months, so the Registrant’s cash flow will be adversely impacted in the short term at least until such time as the Registrant may receive insurance proceeds for loss of rents.	Hurricane Rita (September 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits Texas-Louisiana border coastal region, creating significant storm surge and wind damage along the coast, and some inland flooding in the FL panhandle, AL, MS, LA, AR, and TX. Prior to landfall, Rita reached the third lowest pressure (897 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	Yes	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Prior to the hurricane, the Registrant was receiving aggregate monthly rent in the approximate amount of $67,200 and $81,300 at Arbor Gate and Waverly, respectively. At this time, the Registrant is not able to predict how long the clean-up and construction process will take at these apartments. The Registrant anticipates that it may not receive most, if not all, of these rents for up to the next several months, so the Registrant’s cash flow will be adversely impacted in the short term at least until such time as the Registrant may receive insurance proceeds for loss of rents. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Rita (September 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits Texas-Louisiana border coastal region, creating significant storm surge and wind damage along the coast, and some inland flooding in the FL panhandle, AL, MS, LA, AR, and TX. Prior to landfall, Rita reached the third lowest pressure (897 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Prior to the hurricane, the Registrant was receiving aggregate monthly rent in the approximate amount of $67,200 and $81,300 at Arbor Gate and Waverly, respectively. At this time, the Registrant is not able to predict how long the clean-up and construction process will take at these apartments. The Registrant anticipates that it may not receive most, if not all, of these rents for up to the next several months, so the Registrant’s cash flow will be adversely impacted in the short term at least until such time as the Registrant may receive insurance proceeds for loss of rents. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Rita (September 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
198,994	A $6 million increase in major storm restoration costs.	Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)	An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] A $6 million increase in major storm restoration costs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] A $6 million increase in major storm restoration costs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
702,667	A tornado struck and damaged the Company’s Mikron facility in Richmond, Kentucky in May 2009. During the second half of fiscal 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company received $1.4 million and $0.4 million of proceeds, respectively, from the property insurance claim related to this incident. In fiscal 2009 and in fiscal 2010, the Company spent approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively on its repair efforts; this spending is reflected in capital expenditures on the statement of cash flows. The Company’s net overall cash flows from this event was zero as the Company received offsetting insurance proceeds related to the Mikron capital repairs.	Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)	Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] A tornado struck and damaged the Company’s Mikron facility in Richmond, Kentucky in May 2009. During the second half of fiscal 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company received $1.4 million and $0.4 million of proceeds, respectively, from the property insurance claim related to this incident. In fiscal 2009 and in fiscal 2010, the Company spent approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively on its repair efforts; this spending is reflected in capital expenditures on the statement of cash flows. The Company’s net overall cash flows from this event was zero as the Company received offsetting insurance proceeds related to the Mikron capital repairs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] A tornado struck and damaged the Company’s Mikron facility in Richmond, Kentucky in May 2009. During the second half of fiscal 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company received $1.4 million and $0.4 million of proceeds, respectively, from the property insurance claim related to this incident. In fiscal 2009 and in fiscal 2010, the Company spent approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively on its repair efforts; this spending is reflected in capital expenditures on the statement of cash flows. The Company’s net overall cash flows from this event was zero as the Company received offsetting insurance proceeds related to the Mikron capital repairs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
72,043	Certain statements contained in this -K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. You can identify our forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “budget”, “continue”, “potential”, “guidance”, “effort”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goals”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “seek”, “target”, “begin”, “could”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future growth, future actions, the continued effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on demand, the effects of the continued volatility of commodity prices and the related macroeconomic and political environment, volumes, capital requirements, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, the potential exposure of the Partnership to market risks, and statements relating to the expected amount of cash available for distribution and level of distributions, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected cost, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent BPMP’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this news release will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of BPMP’s control including the effects of storms and hurricanes including Hurricane Ida. Other factors and uncertainties inherent in our business, as discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements found in BPMP’s filings with the SEC, including the annual report on -K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on February 25, 2021 and the quarterly report on -Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed with SEC on August 5, 2021.	Central Severe Storms (July 2021)	Severe storms caused considerable hail damage across numerous Central states including Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, New Mexico and Texas. There was also widespread high wind damage to homes, vehicles and businesses in many other surrounding states.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Certain statements contained in this -K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. You can identify our forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “budget”, “continue”, “potential”, “guidance”, “effort”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goals”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “seek”, “target”, “begin”, “could”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future growth, future actions, the continued effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on demand, the effects of the continued volatility of commodity prices and the related macroeconomic and political environment, volumes, capital requirements, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, the potential exposure of the Partnership to market risks, and statements relating to the expected amount of cash available for distribution and level of distributions, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected cost, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent BPMP’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this news release will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of BPMP’s control including the effects of storms and hurricanes including Hurricane Ida. Other factors and uncertainties inherent in our business, as discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements found in BPMP’s filings with the SEC, including the annual report on -K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on February 25, 2021 and the quarterly report on -Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed with SEC on August 5, 2021. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Storms (July 2021)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms caused considerable hail damage across numerous Central states including Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, New Mexico and Texas. There was also widespread high wind damage to homes, vehicles and businesses in many other surrounding states." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Certain statements contained in this -K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. You can identify our forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “budget”, “continue”, “potential”, “guidance”, “effort”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goals”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “seek”, “target”, “begin”, “could”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future growth, future actions, the continued effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on demand, the effects of the continued volatility of commodity prices and the related macroeconomic and political environment, volumes, capital requirements, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, the potential exposure of the Partnership to market risks, and statements relating to the expected amount of cash available for distribution and level of distributions, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected cost, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent BPMP’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this news release will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of BPMP’s control including the effects of storms and hurricanes including Hurricane Ida. Other factors and uncertainties inherent in our business, as discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements found in BPMP’s filings with the SEC, including the annual report on -K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on February 25, 2021 and the quarterly report on -Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed with SEC on August 5, 2021. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Storms (July 2021)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
530,870	Our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, intentional acts of misappropriation, and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan or back-up operations. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and require us to curtail our operations.	Southeast Ohio Valley and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2019)	Tornadoes, severe weather and flooding in the south (MS, AL, TN) and high-wind damage across many Ohio Valley (IL, IN, OH) and Northeastern states (CT, MD, MA, NJ, NY, PA, VA, WV). This storm system produced heavy rain that caused major flooding along parts of the Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee rivers.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, intentional acts of misappropriation, and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan or back-up operations. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and require us to curtail our operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southeast Ohio Valley and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2019)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornadoes, severe weather and flooding in the south (MS, AL, TN) and high-wind damage across many Ohio Valley (IL, IN, OH) and Northeastern states (CT, MD, MA, NJ, NY, PA, VA, WV). This storm system produced heavy rain that caused major flooding along parts of the Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee rivers." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, intentional acts of misappropriation, and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan or back-up operations. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and require us to curtail our operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southeast Ohio Valley and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2019)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,314,319	Due to the geographic concentration of our manufacturing operations in our PRC facility and the operations of certain of our suppliers, a disruption resulting from equipment failure, power failures, quality control issues, human error, government intervention or natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, could interrupt or interfere with our manufacturing operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such disruptions would cause significant delays in shipments of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In July 2014, our PRC facility suffered water damage as a result of heavy rain and floods, which forced us to temporarily halt manufacturing at the facility while necessary repairs or replacements were made to the facility and to certain of our manufacturing equipment. This incident caused us to incur additional expenses as we shifted our manufacturing activities to a third-party manufacturing facility in the PRC to enable us to mitigate the disruption in shipments to our customers. While we believe we have contained the disruptions we expect that our relationships with our key customers could be materially harmed if we incur additional manufacturing disruptions in the future. While we were able to favorably resolve our claim with our insurance carrier, similar events could occur in the future and, in such event, we may not be able to secure alternative manufacturing capabilities if manufacturing at our PRC facility is disrupted.	Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)	Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Due to the geographic concentration of our manufacturing operations in our PRC facility and the operations of certain of our suppliers, a disruption resulting from equipment failure, power failures, quality control issues, human error, government intervention or natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, could interrupt or interfere with our manufacturing operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such disruptions would cause significant delays in shipments of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In July 2014, our PRC facility suffered water damage as a result of heavy rain and floods, which forced us to temporarily halt manufacturing at the facility while necessary repairs or replacements were made to the facility and to certain of our manufacturing equipment. This incident caused us to incur additional expenses as we shifted our manufacturing activities to a third-party manufacturing facility in the PRC to enable us to mitigate the disruption in shipments to our customers. While we believe we have contained the disruptions we expect that our relationships with our key customers could be materially harmed if we incur additional manufacturing disruptions in the future. While we were able to favorably resolve our claim with our insurance carrier, similar events could occur in the future and, in such event, we may not be able to secure alternative manufacturing capabilities if manufacturing at our PRC facility is disrupted. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Due to the geographic concentration of our manufacturing operations in our PRC facility and the operations of certain of our suppliers, a disruption resulting from equipment failure, power failures, quality control issues, human error, government intervention or natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, could interrupt or interfere with our manufacturing operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such disruptions would cause significant delays in shipments of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In July 2014, our PRC facility suffered water damage as a result of heavy rain and floods, which forced us to temporarily halt manufacturing at the facility while necessary repairs or replacements were made to the facility and to certain of our manufacturing equipment. This incident caused us to incur additional expenses as we shifted our manufacturing activities to a third-party manufacturing facility in the PRC to enable us to mitigate the disruption in shipments to our customers. While we believe we have contained the disruptions we expect that our relationships with our key customers could be materially harmed if we incur additional manufacturing disruptions in the future. While we were able to favorably resolve our claim with our insurance carrier, similar events could occur in the future and, in such event, we may not be able to secure alternative manufacturing capabilities if manufacturing at our PRC facility is disrupted. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,139,840	Claims Services' catastrophe response strategy is to respond to a significant catastrophic event using its own personnel, enabling it to minimize reliance on independent adjusters and appraisers. The Company has developed a large dedicated catastrophe response team and trained a large Enterprise Response Team of existing employees who can be deployed on short notice in the event of a catastrophe that generates claim volume exceeding the capacity of the dedicated catastrophe response team. In recent years, these internal resources were successfully deployed to respond to a record number of catastrophe claims.	Midwest/Ohio Valley Severe Weather (April 2015)	Severe storms across the Midwest and Ohio Valley including the states (AR, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MI, MO, NC, OH, OK, PA, TN, TX, WI, WV). Large hail and high winds created the most damage across Missouri and Illinois.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Claims Services' catastrophe response strategy is to respond to a significant catastrophic event using its own personnel, enabling it to minimize reliance on independent adjusters and appraisers. The Company has developed a large dedicated catastrophe response team and trained a large Enterprise Response Team of existing employees who can be deployed on short notice in the event of a catastrophe that generates claim volume exceeding the capacity of the dedicated catastrophe response team. In recent years, these internal resources were successfully deployed to respond to a record number of catastrophe claims. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest/Ohio Valley Severe Weather (April 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across the Midwest and Ohio Valley including the states (AR, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MI, MO, NC, OH, OK, PA, TN, TX, WI, WV). Large hail and high winds created the most damage across Missouri and Illinois." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Claims Services' catastrophe response strategy is to respond to a significant catastrophic event using its own personnel, enabling it to minimize reliance on independent adjusters and appraisers. The Company has developed a large dedicated catastrophe response team and trained a large Enterprise Response Team of existing employees who can be deployed on short notice in the event of a catastrophe that generates claim volume exceeding the capacity of the dedicated catastrophe response team. In recent years, these internal resources were successfully deployed to respond to a record number of catastrophe claims. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Ohio Valley Severe Weather (April 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
353,391	attribute all of these decreases in cartons sold due primarily to weather related issues effecting the quality and quantity of the fruit.Calavo FoodsFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in sales of salsa products of approximately $1.4 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $2.9 million, or 4.9%. This increase is due to an increase in sales of prepared guacamole products which increased approximately $2.3 million, or 3.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of prepared guacamole was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.7 million pounds, or 2.8%. In addition, sales of salsa products increased approximately $0.6 million, or 41.3%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.4 million pounds, or 47.8%.RFGFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $39.5 million, or 13.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from fresh prepared food and fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, which we believe results from an increase in demand for the variety of innovative and convenient products that we offer, as well as our ability to expand retail relationships by providing high-quality, fresh foods solutions from our growing national production footprint.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $41.7 million, or 16.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from cut fruit and deli products, as well as an increase in sales of cut vegetables. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the sales price per unit. Collectively, cut fruit, cut vegetable, and deli product sales increased 8.8 million units, or 31.2%. We believe the overall increase in sales volume is primarily due to an increase in demand for the variety of innovative products that we offer.	North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)	Widespread severe hail damage across north and central Texas including the cities of Plano, Wylie, Frisco, Allen and San Antonio. The damage in San Antonio was particularly severe as the National Weather Service verified reports of hail size reaching 4.5 inches in diameter. This ranks as one of the most costly hail events to affect the United States.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] attribute all of these decreases in cartons sold due primarily to weather related issues effecting the quality and quantity of the fruit.Calavo FoodsFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in sales of salsa products of approximately $1.4 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $2.9 million, or 4.9%. This increase is due to an increase in sales of prepared guacamole products which increased approximately $2.3 million, or 3.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of prepared guacamole was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.7 million pounds, or 2.8%. In addition, sales of salsa products increased approximately $0.6 million, or 41.3%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.4 million pounds, or 47.8%.RFGFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $39.5 million, or 13.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from fresh prepared food and fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, which we believe results from an increase in demand for the variety of innovative and convenient products that we offer, as well as our ability to expand retail relationships by providing high-quality, fresh foods solutions from our growing national production footprint.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $41.7 million, or 16.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from cut fruit and deli products, as well as an increase in sales of cut vegetables. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the sales price per unit. Collectively, cut fruit, cut vegetable, and deli product sales increased 8.8 million units, or 31.2%. We believe the overall increase in sales volume is primarily due to an increase in demand for the variety of innovative products that we offer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Widespread severe hail damage across north and central Texas including the cities of Plano, Wylie, Frisco, Allen and San Antonio. The damage in San Antonio was particularly severe as the National Weather Service verified reports of hail size reaching 4.5 inches in diameter. This ranks as one of the most costly hail events to affect the United States." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] attribute all of these decreases in cartons sold due primarily to weather related issues effecting the quality and quantity of the fruit.Calavo FoodsFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in sales of salsa products of approximately $1.4 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $2.9 million, or 4.9%. This increase is due to an increase in sales of prepared guacamole products which increased approximately $2.3 million, or 3.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of prepared guacamole was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.7 million pounds, or 2.8%. In addition, sales of salsa products increased approximately $0.6 million, or 41.3%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.4 million pounds, or 47.8%.RFGFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $39.5 million, or 13.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from fresh prepared food and fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, which we believe results from an increase in demand for the variety of innovative and convenient products that we offer, as well as our ability to expand retail relationships by providing high-quality, fresh foods solutions from our growing national production footprint.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $41.7 million, or 16.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from cut fruit and deli products, as well as an increase in sales of cut vegetables. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the sales price per unit. Collectively, cut fruit, cut vegetable, and deli product sales increased 8.8 million units, or 31.2%. We believe the overall increase in sales volume is primarily due to an increase in demand for the variety of innovative products that we offer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,257,690	The slight 2014 decrease of 30 basis points in gross profit as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to bad winter weather conditions in North America, as well as costs to prepare to serve a large new customer in Alaska and an important new contract with a major integrated energy company with significant operations in the Canadian oil sands region. Additionally, the Company incurred staffing costs which preceded revenues pertaining to market share gains in France. The cumulative adverse impact of these items aggregated approximately $3 million, approximately $2 million of which reduced gross profit and the remainder increased operating expenses during fiscal 2014.	Southern Plains Tornadoes (May 2015)	Tornado outbreak across the Southern Plain states (IA, KS, NE, OK, CO, SD, TX) with 122 tornadoes. The most costly damage occurred across Texas and Oklahoma.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The slight 2014 decrease of 30 basis points in gross profit as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to bad winter weather conditions in North America, as well as costs to prepare to serve a large new customer in Alaska and an important new contract with a major integrated energy company with significant operations in the Canadian oil sands region. Additionally, the Company incurred staffing costs which preceded revenues pertaining to market share gains in France. The cumulative adverse impact of these items aggregated approximately $3 million, approximately $2 million of which reduced gross profit and the remainder increased operating expenses during fiscal 2014. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southern Plains Tornadoes (May 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornado outbreak across the Southern Plain states (IA, KS, NE, OK, CO, SD, TX) with 122 tornadoes. The most costly damage occurred across Texas and Oklahoma." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The slight 2014 decrease of 30 basis points in gross profit as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to bad winter weather conditions in North America, as well as costs to prepare to serve a large new customer in Alaska and an important new contract with a major integrated energy company with significant operations in the Canadian oil sands region. Additionally, the Company incurred staffing costs which preceded revenues pertaining to market share gains in France. The cumulative adverse impact of these items aggregated approximately $3 million, approximately $2 million of which reduced gross profit and the remainder increased operating expenses during fiscal 2014. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern Plains Tornadoes (May 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
991,636	Sources of Revenues and Health Care Reform:Given increasing budget deficits, the federal government and many states are currently considering additional ways to limit increases in levels of Medicare and Medicaid funding, which could also adversely affect future payments received by our hospitals. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon the federal government as a result of, among other things, the War on Terrorism, economic recovery stimulus packages, responses to natural disasters, the expansion of a Medicare drug benefit and the federal budget deficit in general may affect the availability of federal funds to provide additional relief in the future. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations.	Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)	Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA).	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Sources of Revenues and Health Care Reform:Given increasing budget deficits, the federal government and many states are currently considering additional ways to limit increases in levels of Medicare and Medicaid funding, which could also adversely affect future payments received by our hospitals. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon the federal government as a result of, among other things, the War on Terrorism, economic recovery stimulus packages, responses to natural disasters, the expansion of a Medicare drug benefit and the federal budget deficit in general may affect the availability of federal funds to provide additional relief in the future. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA)." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Sources of Revenues and Health Care Reform:Given increasing budget deficits, the federal government and many states are currently considering additional ways to limit increases in levels of Medicare and Medicaid funding, which could also adversely affect future payments received by our hospitals. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon the federal government as a result of, among other things, the War on Terrorism, economic recovery stimulus packages, responses to natural disasters, the expansion of a Medicare drug benefit and the federal budget deficit in general may affect the availability of federal funds to provide additional relief in the future. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
751,907	Operating income (loss) for fiscal year 2014 includes approximately $3.7 million in flood-related income related to settlement payments from our insurers and contract manufacturer relating to losses we incurred during the Thailand flooding as more fully discussed in Note 6,Flood-Related (Income) Expense, Net,to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on -K filed on August 28, 2015.	Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2018)	In 2018, California has experienced its costliest, deadliest and largest wildfires to date, with records back to 1933. The Camp Fire is the costliest and deadliest wildfire - destroying more than 18,500 buildings. California also endured its largest wildfire on record - the Medincino Complex Fire - burning over 450,000 acres. Additionally, California was impacted by other destructive wildfires: the Carr Fire in Northern California and the Woolsey Fire in Southern California. The total 2018 wildfire costs in California (with minor costs in other Western states) approach $24.0 ($30.0) billion - a new U.S. record. In total, over 8.7 million acres has burned across the U.S. during 2018, which is well above the 10-year average (2009-2018) of 6.8 million acres. The last 2 years of U.S. wildfire damage has been unprecedented in damage, with losses exceeding $40.0 ($50.0) billion.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Operating income (loss) for fiscal year 2014 includes approximately $3.7 million in flood-related income related to settlement payments from our insurers and contract manufacturer relating to losses we incurred during the Thailand flooding as more fully discussed in Note 6,Flood-Related (Income) Expense, Net,to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on -K filed on August 28, 2015. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2018)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "In 2018, California has experienced its costliest, deadliest and largest wildfires to date, with records back to 1933. The Camp Fire is the costliest and deadliest wildfire - destroying more than 18,500 buildings. California also endured its largest wildfire on record - the Medincino Complex Fire - burning over 450,000 acres. Additionally, California was impacted by other destructive wildfires: the Carr Fire in Northern California and the Woolsey Fire in Southern California. The total 2018 wildfire costs in California (with minor costs in other Western states) approach $24.0 ($30.0) billion - a new U.S. record. In total, over 8.7 million acres has burned across the U.S. during 2018, which is well above the 10-year average (2009-2018) of 6.8 million acres. The last 2 years of U.S. wildfire damage has been unprecedented in damage, with losses exceeding $40.0 ($50.0) billion." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Operating income (loss) for fiscal year 2014 includes approximately $3.7 million in flood-related income related to settlement payments from our insurers and contract manufacturer relating to losses we incurred during the Thailand flooding as more fully discussed in Note 6,Flood-Related (Income) Expense, Net,to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on -K filed on August 28, 2015. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2018)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
23,362	The Company provides a hurricane update and revises the second quarter earning estimate. A copy of the announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.	Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)	Category 3 hurricane initially impacts the U.S. as a Category 1 near Miami, FL, then as a strong Category 3 along the eastern LA-western MS coastlines, resulting in severe storm surge damage (maximum surge probably exceeded 30 feet) along the LA-MS-AL coasts, wind damage, and the failure of parts of the levee system in New Orleans. Inland effects included high winds and some flooding in the states of AL, MS, FL, TN, KY, IN, OH, and GA.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Company provides a hurricane update and revises the second quarter earning estimate. A copy of the announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane initially impacts the U.S. as a Category 1 near Miami, FL, then as a strong Category 3 along the eastern LA-western MS coastlines, resulting in severe storm surge damage (maximum surge probably exceeded 30 feet) along the LA-MS-AL coasts, wind damage, and the failure of parts of the levee system in New Orleans. Inland effects included high winds and some flooding in the states of AL, MS, FL, TN, KY, IN, OH, and GA." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Company provides a hurricane update and revises the second quarter earning estimate. A copy of the announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
45,412	Market Outlook: With the recent urbanization and industrialization of PRC, pollution has become a big problem. Air pollution in particular causes several diseases of the pharynx. Researchers believe that approximately 10% of the people who live in cities suffer from pharynx disease, while in some rural areas, the ratio is a lower, though still significant, 5.5%. Until now treatments for upper respiratory tract infections have relied on antibiotics to control acute pharyngitis temporarily. However, no medicine in the market has thus far been effective at treating chronic pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Killer therapy overcomes the deficiencies of other treatments and eradicates the disease.	North Central Severe Weather and Tornadoes (August 2006)	Severe weather and tornadoes cause impacts across several north central states including Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana and Illinois.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Market Outlook: With the recent urbanization and industrialization of PRC, pollution has become a big problem. Air pollution in particular causes several diseases of the pharynx. Researchers believe that approximately 10% of the people who live in cities suffer from pharynx disease, while in some rural areas, the ratio is a lower, though still significant, 5.5%. Until now treatments for upper respiratory tract infections have relied on antibiotics to control acute pharyngitis temporarily. However, no medicine in the market has thus far been effective at treating chronic pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Killer therapy overcomes the deficiencies of other treatments and eradicates the disease. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North Central Severe Weather and Tornadoes (August 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and tornadoes cause impacts across several north central states including Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana and Illinois." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Market Outlook: With the recent urbanization and industrialization of PRC, pollution has become a big problem. Air pollution in particular causes several diseases of the pharynx. Researchers believe that approximately 10% of the people who live in cities suffer from pharynx disease, while in some rural areas, the ratio is a lower, though still significant, 5.5%. Until now treatments for upper respiratory tract infections have relied on antibiotics to control acute pharyngitis temporarily. However, no medicine in the market has thus far been effective at treating chronic pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Killer therapy overcomes the deficiencies of other treatments and eradicates the disease. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Central Severe Weather and Tornadoes (August 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
24,162	SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)September 26, 2005Republic Services, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)1-1426765-0716904(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida33301(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)(954) 769-2400(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13d-4(c))ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSOn September 26, 2005, Republic Services, Inc. issued a press release to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS(C) ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2005 to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance.2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.September 26, 2005REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Tod C.	Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)September 26, 2005Republic Services, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)1-1426765-0716904(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida33301(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)(954) 769-2400(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13d-4(c))ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSOn September 26, 2005, Republic Services, Inc. issued a press release to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS(C) ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2005 to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance.2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.September 26, 2005REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Tod C. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)September 26, 2005Republic Services, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)1-1426765-0716904(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida33301(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)(954) 769-2400(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13d-4(c))ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSOn September 26, 2005, Republic Services, Inc. issued a press release to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS(C) ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2005 to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance.2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.September 26, 2005REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Tod C. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
23,727	Management expects continued profitability from the Company's agricultural operations in fiscal year 2006, but at reduced levels from fiscal year 2005 due to the hurricane.	Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Management expects continued profitability from the Company's agricultural operations in fiscal year 2006, but at reduced levels from fiscal year 2005 due to the hurricane. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Management expects continued profitability from the Company's agricultural operations in fiscal year 2006, but at reduced levels from fiscal year 2005 due to the hurricane. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,220,055	hedging gains and losses and inventory write-downs, which cause our reported revenues to fluctuate from period to period. The components of optimization revenues are as follows:•Realized Optimization Revenues.Net realized optimization revenues decreased by $47.3 million compared to fiscal 2014. The average realized margin for optimization activities was $0.45 per Mcf in fiscal 2015 compared to $1.29 per Mcf in fiscal 2014. The profitability of realized optimization was reduced in the current year as a result of the suppressed spread environment and a lack of market volatility. Gains during the previous year were driven by higher levels of volatility in North American natural gas markets, which resulted from changes in pipeline pricing in our Canadian markets during the summer and autumn of 2013. In addition, cold winter weather significantly increased demand for natural gas across North American markets in the latter part of 2013 and the first three months of 2014, which created significant opportunities.Realized optimization revenues include revenues from our natural gas marketing operations of $13.0 million and $9.7 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. Revenue from the marketing business increased last year as a result of a stronger residential market in Western Canada.•Unrealized Risk Management Gains (Losses).Unrealized risk management gains for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 were $31.7 million compared to losses of $8.7 million in fiscal 2014. Unrealized gains in fiscal 2015 were due to increases in the value of financial hedges resulting from decreases in forward sales price of natural gas relative to our contracts. Losses in fiscal 2014 were due to prices rising after financial hedges were transacted in prior periods. Unrealized risk management gains and losses from our natural gas marketing operations amounted to a loss of $0.6 million and a gain of $0.8 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.•Write-Down of Inventory.Natural gas prices fell during the year ended March 31, 2015. This reduction increased the value of our economic hedges and decreased the value of the proprietary optimization inventory underlying those hedges. With the realization of hedging gains positioned in the current fiscal year and the positioning of new hedges at lower values in future periods, the estimated market value of our inventories became less than its carrying cost. Accordingly, we wrote down our proprietary inventories by $63.8 million during fiscal 2015.	South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)	Severe weather produced tornadoes, large hail and high wind damage across numerous southern and southeastern states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. These storms caused widespread impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] hedging gains and losses and inventory write-downs, which cause our reported revenues to fluctuate from period to period. The components of optimization revenues are as follows:•Realized Optimization Revenues.Net realized optimization revenues decreased by $47.3 million compared to fiscal 2014. The average realized margin for optimization activities was $0.45 per Mcf in fiscal 2015 compared to $1.29 per Mcf in fiscal 2014. The profitability of realized optimization was reduced in the current year as a result of the suppressed spread environment and a lack of market volatility. Gains during the previous year were driven by higher levels of volatility in North American natural gas markets, which resulted from changes in pipeline pricing in our Canadian markets during the summer and autumn of 2013. In addition, cold winter weather significantly increased demand for natural gas across North American markets in the latter part of 2013 and the first three months of 2014, which created significant opportunities.Realized optimization revenues include revenues from our natural gas marketing operations of $13.0 million and $9.7 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. Revenue from the marketing business increased last year as a result of a stronger residential market in Western Canada.•Unrealized Risk Management Gains (Losses).Unrealized risk management gains for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 were $31.7 million compared to losses of $8.7 million in fiscal 2014. Unrealized gains in fiscal 2015 were due to increases in the value of financial hedges resulting from decreases in forward sales price of natural gas relative to our contracts. Losses in fiscal 2014 were due to prices rising after financial hedges were transacted in prior periods. Unrealized risk management gains and losses from our natural gas marketing operations amounted to a loss of $0.6 million and a gain of $0.8 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.•Write-Down of Inventory.Natural gas prices fell during the year ended March 31, 2015. This reduction increased the value of our economic hedges and decreased the value of the proprietary optimization inventory underlying those hedges. With the realization of hedging gains positioned in the current fiscal year and the positioning of new hedges at lower values in future periods, the estimated market value of our inventories became less than its carrying cost. Accordingly, we wrote down our proprietary inventories by $63.8 million during fiscal 2015. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather produced tornadoes, large hail and high wind damage across numerous southern and southeastern states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. These storms caused widespread impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] hedging gains and losses and inventory write-downs, which cause our reported revenues to fluctuate from period to period. The components of optimization revenues are as follows:•Realized Optimization Revenues.Net realized optimization revenues decreased by $47.3 million compared to fiscal 2014. The average realized margin for optimization activities was $0.45 per Mcf in fiscal 2015 compared to $1.29 per Mcf in fiscal 2014. The profitability of realized optimization was reduced in the current year as a result of the suppressed spread environment and a lack of market volatility. Gains during the previous year were driven by higher levels of volatility in North American natural gas markets, which resulted from changes in pipeline pricing in our Canadian markets during the summer and autumn of 2013. In addition, cold winter weather significantly increased demand for natural gas across North American markets in the latter part of 2013 and the first three months of 2014, which created significant opportunities.Realized optimization revenues include revenues from our natural gas marketing operations of $13.0 million and $9.7 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. Revenue from the marketing business increased last year as a result of a stronger residential market in Western Canada.•Unrealized Risk Management Gains (Losses).Unrealized risk management gains for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 were $31.7 million compared to losses of $8.7 million in fiscal 2014. Unrealized gains in fiscal 2015 were due to increases in the value of financial hedges resulting from decreases in forward sales price of natural gas relative to our contracts. Losses in fiscal 2014 were due to prices rising after financial hedges were transacted in prior periods. Unrealized risk management gains and losses from our natural gas marketing operations amounted to a loss of $0.6 million and a gain of $0.8 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.•Write-Down of Inventory.Natural gas prices fell during the year ended March 31, 2015. This reduction increased the value of our economic hedges and decreased the value of the proprietary optimization inventory underlying those hedges. With the realization of hedging gains positioned in the current fiscal year and the positioning of new hedges at lower values in future periods, the estimated market value of our inventories became less than its carrying cost. Accordingly, we wrote down our proprietary inventories by $63.8 million during fiscal 2015. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
2,850	Acts of war, terrorism, other acts of violence or natural or manmade disasters such as a global pandemic may affect the markets in which the Company operates, the Company's customers, the Company's delivery of products and customer service, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.	Midwest and Ohio Valley Severe Weather (March 2020)	Severe weather caused damage across many Midwest and Ohio Valley states including Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. The states most affected from a combination of high winds and hail were Missouri, Ohio and Arkansas. There were also two dozen tornadoes across Iowa, Illinois, Indiana and Arkansas causing additional damage.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Acts of war, terrorism, other acts of violence or natural or manmade disasters such as a global pandemic may affect the markets in which the Company operates, the Company's customers, the Company's delivery of products and customer service, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest and Ohio Valley Severe Weather (March 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather caused damage across many Midwest and Ohio Valley states including Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. The states most affected from a combination of high winds and hail were Missouri, Ohio and Arkansas. There were also two dozen tornadoes across Iowa, Illinois, Indiana and Arkansas causing additional damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Acts of war, terrorism, other acts of violence or natural or manmade disasters such as a global pandemic may affect the markets in which the Company operates, the Company's customers, the Company's delivery of products and customer service, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest and Ohio Valley Severe Weather (March 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,613,610	ceded to Global Indemnity Reinsurance. Effective January 1, 2016, the cession percentage was lowered to 40% from 50%. These agreements exclude named storms. Global Indemnity Reinsurance is an unauthorized reinsurer. As a result, any losses and unearned premiums that are ceded to Global Indemnity Reinsurance by the U.S. insurance companies must be collateralized. To satisfy this requirement, Global Indemnity Reinsurance has set up custodial trust accounts on behalf of the U.S. insurance companies.	Southern Severe Weather (March 2016)	Severe hail impacts the Fort Worth and Arlington metro region in Texas. Additional large hail and high wind damage occurred in other locations of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ceded to Global Indemnity Reinsurance. Effective January 1, 2016, the cession percentage was lowered to 40% from 50%. These agreements exclude named storms. Global Indemnity Reinsurance is an unauthorized reinsurer. As a result, any losses and unearned premiums that are ceded to Global Indemnity Reinsurance by the U.S. insurance companies must be collateralized. To satisfy this requirement, Global Indemnity Reinsurance has set up custodial trust accounts on behalf of the U.S. insurance companies. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southern Severe Weather (March 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe hail impacts the Fort Worth and Arlington metro region in Texas. Additional large hail and high wind damage occurred in other locations of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ceded to Global Indemnity Reinsurance. Effective January 1, 2016, the cession percentage was lowered to 40% from 50%. These agreements exclude named storms. Global Indemnity Reinsurance is an unauthorized reinsurer. As a result, any losses and unearned premiums that are ceded to Global Indemnity Reinsurance by the U.S. insurance companies must be collateralized. To satisfy this requirement, Global Indemnity Reinsurance has set up custodial trust accounts on behalf of the U.S. insurance companies. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern Severe Weather (March 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,533,912	Our insurance subsidiaries’ loss ratio, which is the ratio of incurred losses and loss expenses to premiums earned, was 69.8% in 2014, compared to 66.6% in 2013. Our insurance subsidiaries’ commercial lines loss ratio increased to 72.0% in 2014, compared to 67.1% in 2013. This increase resulted primarily from the commercial automobile loss ratio increasing to 83.2% in 2014, compared to 73.0% in 2013, and the commercial multi-peril loss ratio increasing to 73.5% in 2014, compared to 61.5% in 2013. The personal lines loss ratio increased to 68.2% in 2014, compared to 66.3% in 2013, primarily as a result of a increase in the homeowners loss ratio to 60.4% in 2014, compared to 57.7% in 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in weather-related claims. Our insurance subsidiaries experienced unfavorable loss reserve development of approximately $14.5 million during 2014 in their reserves for prior accident years, compared to unfavorable loss reserve development of approximately $10.4 million during 2013. The change in loss reserve development patterns occurred primarily within our insurance subsidiaries’ commercial automobile, commercial multi-peril and personal automobile reserves.	Southeast and Eastern Tornadoes (February 2016)	Early outbreak of tornadoes and severe weather across many southern and eastern states including (AL, CT, FL, GA, LA, MA, MD, MS, NC, NJ, NY, PA, SC, TX, VA). There were at least 50 confirmed tornadoes causing widespread damage.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Our insurance subsidiaries’ loss ratio, which is the ratio of incurred losses and loss expenses to premiums earned, was 69.8% in 2014, compared to 66.6% in 2013. Our insurance subsidiaries’ commercial lines loss ratio increased to 72.0% in 2014, compared to 67.1% in 2013. This increase resulted primarily from the commercial automobile loss ratio increasing to 83.2% in 2014, compared to 73.0% in 2013, and the commercial multi-peril loss ratio increasing to 73.5% in 2014, compared to 61.5% in 2013. The personal lines loss ratio increased to 68.2% in 2014, compared to 66.3% in 2013, primarily as a result of a increase in the homeowners loss ratio to 60.4% in 2014, compared to 57.7% in 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in weather-related claims. Our insurance subsidiaries experienced unfavorable loss reserve development of approximately $14.5 million during 2014 in their reserves for prior accident years, compared to unfavorable loss reserve development of approximately $10.4 million during 2013. The change in loss reserve development patterns occurred primarily within our insurance subsidiaries’ commercial automobile, commercial multi-peril and personal automobile reserves. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southeast and Eastern Tornadoes (February 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Early outbreak of tornadoes and severe weather across many southern and eastern states including (AL, CT, FL, GA, LA, MA, MD, MS, NC, NJ, NY, PA, SC, TX, VA). There were at least 50 confirmed tornadoes causing widespread damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Our insurance subsidiaries’ loss ratio, which is the ratio of incurred losses and loss expenses to premiums earned, was 69.8% in 2014, compared to 66.6% in 2013. Our insurance subsidiaries’ commercial lines loss ratio increased to 72.0% in 2014, compared to 67.1% in 2013. This increase resulted primarily from the commercial automobile loss ratio increasing to 83.2% in 2014, compared to 73.0% in 2013, and the commercial multi-peril loss ratio increasing to 73.5% in 2014, compared to 61.5% in 2013. The personal lines loss ratio increased to 68.2% in 2014, compared to 66.3% in 2013, primarily as a result of a increase in the homeowners loss ratio to 60.4% in 2014, compared to 57.7% in 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in weather-related claims. Our insurance subsidiaries experienced unfavorable loss reserve development of approximately $14.5 million during 2014 in their reserves for prior accident years, compared to unfavorable loss reserve development of approximately $10.4 million during 2013. The change in loss reserve development patterns occurred primarily within our insurance subsidiaries’ commercial automobile, commercial multi-peril and personal automobile reserves. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southeast and Eastern Tornadoes (February 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
119,522	Weather also can impact our results, and did so in 2004 and 2005. The multiple hurricanes that hit the Southern United States and other regions in the second half of each of these years caused cancellation or disruption of certain cruises and the closure of certain of our resort spas and campuses of our massage and beauty schools, which had adverse effects on us.In 2006, we closed two campuses of UCMT for several days due to severe snow conditions.In addition, the strong tsunami that hit various Asian regions in December 2004 resulted in damage to, and the closing of, most of our operations in the Maldives during much of 2005.	Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)	Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Weather also can impact our results, and did so in 2004 and 2005. The multiple hurricanes that hit the Southern United States and other regions in the second half of each of these years caused cancellation or disruption of certain cruises and the closure of certain of our resort spas and campuses of our massage and beauty schools, which had adverse effects on us.In 2006, we closed two campuses of UCMT for several days due to severe snow conditions.In addition, the strong tsunami that hit various Asian regions in December 2004 resulted in damage to, and the closing of, most of our operations in the Maldives during much of 2005. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Weather also can impact our results, and did so in 2004 and 2005. The multiple hurricanes that hit the Southern United States and other regions in the second half of each of these years caused cancellation or disruption of certain cruises and the closure of certain of our resort spas and campuses of our massage and beauty schools, which had adverse effects on us.In 2006, we closed two campuses of UCMT for several days due to severe snow conditions.In addition, the strong tsunami that hit various Asian regions in December 2004 resulted in damage to, and the closing of, most of our operations in the Maldives during much of 2005. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
114,501	The Company has requested that the FPSC allow 2005 over-earnings in natural gas to be used to recover the regulatory asset -storm and discontinue this storm surcharge. As part of this same request, the Company has also asked the FPSC to allow any excess over-earnings amount to provide additional funds for the “regulatory liability- storm reserve” for natural gas. We expect the FPSC to rule on this request during 2007.	Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)	Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Company has requested that the FPSC allow 2005 over-earnings in natural gas to be used to recover the regulatory asset -storm and discontinue this storm surcharge. As part of this same request, the Company has also asked the FPSC to allow any excess over-earnings amount to provide additional funds for the “regulatory liability- storm reserve” for natural gas. We expect the FPSC to rule on this request during 2007. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Company has requested that the FPSC allow 2005 over-earnings in natural gas to be used to recover the regulatory asset -storm and discontinue this storm surcharge. As part of this same request, the Company has also asked the FPSC to allow any excess over-earnings amount to provide additional funds for the “regulatory liability- storm reserve” for natural gas. We expect the FPSC to rule on this request during 2007. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,562,842	We periodically review the estimates and assumptions that are reflected in REMS© and our other tools. For example, the 2011 and 2010 New Zealand Earthquakes and the Tohoku Earthquake provided new insight on certain aspects of hazard and vulnerability to the global earthquake science community. Utilizing internal research capabilities from our team of scientists at Weather Predict Consulting Inc. (“Weather Predict”) and new research from the global earthquake science community, we updated several of our internal regional representations of earthquake risk in advance of the commercially available models. In late 2012, Storm Sandy gave rise to new data relating to storm surge, flood persistence and mid-Atlantic tropical storm meteorology. We subsequently updated our North Atlantic storm surge model to reflect this new data.	Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)	Multiple days of heavy rainfall averaging 15 to 20 inches led to widespread flooding along the Sabine River basin on the Texas and Louisiana border. This prompted numerous evacuations, high-water rescues and destruction, as more than 1,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] We periodically review the estimates and assumptions that are reflected in REMS© and our other tools. For example, the 2011 and 2010 New Zealand Earthquakes and the Tohoku Earthquake provided new insight on certain aspects of hazard and vulnerability to the global earthquake science community. Utilizing internal research capabilities from our team of scientists at Weather Predict Consulting Inc. (“Weather Predict”) and new research from the global earthquake science community, we updated several of our internal regional representations of earthquake risk in advance of the commercially available models. In late 2012, Storm Sandy gave rise to new data relating to storm surge, flood persistence and mid-Atlantic tropical storm meteorology. We subsequently updated our North Atlantic storm surge model to reflect this new data. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Multiple days of heavy rainfall averaging 15 to 20 inches led to widespread flooding along the Sabine River basin on the Texas and Louisiana border. This prompted numerous evacuations, high-water rescues and destruction, as more than 1,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] We periodically review the estimates and assumptions that are reflected in REMS© and our other tools. For example, the 2011 and 2010 New Zealand Earthquakes and the Tohoku Earthquake provided new insight on certain aspects of hazard and vulnerability to the global earthquake science community. Utilizing internal research capabilities from our team of scientists at Weather Predict Consulting Inc. (“Weather Predict”) and new research from the global earthquake science community, we updated several of our internal regional representations of earthquake risk in advance of the commercially available models. In late 2012, Storm Sandy gave rise to new data relating to storm surge, flood persistence and mid-Atlantic tropical storm meteorology. We subsequently updated our North Atlantic storm surge model to reflect this new data. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
677,180	Natural disasters and extreme weather conditions, including those impacted by climate change, such as hurricanes, typhoons, floods, earthquakes, wildfires, droughts; acts of terrorism or violence, including active shooter situations; and energy shortages; particularly in California or Washington state, where our centralized operating systems and administrative personnel are located, could negatively affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result in physical damage to our properties, limitations on store operating hours, less frequent visits by members to physical locations, the temporary closure of warehouses, depots, manufacturing or home office facilities, the temporary lack of an adequate work force, disruptions to our IT systems, the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local or overseas suppliers, the temporary disruption in the transport of goods to or from overseas, delays in the delivery of goods to our warehouses or depots, and the temporary reduction in the availability of products in our warehouses. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to procure products. We may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.	Southern Hail Storms (September 2023)	Hail storms impact Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri. The most damaging impacts were in central Texas including Austin, Georgetown, Round Rock and Arlington on September 24. Towns north of Austin in particular were impacted by baseball sized hail causing damage to homes, vehicles and businesses.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Natural disasters and extreme weather conditions, including those impacted by climate change, such as hurricanes, typhoons, floods, earthquakes, wildfires, droughts; acts of terrorism or violence, including active shooter situations; and energy shortages; particularly in California or Washington state, where our centralized operating systems and administrative personnel are located, could negatively affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result in physical damage to our properties, limitations on store operating hours, less frequent visits by members to physical locations, the temporary closure of warehouses, depots, manufacturing or home office facilities, the temporary lack of an adequate work force, disruptions to our IT systems, the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local or overseas suppliers, the temporary disruption in the transport of goods to or from overseas, delays in the delivery of goods to our warehouses or depots, and the temporary reduction in the availability of products in our warehouses. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to procure products. We may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southern Hail Storms (September 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Hail storms impact Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri. The most damaging impacts were in central Texas including Austin, Georgetown, Round Rock and Arlington on September 24. Towns north of Austin in particular were impacted by baseball sized hail causing damage to homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Natural disasters and extreme weather conditions, including those impacted by climate change, such as hurricanes, typhoons, floods, earthquakes, wildfires, droughts; acts of terrorism or violence, including active shooter situations; and energy shortages; particularly in California or Washington state, where our centralized operating systems and administrative personnel are located, could negatively affect our operations and financial performance. Such events could result in physical damage to our properties, limitations on store operating hours, less frequent visits by members to physical locations, the temporary closure of warehouses, depots, manufacturing or home office facilities, the temporary lack of an adequate work force, disruptions to our IT systems, the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local or overseas suppliers, the temporary disruption in the transport of goods to or from overseas, delays in the delivery of goods to our warehouses or depots, and the temporary reduction in the availability of products in our warehouses. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to procure products. We may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern Hail Storms (September 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
212,195	a $47 million increase in Piedmont's fourth quarter results due to colder weather, higher natural gas prices, Integrity Management Rider (IMR) rate adjustments, customer growth and new power generation customers.	North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)	Extreme drought causes extensive impacts to agriculture in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana. Field crops including wheat were severely damaged and the lack of feed for cattle forced ranchers to sell off livestock. This drought has also contributed to the increased potential for severe wildfires.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] a $47 million increase in Piedmont's fourth quarter results due to colder weather, higher natural gas prices, Integrity Management Rider (IMR) rate adjustments, customer growth and new power generation customers. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Extreme drought causes extensive impacts to agriculture in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana. Field crops including wheat were severely damaged and the lack of feed for cattle forced ranchers to sell off livestock. This drought has also contributed to the increased potential for severe wildfires." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] a $47 million increase in Piedmont's fourth quarter results due to colder weather, higher natural gas prices, Integrity Management Rider (IMR) rate adjustments, customer growth and new power generation customers. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
20,805	UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):September 9, 2005Cabot Corporation__________________________________________(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Delaware1-566704-2271897_____________________(State or other jurisdiction_____________(Commission______________(I.R.S. Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)Two Seaport Lane, Suite 1300, Boston, Massachusetts02210-2019_________________________________(Address of principal executive offices)___________(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:617-345-0100Not Applicable______________________________________________Former name or former address, if changed since last reportCheck the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))Top of the FormItem 8.01 Other Events.On September 9, 2005, Cabot Corporation issued a press release announcing that the Company's Louisiana carbon black facilities were not significantly damaged by Hurricane Katrina and that raw material costs continue to rise.	Hurricane Rita (September 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits Texas-Louisiana border coastal region, creating significant storm surge and wind damage along the coast, and some inland flooding in the FL panhandle, AL, MS, LA, AR, and TX. Prior to landfall, Rita reached the third lowest pressure (897 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):September 9, 2005Cabot Corporation__________________________________________(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Delaware1-566704-2271897_____________________(State or other jurisdiction_____________(Commission______________(I.R.S. Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)Two Seaport Lane, Suite 1300, Boston, Massachusetts02210-2019_________________________________(Address of principal executive offices)___________(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:617-345-0100Not Applicable______________________________________________Former name or former address, if changed since last reportCheck the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))Top of the FormItem 8.01 Other Events.On September 9, 2005, Cabot Corporation issued a press release announcing that the Company's Louisiana carbon black facilities were not significantly damaged by Hurricane Katrina and that raw material costs continue to rise. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Rita (September 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits Texas-Louisiana border coastal region, creating significant storm surge and wind damage along the coast, and some inland flooding in the FL panhandle, AL, MS, LA, AR, and TX. Prior to landfall, Rita reached the third lowest pressure (897 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):September 9, 2005Cabot Corporation__________________________________________(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Delaware1-566704-2271897_____________________(State or other jurisdiction_____________(Commission______________(I.R.S. Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)Two Seaport Lane, Suite 1300, Boston, Massachusetts02210-2019_________________________________(Address of principal executive offices)___________(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:617-345-0100Not Applicable______________________________________________Former name or former address, if changed since last reportCheck the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))Top of the FormItem 8.01 Other Events.On September 9, 2005, Cabot Corporation issued a press release announcing that the Company's Louisiana carbon black facilities were not significantly damaged by Hurricane Katrina and that raw material costs continue to rise. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Rita (September 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
193,340	other sources of raw material. We cannot predict the future availability of such feedstock or be sure that ADM will be able to supply it in sufficient quantities or in a timely manner. Weather conditions have historically caused volatility in the corn market by causing crop failures or reduced harvests. Crop disease and pestilence can also occur from time to time and can adversely affect corn harvests. Processing agents that are used in the manufacture of Mirel and additives and other materials blended with Mirel formulations may only be available from limited sources. If corn sugar production is adversely affected by weather or other conditions, or if other raw materials cannot be obtained in sufficient quantities or at acceptable prices, Telles' ability to produce its products may be impaired, the cost of manufacturing Mirel formulations may increase, and our business will be adversely affected.	Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)	An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] other sources of raw material. We cannot predict the future availability of such feedstock or be sure that ADM will be able to supply it in sufficient quantities or in a timely manner. Weather conditions have historically caused volatility in the corn market by causing crop failures or reduced harvests. Crop disease and pestilence can also occur from time to time and can adversely affect corn harvests. Processing agents that are used in the manufacture of Mirel and additives and other materials blended with Mirel formulations may only be available from limited sources. If corn sugar production is adversely affected by weather or other conditions, or if other raw materials cannot be obtained in sufficient quantities or at acceptable prices, Telles' ability to produce its products may be impaired, the cost of manufacturing Mirel formulations may increase, and our business will be adversely affected. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] other sources of raw material. We cannot predict the future availability of such feedstock or be sure that ADM will be able to supply it in sufficient quantities or in a timely manner. Weather conditions have historically caused volatility in the corn market by causing crop failures or reduced harvests. Crop disease and pestilence can also occur from time to time and can adversely affect corn harvests. Processing agents that are used in the manufacture of Mirel and additives and other materials blended with Mirel formulations may only be available from limited sources. If corn sugar production is adversely affected by weather or other conditions, or if other raw materials cannot be obtained in sufficient quantities or at acceptable prices, Telles' ability to produce its products may be impaired, the cost of manufacturing Mirel formulations may increase, and our business will be adversely affected. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,269,964	●$2.6 million decrease in operating expenses primarily related to prior year bad debt expenses and snow removal costs incurred from severe winter storms during 2014.	Texas and Oklahoma Flooding and Severe Weather (May 2015)	A slow-moving system caused tremendous rainfall and subsequent flooding to occur in Texas and Oklahoma. The Blanco river in Texas swelled from 5 feet to a crest of more than 40 feet over several hours causing considerable property damage and loss of life. The city of Houston also experienced flooding which resulted in hundreds of high-water rescues. The damage in Texas alone exceeded $1.0 ($1.4) billion. There was also damage in other states (KS, CO, AR, OH, LA, GA, SC) from associated severe storms.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ●$2.6 million decrease in operating expenses primarily related to prior year bad debt expenses and snow removal costs incurred from severe winter storms during 2014. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas and Oklahoma Flooding and Severe Weather (May 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A slow-moving system caused tremendous rainfall and subsequent flooding to occur in Texas and Oklahoma. The Blanco river in Texas swelled from 5 feet to a crest of more than 40 feet over several hours causing considerable property damage and loss of life. The city of Houston also experienced flooding which resulted in hundreds of high-water rescues. The damage in Texas alone exceeded $1.0 ($1.4) billion. There was also damage in other states (KS, CO, AR, OH, LA, GA, SC) from associated severe storms." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ●$2.6 million decrease in operating expenses primarily related to prior year bad debt expenses and snow removal costs incurred from severe winter storms during 2014. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas and Oklahoma Flooding and Severe Weather (May 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
24,208	Pretax hurricane charges by segment were $113 Coatings & Color Technologies, $11 Performance Materials and $22 Safety & Protection. These amounts do not include the estimated impact of hurricane-related business interruptions.	Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Pretax hurricane charges by segment were $113 Coatings & Color Technologies, $11 Performance Materials and $22 Safety & Protection. These amounts do not include the estimated impact of hurricane-related business interruptions. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Pretax hurricane charges by segment were $113 Coatings & Color Technologies, $11 Performance Materials and $22 Safety & Protection. These amounts do not include the estimated impact of hurricane-related business interruptions. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
25,181	The following information is furnished pursuant to Item 7.01, “Regulation FD Disclosure”. On October 25, 2005, PartnerRe Ltd. issued a press release reporting its initial estimate of expected claims from Hurricane Wilma. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is hereby incorporated by reference.	Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	Yes	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The following information is furnished pursuant to Item 7.01, “Regulation FD Disclosure”. On October 25, 2005, PartnerRe Ltd. issued a press release reporting its initial estimate of expected claims from Hurricane Wilma. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is hereby incorporated by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The following information is furnished pursuant to Item 7.01, “Regulation FD Disclosure”. On October 25, 2005, PartnerRe Ltd. issued a press release reporting its initial estimate of expected claims from Hurricane Wilma. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is hereby incorporated by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
53,858	Under the terms of the Biloxi Agreement, Buyer will acquire Pinnacle’s Casino Magic Biloxi site and certain related assets for approximately $45 million. The physical property being acquired was severely damaged by Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and the casino remains closed since that time. Pinnacle will retain the insurance claims relating to such damage.	Midwest Tornadoes (April 2006)	Tornadoes and severe weather cause significant damage in the states of IA, IL, IN, and WI. The state of Indiana was most affected with over one billion dollars in damage.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Under the terms of the Biloxi Agreement, Buyer will acquire Pinnacle’s Casino Magic Biloxi site and certain related assets for approximately $45 million. The physical property being acquired was severely damaged by Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and the casino remains closed since that time. Pinnacle will retain the insurance claims relating to such damage. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest Tornadoes (April 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornadoes and severe weather cause significant damage in the states of IA, IL, IN, and WI. The state of Indiana was most affected with over one billion dollars in damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Under the terms of the Biloxi Agreement, Buyer will acquire Pinnacle’s Casino Magic Biloxi site and certain related assets for approximately $45 million. The physical property being acquired was severely damaged by Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and the casino remains closed since that time. Pinnacle will retain the insurance claims relating to such damage. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest Tornadoes (April 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
199,195	Information technology system failures, network disruptions (whether intentional by a third party or due to natural disaster), breaches of network or data security, or disruption or failure of the network system used to monitor and control pipeline operations could disrupt our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, our ability to protect customer or company information and our financial reporting. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, could be damaged or interrupted by power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, internal or external security breaches, events such as fires, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes and hurricanes, and/or errors by our employees. Although we have taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.	Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)	An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Information technology system failures, network disruptions (whether intentional by a third party or due to natural disaster), breaches of network or data security, or disruption or failure of the network system used to monitor and control pipeline operations could disrupt our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, our ability to protect customer or company information and our financial reporting. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, could be damaged or interrupted by power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, internal or external security breaches, events such as fires, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes and hurricanes, and/or errors by our employees. Although we have taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Information technology system failures, network disruptions (whether intentional by a third party or due to natural disaster), breaches of network or data security, or disruption or failure of the network system used to monitor and control pipeline operations could disrupt our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, our ability to protect customer or company information and our financial reporting. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, could be damaged or interrupted by power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, internal or external security breaches, events such as fires, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes and hurricanes, and/or errors by our employees. Although we have taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
157,242	•seasonality and the impact of inclement weather, including major hurricanes, tropical cyclones, major snow and/or ice storms in areas not accustomed to them and other instances of severe weather and other natural phenomena;	Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (March 2023)	Severe storms impact numerous southern and eastern states including Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio. Impacts from high wind and tornadoes cause widespread damage to homes, vehicles, businesses, government buildings and infrastructure.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •seasonality and the impact of inclement weather, including major hurricanes, tropical cyclones, major snow and/or ice storms in areas not accustomed to them and other instances of severe weather and other natural phenomena; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (March 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms impact numerous southern and eastern states including Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio. Impacts from high wind and tornadoes cause widespread damage to homes, vehicles, businesses, government buildings and infrastructure." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •seasonality and the impact of inclement weather, including major hurricanes, tropical cyclones, major snow and/or ice storms in areas not accustomed to them and other instances of severe weather and other natural phenomena; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (March 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
703,519	materialize, price erosion may become more pronounced. Conversely, during periods where demand exceeds supply, price erosion is generally muted. For the first half of fiscal year 2011, our industry experienced a period of relative balance between supply and demand. While we believe there was unmet demand in the last quarter of fiscal year 2011 due to a reaction to possible supply chain disruptions stemming from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, the industry returned to a relatively balanced supply environment at the end of the fiscal year.	Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)	Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] materialize, price erosion may become more pronounced. Conversely, during periods where demand exceeds supply, price erosion is generally muted. For the first half of fiscal year 2011, our industry experienced a period of relative balance between supply and demand. While we believe there was unmet demand in the last quarter of fiscal year 2011 due to a reaction to possible supply chain disruptions stemming from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, the industry returned to a relatively balanced supply environment at the end of the fiscal year. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] materialize, price erosion may become more pronounced. Conversely, during periods where demand exceeds supply, price erosion is generally muted. For the first half of fiscal year 2011, our industry experienced a period of relative balance between supply and demand. While we believe there was unmet demand in the last quarter of fiscal year 2011 due to a reaction to possible supply chain disruptions stemming from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, the industry returned to a relatively balanced supply environment at the end of the fiscal year. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
24,499	On September 27, 2005, Argonaut Group, Inc. issued a press release announcing various information related to the impact of recent hurricanes and certain other matters. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.	Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On September 27, 2005, Argonaut Group, Inc. issued a press release announcing various information related to the impact of recent hurricanes and certain other matters. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On September 27, 2005, Argonaut Group, Inc. issued a press release announcing various information related to the impact of recent hurricanes and certain other matters. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
132,615	The $28.6 million increase in net income from 2005 to 2006 was primarily the result of the operating results from the acquisitions completed in 2005 and 2006 in the Western Pipeline System, an increase in total shipments in the Eastern Pipeline System, increased revenues at the Partnership’s refined product terminals associated with ethanol blending, higher lease acquisition results and the absence of non-recurring costs related to Hurricane Rita, described below. These increases in net income were partially offset by higher interest expense related to financing the acquisitions completed in 2006 and the Partnership’s internal expansion capital program.	Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)	Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The $28.6 million increase in net income from 2005 to 2006 was primarily the result of the operating results from the acquisitions completed in 2005 and 2006 in the Western Pipeline System, an increase in total shipments in the Eastern Pipeline System, increased revenues at the Partnership’s refined product terminals associated with ethanol blending, higher lease acquisition results and the absence of non-recurring costs related to Hurricane Rita, described below. These increases in net income were partially offset by higher interest expense related to financing the acquisitions completed in 2006 and the Partnership’s internal expansion capital program. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The $28.6 million increase in net income from 2005 to 2006 was primarily the result of the operating results from the acquisitions completed in 2005 and 2006 in the Western Pipeline System, an increase in total shipments in the Eastern Pipeline System, increased revenues at the Partnership’s refined product terminals associated with ethanol blending, higher lease acquisition results and the absence of non-recurring costs related to Hurricane Rita, described below. These increases in net income were partially offset by higher interest expense related to financing the acquisitions completed in 2006 and the Partnership’s internal expansion capital program. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,309	In the factory-built housing segment, Gross profit increased from the higher home sales prices and more units sold, partially offset by higher input costs. In the financial services segment, Gross profit decreased primarily due to higher weather-related claims and market fluctuations of the marketable equity securities in the insurance subsidiary's portfolio.	Central and Eastern Severe Weather (April 2023)	Severe storms produced large hail, high winds and more than 35 tornadoes across many central and southern states. The states most affected were Illinois, Kentucky, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri and Michigan where there was considerable damage to homes, businesses, agriculture, vehicles and other infrastructure.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In the factory-built housing segment, Gross profit increased from the higher home sales prices and more units sold, partially offset by higher input costs. In the financial services segment, Gross profit decreased primarily due to higher weather-related claims and market fluctuations of the marketable equity securities in the insurance subsidiary's portfolio. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central and Eastern Severe Weather (April 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms produced large hail, high winds and more than 35 tornadoes across many central and southern states. The states most affected were Illinois, Kentucky, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri and Michigan where there was considerable damage to homes, businesses, agriculture, vehicles and other infrastructure." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In the factory-built housing segment, Gross profit increased from the higher home sales prices and more units sold, partially offset by higher input costs. In the financial services segment, Gross profit decreased primarily due to higher weather-related claims and market fluctuations of the marketable equity securities in the insurance subsidiary's portfolio. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Eastern Severe Weather (April 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
5,605	the market value of real estate that secures our loans has been and may continue to be, adversely affected by current economic and market conditions, and may be affected by other conditions outside of our control such as lack of demand for real estate of the type securing of our loans, natural disasters, changes in neighborhood values, competitive overbuilding, weather, casualty losses, occupancy rates and other similar factors.	Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)	Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA).	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] the market value of real estate that secures our loans has been and may continue to be, adversely affected by current economic and market conditions, and may be affected by other conditions outside of our control such as lack of demand for real estate of the type securing of our loans, natural disasters, changes in neighborhood values, competitive overbuilding, weather, casualty losses, occupancy rates and other similar factors. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA)." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] the market value of real estate that secures our loans has been and may continue to be, adversely affected by current economic and market conditions, and may be affected by other conditions outside of our control such as lack of demand for real estate of the type securing of our loans, natural disasters, changes in neighborhood values, competitive overbuilding, weather, casualty losses, occupancy rates and other similar factors. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
111,954	Net unfavorable prior year loss reserve development in 2013 of1.1points, primarily related to a few large claims inSpecialty Property, reduced in part by favorable prior year loss reserve development in the healthcare business included inProfessional Insurance. The 2014 results also included1.0point of catastrophe losses, primarily related to wind and thunderstorms in the midwestern and southern United States impactingProfessional InsuranceandPrograms, as well as ice and snow storms in the midwestern and northeastern United States primarily impacting the financial services business withinProfessional Insurance, which compared with0.6points of catastrophe losses in 2013 primarily related to storms in the southern and midwestern United States impactingProfessional InsuranceandCollector Cars and Boats.	Central and Eastern Winter storm Cold Wave (February 2015)	A large winter storm and associated cold wave impacted many central, eastern and northeastern states (CT, DE, GA, IL, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA). The city of Boston was particularly impacted as feet of snow continued to accumulate causing load-stress on buildings and clogging transportation corridors. Total, direct losses in Massachusetts alone exceed $1.0 ($1.3) billion for this event, with considerable damage in many other states.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Net unfavorable prior year loss reserve development in 2013 of1.1points, primarily related to a few large claims inSpecialty Property, reduced in part by favorable prior year loss reserve development in the healthcare business included inProfessional Insurance. The 2014 results also included1.0point of catastrophe losses, primarily related to wind and thunderstorms in the midwestern and southern United States impactingProfessional InsuranceandPrograms, as well as ice and snow storms in the midwestern and northeastern United States primarily impacting the financial services business withinProfessional Insurance, which compared with0.6points of catastrophe losses in 2013 primarily related to storms in the southern and midwestern United States impactingProfessional InsuranceandCollector Cars and Boats. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central and Eastern Winter storm Cold Wave (February 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A large winter storm and associated cold wave impacted many central, eastern and northeastern states (CT, DE, GA, IL, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA). The city of Boston was particularly impacted as feet of snow continued to accumulate causing load-stress on buildings and clogging transportation corridors. Total, direct losses in Massachusetts alone exceed $1.0 ($1.3) billion for this event, with considerable damage in many other states." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Net unfavorable prior year loss reserve development in 2013 of1.1points, primarily related to a few large claims inSpecialty Property, reduced in part by favorable prior year loss reserve development in the healthcare business included inProfessional Insurance. The 2014 results also included1.0point of catastrophe losses, primarily related to wind and thunderstorms in the midwestern and southern United States impactingProfessional InsuranceandPrograms, as well as ice and snow storms in the midwestern and northeastern United States primarily impacting the financial services business withinProfessional Insurance, which compared with0.6points of catastrophe losses in 2013 primarily related to storms in the southern and midwestern United States impactingProfessional InsuranceandCollector Cars and Boats. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Eastern Winter storm Cold Wave (February 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
416,545	Campo Medio (Santa Eulalia).This prospect is located close to the west border of the Santa Eulalia mine. Results of geological surveying and drilling programs indicated that its mineralization consists of sulfides with 2.85 meters of width, 219 grams of silver, 6.60% of lead and 7.55% of zinc. Exploration at the Campo Medio area did not render positive results and exploration activities were suspended. In order to continue exploration towards the southern end of the San Antonio mine, the area must be drained because it was affected by flooding at Santa Eulalia. In 2022, this situation continued.	California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)	Numerous atmospheric rivers in continuous succession caused severe flooding, record snowfall and copious rainfall that significantly reduced drought deficits across California, between late-December and March 2023. Flooding impacted many homes, businesses, levees, agriculture and other infrastructure particularly across central California.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Campo Medio (Santa Eulalia).This prospect is located close to the west border of the Santa Eulalia mine. Results of geological surveying and drilling programs indicated that its mineralization consists of sulfides with 2.85 meters of width, 219 grams of silver, 6.60% of lead and 7.55% of zinc. Exploration at the Campo Medio area did not render positive results and exploration activities were suspended. In order to continue exploration towards the southern end of the San Antonio mine, the area must be drained because it was affected by flooding at Santa Eulalia. In 2022, this situation continued. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous atmospheric rivers in continuous succession caused severe flooding, record snowfall and copious rainfall that significantly reduced drought deficits across California, between late-December and March 2023. Flooding impacted many homes, businesses, levees, agriculture and other infrastructure particularly across central California." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Campo Medio (Santa Eulalia).This prospect is located close to the west border of the Santa Eulalia mine. Results of geological surveying and drilling programs indicated that its mineralization consists of sulfides with 2.85 meters of width, 219 grams of silver, 6.60% of lead and 7.55% of zinc. Exploration at the Campo Medio area did not render positive results and exploration activities were suspended. In order to continue exploration towards the southern end of the San Antonio mine, the area must be drained because it was affected by flooding at Santa Eulalia. In 2022, this situation continued. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
876,614	The Orlando water rights include the senior-most direct flow water right on the Huerfano River, or #1 priority, along with the #9 priority and miscellaneous junior water rights. The seniority of those water rights allowed the production of crops during most of the recent drought years. The Orlando assets also include the Orlando reservoir, which is situated on the Huerfano branch of the Huerfano River and has a storage capacity of 3,100 acre-feet.	South/Southeast Tornadoes (April 2016)	Large outbreak of tornadoes affects numerous states across the South and Southeast. Additional damage also from large hail and straight-line wind during the multi-day thunderstorm event.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Orlando water rights include the senior-most direct flow water right on the Huerfano River, or #1 priority, along with the #9 priority and miscellaneous junior water rights. The seniority of those water rights allowed the production of crops during most of the recent drought years. The Orlando assets also include the Orlando reservoir, which is situated on the Huerfano branch of the Huerfano River and has a storage capacity of 3,100 acre-feet. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South/Southeast Tornadoes (April 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Large outbreak of tornadoes affects numerous states across the South and Southeast. Additional damage also from large hail and straight-line wind during the multi-day thunderstorm event." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Orlando water rights include the senior-most direct flow water right on the Huerfano River, or #1 priority, along with the #9 priority and miscellaneous junior water rights. The seniority of those water rights allowed the production of crops during most of the recent drought years. The Orlando assets also include the Orlando reservoir, which is situated on the Huerfano branch of the Huerfano River and has a storage capacity of 3,100 acre-feet. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South/Southeast Tornadoes (April 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
865,261	At December 31, 2015, total liabilities were $108.7 million, compared to $111.5 million at December 31, 2014. The $2.8 million decrease was primarily due to a decline in reserves for unpaid loss and LAE. The reserve for unpaid loss and LAE was $45.3 million at December 31, 2015, compared to $50.5 million at December 31, 2014. This decrease was due primarily to crop and weather related losses in 2014.	South/Southeast Tornadoes (April 2016)	Large outbreak of tornadoes affects numerous states across the South and Southeast. Additional damage also from large hail and straight-line wind during the multi-day thunderstorm event.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] At December 31, 2015, total liabilities were $108.7 million, compared to $111.5 million at December 31, 2014. The $2.8 million decrease was primarily due to a decline in reserves for unpaid loss and LAE. The reserve for unpaid loss and LAE was $45.3 million at December 31, 2015, compared to $50.5 million at December 31, 2014. This decrease was due primarily to crop and weather related losses in 2014. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South/Southeast Tornadoes (April 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Large outbreak of tornadoes affects numerous states across the South and Southeast. Additional damage also from large hail and straight-line wind during the multi-day thunderstorm event." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] At December 31, 2015, total liabilities were $108.7 million, compared to $111.5 million at December 31, 2014. The $2.8 million decrease was primarily due to a decline in reserves for unpaid loss and LAE. The reserve for unpaid loss and LAE was $45.3 million at December 31, 2015, compared to $50.5 million at December 31, 2014. This decrease was due primarily to crop and weather related losses in 2014. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South/Southeast Tornadoes (April 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,417,738	A $15.8 million increase in natural gas margins, primarily due to colder winter weather in 2014. We estimate that colder winter weather increased natural gas margins by approximately $11.2 million. As measured by heating degree days, 2014 was 5.3% colder than 2013 and 15.4% colder than normal.	Texas Tornadoes and Midwest Flooding (December 2015)	A powerful storm system packing unseasonably strong tornadoes caused widespread destruction in the Dallas metropolitan region, damaging well over 1,000 homes and businesses. This same potent system also produced intense rainfall over several Midwestern states triggering historic flooding that has approached or broken records at river gauges in several states (MO, IL, AR, TN, MS, LA). The flooding has overtopped levees and caused damage in numerous areas. This historic storm also produced high wind, snow and ice impacts from New Mexico through the Midwest and into New England. Overall, the storm caused at least 50 deaths from the combined impact of tornadoes, flooding and winter weather.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] A $15.8 million increase in natural gas margins, primarily due to colder winter weather in 2014. We estimate that colder winter weather increased natural gas margins by approximately $11.2 million. As measured by heating degree days, 2014 was 5.3% colder than 2013 and 15.4% colder than normal. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas Tornadoes and Midwest Flooding (December 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A powerful storm system packing unseasonably strong tornadoes caused widespread destruction in the Dallas metropolitan region, damaging well over 1,000 homes and businesses. This same potent system also produced intense rainfall over several Midwestern states triggering historic flooding that has approached or broken records at river gauges in several states (MO, IL, AR, TN, MS, LA). The flooding has overtopped levees and caused damage in numerous areas. This historic storm also produced high wind, snow and ice impacts from New Mexico through the Midwest and into New England. Overall, the storm caused at least 50 deaths from the combined impact of tornadoes, flooding and winter weather." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] A $15.8 million increase in natural gas margins, primarily due to colder winter weather in 2014. We estimate that colder winter weather increased natural gas margins by approximately $11.2 million. As measured by heating degree days, 2014 was 5.3% colder than 2013 and 15.4% colder than normal. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas Tornadoes and Midwest Flooding (December 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
4,115	·incidents concerning our ships, guests or the cruise vacation industry as well as adverse weather conditions and other natural disasters may impact the satisfaction of our guests and crew and lead to reputational damage;	Hurricane Laura (August 2020)	Hurricane Laura was a powerful category 4 that made landfall at Cameron Parish, in southwestern Louisiana on August 27. Winds up to 150 mph and storm surge in excess of 15 feet caused heavy damage along the coast and inland to the city of Lake Charles. Many broken water systems and a severely damaged electrical grid in southern Louisiana will slow the recovery process. Laura was the strongest hurricane (by maximum sustained windspeed at landfall) to hit Louisiana since the 1856 Last Island hurricane. Laura also had highest landfall wind speed to impact the U.S. since Hurricane Michael in 2018. There were additional impacts to surrounding states including Texas, Mississippi and Arkansas.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ·incidents concerning our ships, guests or the cruise vacation industry as well as adverse weather conditions and other natural disasters may impact the satisfaction of our guests and crew and lead to reputational damage; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Laura (August 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Hurricane Laura was a powerful category 4 that made landfall at Cameron Parish, in southwestern Louisiana on August 27. Winds up to 150 mph and storm surge in excess of 15 feet caused heavy damage along the coast and inland to the city of Lake Charles. Many broken water systems and a severely damaged electrical grid in southern Louisiana will slow the recovery process. Laura was the strongest hurricane (by maximum sustained windspeed at landfall) to hit Louisiana since the 1856 Last Island hurricane. Laura also had highest landfall wind speed to impact the U.S. since Hurricane Michael in 2018. There were additional impacts to surrounding states including Texas, Mississippi and Arkansas." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ·incidents concerning our ships, guests or the cruise vacation industry as well as adverse weather conditions and other natural disasters may impact the satisfaction of our guests and crew and lead to reputational damage; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Laura (August 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
941,512	We rely upon estimates of merchantable timber inventories (which include judgments regarding inventories that may be lawfully and economically harvested), timber growth rates and end-product yields when acquiring and managing working forests. These estimates, which are inherently inexact and uncertain in nature, are central to forecasting our anticipated timber revenues and expected cash flows. Growth rates and end-product yield estimates are developed using statistical sampling, harvest results and growth and yield modeling, in conjunction with industry research cooperatives and by in-house forest biometricians, using measurements of trees in research plots spread across our timberland holdings. The growth equations predict the rate of height and diameter growth of trees so that foresters can estimate the volume of timber that may be present in a tree stand at a given age. Tree growth varies by species, soil type, geographic area, and climate. Errors in or inappropriate application of growth equations in forest management planning may lead to inaccurate estimates of future volumes. If the assumptions we rely upon change or these estimates are inaccurate, our ability to manage our timberlands in a sustainable or profitable manner may be diminished, which may cause our results of operations and our stock price to be adversely affected.	Central Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (April 2020)	Severe weather across many Central, Southern and Eastern states produced primarily large hail and high winds that caused widespread damage to many homes, vehicles and businesses. The states affected included Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] We rely upon estimates of merchantable timber inventories (which include judgments regarding inventories that may be lawfully and economically harvested), timber growth rates and end-product yields when acquiring and managing working forests. These estimates, which are inherently inexact and uncertain in nature, are central to forecasting our anticipated timber revenues and expected cash flows. Growth rates and end-product yield estimates are developed using statistical sampling, harvest results and growth and yield modeling, in conjunction with industry research cooperatives and by in-house forest biometricians, using measurements of trees in research plots spread across our timberland holdings. The growth equations predict the rate of height and diameter growth of trees so that foresters can estimate the volume of timber that may be present in a tree stand at a given age. Tree growth varies by species, soil type, geographic area, and climate. Errors in or inappropriate application of growth equations in forest management planning may lead to inaccurate estimates of future volumes. If the assumptions we rely upon change or these estimates are inaccurate, our ability to manage our timberlands in a sustainable or profitable manner may be diminished, which may cause our results of operations and our stock price to be adversely affected. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (April 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather across many Central, Southern and Eastern states produced primarily large hail and high winds that caused widespread damage to many homes, vehicles and businesses. The states affected included Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] We rely upon estimates of merchantable timber inventories (which include judgments regarding inventories that may be lawfully and economically harvested), timber growth rates and end-product yields when acquiring and managing working forests. These estimates, which are inherently inexact and uncertain in nature, are central to forecasting our anticipated timber revenues and expected cash flows. Growth rates and end-product yield estimates are developed using statistical sampling, harvest results and growth and yield modeling, in conjunction with industry research cooperatives and by in-house forest biometricians, using measurements of trees in research plots spread across our timberland holdings. The growth equations predict the rate of height and diameter growth of trees so that foresters can estimate the volume of timber that may be present in a tree stand at a given age. Tree growth varies by species, soil type, geographic area, and climate. Errors in or inappropriate application of growth equations in forest management planning may lead to inaccurate estimates of future volumes. If the assumptions we rely upon change or these estimates are inaccurate, our ability to manage our timberlands in a sustainable or profitable manner may be diminished, which may cause our results of operations and our stock price to be adversely affected. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (April 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
23,860	Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a press release issued by the Company on November 11, 2005 announcing an estimate of losses from Hurricane Wilma.	Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)	Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.	Yes	Yes	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a press release issued by the Company on November 11, 2005 announcing an estimate of losses from Hurricane Wilma. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a press release issued by the Company on November 11, 2005 announcing an estimate of losses from Hurricane Wilma. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,323,020	•proceeds of $310 million received from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation in August 2014 as a result of the Louisiana Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements and “Hurricane Isaac” above for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing;	Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)	Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •proceeds of $310 million received from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation in August 2014 as a result of the Louisiana Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements and “Hurricane Isaac” above for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •proceeds of $310 million received from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation in August 2014 as a result of the Louisiana Act 55 storm cost financing. See Note 2 to the financial statements and “Hurricane Isaac” above for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing; [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
18,899	On October 3, 2005, Offshore Logistics, Inc. issued a press release providing an update after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.	Hurricane Dennis (July 2005)	Category 3 hurricane makes landfall in western Florida panhandle resulting in storm surge and wind damage along the FL and AL coasts, along with scattered wind and flood damage in GA and MS.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On October 3, 2005, Offshore Logistics, Inc. issued a press release providing an update after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Dennis (July 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane makes landfall in western Florida panhandle resulting in storm surge and wind damage along the FL and AL coasts, along with scattered wind and flood damage in GA and MS." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On October 3, 2005, Offshore Logistics, Inc. issued a press release providing an update after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Dennis (July 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
117,052	2006 compared to 20052005 compared to 2004Increases in losses on sales of assets$2$92Hurricane asset retirement loss(19)19Increases (decreases) in special charges, net6(97)Decreases in unfavorable contracts and other settlements--5$(11)$19For more information, see Note 17 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”	Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)	Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] 2006 compared to 20052005 compared to 2004Increases in losses on sales of assets$2$92Hurricane asset retirement loss(19)19Increases (decreases) in special charges, net6(97)Decreases in unfavorable contracts and other settlements--5$(11)$19For more information, see Note 17 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] 2006 compared to 20052005 compared to 2004Increases in losses on sales of assets$2$92Hurricane asset retirement loss(19)19Increases (decreases) in special charges, net6(97)Decreases in unfavorable contracts and other settlements--5$(11)$19For more information, see Note 17 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
666,282	Garden net sales decreased $27.6 million, or 1.9%, to $1,432.9 million in fiscal 2023 from $1,460.5 million in fiscal 2022. The decrease in Garden net sales was due primarily to lower sales in our private-label controls and fertilizer business and our grass seed business, partially offset by increased sales in our wild bird feed business. The volume related sales decline was due primarily to adverse weather during our second quarter of fiscal 2023, unfavorable retailer inventory management and lighter retailer foot traffic. Garden branded sales decreased $19.1 million and sales of other manufacturers' products decreased $8.5 million.	Central Severe Weather (June 2023)	Severe storms caused damage across numerous Central states. The state most impacted were Missouri, Illinois and Indiana while there were also damage in many surrounding states. The damage to many homes, vehicles, businesses and agriculture assets was largely from high wind and damaging hail but there were also scattered tornado impacts.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Garden net sales decreased $27.6 million, or 1.9%, to $1,432.9 million in fiscal 2023 from $1,460.5 million in fiscal 2022. The decrease in Garden net sales was due primarily to lower sales in our private-label controls and fertilizer business and our grass seed business, partially offset by increased sales in our wild bird feed business. The volume related sales decline was due primarily to adverse weather during our second quarter of fiscal 2023, unfavorable retailer inventory management and lighter retailer foot traffic. Garden branded sales decreased $19.1 million and sales of other manufacturers' products decreased $8.5 million. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Weather (June 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms caused damage across numerous Central states. The state most impacted were Missouri, Illinois and Indiana while there were also damage in many surrounding states. The damage to many homes, vehicles, businesses and agriculture assets was largely from high wind and damaging hail but there were also scattered tornado impacts." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Garden net sales decreased $27.6 million, or 1.9%, to $1,432.9 million in fiscal 2023 from $1,460.5 million in fiscal 2022. The decrease in Garden net sales was due primarily to lower sales in our private-label controls and fertilizer business and our grass seed business, partially offset by increased sales in our wild bird feed business. The volume related sales decline was due primarily to adverse weather during our second quarter of fiscal 2023, unfavorable retailer inventory management and lighter retailer foot traffic. Garden branded sales decreased $19.1 million and sales of other manufacturers' products decreased $8.5 million. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Weather (June 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
2,619	If a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease including the recent outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, or other public health crisis were to affect our markets or facilities or those of our suppliers, our business could be adversely affected. Consequences of the coronavirus outbreak are resulting in disruptions in or restrictions on our ability to travel. If such an infectious disease broke out at our office, facilities or work sites, our operations may be affected significantly, our productivity may be affected, our ability to complete projects in accordance with our contractual obligations may be affected, and we may incur increased labor and materials costs. If the customers with which we contract are affected by an outbreak of infectious disease, service work may be delayed or cancelled, and we may incur increased labor and materials costs. If our subcontractors with whom we work were affected by an outbreak of infectious disease, our labor supply may be affected and we may incur increased labor costs. In addition, we may experience difficulties with certain suppliers or with vendors in their supply chains, and our business could be affected if we become unable to procure essential equipment, supplies or services in adequate quantities and at acceptable prices. Further, infectious outbreak may cause disruption to the U.S. economy, or the local economies of the markets in which we operate, cause shortages of materials, increase costs associated with obtaining materials, affect job growth and consumer confidence, or cause economic changes that we cannot anticipate. Overall, the potential impact of a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease with respect to our market or our facilities is difficult to predict and could adversely impact our business. In response to the COVID-19 situation, federal, state and local governments (or other governments or bodies) are considering placing, or have placed, restrictions on travel and conducting or operating business activities. At this time those restrictions are very fluid and evolving. We have been and will continue to be impacted by those restrictions. Given that the type, degree and length of such restrictions are not known at this time, we cannot predict the overall impact of such restrictions on us, our customers, our subcontractors and supply chain, others that we work with or the overall economic environment. As such, theimpact these restrictions may have on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact may be material. In addition,due to the speed with which the COVID-19 situation is developing and evolving, there is uncertainty around its ultimate impact on public health, business operations and the overall economy; therefore, the negative impact on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact may be material.	Tennessee Tornadoes and Southeast Severe Weather (March 2020)	Powerful EF-3 and EF-4 tornadoes cause considerable damage across the Nashville metroplex and several counties east of Nashville. This damage included many homes, businesses, vehicles, 90 planes and numerous buildings at the Nashville airport. There was also additional hail and wind damage in the surrounding states including Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi and Missouri.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] If a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease including the recent outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, or other public health crisis were to affect our markets or facilities or those of our suppliers, our business could be adversely affected. Consequences of the coronavirus outbreak are resulting in disruptions in or restrictions on our ability to travel. If such an infectious disease broke out at our office, facilities or work sites, our operations may be affected significantly, our productivity may be affected, our ability to complete projects in accordance with our contractual obligations may be affected, and we may incur increased labor and materials costs. If the customers with which we contract are affected by an outbreak of infectious disease, service work may be delayed or cancelled, and we may incur increased labor and materials costs. If our subcontractors with whom we work were affected by an outbreak of infectious disease, our labor supply may be affected and we may incur increased labor costs. In addition, we may experience difficulties with certain suppliers or with vendors in their supply chains, and our business could be affected if we become unable to procure essential equipment, supplies or services in adequate quantities and at acceptable prices. Further, infectious outbreak may cause disruption to the U.S. economy, or the local economies of the markets in which we operate, cause shortages of materials, increase costs associated with obtaining materials, affect job growth and consumer confidence, or cause economic changes that we cannot anticipate. Overall, the potential impact of a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease with respect to our market or our facilities is difficult to predict and could adversely impact our business. In response to the COVID-19 situation, federal, state and local governments (or other governments or bodies) are considering placing, or have placed, restrictions on travel and conducting or operating business activities. At this time those restrictions are very fluid and evolving. We have been and will continue to be impacted by those restrictions. Given that the type, degree and length of such restrictions are not known at this time, we cannot predict the overall impact of such restrictions on us, our customers, our subcontractors and supply chain, others that we work with or the overall economic environment. As such, theimpact these restrictions may have on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact may be material. In addition,due to the speed with which the COVID-19 situation is developing and evolving, there is uncertainty around its ultimate impact on public health, business operations and the overall economy; therefore, the negative impact on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact may be material. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Tennessee Tornadoes and Southeast Severe Weather (March 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Powerful EF-3 and EF-4 tornadoes cause considerable damage across the Nashville metroplex and several counties east of Nashville. This damage included many homes, businesses, vehicles, 90 planes and numerous buildings at the Nashville airport. There was also additional hail and wind damage in the surrounding states including Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi and Missouri." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] If a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease including the recent outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, or other public health crisis were to affect our markets or facilities or those of our suppliers, our business could be adversely affected. Consequences of the coronavirus outbreak are resulting in disruptions in or restrictions on our ability to travel. If such an infectious disease broke out at our office, facilities or work sites, our operations may be affected significantly, our productivity may be affected, our ability to complete projects in accordance with our contractual obligations may be affected, and we may incur increased labor and materials costs. If the customers with which we contract are affected by an outbreak of infectious disease, service work may be delayed or cancelled, and we may incur increased labor and materials costs. If our subcontractors with whom we work were affected by an outbreak of infectious disease, our labor supply may be affected and we may incur increased labor costs. In addition, we may experience difficulties with certain suppliers or with vendors in their supply chains, and our business could be affected if we become unable to procure essential equipment, supplies or services in adequate quantities and at acceptable prices. Further, infectious outbreak may cause disruption to the U.S. economy, or the local economies of the markets in which we operate, cause shortages of materials, increase costs associated with obtaining materials, affect job growth and consumer confidence, or cause economic changes that we cannot anticipate. Overall, the potential impact of a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease with respect to our market or our facilities is difficult to predict and could adversely impact our business. In response to the COVID-19 situation, federal, state and local governments (or other governments or bodies) are considering placing, or have placed, restrictions on travel and conducting or operating business activities. At this time those restrictions are very fluid and evolving. We have been and will continue to be impacted by those restrictions. Given that the type, degree and length of such restrictions are not known at this time, we cannot predict the overall impact of such restrictions on us, our customers, our subcontractors and supply chain, others that we work with or the overall economic environment. As such, theimpact these restrictions may have on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact may be material. In addition,due to the speed with which the COVID-19 situation is developing and evolving, there is uncertainty around its ultimate impact on public health, business operations and the overall economy; therefore, the negative impact on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact may be material. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Tennessee Tornadoes and Southeast Severe Weather (March 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
27,460	Excluding the impact of net storm-related items and securities transactions, non-interest income for the first quarter of 2006 was up $2.46 million, or 11 percent, compared to the same quarter a year ago. Non-interest income was up $1.87 million, or 8 percent, compared to the fourth quarter of 2005. The primary factors impacting the higher levels of non-interest income as compared to the same quarter a year ago were higher levels of insurance fees (up $1.28 million) mostly related to higher revenues associated with Magna Insurance Company, the Company’s wholly owned insurance company, and the July, 1, 2005, acquisition of J. Everett Eaves, Inc. In addition, other income was up $1.26 million, when compared to the same quarter a year ago. However, service charges were down $1.61 million principally due to waived return item fees and other service charges as a result of accommodations to customers impacted by Hurricane Katrina. The increase in non-interest income for the first quarter of 2006 (excluding the 2005 net storm-related items and securities transactions) compared to the prior quarter was due to increases in service charges (up $1.03 million) and ATM fees (up $489,000).	Severe Storms and Tornadoes (March 2006)	Outbreak of tornadoes over portions of the midwest and south during a week-long period-affecting the states of AL, AR, KY, MS, TN, TX, IN, KS, MO, and OK.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Excluding the impact of net storm-related items and securities transactions, non-interest income for the first quarter of 2006 was up $2.46 million, or 11 percent, compared to the same quarter a year ago. Non-interest income was up $1.87 million, or 8 percent, compared to the fourth quarter of 2005. The primary factors impacting the higher levels of non-interest income as compared to the same quarter a year ago were higher levels of insurance fees (up $1.28 million) mostly related to higher revenues associated with Magna Insurance Company, the Company’s wholly owned insurance company, and the July, 1, 2005, acquisition of J. Everett Eaves, Inc. In addition, other income was up $1.26 million, when compared to the same quarter a year ago. However, service charges were down $1.61 million principally due to waived return item fees and other service charges as a result of accommodations to customers impacted by Hurricane Katrina. The increase in non-interest income for the first quarter of 2006 (excluding the 2005 net storm-related items and securities transactions) compared to the prior quarter was due to increases in service charges (up $1.03 million) and ATM fees (up $489,000). [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Severe Storms and Tornadoes (March 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Outbreak of tornadoes over portions of the midwest and south during a week-long period-affecting the states of AL, AR, KY, MS, TN, TX, IN, KS, MO, and OK." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Excluding the impact of net storm-related items and securities transactions, non-interest income for the first quarter of 2006 was up $2.46 million, or 11 percent, compared to the same quarter a year ago. Non-interest income was up $1.87 million, or 8 percent, compared to the fourth quarter of 2005. The primary factors impacting the higher levels of non-interest income as compared to the same quarter a year ago were higher levels of insurance fees (up $1.28 million) mostly related to higher revenues associated with Magna Insurance Company, the Company’s wholly owned insurance company, and the July, 1, 2005, acquisition of J. Everett Eaves, Inc. In addition, other income was up $1.26 million, when compared to the same quarter a year ago. However, service charges were down $1.61 million principally due to waived return item fees and other service charges as a result of accommodations to customers impacted by Hurricane Katrina. The increase in non-interest income for the first quarter of 2006 (excluding the 2005 net storm-related items and securities transactions) compared to the prior quarter was due to increases in service charges (up $1.03 million) and ATM fees (up $489,000). [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Severe Storms and Tornadoes (March 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
988,393	In May 2003, a fuse plug at the Silver Lake reservoir owned by UPPCO was breached, resulting in subsequent flooding downstream on the Dead River, located in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. All litigation matters have been resolved. All environmental claims have been resolved with the State of Michigan, and a Consent Judgment on the environmental matters was filed and approved in June 2009.	Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)	Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA).	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In May 2003, a fuse plug at the Silver Lake reservoir owned by UPPCO was breached, resulting in subsequent flooding downstream on the Dead River, located in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. All litigation matters have been resolved. All environmental claims have been resolved with the State of Michigan, and a Consent Judgment on the environmental matters was filed and approved in June 2009. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA)." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In May 2003, a fuse plug at the Silver Lake reservoir owned by UPPCO was breached, resulting in subsequent flooding downstream on the Dead River, located in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. All litigation matters have been resolved. All environmental claims have been resolved with the State of Michigan, and a Consent Judgment on the environmental matters was filed and approved in June 2009. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,650,779	•Other environmental, health and safety matters, including alleged personal injury, wrongful death, complaints that our operations are adversely impacting nearby farms and other business operations, other property damage, subsidence from mining operations, natural resource damages and other damage to the environment, arising out of operations, including accidents. For example, several actions were initiated by the government and private parties related to a release of phosphoric acid process wastewater at our Riverview, Florida facility during a 2004 hurricane. In addition, a putative class action lawsuit was filed following the water loss incident that occurred at our New Wales, Florida facility in 2016 and in connection with that incident we also entered into an administrative consent order with the FDEP as discussed in greater detail in Note21of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.	North Texas Hail Storm (March 2016)	Large hail and strong winds caused considerable damage in heavily populated areas of north Texas. This damage was most notable in the cities of Dallas, Fort Worth and Plano.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •Other environmental, health and safety matters, including alleged personal injury, wrongful death, complaints that our operations are adversely impacting nearby farms and other business operations, other property damage, subsidence from mining operations, natural resource damages and other damage to the environment, arising out of operations, including accidents. For example, several actions were initiated by the government and private parties related to a release of phosphoric acid process wastewater at our Riverview, Florida facility during a 2004 hurricane. In addition, a putative class action lawsuit was filed following the water loss incident that occurred at our New Wales, Florida facility in 2016 and in connection with that incident we also entered into an administrative consent order with the FDEP as discussed in greater detail in Note21of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North Texas Hail Storm (March 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Large hail and strong winds caused considerable damage in heavily populated areas of north Texas. This damage was most notable in the cities of Dallas, Fort Worth and Plano." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •Other environmental, health and safety matters, including alleged personal injury, wrongful death, complaints that our operations are adversely impacting nearby farms and other business operations, other property damage, subsidence from mining operations, natural resource damages and other damage to the environment, arising out of operations, including accidents. For example, several actions were initiated by the government and private parties related to a release of phosphoric acid process wastewater at our Riverview, Florida facility during a 2004 hurricane. In addition, a putative class action lawsuit was filed following the water loss incident that occurred at our New Wales, Florida facility in 2016 and in connection with that incident we also entered into an administrative consent order with the FDEP as discussed in greater detail in Note21of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Texas Hail Storm (March 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
810,666	Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce and the global economy, and thus could harm our business. We have a large employee presence in San Francisco, California and the west coast of the United States contains active earthquake and wildfire zones which have the potential to disrupt our business. For example, in the fall of 2019 and 2020, PG&E shut off power to certain cities in the San Francisco Bay Area in order to reduce the risk of wildfires and this resulted in many of our employees being unable to work remotely. In the event of a major earthquake, hurricane or catastrophic event such as fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, vandalism, cyber-attack, war, terrorist attack or health epidemic (including COVID-19), we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our application development, lengthy interruptions in our products, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, all of which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the insurance we maintain may be insufficient to cover our losses resulting from disasters, cyber-attacks or other business interruptions, and any incidents may result in loss of, or increased costs of, such insurance.	Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (March 2023)	Severe storms impact numerous southern and eastern states including Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio. Impacts from high wind and tornadoes cause widespread damage to homes, vehicles, businesses, government buildings and infrastructure.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce and the global economy, and thus could harm our business. We have a large employee presence in San Francisco, California and the west coast of the United States contains active earthquake and wildfire zones which have the potential to disrupt our business. For example, in the fall of 2019 and 2020, PG&E shut off power to certain cities in the San Francisco Bay Area in order to reduce the risk of wildfires and this resulted in many of our employees being unable to work remotely. In the event of a major earthquake, hurricane or catastrophic event such as fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, vandalism, cyber-attack, war, terrorist attack or health epidemic (including COVID-19), we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our application development, lengthy interruptions in our products, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, all of which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the insurance we maintain may be insufficient to cover our losses resulting from disasters, cyber-attacks or other business interruptions, and any incidents may result in loss of, or increased costs of, such insurance. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (March 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms impact numerous southern and eastern states including Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio. Impacts from high wind and tornadoes cause widespread damage to homes, vehicles, businesses, government buildings and infrastructure." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce and the global economy, and thus could harm our business. We have a large employee presence in San Francisco, California and the west coast of the United States contains active earthquake and wildfire zones which have the potential to disrupt our business. For example, in the fall of 2019 and 2020, PG&E shut off power to certain cities in the San Francisco Bay Area in order to reduce the risk of wildfires and this resulted in many of our employees being unable to work remotely. In the event of a major earthquake, hurricane or catastrophic event such as fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, vandalism, cyber-attack, war, terrorist attack or health epidemic (including COVID-19), we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our application development, lengthy interruptions in our products, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, all of which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the insurance we maintain may be insufficient to cover our losses resulting from disasters, cyber-attacks or other business interruptions, and any incidents may result in loss of, or increased costs of, such insurance. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern and Eastern Severe Weather (March 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
8,136	default by the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries (as defined in the Indenture) with respect to any mortgage, agreement or other instrument under which there may be outstanding, or by which there may be secured or evidenced, any indebtedness for money borrowed in excess of $40,000,000 (or its foreign currency equivalent) in the aggregate of the Company and/or any such significant subsidiary, whether such indebtedness now exists or shall hereafter be created (i) resulting in such indebtedness becoming or being declared due and payable or (ii) constituting a failure to pay the principal of any such indebtedness when due and payable (after the expiration of all applicable grace periods) at its stated maturity, upon required repurchase, upon declaration of acceleration or otherwise, and, in the case of clauses (i) and (ii), such acceleration shall not have been rescinded or annulled or such failure to pay or default shall not have been cured or waived, or such indebtedness is not paid or discharged, as the case may be, within 30 days after written notice to the Company from the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of Notes then outstanding in accordance with the Indenture; or	Central Severe Weather (July 2020)	Central severe weather producing hundreds of severe hail and high wind reports across numerous states including Nebraska, South Dakota, Minnesota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Illinois and Indiana. These storms caused impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] default by the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries (as defined in the Indenture) with respect to any mortgage, agreement or other instrument under which there may be outstanding, or by which there may be secured or evidenced, any indebtedness for money borrowed in excess of $40,000,000 (or its foreign currency equivalent) in the aggregate of the Company and/or any such significant subsidiary, whether such indebtedness now exists or shall hereafter be created (i) resulting in such indebtedness becoming or being declared due and payable or (ii) constituting a failure to pay the principal of any such indebtedness when due and payable (after the expiration of all applicable grace periods) at its stated maturity, upon required repurchase, upon declaration of acceleration or otherwise, and, in the case of clauses (i) and (ii), such acceleration shall not have been rescinded or annulled or such failure to pay or default shall not have been cured or waived, or such indebtedness is not paid or discharged, as the case may be, within 30 days after written notice to the Company from the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of Notes then outstanding in accordance with the Indenture; or [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Weather (July 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Central severe weather producing hundreds of severe hail and high wind reports across numerous states including Nebraska, South Dakota, Minnesota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Illinois and Indiana. These storms caused impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] default by the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries (as defined in the Indenture) with respect to any mortgage, agreement or other instrument under which there may be outstanding, or by which there may be secured or evidenced, any indebtedness for money borrowed in excess of $40,000,000 (or its foreign currency equivalent) in the aggregate of the Company and/or any such significant subsidiary, whether such indebtedness now exists or shall hereafter be created (i) resulting in such indebtedness becoming or being declared due and payable or (ii) constituting a failure to pay the principal of any such indebtedness when due and payable (after the expiration of all applicable grace periods) at its stated maturity, upon required repurchase, upon declaration of acceleration or otherwise, and, in the case of clauses (i) and (ii), such acceleration shall not have been rescinded or annulled or such failure to pay or default shall not have been cured or waived, or such indebtedness is not paid or discharged, as the case may be, within 30 days after written notice to the Company from the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of Notes then outstanding in accordance with the Indenture; or [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Weather (July 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
16,339	Regulated Electricity Segment RevenuesRegulated electricity segment revenues were $283 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of:•a $191 million increase in retail revenues due to a rate increase effective July 1, 2007;•a $60 million increase in retail revenues primarily related to customer growth, excluding weather effects;•a $50 million increase in retail revenues due to the effects of weather;•a $3 million increase in revenues from Off-System Sales due to higher prices and volumes;•a $35 million decrease in retail revenues related to recovery of PSA deferrals, which had no earnings effect because of amortization of the same amount recorded as fuel and purchased power expense (see Note 3); and•a $14 million net increase due to miscellaneous factors.Real Estate Segment RevenuesReal estate segment revenues were $187 million lower for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of:•a $167 million decrease in residential property sales due to the continued slowdown in western United States real estate markets; and•a $20 million decrease primarily due to lower sales of land parcels.All Other RevenuesMarketing and trading revenues were $12 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of higher mark-to-market gains resulting from changes in forward prices and higher competitive retail sales volumes in California.Other revenues were $12 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily as a result of increased sales by APSES of energy-related products and services.2006 Compared with 2005Our consolidated net income for 2006 was $327 million compared with $176 million for the comparable prior-year period. The prior year included a net loss from discontinued operations of $47 million, which was related to the sale and operations of Silverhawk, partially offset by income from sales of real estate commercial properties at SunCor. Income from continuing operations increased $94 million in the period-to-period comparison, reflecting the following changes in earnings by segment:30	Hurricane Gustav (September 2008)	Category 2 hurricane makes landfall in Louisiana causing significant wind, storm surge, and flooding damage in AL, AR, LA, and MS.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Regulated Electricity Segment RevenuesRegulated electricity segment revenues were $283 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of:•a $191 million increase in retail revenues due to a rate increase effective July 1, 2007;•a $60 million increase in retail revenues primarily related to customer growth, excluding weather effects;•a $50 million increase in retail revenues due to the effects of weather;•a $3 million increase in revenues from Off-System Sales due to higher prices and volumes;•a $35 million decrease in retail revenues related to recovery of PSA deferrals, which had no earnings effect because of amortization of the same amount recorded as fuel and purchased power expense (see Note 3); and•a $14 million net increase due to miscellaneous factors.Real Estate Segment RevenuesReal estate segment revenues were $187 million lower for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of:•a $167 million decrease in residential property sales due to the continued slowdown in western United States real estate markets; and•a $20 million decrease primarily due to lower sales of land parcels.All Other RevenuesMarketing and trading revenues were $12 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of higher mark-to-market gains resulting from changes in forward prices and higher competitive retail sales volumes in California.Other revenues were $12 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily as a result of increased sales by APSES of energy-related products and services.2006 Compared with 2005Our consolidated net income for 2006 was $327 million compared with $176 million for the comparable prior-year period. The prior year included a net loss from discontinued operations of $47 million, which was related to the sale and operations of Silverhawk, partially offset by income from sales of real estate commercial properties at SunCor. Income from continuing operations increased $94 million in the period-to-period comparison, reflecting the following changes in earnings by segment:30 [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Gustav (September 2008)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 2 hurricane makes landfall in Louisiana causing significant wind, storm surge, and flooding damage in AL, AR, LA, and MS." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Regulated Electricity Segment RevenuesRegulated electricity segment revenues were $283 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of:•a $191 million increase in retail revenues due to a rate increase effective July 1, 2007;•a $60 million increase in retail revenues primarily related to customer growth, excluding weather effects;•a $50 million increase in retail revenues due to the effects of weather;•a $3 million increase in revenues from Off-System Sales due to higher prices and volumes;•a $35 million decrease in retail revenues related to recovery of PSA deferrals, which had no earnings effect because of amortization of the same amount recorded as fuel and purchased power expense (see Note 3); and•a $14 million net increase due to miscellaneous factors.Real Estate Segment RevenuesReal estate segment revenues were $187 million lower for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of:•a $167 million decrease in residential property sales due to the continued slowdown in western United States real estate markets; and•a $20 million decrease primarily due to lower sales of land parcels.All Other RevenuesMarketing and trading revenues were $12 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily because of higher mark-to-market gains resulting from changes in forward prices and higher competitive retail sales volumes in California.Other revenues were $12 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the prior year primarily as a result of increased sales by APSES of energy-related products and services.2006 Compared with 2005Our consolidated net income for 2006 was $327 million compared with $176 million for the comparable prior-year period. The prior year included a net loss from discontinued operations of $47 million, which was related to the sale and operations of Silverhawk, partially offset by income from sales of real estate commercial properties at SunCor. Income from continuing operations increased $94 million in the period-to-period comparison, reflecting the following changes in earnings by segment:30 [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Gustav (September 2008)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,299,114	Unitil’s total therm sales of natural gas increased 7.7% in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase in gas therm sales in the Company’s utility service territories was driven by the colder winter and spring weather in 2014 compared to 2013 coupled with strong growth in the number of new customers. Based on weather data collected in the Company’s service areas, there were 5.9% more Heating Degree Days in 2014 compared to 2013. Weather-normalized gas therm sales, excluding decoupled sales, were estimated to be up 5.2% in 2014 compared to 2013.	Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)	Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Unitil’s total therm sales of natural gas increased 7.7% in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase in gas therm sales in the Company’s utility service territories was driven by the colder winter and spring weather in 2014 compared to 2013 coupled with strong growth in the number of new customers. Based on weather data collected in the Company’s service areas, there were 5.9% more Heating Degree Days in 2014 compared to 2013. Weather-normalized gas therm sales, excluding decoupled sales, were estimated to be up 5.2% in 2014 compared to 2013. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Unitil’s total therm sales of natural gas increased 7.7% in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase in gas therm sales in the Company’s utility service territories was driven by the colder winter and spring weather in 2014 compared to 2013 coupled with strong growth in the number of new customers. Based on weather data collected in the Company’s service areas, there were 5.9% more Heating Degree Days in 2014 compared to 2013. Weather-normalized gas therm sales, excluding decoupled sales, were estimated to be up 5.2% in 2014 compared to 2013. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
516,239	Revenue decreased by $25,675 thousand, or 22.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The decrease was primarily related to a $25,829 thousand decrease in revenue from fewer event-based storm recovery events in 2022 compared to 2021. Additionally in 2022, the Renewables business experienced an overall decline in project wins as well as lower volumes from a key customer.	Central Severe Weather (April 2023)	Severe hail, scattered tornadoes and high winds caused damage across numerous central states. Central Oklahoma was impacted by a cluster of tornadoes. Texas, Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin was impacted by hail and high wind damage from severe storms.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Revenue decreased by $25,675 thousand, or 22.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The decrease was primarily related to a $25,829 thousand decrease in revenue from fewer event-based storm recovery events in 2022 compared to 2021. Additionally in 2022, the Renewables business experienced an overall decline in project wins as well as lower volumes from a key customer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Weather (April 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe hail, scattered tornadoes and high winds caused damage across numerous central states. Central Oklahoma was impacted by a cluster of tornadoes. Texas, Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin was impacted by hail and high wind damage from severe storms." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Revenue decreased by $25,675 thousand, or 22.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The decrease was primarily related to a $25,829 thousand decrease in revenue from fewer event-based storm recovery events in 2022 compared to 2021. Additionally in 2022, the Renewables business experienced an overall decline in project wins as well as lower volumes from a key customer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Weather (April 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
126,883	The primary cause of the temporary impairments in the Corporation’s investment in debt securities was the decline in prices as interest rates have risen. There are 33 securities totaling $13.62 million in the Corporation’s debt securites portfolio considered temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006. Because the Corporation has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006. The temporary impairments in the Corporation’s investment in preferred stock have declined to $29,000 at December 31, 2006 from $223,000 at December 31, 2005. The primary cause of the temporary impairment in the Corporation’s investment in preferred stock at December 31, 2005 was one holding in an energy company, which suffered a liquidity crisis as a result of damage to electric and gas facilities by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The fair value of the Corporation’s investment in this company recovered almost entirely during 2006.	Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)	Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The primary cause of the temporary impairments in the Corporation’s investment in debt securities was the decline in prices as interest rates have risen. There are 33 securities totaling $13.62 million in the Corporation’s debt securites portfolio considered temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006. Because the Corporation has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006. The temporary impairments in the Corporation’s investment in preferred stock have declined to $29,000 at December 31, 2006 from $223,000 at December 31, 2005. The primary cause of the temporary impairment in the Corporation’s investment in preferred stock at December 31, 2005 was one holding in an energy company, which suffered a liquidity crisis as a result of damage to electric and gas facilities by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The fair value of the Corporation’s investment in this company recovered almost entirely during 2006. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and numerous tornadoes affecting the states of OK, KS, MO, NE, KY, OH, TN, IN, MS, GA, and AL on April 6-8 with 3 "killer" tornadoes in TN." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The primary cause of the temporary impairments in the Corporation’s investment in debt securities was the decline in prices as interest rates have risen. There are 33 securities totaling $13.62 million in the Corporation’s debt securites portfolio considered temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006. Because the Corporation has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006. The temporary impairments in the Corporation’s investment in preferred stock have declined to $29,000 at December 31, 2006 from $223,000 at December 31, 2005. The primary cause of the temporary impairment in the Corporation’s investment in preferred stock at December 31, 2005 was one holding in an energy company, which suffered a liquidity crisis as a result of damage to electric and gas facilities by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The fair value of the Corporation’s investment in this company recovered almost entirely during 2006. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Southeast Tornadoes (April 6-8 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
544,046	frequent occurrencesof extremeweather events,which maybe exacerbatedby climatechange, maycause cropand livestock	Texas Hail Storms (May 2023)	Texas hail storms impact numerous counties across north central Texas. Collin county in particular was impacted by golf ball to tennis ball sized hail causing damage to homes, vehicles and businesses.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] frequent occurrencesof extremeweather events,which maybe exacerbatedby climatechange, maycause cropand livestock [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas Hail Storms (May 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Texas hail storms impact numerous counties across north central Texas. Collin county in particular was impacted by golf ball to tennis ball sized hail causing damage to homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] frequent occurrencesof extremeweather events,which maybe exacerbatedby climatechange, maycause cropand livestock [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas Hail Storms (May 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
177,475	In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey produced the largest recorded rain volume for a single weather event in U.S. history, resulting in historic flooding and widespread property damage, primarily in southeast Texas. Although our insurance subsidiary does not write policies for manufactured home residents in gulf coast counties or in flood plains, the enormity of this event caused high homeowners' insurance claim volume inland and in non-flood plain areas. The insurance subsidiary's catastrophic reinsurance contracts served to limit financial exposure to a pre-established retention amount of $1.5 million; however, these contracts also carried the requirement for the Company to pay additional premiums in order to reinstate reinsurance coverage for the remainder of calendar year 2017, further adding to costs incurred as a result of the hurricane.	Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2017)	A historic firestorm damages or destroys over 15,000 homes, businesses and other structures across California in October. The combined destruction of the Tubbs, Atlas, Nuns and Redwood Valley wildfires represent the most costly wildfire event on record, also causing 44 deaths. Extreme wildfire conditions in early December also burned hundreds of homes in Los Angeles. Numerous other wildfires across many western and northwestern states burn over 9.8 million acres exceeding the 10-year annual average of 6.5 million acres. Montana in particular was affected by wildfires that burned in excess of 1 million acres. These wildfire conditions were enhanced by the preceding drought conditions in several states.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey produced the largest recorded rain volume for a single weather event in U.S. history, resulting in historic flooding and widespread property damage, primarily in southeast Texas. Although our insurance subsidiary does not write policies for manufactured home residents in gulf coast counties or in flood plains, the enormity of this event caused high homeowners' insurance claim volume inland and in non-flood plain areas. The insurance subsidiary's catastrophic reinsurance contracts served to limit financial exposure to a pre-established retention amount of $1.5 million; however, these contracts also carried the requirement for the Company to pay additional premiums in order to reinstate reinsurance coverage for the remainder of calendar year 2017, further adding to costs incurred as a result of the hurricane. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2017)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A historic firestorm damages or destroys over 15,000 homes, businesses and other structures across California in October. The combined destruction of the Tubbs, Atlas, Nuns and Redwood Valley wildfires represent the most costly wildfire event on record, also causing 44 deaths. Extreme wildfire conditions in early December also burned hundreds of homes in Los Angeles. Numerous other wildfires across many western and northwestern states burn over 9.8 million acres exceeding the 10-year annual average of 6.5 million acres. Montana in particular was affected by wildfires that burned in excess of 1 million acres. These wildfire conditions were enhanced by the preceding drought conditions in several states." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey produced the largest recorded rain volume for a single weather event in U.S. history, resulting in historic flooding and widespread property damage, primarily in southeast Texas. Although our insurance subsidiary does not write policies for manufactured home residents in gulf coast counties or in flood plains, the enormity of this event caused high homeowners' insurance claim volume inland and in non-flood plain areas. The insurance subsidiary's catastrophic reinsurance contracts served to limit financial exposure to a pre-established retention amount of $1.5 million; however, these contracts also carried the requirement for the Company to pay additional premiums in order to reinstate reinsurance coverage for the remainder of calendar year 2017, further adding to costs incurred as a result of the hurricane. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2017)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
5,623	Consistent with the Utility’s GRC application, the settlement agreement did not propose funding for claims resulting from the 2017 Northern California wildfires or the 2018 Camp fire. Also, the Utility did not seek recovery of compensation for PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s officers.	Hurricane Sally (September 2020)	Hurricane Sally was a category 2 hurricane at landfall in Gulf Shores, Alabama. Wind gusts up to 100 mph and 20-30 inches of rainfall caused considerable flood and wind damage across Alabama, the Florida panhandle and into Georgia. Many homes and businesses in downtown Pensacola, FL were impacted from flooding produced by storm surge and heavy rainfall. 2020 is now the fourth consecutive year (2017-2020) that the U.S. has been impacted by a slow moving tropical cyclone that produced extreme rainfall and damaging floods - Harvey, Florence, Imelda and Sally.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Consistent with the Utility’s GRC application, the settlement agreement did not propose funding for claims resulting from the 2017 Northern California wildfires or the 2018 Camp fire. Also, the Utility did not seek recovery of compensation for PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s officers. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Sally (September 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Hurricane Sally was a category 2 hurricane at landfall in Gulf Shores, Alabama. Wind gusts up to 100 mph and 20-30 inches of rainfall caused considerable flood and wind damage across Alabama, the Florida panhandle and into Georgia. Many homes and businesses in downtown Pensacola, FL were impacted from flooding produced by storm surge and heavy rainfall. 2020 is now the fourth consecutive year (2017-2020) that the U.S. has been impacted by a slow moving tropical cyclone that produced extreme rainfall and damaging floods - Harvey, Florence, Imelda and Sally." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Consistent with the Utility’s GRC application, the settlement agreement did not propose funding for claims resulting from the 2017 Northern California wildfires or the 2018 Camp fire. Also, the Utility did not seek recovery of compensation for PG&E Corporation’s and the Utility’s officers. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Sally (September 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
57,252	20072006(In Millions)Asset Retirement Obligation- recovery dependent upon timing of decommissioning(Note 9) (c)$11.9$11.3Removal costs- recovered through depreciation rates (Note 9) (c)-3.8Depreciation re-direct(c)-79.1DOE Decom. and Decontamination Fees- recovered through fuel rates until December2007 (Note 9)-0.8Gas hedging costs- recovered through fuel rates3.518.7Jurisdictional separation transition costs- recovery timing will be determined by theLPSC4.1-Pension & postretirement costs(Note 11 -Qualified Pension PlansandNon-QualifiedPension Plans) (c)19.470.3Provision for storm damages, including Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita costs-recovered through securitization, insurance proceeds (Note 2 -Storm Cost RecoveryFilings with Retail Regulators), and through retail rates (a)202.7570.4Transition to competition- recovered through February 2021 (Note 2)-117.8Deferred capacity- recovery timing will be determined by the LPSC in the formula rateplan filings (Note 2 -Retail Rate Proceedings- Filings with the LPSC)6.913.2River Bend AFUDC- recovered through August 2025 (Note 1 -River Bend AFUDC)31.833.7Spindletop gas storage facility- recovered through December 2032 (b) (d)37.439.0Unamortized loss on reacquired debt- recovered over term of debt15.537.4Other2.75.5Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Total$335.9$1,001.0	Western Central and Northeast Severe Weather (January 2008)	Strong storm produces severe weather including hail, high winds and heavy precipitation from California to New York. Flash floods and landslides cause damage in California. In addition, more than 70 tornadoes were reported from Arkansas to Wisconsin, with the highest concentration of tornadoes in Missouri.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] 20072006(In Millions)Asset Retirement Obligation- recovery dependent upon timing of decommissioning(Note 9) (c)$11.9$11.3Removal costs- recovered through depreciation rates (Note 9) (c)-3.8Depreciation re-direct(c)-79.1DOE Decom. and Decontamination Fees- recovered through fuel rates until December2007 (Note 9)-0.8Gas hedging costs- recovered through fuel rates3.518.7Jurisdictional separation transition costs- recovery timing will be determined by theLPSC4.1-Pension & postretirement costs(Note 11 -Qualified Pension PlansandNon-QualifiedPension Plans) (c)19.470.3Provision for storm damages, including Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita costs-recovered through securitization, insurance proceeds (Note 2 -Storm Cost RecoveryFilings with Retail Regulators), and through retail rates (a)202.7570.4Transition to competition- recovered through February 2021 (Note 2)-117.8Deferred capacity- recovery timing will be determined by the LPSC in the formula rateplan filings (Note 2 -Retail Rate Proceedings- Filings with the LPSC)6.913.2River Bend AFUDC- recovered through August 2025 (Note 1 -River Bend AFUDC)31.833.7Spindletop gas storage facility- recovered through December 2032 (b) (d)37.439.0Unamortized loss on reacquired debt- recovered over term of debt15.537.4Other2.75.5Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Total$335.9$1,001.0 [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Western Central and Northeast Severe Weather (January 2008)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Strong storm produces severe weather including hail, high winds and heavy precipitation from California to New York. Flash floods and landslides cause damage in California. In addition, more than 70 tornadoes were reported from Arkansas to Wisconsin, with the highest concentration of tornadoes in Missouri." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] 20072006(In Millions)Asset Retirement Obligation- recovery dependent upon timing of decommissioning(Note 9) (c)$11.9$11.3Removal costs- recovered through depreciation rates (Note 9) (c)-3.8Depreciation re-direct(c)-79.1DOE Decom. and Decontamination Fees- recovered through fuel rates until December2007 (Note 9)-0.8Gas hedging costs- recovered through fuel rates3.518.7Jurisdictional separation transition costs- recovery timing will be determined by theLPSC4.1-Pension & postretirement costs(Note 11 -Qualified Pension PlansandNon-QualifiedPension Plans) (c)19.470.3Provision for storm damages, including Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita costs-recovered through securitization, insurance proceeds (Note 2 -Storm Cost RecoveryFilings with Retail Regulators), and through retail rates (a)202.7570.4Transition to competition- recovered through February 2021 (Note 2)-117.8Deferred capacity- recovery timing will be determined by the LPSC in the formula rateplan filings (Note 2 -Retail Rate Proceedings- Filings with the LPSC)6.913.2River Bend AFUDC- recovered through August 2025 (Note 1 -River Bend AFUDC)31.833.7Spindletop gas storage facility- recovered through December 2032 (b) (d)37.439.0Unamortized loss on reacquired debt- recovered over term of debt15.537.4Other2.75.5Entergy Gulf States Louisiana Total$335.9$1,001.0 [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Central and Northeast Severe Weather (January 2008)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
702,957	Operating revenues increased $967 million year over year due primarily to an increase in the fuel rate from 2010 to 2011 resulting in a $1.3 billion impact. The main driver behind the increase in the fuel rate was the unusually low rate in 2010 which resulted from the liquidation of the fuel cost adjustment liability. This fuel cost adjustment liability was the product of over collection of fuel costs in 2009 through the fuel cost adjustment formula. Prior to October 2009 the fuel cost adjustment formula was updated quarterly resulting in the potential for larger positive and negative swings. Starting in 2010 the TVA Board revised the operation of this formula so that it was updated monthly and the TVA Board also approved the liquidation of the remaining liability through rates charged to rate payers over the nine-month period from October 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010, thereby decreasing the fuel rate charged to customers for that period. If not for this decrease to the fuel rate, 2010 revenues would have been $822 million higher. Fuel rates also increased in 2011 as a result of the recovery of a $300 million increase in purchased power with approximately $95 million of this increase resulting from the issues related to the April 2011 storms and the remaining increase relating to TVA's decision to purchase lower-cost power as opposed to running its higher cost peaking units. Finally, fuel rates increased year over year by approximately $180 million as a result of an increase in average fuel cost per kWh of net thermal generation of approximately 10 percent.	Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)	Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Operating revenues increased $967 million year over year due primarily to an increase in the fuel rate from 2010 to 2011 resulting in a $1.3 billion impact. The main driver behind the increase in the fuel rate was the unusually low rate in 2010 which resulted from the liquidation of the fuel cost adjustment liability. This fuel cost adjustment liability was the product of over collection of fuel costs in 2009 through the fuel cost adjustment formula. Prior to October 2009 the fuel cost adjustment formula was updated quarterly resulting in the potential for larger positive and negative swings. Starting in 2010 the TVA Board revised the operation of this formula so that it was updated monthly and the TVA Board also approved the liquidation of the remaining liability through rates charged to rate payers over the nine-month period from October 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010, thereby decreasing the fuel rate charged to customers for that period. If not for this decrease to the fuel rate, 2010 revenues would have been $822 million higher. Fuel rates also increased in 2011 as a result of the recovery of a $300 million increase in purchased power with approximately $95 million of this increase resulting from the issues related to the April 2011 storms and the remaining increase relating to TVA's decision to purchase lower-cost power as opposed to running its higher cost peaking units. Finally, fuel rates increased year over year by approximately $180 million as a result of an increase in average fuel cost per kWh of net thermal generation of approximately 10 percent. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Operating revenues increased $967 million year over year due primarily to an increase in the fuel rate from 2010 to 2011 resulting in a $1.3 billion impact. The main driver behind the increase in the fuel rate was the unusually low rate in 2010 which resulted from the liquidation of the fuel cost adjustment liability. This fuel cost adjustment liability was the product of over collection of fuel costs in 2009 through the fuel cost adjustment formula. Prior to October 2009 the fuel cost adjustment formula was updated quarterly resulting in the potential for larger positive and negative swings. Starting in 2010 the TVA Board revised the operation of this formula so that it was updated monthly and the TVA Board also approved the liquidation of the remaining liability through rates charged to rate payers over the nine-month period from October 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010, thereby decreasing the fuel rate charged to customers for that period. If not for this decrease to the fuel rate, 2010 revenues would have been $822 million higher. Fuel rates also increased in 2011 as a result of the recovery of a $300 million increase in purchased power with approximately $95 million of this increase resulting from the issues related to the April 2011 storms and the remaining increase relating to TVA's decision to purchase lower-cost power as opposed to running its higher cost peaking units. Finally, fuel rates increased year over year by approximately $180 million as a result of an increase in average fuel cost per kWh of net thermal generation of approximately 10 percent. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
21,871	Exhibit IndexExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release dated September 6, 2005, providing an update on its two Louisiana Inland Barge facilities following Hurricane Katrina.	Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)	Category 3 hurricane initially impacts the U.S. as a Category 1 near Miami, FL, then as a strong Category 3 along the eastern LA-western MS coastlines, resulting in severe storm surge damage (maximum surge probably exceeded 30 feet) along the LA-MS-AL coasts, wind damage, and the failure of parts of the levee system in New Orleans. Inland effects included high winds and some flooding in the states of AL, MS, FL, TN, KY, IN, OH, and GA.	Yes	Yes	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Exhibit IndexExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release dated September 6, 2005, providing an update on its two Louisiana Inland Barge facilities following Hurricane Katrina. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane initially impacts the U.S. as a Category 1 near Miami, FL, then as a strong Category 3 along the eastern LA-western MS coastlines, resulting in severe storm surge damage (maximum surge probably exceeded 30 feet) along the LA-MS-AL coasts, wind damage, and the failure of parts of the levee system in New Orleans. Inland effects included high winds and some flooding in the states of AL, MS, FL, TN, KY, IN, OH, and GA." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Exhibit IndexExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release dated September 6, 2005, providing an update on its two Louisiana Inland Barge facilities following Hurricane Katrina. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
488,933	The impact of weather and other natural events on our operations.	Central Severe Weather (June 2023)	Severe storms caused damage across numerous Central states. The state most impacted were Missouri, Illinois and Indiana while there were also damage in many surrounding states. The damage to many homes, vehicles, businesses and agriculture assets was largely from high wind and damaging hail but there were also scattered tornado impacts.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The impact of weather and other natural events on our operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Weather (June 2023)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms caused damage across numerous Central states. The state most impacted were Missouri, Illinois and Indiana while there were also damage in many surrounding states. The damage to many homes, vehicles, businesses and agriculture assets was largely from high wind and damaging hail but there were also scattered tornado impacts." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The impact of weather and other natural events on our operations. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Weather (June 2023)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
61,982	UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934September 28, 2006Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)STONE ENERGY CORPORATION(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)Delaware1-1207472-1235413(State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation)(Commission FileNumber)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)625 E. Kaliste Saloom RoadLafayette, Louisiana70508(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (337) 237-0410Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e 4(c))TABLE OF CONTENTSItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXPress ReleaseTable of ContentsItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.On September 28, 2006, we issued a press release announcing the restoration of production at the Mississippi Canyon 109 Amberjack Platform following repairs and rerouting of the oil pipeline damaged during Hurricane Katrina in August 2005.	Central Severe Weather (October 2006)	Severe storms cause high wind and hail damage across numerous states including OH, IL, IN, MI, MN and WI.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934September 28, 2006Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)STONE ENERGY CORPORATION(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)Delaware1-1207472-1235413(State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation)(Commission FileNumber)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)625 E. Kaliste Saloom RoadLafayette, Louisiana70508(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (337) 237-0410Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e 4(c))TABLE OF CONTENTSItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXPress ReleaseTable of ContentsItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.On September 28, 2006, we issued a press release announcing the restoration of production at the Mississippi Canyon 109 Amberjack Platform following repairs and rerouting of the oil pipeline damaged during Hurricane Katrina in August 2005. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Weather (October 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms cause high wind and hail damage across numerous states including OH, IL, IN, MI, MN and WI." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934September 28, 2006Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)STONE ENERGY CORPORATION(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)Delaware1-1207472-1235413(State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation)(Commission FileNumber)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)625 E. Kaliste Saloom RoadLafayette, Louisiana70508(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (337) 237-0410Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e 4(c))TABLE OF CONTENTSItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXPress ReleaseTable of ContentsItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.On September 28, 2006, we issued a press release announcing the restoration of production at the Mississippi Canyon 109 Amberjack Platform following repairs and rerouting of the oil pipeline damaged during Hurricane Katrina in August 2005. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Weather (October 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
46,385	WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, INCREASED COSTS DRIVE MIDDLESEX	Spring Freeze (April 2007)	Widespread severe freeze over much of the east and midwest (AL, AR, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MO, MS, NC, NE, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WV), causing significant losses in fruit crops, field crops (especially wheat), and the ornamental industry. Temperatures in the teens/20s accompanied by rather high winds nullified typical crop-protection systems.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, INCREASED COSTS DRIVE MIDDLESEX [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Spring Freeze (April 2007)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Widespread severe freeze over much of the east and midwest (AL, AR, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MO, MS, NC, NE, OH, OK, SC, TN, VA, WV), causing significant losses in fruit crops, field crops (especially wheat), and the ornamental industry. Temperatures in the teens/20s accompanied by rather high winds nullified typical crop-protection systems." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, INCREASED COSTS DRIVE MIDDLESEX [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Spring Freeze (April 2007)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
43,468	ITEM 8.01 Other Events.White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (“White Mountains”) today announced that, following receipt of new claims information, its Folksamerica Reinsurance Company subsidiary (“Folksamerica”) has increased its gross loss estimates for hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma (“KRW”) by $203 million (net of reinstatement premiums). In taking this action, Folksamerica has set its reserves for offshore energy and marine exposures for hurricanes Katrina and Rita at full policy limits and has also increased reserves on other exposures affected by KRW.Under the terms of Folksamerica’s quota share reinsurance treaty from 2005 with Olympus Reinsurance Company (“Olympus”), $143 million of the loss is ceded to Olympus. Without other action, this cession would exhaust the bulk of Olympus’ capital. However, White Mountains is in advanced discussions with Olympus and its two largest shareholders regarding an arrangement to reimburse Olympus for up to $137 million of the ceded losses. In addition, White Mountains would waive override commissions due from Olympus after March 31, 2006 for reinsurance contracts with an effective date of December 31, 2005 and prior. White Mountains expects the commission waivers would total approximately $8 million.After giving effect to the reimbursement, Olympus’ capital would be approximately $140 million, which is roughly in line with its level prior to this adverse development. Olympus would continue to receive cessions from Folksamerica under the quota share agreement as revised at the beginning of 2006 and would continue to be responsible to Folksamerica for losses on exposures that have been ceded to it. In addition, Olympus and its two largest shareholders would agree, at Folksamerica’s option, to continue the quota share treaty with Folksamerica through the end of 2007.If this arrangement is consummated, the total effect on White Mountains in the second quarter of 2006 from the adverse development and the arrangement would be $197 million pre-tax ($128 million after tax or $12 per common share). If the arrangement is not consummated, the second quarter effect on White Mountains would be reduced, but due to Olympus’ financial position, in the future Folksamerica would not expect to be able to recover significant amounts (beyond amounts capitalized) arising from losses on exposures that have been ceded to Olympus.ITEM 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)Exhibits. The following exhibit is furnished herewith:EXHIBIT INDEX99.1Press Release of White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. dated June 16, 2006.SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.DATED: June 16, 2006By:/s/ J. BRIAN PALMERJ. Brian PalmerChief Accounting Officer	Northeast Flooding (June 2006)	Severe flooding over portions of the northeast due to several weeks of heavy rainfall, affecting the states of NY, PA, DE, MD, NJ, and VA.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ITEM 8.01 Other Events.White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (“White Mountains”) today announced that, following receipt of new claims information, its Folksamerica Reinsurance Company subsidiary (“Folksamerica”) has increased its gross loss estimates for hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma (“KRW”) by $203 million (net of reinstatement premiums). In taking this action, Folksamerica has set its reserves for offshore energy and marine exposures for hurricanes Katrina and Rita at full policy limits and has also increased reserves on other exposures affected by KRW.Under the terms of Folksamerica’s quota share reinsurance treaty from 2005 with Olympus Reinsurance Company (“Olympus”), $143 million of the loss is ceded to Olympus. Without other action, this cession would exhaust the bulk of Olympus’ capital. However, White Mountains is in advanced discussions with Olympus and its two largest shareholders regarding an arrangement to reimburse Olympus for up to $137 million of the ceded losses. In addition, White Mountains would waive override commissions due from Olympus after March 31, 2006 for reinsurance contracts with an effective date of December 31, 2005 and prior. White Mountains expects the commission waivers would total approximately $8 million.After giving effect to the reimbursement, Olympus’ capital would be approximately $140 million, which is roughly in line with its level prior to this adverse development. Olympus would continue to receive cessions from Folksamerica under the quota share agreement as revised at the beginning of 2006 and would continue to be responsible to Folksamerica for losses on exposures that have been ceded to it. In addition, Olympus and its two largest shareholders would agree, at Folksamerica’s option, to continue the quota share treaty with Folksamerica through the end of 2007.If this arrangement is consummated, the total effect on White Mountains in the second quarter of 2006 from the adverse development and the arrangement would be $197 million pre-tax ($128 million after tax or $12 per common share). If the arrangement is not consummated, the second quarter effect on White Mountains would be reduced, but due to Olympus’ financial position, in the future Folksamerica would not expect to be able to recover significant amounts (beyond amounts capitalized) arising from losses on exposures that have been ceded to Olympus.ITEM 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)Exhibits. The following exhibit is furnished herewith:EXHIBIT INDEX99.1Press Release of White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. dated June 16, 2006.SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.DATED: June 16, 2006By:/s/ J. BRIAN PALMERJ. Brian PalmerChief Accounting Officer [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Northeast Flooding (June 2006)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe flooding over portions of the northeast due to several weeks of heavy rainfall, affecting the states of NY, PA, DE, MD, NJ, and VA." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ITEM 8.01 Other Events.White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (“White Mountains”) today announced that, following receipt of new claims information, its Folksamerica Reinsurance Company subsidiary (“Folksamerica”) has increased its gross loss estimates for hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma (“KRW”) by $203 million (net of reinstatement premiums). In taking this action, Folksamerica has set its reserves for offshore energy and marine exposures for hurricanes Katrina and Rita at full policy limits and has also increased reserves on other exposures affected by KRW.Under the terms of Folksamerica’s quota share reinsurance treaty from 2005 with Olympus Reinsurance Company (“Olympus”), $143 million of the loss is ceded to Olympus. Without other action, this cession would exhaust the bulk of Olympus’ capital. However, White Mountains is in advanced discussions with Olympus and its two largest shareholders regarding an arrangement to reimburse Olympus for up to $137 million of the ceded losses. In addition, White Mountains would waive override commissions due from Olympus after March 31, 2006 for reinsurance contracts with an effective date of December 31, 2005 and prior. White Mountains expects the commission waivers would total approximately $8 million.After giving effect to the reimbursement, Olympus’ capital would be approximately $140 million, which is roughly in line with its level prior to this adverse development. Olympus would continue to receive cessions from Folksamerica under the quota share agreement as revised at the beginning of 2006 and would continue to be responsible to Folksamerica for losses on exposures that have been ceded to it. In addition, Olympus and its two largest shareholders would agree, at Folksamerica’s option, to continue the quota share treaty with Folksamerica through the end of 2007.If this arrangement is consummated, the total effect on White Mountains in the second quarter of 2006 from the adverse development and the arrangement would be $197 million pre-tax ($128 million after tax or $12 per common share). If the arrangement is not consummated, the second quarter effect on White Mountains would be reduced, but due to Olympus’ financial position, in the future Folksamerica would not expect to be able to recover significant amounts (beyond amounts capitalized) arising from losses on exposures that have been ceded to Olympus.ITEM 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)Exhibits. The following exhibit is furnished herewith:EXHIBIT INDEX99.1Press Release of White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. dated June 16, 2006.SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.DATED: June 16, 2006By:/s/ J. BRIAN PALMERJ. Brian PalmerChief Accounting Officer [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Northeast Flooding (June 2006)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,036,100	The increase in Seating was due to higher volumes to the Company's major OEM customers ($407 million), incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($89 million), favorable sales mix ($75 million), and the fiscal 2012 negative impact of the flooding in Thailand and related events ($25 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($147 million) and lower volumes due to a business divestiture ($18 million).	Rockies/Plains Severe Weather (September 2014)	Severe storms across the Rockies and Plains states (CO, KS, TX). Large hail and high winds created significant damage across eastern Colorado and Texas, particularly in the Dallas metro area.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The increase in Seating was due to higher volumes to the Company's major OEM customers ($407 million), incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($89 million), favorable sales mix ($75 million), and the fiscal 2012 negative impact of the flooding in Thailand and related events ($25 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($147 million) and lower volumes due to a business divestiture ($18 million). [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Rockies/Plains Severe Weather (September 2014)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across the Rockies and Plains states (CO, KS, TX). Large hail and high winds created significant damage across eastern Colorado and Texas, particularly in the Dallas metro area." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The increase in Seating was due to higher volumes to the Company's major OEM customers ($407 million), incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($89 million), favorable sales mix ($75 million), and the fiscal 2012 negative impact of the flooding in Thailand and related events ($25 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($147 million) and lower volumes due to a business divestiture ($18 million). [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Rockies/Plains Severe Weather (September 2014)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
561,331	ed volatility experienced throughout 2020 as commodity prices increased and activity has returned to our acreage. There are currently 27 gross rigs operating on our mineral and royalty acreage, four of which are operated by Diamondback. Our production and free cash flow outlook is expected to be driven by Diamondback’s continued focus on developing our acreage, as well as our exposure to other well-capitalized operators in the Permian Basin. We expect that the production impact from the recent winter storms in the Permian Basin will be in the range of four to five days of total net production lost during February 2021 for Diamondback operated properties, with a slightly higher negative impact expected for third party operated properties.	Northwest Central Eastern Winter Storm and Cold Wave (February 2021)	Historic cold wave and winter storm impacts many northwest, central and eastern states. Temperature departures exceeding 40.0 degrees F (22.2 degrees C) below normal occurred from Nebraska southward to Texas. The prolonged arctic air caused widespread power outages in Texas, as well as other southern states, with multiple days of sustained below-freezing temperatures. At the peak of the outage, nearly 10 million people were without power. Additional impacts were frozen water pipes, which burst upon thawing causing water damage to buildings. These extreme conditions also caused or contributed to the direct and indirect deaths of more than 210 people in Texas alone. This count does not include excess mortality that may be hundreds of additional deaths. There were also snow and ice impacts across numerous states including Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Colorado, Oregon and Washington. This is now the costliest U.S. winter storm event on record, more than doubling the inflation-adjusted cost of the 'Storm of the Century' that occurred in March 1993.	Yes	Yes	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ed volatility experienced throughout 2020 as commodity prices increased and activity has returned to our acreage. There are currently 27 gross rigs operating on our mineral and royalty acreage, four of which are operated by Diamondback. Our production and free cash flow outlook is expected to be driven by Diamondback’s continued focus on developing our acreage, as well as our exposure to other well-capitalized operators in the Permian Basin. We expect that the production impact from the recent winter storms in the Permian Basin will be in the range of four to five days of total net production lost during February 2021 for Diamondback operated properties, with a slightly higher negative impact expected for third party operated properties. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Northwest Central Eastern Winter Storm and Cold Wave (February 2021)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Historic cold wave and winter storm impacts many northwest, central and eastern states. Temperature departures exceeding 40.0 degrees F (22.2 degrees C) below normal occurred from Nebraska southward to Texas. The prolonged arctic air caused widespread power outages in Texas, as well as other southern states, with multiple days of sustained below-freezing temperatures. At the peak of the outage, nearly 10 million people were without power. Additional impacts were frozen water pipes, which burst upon thawing causing water damage to buildings. These extreme conditions also caused or contributed to the direct and indirect deaths of more than 210 people in Texas alone. This count does not include excess mortality that may be hundreds of additional deaths. There were also snow and ice impacts across numerous states including Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Colorado, Oregon and Washington. This is now the costliest U.S. winter storm event on record, more than doubling the inflation-adjusted cost of the 'Storm of the Century' that occurred in March 1993." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] ed volatility experienced throughout 2020 as commodity prices increased and activity has returned to our acreage. There are currently 27 gross rigs operating on our mineral and royalty acreage, four of which are operated by Diamondback. Our production and free cash flow outlook is expected to be driven by Diamondback’s continued focus on developing our acreage, as well as our exposure to other well-capitalized operators in the Permian Basin. We expect that the production impact from the recent winter storms in the Permian Basin will be in the range of four to five days of total net production lost during February 2021 for Diamondback operated properties, with a slightly higher negative impact expected for third party operated properties. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Northwest Central Eastern Winter Storm and Cold Wave (February 2021)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
7,872	On October 15, 2020, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing estimated weather-related losses for its quarter ended September 30, 2020. A copy of the press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1.	Hurricane Hanna (July 2020)	Category 1 Hurricane Hanna made landfall at Padre Island, Texas on July 25 with sustained winds of 90 miles per hour. The impacts from wind, wave action and flooding were most notable in damaging coastal infrastructure and to the agriculture sector. The crop damage was most focused across the Rio Grande Valley in southern Texas.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On October 15, 2020, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing estimated weather-related losses for its quarter ended September 30, 2020. A copy of the press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Hurricane Hanna (July 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 1 Hurricane Hanna made landfall at Padre Island, Texas on July 25 with sustained winds of 90 miles per hour. The impacts from wind, wave action and flooding were most notable in damaging coastal infrastructure and to the agriculture sector. The crop damage was most focused across the Rio Grande Valley in southern Texas." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] On October 15, 2020, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing estimated weather-related losses for its quarter ended September 30, 2020. A copy of the press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Hanna (July 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
57,267	The Company began generating operating revenue in January 2006. The Company had not yet started full operation of the expressway prior to June 2006, therefore the operating income was at a low level and the growth was moderate. With the full operation of the Expressway in June 2006, the operating income had seen sustained rapid growth. With respect to profit, as the loan interest of the Company was included in the expenses, and the depreciation of fixed assets was accounted in the current period, the Company incurred a temporary loss in June. But with the increase of revenue, the Company has generated a profit and has achieved sustained increases in profit for the past several months. Income in December was the same as in November on the whole, because of the seasonal winter impact on the traffic flow in December.	Southeast Tornadoes and Severe Weather (February 2008)	Series of tornadoes and severe thunderstorms across the Southeast and Midwest states (AL, AR, IN, KY, MS, OH, TN, TX) with 87 tornadoes confirmed.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Company began generating operating revenue in January 2006. The Company had not yet started full operation of the expressway prior to June 2006, therefore the operating income was at a low level and the growth was moderate. With the full operation of the Expressway in June 2006, the operating income had seen sustained rapid growth. With respect to profit, as the loan interest of the Company was included in the expenses, and the depreciation of fixed assets was accounted in the current period, the Company incurred a temporary loss in June. But with the increase of revenue, the Company has generated a profit and has achieved sustained increases in profit for the past several months. Income in December was the same as in November on the whole, because of the seasonal winter impact on the traffic flow in December. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Southeast Tornadoes and Severe Weather (February 2008)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Series of tornadoes and severe thunderstorms across the Southeast and Midwest states (AL, AR, IN, KY, MS, OH, TN, TX) with 87 tornadoes confirmed." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] The Company began generating operating revenue in January 2006. The Company had not yet started full operation of the expressway prior to June 2006, therefore the operating income was at a low level and the growth was moderate. With the full operation of the Expressway in June 2006, the operating income had seen sustained rapid growth. With respect to profit, as the loan interest of the Company was included in the expenses, and the depreciation of fixed assets was accounted in the current period, the Company incurred a temporary loss in June. But with the increase of revenue, the Company has generated a profit and has achieved sustained increases in profit for the past several months. Income in December was the same as in November on the whole, because of the seasonal winter impact on the traffic flow in December. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southeast Tornadoes and Severe Weather (February 2008)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
298,027	Insurance proceeds related to hurricane damage	South East and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2020)	Severe weather across many South, East and Northeastern states including AL, FL, GA, SC, LA, MS, TN, NC, VA, PA, RI, NY, NJ, MD and MA. There were more than 20 tornadoes clustered across central Mississippi into Tennessee. There were also hundreds of high wind damage reports from Florida to New Jersey, with the Carolinas and Florida receiving the most costly damage.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Insurance proceeds related to hurricane damage [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South East and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather across many South, East and Northeastern states including AL, FL, GA, SC, LA, MS, TN, NC, VA, PA, RI, NY, NJ, MD and MA. There were more than 20 tornadoes clustered across central Mississippi into Tennessee. There were also hundreds of high wind damage reports from Florida to New Jersey, with the Carolinas and Florida receiving the most costly damage." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Insurance proceeds related to hurricane damage [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South East and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
602,384	As a result of our cost structure and strategy of vertical integration, we conduct our operations at large, high volume, purpose-built facilities in California and throughout Asia. The concentration of Flash Ventures in Yokkaichi, Japan, magnifies the risks of supply disruption. The facilities of many of our customers, our suppliers and our customers’ suppliers are also concentrated in certain geographic locations throughout Asia and elsewhere. A localized health risk affecting our employees at these facilities or the staff of our or our customers’ other suppliers, such as the spread of a pandemic influenza, could impair the total volume of our products that we are able to manufacture or sell, which would result in substantial harm to our operating results. Similarly, a fire, flood, earthquake, tsunami or other natural disaster, condition or event such as political instability, civil unrest or a power outage that adversely affects any of these facilities, including access to or from these facilities by employees or logistics operators, would significantly affect our ability to manufacture or sell our products, which would result in a substantial loss of sales and revenue and a substantial harm to our operating results. For example, prior to the 2011 flooding in Thailand, all of WD's internal slider capacity and 60% of WD's hard drive manufacturing capacity was in Thailand. As a result of the flooding in Thailand, WD's facilities were inundated and temporarily shut down. During that period, WD's ability to manufacture hard drives was significantly constrained, adversely affecting WD's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the concentration of our manufacturing sites could exacerbate the negative impacts resulting from localized labor unrest or other employment issues. A significant event that impacts any of our manufacturing sites, or the sites of our customers or suppliers, could adversely affect our ability to manufacture or sell our products, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.	Plains Tornadoes and Central Severe Weather (May 2016)	Tornadoes and severe storms cause widespread damage across the Plains and Central states (NE, MO, TX, OK, KS, CO, IL, KY, TN) over a multi-day period. The damage from tornadoes and high wind was most costly in Nebraska and Missouri.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] As a result of our cost structure and strategy of vertical integration, we conduct our operations at large, high volume, purpose-built facilities in California and throughout Asia. The concentration of Flash Ventures in Yokkaichi, Japan, magnifies the risks of supply disruption. The facilities of many of our customers, our suppliers and our customers’ suppliers are also concentrated in certain geographic locations throughout Asia and elsewhere. A localized health risk affecting our employees at these facilities or the staff of our or our customers’ other suppliers, such as the spread of a pandemic influenza, could impair the total volume of our products that we are able to manufacture or sell, which would result in substantial harm to our operating results. Similarly, a fire, flood, earthquake, tsunami or other natural disaster, condition or event such as political instability, civil unrest or a power outage that adversely affects any of these facilities, including access to or from these facilities by employees or logistics operators, would significantly affect our ability to manufacture or sell our products, which would result in a substantial loss of sales and revenue and a substantial harm to our operating results. For example, prior to the 2011 flooding in Thailand, all of WD's internal slider capacity and 60% of WD's hard drive manufacturing capacity was in Thailand. As a result of the flooding in Thailand, WD's facilities were inundated and temporarily shut down. During that period, WD's ability to manufacture hard drives was significantly constrained, adversely affecting WD's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the concentration of our manufacturing sites could exacerbate the negative impacts resulting from localized labor unrest or other employment issues. A significant event that impacts any of our manufacturing sites, or the sites of our customers or suppliers, could adversely affect our ability to manufacture or sell our products, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Plains Tornadoes and Central Severe Weather (May 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornadoes and severe storms cause widespread damage across the Plains and Central states (NE, MO, TX, OK, KS, CO, IL, KY, TN) over a multi-day period. The damage from tornadoes and high wind was most costly in Nebraska and Missouri." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] As a result of our cost structure and strategy of vertical integration, we conduct our operations at large, high volume, purpose-built facilities in California and throughout Asia. The concentration of Flash Ventures in Yokkaichi, Japan, magnifies the risks of supply disruption. The facilities of many of our customers, our suppliers and our customers’ suppliers are also concentrated in certain geographic locations throughout Asia and elsewhere. A localized health risk affecting our employees at these facilities or the staff of our or our customers’ other suppliers, such as the spread of a pandemic influenza, could impair the total volume of our products that we are able to manufacture or sell, which would result in substantial harm to our operating results. Similarly, a fire, flood, earthquake, tsunami or other natural disaster, condition or event such as political instability, civil unrest or a power outage that adversely affects any of these facilities, including access to or from these facilities by employees or logistics operators, would significantly affect our ability to manufacture or sell our products, which would result in a substantial loss of sales and revenue and a substantial harm to our operating results. For example, prior to the 2011 flooding in Thailand, all of WD's internal slider capacity and 60% of WD's hard drive manufacturing capacity was in Thailand. As a result of the flooding in Thailand, WD's facilities were inundated and temporarily shut down. During that period, WD's ability to manufacture hard drives was significantly constrained, adversely affecting WD's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the concentration of our manufacturing sites could exacerbate the negative impacts resulting from localized labor unrest or other employment issues. A significant event that impacts any of our manufacturing sites, or the sites of our customers or suppliers, could adversely affect our ability to manufacture or sell our products, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Plains Tornadoes and Central Severe Weather (May 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
6,367	. We present diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for our fourth quarter and 2020 fiscal year and the corresponding prior periods, after eliminating items that we believe are not part of our ordinary operations and affect the comparability of the periods presented (“adjusted EPS”). Adjusted EPS includes adjustments for purchase accounting adjustments, integration and restructuring costs, divestiture-related gains, certain product recall, legal defense and remediation costs, the impact of the extinguishment of debt, certain regulatory costs, certain asset impairments and hurricane insurance recoveries. We believe adjustments for these items allow investors to better understand the underlying operating results of BD and facilitate comparisons between the periods shown. We also show the growth in adjusted EPS compared to the prior year period after eliminating the impact of foreign currency translation to further enable investors to evaluate BD’s underlying earnings performance compared to the prior period. Details regarding these adjustments can be found in the schedules included in the press release furnished as Exhibit 99.1.	Central Severe Weather - Derecho (August 2020)	A powerful derecho traveled from southeast South Dakota to Ohio, a path of 770 miles in 14 hours producing widespread winds greater than 100 mph. The states most affected included Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana and Ohio. This derecho caused widespread damage to millions of acres of corn and soybean crops across central Iowa. There was also severe damage to homes, businesses and vehicles particularly in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In addition, there were 15 tornadoes across northeastern Illinois several affecting the Chicago metropolitan area. This is the third severe weather event (since 1980) with inflation-adjusted costs over $10.0 ($12.1) billion joining the late-April and May 2011 tornado outbreaks across the Southeastern and Central states, respectively.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] . We present diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for our fourth quarter and 2020 fiscal year and the corresponding prior periods, after eliminating items that we believe are not part of our ordinary operations and affect the comparability of the periods presented (“adjusted EPS”). Adjusted EPS includes adjustments for purchase accounting adjustments, integration and restructuring costs, divestiture-related gains, certain product recall, legal defense and remediation costs, the impact of the extinguishment of debt, certain regulatory costs, certain asset impairments and hurricane insurance recoveries. We believe adjustments for these items allow investors to better understand the underlying operating results of BD and facilitate comparisons between the periods shown. We also show the growth in adjusted EPS compared to the prior year period after eliminating the impact of foreign currency translation to further enable investors to evaluate BD’s underlying earnings performance compared to the prior period. Details regarding these adjustments can be found in the schedules included in the press release furnished as Exhibit 99.1. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Central Severe Weather - Derecho (August 2020)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A powerful derecho traveled from southeast South Dakota to Ohio, a path of 770 miles in 14 hours producing widespread winds greater than 100 mph. The states most affected included Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana and Ohio. This derecho caused widespread damage to millions of acres of corn and soybean crops across central Iowa. There was also severe damage to homes, businesses and vehicles particularly in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In addition, there were 15 tornadoes across northeastern Illinois several affecting the Chicago metropolitan area. This is the third severe weather event (since 1980) with inflation-adjusted costs over $10.0 ($12.1) billion joining the late-April and May 2011 tornado outbreaks across the Southeastern and Central states, respectively." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] . We present diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for our fourth quarter and 2020 fiscal year and the corresponding prior periods, after eliminating items that we believe are not part of our ordinary operations and affect the comparability of the periods presented (“adjusted EPS”). Adjusted EPS includes adjustments for purchase accounting adjustments, integration and restructuring costs, divestiture-related gains, certain product recall, legal defense and remediation costs, the impact of the extinguishment of debt, certain regulatory costs, certain asset impairments and hurricane insurance recoveries. We believe adjustments for these items allow investors to better understand the underlying operating results of BD and facilitate comparisons between the periods shown. We also show the growth in adjusted EPS compared to the prior year period after eliminating the impact of foreign currency translation to further enable investors to evaluate BD’s underlying earnings performance compared to the prior period. Details regarding these adjustments can be found in the schedules included in the press release furnished as Exhibit 99.1. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Weather - Derecho (August 2020)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,188,408	•An increase of $10 million in amortization of regulatory assets primarily related to recoverable AMI costs, major storm costs and rate case costs.	South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)	Severe weather produced tornadoes, large hail and high wind damage across numerous southern and southeastern states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. These storms caused widespread impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •An increase of $10 million in amortization of regulatory assets primarily related to recoverable AMI costs, major storm costs and rate case costs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather produced tornadoes, large hail and high wind damage across numerous southern and southeastern states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. These storms caused widespread impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •An increase of $10 million in amortization of regulatory assets primarily related to recoverable AMI costs, major storm costs and rate case costs. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
1,216,104	(b)Reflects an increase of $85 million in incremental storm costs, including the February 5, 2014 ice storm and the significant July 2014 storms.	South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)	Severe weather produced tornadoes, large hail and high wind damage across numerous southern and southeastern states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. These storms caused widespread impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] (b)Reflects an increase of $85 million in incremental storm costs, including the February 5, 2014 ice storm and the significant July 2014 storms. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather produced tornadoes, large hail and high wind damage across numerous southern and southeastern states including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. These storms caused widespread impacts to many homes, vehicles and businesses." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] (b)Reflects an increase of $85 million in incremental storm costs, including the February 5, 2014 ice storm and the significant July 2014 storms. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South and Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
23,991	In 2008, wholesale revenues increased $412 million primarily as a result of a 21.8% increase in the average cost of fuel per net KWH generated, as well as revenues resulting from new and existing PPAs and revenues derived from contracts for Southern Power’s Plant Oleander Unit 5 and Plant Franklin Unit 3 placed in operation in December 2007 and June 2008, respectively. The 2008 increase was partially offset by a decrease in short-term opportunity sales and weather-related generation load reductions.	Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)	Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA).	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In 2008, wholesale revenues increased $412 million primarily as a result of a 21.8% increase in the average cost of fuel per net KWH generated, as well as revenues resulting from new and existing PPAs and revenues derived from contracts for Southern Power’s Plant Oleander Unit 5 and Plant Franklin Unit 3 placed in operation in December 2007 and June 2008, respectively. The 2008 increase was partially offset by a decrease in short-term opportunity sales and weather-related generation load reductions. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA)." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] In 2008, wholesale revenues increased $412 million primarily as a result of a 21.8% increase in the average cost of fuel per net KWH generated, as well as revenues resulting from new and existing PPAs and revenues derived from contracts for Southern Power’s Plant Oleander Unit 5 and Plant Franklin Unit 3 placed in operation in December 2007 and June 2008, respectively. The 2008 increase was partially offset by a decrease in short-term opportunity sales and weather-related generation load reductions. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
266,450	Entergy Arkansas sought to overturn the APSC’s decision, but in December 2008 the Arkansas Court of Appeals upheld almost all aspects of the APSC decision. After considering the progress of the proceeding in light of the decision of the Court of Appeals, Entergy Arkansas recorded in the fourth quarter 2008 an approximately $70 million charge to earnings, on both a pre- and after-tax basis because these are primarily flow-through items, to recognize that the regulatory assets associated with the storm reserve costs, lease termination removal costs, and stock-based compensation were no longer probable of recovery. In April 2009 the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy Arkansas’s petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision.	Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)	An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Entergy Arkansas sought to overturn the APSC’s decision, but in December 2008 the Arkansas Court of Appeals upheld almost all aspects of the APSC decision. After considering the progress of the proceeding in light of the decision of the Court of Appeals, Entergy Arkansas recorded in the fourth quarter 2008 an approximately $70 million charge to earnings, on both a pre- and after-tax basis because these are primarily flow-through items, to recognize that the regulatory assets associated with the storm reserve costs, lease termination removal costs, and stock-based compensation were no longer probable of recovery. In April 2009 the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy Arkansas’s petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Entergy Arkansas sought to overturn the APSC’s decision, but in December 2008 the Arkansas Court of Appeals upheld almost all aspects of the APSC decision. After considering the progress of the proceeding in light of the decision of the Court of Appeals, Entergy Arkansas recorded in the fourth quarter 2008 an approximately $70 million charge to earnings, on both a pre- and after-tax basis because these are primarily flow-through items, to recognize that the regulatory assets associated with the storm reserve costs, lease termination removal costs, and stock-based compensation were no longer probable of recovery. In April 2009 the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy Arkansas’s petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
333,068	Exploration activities usually require the granting of permits from various governmental agencies. For example, exploration drilling on unpatented mining claims requires a permit to be obtained from the BLM, which may take several months or longer to grant the requested permit. Depending on the size, location and scope of the exploration program, additional permits may also be required before exploration activities can be undertaken. Prehistoric or Indian graves, threatened or endangered species, archeological sites or the possibility thereof, difficult access and excessive dust may all result in the need for additional permits before exploration activities can commence.	North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)	Widespread severe hail damage across north and central Texas including the cities of Plano, Wylie, Frisco, Allen and San Antonio. The damage in San Antonio was particularly severe as the National Weather Service verified reports of hail size reaching 4.5 inches in diameter. This ranks as one of the most costly hail events to affect the United States.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Exploration activities usually require the granting of permits from various governmental agencies. For example, exploration drilling on unpatented mining claims requires a permit to be obtained from the BLM, which may take several months or longer to grant the requested permit. Depending on the size, location and scope of the exploration program, additional permits may also be required before exploration activities can be undertaken. Prehistoric or Indian graves, threatened or endangered species, archeological sites or the possibility thereof, difficult access and excessive dust may all result in the need for additional permits before exploration activities can commence. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Widespread severe hail damage across north and central Texas including the cities of Plano, Wylie, Frisco, Allen and San Antonio. The damage in San Antonio was particularly severe as the National Weather Service verified reports of hail size reaching 4.5 inches in diameter. This ranks as one of the most costly hail events to affect the United States." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] Exploration activities usually require the granting of permits from various governmental agencies. For example, exploration drilling on unpatented mining claims requires a permit to be obtained from the BLM, which may take several months or longer to grant the requested permit. Depending on the size, location and scope of the exploration program, additional permits may also be required before exploration activities can be undertaken. Prehistoric or Indian graves, threatened or endangered species, archeological sites or the possibility thereof, difficult access and excessive dust may all result in the need for additional permits before exploration activities can commence. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
195,651	•$11 million of net favorable prior period reserve development on catastrophe business, primarily related to the 2009 and 2005 accident years. Development on the 2009 accident year was primarily driven by better than expected loss emergence, while the development on the 2005 accident year largely related to a reduction in our reserve for one particular claim following receipt of updated information. Partially offsetting this, we recognized net adverse development of $33 million on the 2008 accident year, largely related to updated information with respect to Hurricane Ike losses.	Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)	An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •$11 million of net favorable prior period reserve development on catastrophe business, primarily related to the 2009 and 2005 accident years. Development on the 2009 accident year was primarily driven by better than expected loss emergence, while the development on the 2005 accident year largely related to a reduction in our reserve for one particular claim following receipt of updated information. Partially offsetting this, we recognized net adverse development of $33 million on the 2008 accident year, largely related to updated information with respect to Hurricane Ike losses. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] •$11 million of net favorable prior period reserve development on catastrophe business, primarily related to the 2009 and 2005 accident years. Development on the 2009 accident year was primarily driven by better than expected loss emergence, while the development on the 2005 accident year largely related to a reduction in our reserve for one particular claim following receipt of updated information. Partially offsetting this, we recognized net adverse development of $33 million on the 2008 accident year, largely related to updated information with respect to Hurricane Ike losses. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
14,801	San Antonio, Texas 78249-3426	Midwest Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2008)	Outbreak of tornadoes over the Midwest/Ohio Valley regions (IL, IN, IA, KS, MN, NE, OK, WY, CO) with 235 tornadoes confirmed.	No	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] San Antonio, Texas 78249-3426 [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Midwest Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2008)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Outbreak of tornadoes over the Midwest/Ohio Valley regions (IL, IN, IA, KS, MN, NE, OK, WY, CO) with 235 tornadoes confirmed." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] San Antonio, Texas 78249-3426 [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2008)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:
581,919	As of December 31, 2016, the balance in the Company's regulatory asset related to storm damage was$206 million. During October 2016, Hurricane Matthew caused significant damage to the Company's transmission and distribution facilities.As of December 31, 2016, the Company had recorded incremental restoration cost related to this hurricane of$121 million, of which approximately$116 millionwas charged to the storm damage reserve and the remainder was capitalized. The Company is accruing$30 millionannually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, to the storm damage reserve to cover the operations and maintenance costs of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities, which is recoverable through base rates. The rate of recovery of storm damage costs after December 31, 2019 is expected to be adjusted in the Company's 2019 base rate case. As a result of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. See Note 1under "Storm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding the Company's storm damage reserve.	Plains Tornadoes and Central Severe Weather (May 2016)	Tornadoes and severe storms cause widespread damage across the Plains and Central states (NE, MO, TX, OK, KS, CO, IL, KY, TN) over a multi-day period. The damage from tornadoes and high wind was most costly in Nebraska and Missouri.	Yes	No	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT. Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] As of December 31, 2016, the balance in the Company's regulatory asset related to storm damage was$206 million. During October 2016, Hurricane Matthew caused significant damage to the Company's transmission and distribution facilities.As of December 31, 2016, the Company had recorded incremental restoration cost related to this hurricane of$121 million, of which approximately$116 millionwas charged to the storm damage reserve and the remainder was capitalized. The Company is accruing$30 millionannually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, to the storm damage reserve to cover the operations and maintenance costs of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities, which is recoverable through base rates. The rate of recovery of storm damage costs after December 31, 2019 is expected to be adjusted in the Company's 2019 base rate case. As a result of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. See Note 1under "Storm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding the Company's storm damage reserve. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:	You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT. EVENT: "Plains Tornadoes and Central Severe Weather (May 2016)" EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornadoes and severe storms cause widespread damage across the Plains and Central states (NE, MO, TX, OK, KS, CO, IL, KY, TN) over a multi-day period. The damage from tornadoes and high wind was most costly in Nebraska and Missouri." Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure: [begin of TEXT] As of December 31, 2016, the balance in the Company's regulatory asset related to storm damage was$206 million. During October 2016, Hurricane Matthew caused significant damage to the Company's transmission and distribution facilities.As of December 31, 2016, the Company had recorded incremental restoration cost related to this hurricane of$121 million, of which approximately$116 millionwas charged to the storm damage reserve and the remainder was capitalized. The Company is accruing$30 millionannually through December 31, 2019, as provided in the 2013 ARP, to the storm damage reserve to cover the operations and maintenance costs of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities, which is recoverable through base rates. The rate of recovery of storm damage costs after December 31, 2019 is expected to be adjusted in the Company's 2019 base rate case. As a result of this regulatory treatment, costs related to storms are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. See Note 1under "Storm Damage Recovery" for additional information regarding the Company's storm damage reserve. [end of TEXT] Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No": - Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Plains Tornadoes and Central Severe Weather (May 2016)"? Decision Guidelines: - A company is considered "exposed" only if: 1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied. 2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company. 3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions. - Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed". - Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed". - TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed". Output Format: Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No". Your Output:

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.