"""Unit tests for CRITIC."""

from unittest.mock import MagicMock

import pytest

from tavily import TavilyClient

from agential.agents.critic.agent import Critic
from agential.agents.critic.output import CriticOutput, CriticStepOutput
from agential.agents.critic.prompts import (
    CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
    CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_HOTPOTQA,
    CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_MBPP,
    CRITIC_CRITIQUE_NO_TOOL_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
    CRITIC_CRITIQUE_NO_TOOL_INSTRUCTION_HUMANEVAL,
    CRITIC_INSTRUCTION_HOTPOTQA,
    CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
    CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_HUMANEVAL,
    CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_MBPP,
    GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
    GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC_NO_TOOL,
    HOTPOTQA_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
    HUMANEVAL_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC_NO_TOOL,
    MBPP_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
)
from agential.agents.critic.strategies.code import (
    CriticHEvalStrategy,
    CriticMBPPStrategy,
)
from agential.agents.critic.strategies.math import (
    CriticGSM8KStrategy,
    CriticSVAMPStrategy,
    CriticTabMWPStrategy,
)
from agential.agents.critic.strategies.qa import (
    CriticAmbigNQStrategy,
    CriticFEVERStrategy,
    CriticHotQAStrategy,
    CriticTriviaQAStrategy,
)
from agential.constants import Benchmarks
from agential.core.fewshots.gsm8k import GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT
from agential.core.fewshots.hotpotqa import HOTPOTQA_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_COT
from agential.core.fewshots.humaneval import HUMANEVAL_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT
from agential.core.fewshots.mbpp import MBPP_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT
from agential.core.llm import BaseLLM, MockLLM, Response


def test_init() -> None:
    """Test initialization."""
    llm = MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=["1"])
    search = MagicMock(spec=TavilyClient)
    agent = Critic(llm=llm, benchmark="hotpotqa", search=search)
    assert isinstance(agent.llm, BaseLLM)
    assert isinstance(search, TavilyClient)


def test_critic_factory_get_strategy() -> None:
    """Tests Critic get_strategy method."""
    llm = MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=[])

    # QA benchmarks.
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.HOTPOTQA, llm=llm),
        CriticHotQAStrategy,
    )
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.TRIVIAQA, llm=llm),
        CriticTriviaQAStrategy,
    )
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.AMBIGNQ, llm=llm),
        CriticAmbigNQStrategy,
    )
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.FEVER, llm=llm),
        CriticFEVERStrategy,
    )

    # Math benchmarks.
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.GSM8K, llm=llm),
        CriticGSM8KStrategy,
    )
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.SVAMP, llm=llm),
        CriticSVAMPStrategy,
    )
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.TABMWP, llm=llm),
        CriticTabMWPStrategy,
    )

    # Code benchmarks.
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.HUMANEVAL, llm=llm),
        CriticHEvalStrategy,
    )
    assert isinstance(
        Critic.get_strategy(Benchmarks.MBPP, llm=llm),
        CriticMBPPStrategy,
    )

    # Unsupported benchmark.
    with pytest.raises(
        ValueError, match="Unsupported benchmark: unknown for agent Critic"
    ):
        Critic.get_strategy("unknown", llm=llm)


def test_critic_factory_get_fewshots() -> None:
    """Tests Critic get_fewshots method."""
    # Valid benchmark with tool usage.
    benchmark = Benchmarks.GSM8K
    fewshots = Critic.get_fewshots(benchmark, fewshot_type="pot", use_tool=True)
    assert "critique_examples" in fewshots
    assert fewshots == {
        "examples": GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT,
        "critique_examples": GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
    }

    # Valid benchmark without tool usage.
    fewshots = Critic.get_fewshots(benchmark, fewshot_type="pot", use_tool=False)
    assert "critique_examples" in fewshots
    assert fewshots == {
        "examples": GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT,
        "critique_examples": GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC_NO_TOOL,
    }

    # Invalid benchmark.
    with pytest.raises(
        ValueError, match="Benchmark 'unknown' few-shots not found for Critic."
    ):
        Critic.get_fewshots("unknown", fewshot_type="pot", use_tool=True)

    # Invalid fewshot_type.
    with pytest.raises(
        ValueError, match="Benchmark 'hotpotqa' few-shot type not supported for Critic."
    ):
        Critic.get_fewshots("hotpotqa", fewshot_type="pot", use_tool=True)

    # Missing use_tool argument.
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="`use_tool` not specified."):
        Critic.get_fewshots(benchmark, fewshot_type="pot")


def test_critic_factory_get_prompts() -> None:
    """Tests Critic get_prompts method."""
    # Valid benchmark with tool usage.
    benchmark = Benchmarks.GSM8K
    prompts = Critic.get_prompts(benchmark, use_tool=True)
    assert "prompt" in prompts
    assert "critique_prompt" in prompts
    assert prompts == {
        "prompt": CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
        "critique_prompt": CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
    }

    # Valid benchmark without tool usage.
    prompts = Critic.get_prompts(benchmark, use_tool=False)
    assert "prompt" in prompts
    assert "critique_prompt" in prompts
    assert prompts == {
        "prompt": CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
        "critique_prompt": CRITIC_CRITIQUE_NO_TOOL_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
    }

    # Invalid benchmark.
    with pytest.raises(
        ValueError, match="Benchmark 'unknown' prompt not found for Critic."
    ):
        Critic.get_prompts("unknown", use_tool=True)

    # Missing use_tool argument.
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="`use_tool` not specified."):
        Critic.get_prompts(benchmark)


def test_generate() -> None:
    """Test generate method."""
    question = 'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring'

    # Test "qa" mode without search tool and auto-select.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
        total_prompt_tokens=50,
        total_completion_tokens=100,
        total_tokens=150,
        total_prompt_cost=7.500000000000001e-05,
        total_completion_cost=0.00019999999999999998,
        total_cost=0.00027499999999999996,
        total_prompt_time=2.5,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                critique="\n\nThe question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet's search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing",
                external_tool_info={
                    "search_query": 'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring',
                    "search_result": "There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n",
                },
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no relevant information available in the search results to confirm the accuracy of the proposed answer.\n\nGiven that the proposed answer incorrectly identifies Mike Tyson as a kickboxer, it is not truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\nHere\'s the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the correct answer.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Tyson made his professional kickboxing debut on May 20, 2006, against Jonathan Paredes in a three-round exhibition. Tyson knocked Paredes down in the first round with a right hook.\n\nThe evidence shows that Mike Tyson did participate in kickboxing, but he is primarily known as a boxer, not a kickboxer. \n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is not accurate in terms of the sport, and it should be revised to reflect the correct sport. \n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the revised answer: The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered one of the best professional boxers in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                critique="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                external_tool_info={"search_query": "", "search_result": ""},
                answer_response=[],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Mike Tyson is not primarily known for kickboxing. He is a former professional boxer who competed from 1985 to 2005.\n\nThe evidence confirms that Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer but a former professional boxer.\n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is incorrect and needs revision.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's think step by step. The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, who is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. The correct answer needs further research to identify the kickboxer matching the description provided.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )
    responses = [
        "Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
        'The question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no relevant information available in the search results to confirm the accuracy of the proposed answer.\n\nGiven that the proposed answer incorrectly identifies Mike Tyson as a kickboxer, it is not truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\nHere\'s the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the correct answer.',
        "There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Tyson made his professional kickboxing debut on May 20, 2006, against Jonathan Paredes in a three-round exhibition. Tyson knocked Paredes down in the first round with a right hook.\n\nThe evidence shows that Mike Tyson did participate in kickboxing, but he is primarily known as a boxer, not a kickboxer. \n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is not accurate in terms of the sport, and it should be revised to reflect the correct sport. \n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the revised answer: The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered one of the best professional boxers in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
        "\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Mike Tyson is not primarily known for kickboxing. He is a former professional boxer who competed from 1985 to 2005.\n\nThe evidence confirms that Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer but a former professional boxer.\n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is incorrect and needs revision.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's think step by step. The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, who is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. The correct answer needs further research to identify the kickboxer matching the description provided.",
        "the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="hotpotqa",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        max_interactions=7,
        use_tool=False,
    )
    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "qa" mode without search tool and auto-select, specifying fewshot_type.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
        total_prompt_tokens=50,
        total_completion_tokens=100,
        total_tokens=150,
        total_prompt_cost=7.500000000000001e-05,
        total_completion_cost=0.00019999999999999998,
        total_cost=0.00027499999999999996,
        total_prompt_time=2.5,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                critique="\n\nThe question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet's search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing",
                external_tool_info={
                    "search_query": 'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring',
                    "search_result": "There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n",
                },
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no relevant information available in the search results to confirm the accuracy of the proposed answer.\n\nGiven that the proposed answer incorrectly identifies Mike Tyson as a kickboxer, it is not truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\nHere\'s the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the correct answer.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Tyson made his professional kickboxing debut on May 20, 2006, against Jonathan Paredes in a three-round exhibition. Tyson knocked Paredes down in the first round with a right hook.\n\nThe evidence shows that Mike Tyson did participate in kickboxing, but he is primarily known as a boxer, not a kickboxer. \n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is not accurate in terms of the sport, and it should be revised to reflect the correct sport. \n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the revised answer: The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered one of the best professional boxers in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                critique="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                external_tool_info={"search_query": "", "search_result": ""},
                answer_response=[],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Mike Tyson is not primarily known for kickboxing. He is a former professional boxer who competed from 1985 to 2005.\n\nThe evidence confirms that Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer but a former professional boxer.\n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is incorrect and needs revision.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's think step by step. The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, who is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. The correct answer needs further research to identify the kickboxer matching the description provided.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )
    responses = [
        "Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
        'The question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no relevant information available in the search results to confirm the accuracy of the proposed answer.\n\nGiven that the proposed answer incorrectly identifies Mike Tyson as a kickboxer, it is not truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\nHere\'s the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the correct answer.',
        "There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Tyson made his professional kickboxing debut on May 20, 2006, against Jonathan Paredes in a three-round exhibition. Tyson knocked Paredes down in the first round with a right hook.\n\nThe evidence shows that Mike Tyson did participate in kickboxing, but he is primarily known as a boxer, not a kickboxer. \n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is not accurate in terms of the sport, and it should be revised to reflect the correct sport. \n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the revised answer: The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered one of the best professional boxers in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
        "\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Mike Tyson is not primarily known for kickboxing. He is a former professional boxer who competed from 1985 to 2005.\n\nThe evidence confirms that Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer but a former professional boxer.\n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is incorrect and needs revision.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's think step by step. The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, who is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. The correct answer needs further research to identify the kickboxer matching the description provided.",
        "the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="hotpotqa",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        fewshot_type="cot",
        max_interactions=7,
        use_tool=False,
    )
    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "qa" mode without search tool and auto-select, specifying incorrect fewshot_type.
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=[]), benchmark="hotpotqa", testing=True
    )
    with pytest.raises(
        ValueError,
        match="Benchmark 'hotpotqa' few-shot type not supported for Critic.",
    ):
        out = agent.generate(
            question=question,
            fewshot_type="invalid_input",
            max_interactions=7,
            use_tool=False,
        )

    # Test "qa" mode without search tool.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
        total_prompt_tokens=50,
        total_completion_tokens=100,
        total_tokens=150,
        total_prompt_cost=7.500000000000001e-05,
        total_completion_cost=0.00019999999999999998,
        total_cost=0.00027499999999999996,
        total_prompt_time=2.5,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                critique="\n\nThe question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet's search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing",
                external_tool_info={
                    "search_query": 'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring',
                    "search_result": "There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n",
                },
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no relevant information available in the search results to confirm the accuracy of the proposed answer.\n\nGiven that the proposed answer incorrectly identifies Mike Tyson as a kickboxer, it is not truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\nHere\'s the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the correct answer.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Tyson made his professional kickboxing debut on May 20, 2006, against Jonathan Paredes in a three-round exhibition. Tyson knocked Paredes down in the first round with a right hook.\n\nThe evidence shows that Mike Tyson did participate in kickboxing, but he is primarily known as a boxer, not a kickboxer. \n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is not accurate in terms of the sport, and it should be revised to reflect the correct sport. \n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the revised answer: The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered one of the best professional boxers in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                critique="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                external_tool_info={"search_query": "", "search_result": ""},
                answer_response=[],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Mike Tyson is not primarily known for kickboxing. He is a former professional boxer who competed from 1985 to 2005.\n\nThe evidence confirms that Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer but a former professional boxer.\n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is incorrect and needs revision.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's think step by step. The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, who is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. The correct answer needs further research to identify the kickboxer matching the description provided.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )
    responses = [
        "Let's think step by step. The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered the best kickboxer in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
        'The question specifies that the individual was once considered the best kickboxer in the world, however, Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer, he is a former professional boxer. So the answer is not plausible.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: There is no relevant information available in the search results to confirm the accuracy of the proposed answer.\n\nGiven that the proposed answer incorrectly identifies Mike Tyson as a kickboxer, it is not truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\nHere\'s the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the correct answer.',
        "There is no specific evidence found for this question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in google:\n\n> Search Query: Mike Tyson kickboxing\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Tyson made his professional kickboxing debut on May 20, 2006, against Jonathan Paredes in a three-round exhibition. Tyson knocked Paredes down in the first round with a right hook.\n\nThe evidence shows that Mike Tyson did participate in kickboxing, but he is primarily known as a boxer, not a kickboxer. \n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is not accurate in terms of the sport, and it should be revised to reflect the correct sport. \n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the revised answer: The person described in the question is Mike Tyson, who was once considered one of the best professional boxers in the world but has been involved in controversies and crimes of violence. So the answer is: Mike Tyson.",
        "\n> Evidence: [Mike Tyson - Wikipedia] Mike Tyson is not primarily known for kickboxing. He is a former professional boxer who competed from 1985 to 2005.\n\nThe evidence confirms that Mike Tyson is not a kickboxer but a former professional boxer.\n\nTherefore, the proposed answer is incorrect and needs revision.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's think step by step. The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, who is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. The correct answer needs further research to identify the kickboxer matching the description provided.",
        "the most possible answer: The individual described in the question is not Mike Tyson, as he is a former professional boxer, not a kickboxer. Unfortunately, without further information or evidence, it is not possible to determine the correct answer to this question.",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="hotpotqa",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        examples=HOTPOTQA_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_COT,
        prompt=CRITIC_INSTRUCTION_HOTPOTQA,
        critique_examples=HOTPOTQA_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
        critique_prompt=CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_HOTPOTQA,
        max_interactions=7,
        use_tool=False,
    )
    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "qa" mode with search tool.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
        total_prompt_tokens=50,
        total_completion_tokens=100,
        total_tokens=150,
        total_prompt_cost=7.500000000000001e-05,
        total_completion_cost=0.00019999999999999998,
        total_cost=0.00027499999999999996,
        total_prompt_time=2.5,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                critique='\nThe question asks for a kickboxer who fits the description provided, and the answer "Badr Hari" is a plausible response.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: [agential-ai/agential: The encyclopedia of LLM-based agents - GitHub] \'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts"\xa0...\n\n',
                external_tool_info={
                    "search_query": 'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring',
                    "search_result": {
                        "title": "agential-ai/agential: The encyclopedia of LLM-based agents - GitHub",
                        "link": "https://github.com/alckasoc/agential",
                        "content": '\'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts"\xa0...',
                    },
                },
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The question asks for a kickboxer who fits the description provided, and the answer "Badr Hari" is a plausible response.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: [Badr Hari - Wikipedia] Badr Hari is a Moroccan-Dutch super heavyweight kickboxer from the Netherlands, fighting out of Mike\'s Gym in Oostzaan. He is a former K-1 Heavyweight Champion (2007-2008) and It\'s Showtime Heavyweight Champion (2009-2010).\n\nThe evidence confirms that Badr Hari fits the description provided in the question.\n\nOverall, the proposed answer is both plausible and truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere\'s the most possible answer: Let\'s break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                critique='\nThe question asks for a kickboxer who fits the description provided, and the answer "Badr Hari" is a plausible response.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: [agential-ai/agential: The encyclopedia of LLM-based agents - GitHub] \'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts"\xa0...\n\n\nThe evidence does not provide any relevant information about the question.\n\nLet\'s search the proposed answer in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Badr Hari kickboxer controversies\n> Evidence: [agential-ai/agential: The encyclopedia of LLM-based agents - GitHub] \'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts"\xa0...\n\n',
                external_tool_info={
                    "search_query": "Badr Hari kickboxer controversies",
                    "search_result": {
                        "title": "agential-ai/agential: The encyclopedia of LLM-based agents - GitHub",
                        "link": "https://github.com/alckasoc/agential",
                        "content": '\'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts"\xa0...',
                    },
                },
                answer_response=[],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="The evidence does not provide any relevant information about the question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Badr Hari kickboxer controversies\n> Evidence: [Badr Hari - Wikipedia] Badr Hari is a Moroccan-Dutch kickboxer. He is a former K-1 Heavyweight champion, It's worth noting that Hari has been involved in several controversies, including unsportsmanlike conduct and criminal charges.\n\nThe evidence supports the claim that Badr Hari fits the description provided in the question.\n\nOverall, the proposed answer is both plausible and truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                critique="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                external_tool_info={"search_query": "", "search_result": ""},
                answer_response=[],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="the most possible answer: The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    ),
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )
    search = MagicMock(spec=TavilyClient)
    search.search.return_value = {
        "results": [
            {
                "title": "agential-ai/agential: The encyclopedia of LLM-based agents - GitHub",
                "link": "https://github.com/alckasoc/agential",
                "content": '\'Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts"\xa0...',
            }
        ]
    }
    responses = [
        "Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
        'The question asks for a kickboxer who fits the description provided, and the answer "Badr Hari" is a plausible response.\n\n2. Truthfulness:\n\nLet\'s search the question in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring\n> Evidence: [Badr Hari - Wikipedia] Badr Hari is a Moroccan-Dutch super heavyweight kickboxer from the Netherlands, fighting out of Mike\'s Gym in Oostzaan. He is a former K-1 Heavyweight Champion (2007-2008) and It\'s Showtime Heavyweight Champion (2009-2010).\n\nThe evidence confirms that Badr Hari fits the description provided in the question.\n\nOverall, the proposed answer is both plausible and truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his "unsportsmanlike conducts" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere\'s the most possible answer: Let\'s break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.',
        "The evidence does not provide any relevant information about the question.\n\nLet's search the proposed answer in Google:\n\n> Search Query: Badr Hari kickboxer controversies\n> Evidence: [Badr Hari - Wikipedia] Badr Hari is a Moroccan-Dutch kickboxer. He is a former K-1 Heavyweight champion, It's worth noting that Hari has been involved in several controversies, including unsportsmanlike conduct and criminal charges.\n\nThe evidence supports the claim that Badr Hari fits the description provided in the question.\n\nOverall, the proposed answer is both plausible and truthful.\n\nQuestion: Who was once considered the best kick boxer in the world, however he has been involved in a number of controversies relating to his \"unsportsmanlike conducts\" in the sport and crimes of violence outside of the ring?\nHere's the most possible answer: Let's break it down step by step. The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
        "the most possible answer: The kickboxer who fits this description is Badr Hari. So the answer is: Badr Hari.",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="hotpotqa",
        search=search,
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        examples=HOTPOTQA_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_COT,
        prompt=CRITIC_INSTRUCTION_HOTPOTQA,
        critique_examples=HOTPOTQA_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
        critique_prompt=CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_HOTPOTQA,
        max_interactions=7,
        use_tool=True,
    )
    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "math" mode without code interpreter tool.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="\n```python\nThe code is correct and there is no issue with it.\n```\n",
        total_prompt_tokens=140,
        total_completion_tokens=280,
        total_tokens=420,
        total_prompt_cost=0.00021,
        total_completion_cost=0.00056,
        total_cost=0.0007699999999999999,
        total_prompt_time=7.0,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="1. The amount of money earned per day should be a positive number, 0 < 10 million, it's reasonable.\n\n2. Let's check the code:\n\n> eggs_laid_per_day = 16\n> eggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\n> eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\n\nThis correctly defines the number of eggs laid per day, used for breakfast, and used for muffins.\n\n> eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\nThis calculates the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins are accounted for, which is correct.\n\n> money_earned_per_egg = 2\n> money_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nThis calculates the amount of money earned per day at the farmers' market based on the remaining eggs and the price per egg, which is correct.\n\nOverall, the code is correct and provides the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="1. The amount of money earned per day should be a positive number, 0 < 10 million, it's reasonable.\n\n2. Let's check the code:\n\n> eggs_laid_per_day = 16\n> eggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\n> eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\n\nThis correctly defines the number of eggs laid per day, used for breakfast, and used for muffins.\n\n> eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\nThis calculates the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins are accounted for, which is correct.\n\n> money_earned_per_egg = 2\n> money_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nThis calculates the amount of money earned per day at the farmers' market based on the remaining eggs and the price per egg, which is correct.\n\nOverall, the code is correct and provides the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="The above code has a logical error in calculating the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins. The subtraction operation is incorrect because it should be subtracting the eggs used for breakfast and muffins from the total eggs laid per day. \n\nHere's the corrected calculation:\n",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="The above code has a logical error in calculating the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins. The subtraction operation is incorrect because it should be subtracting the eggs used for breakfast and muffins from the total eggs laid per day. \n\nHere's the corrected calculation:\n```python\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n``` \n\nAfter this correction, the code will accurately calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="The code is correct and there is no issue with it.",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="The code is correct and there is no issue with it.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\neggs_remaining = max(eggs_remaining, 0)\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\neggs_remaining = max(eggs_remaining, 0)\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n1. The amount of money earned per day should be a positive number, 0 < 10 million, it's reasonable.\n\n2. Let's check the code:\n\n> eggs_laid_per_day = 16\n> eggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\n> eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\n\nThis correctly defines the number of eggs laid per day, used for breakfast, and used for muffins.\n\n> eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\nThis calculates the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins are accounted for, which is correct.\n\n> money_earned_per_egg = 2\n> money_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nThis calculates the amount of money earned per day at the farmers' market based on the remaining eggs and the price per egg, which is correct.\n\nOverall, the code is correct and provides the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.\n```\n",
                critique="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="1. The amount of money earned per day should be a positive number, 0 < 10 million, it's reasonable.\n\n2. Let's check the code:\n\n> eggs_laid_per_day = 16\n> eggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\n> eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\n\nThis correctly defines the number of eggs laid per day, used for breakfast, and used for muffins.\n\n> eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\nThis calculates the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins are accounted for, which is correct.\n\n> money_earned_per_egg = 2\n> money_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nThis calculates the amount of money earned per day at the farmers' market based on the remaining eggs and the price per egg, which is correct.\n\nOverall, the code is correct and provides the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="The above code has a logical error in calculating the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins. The subtraction operation is incorrect because it should be subtracting the eggs used for breakfast and muffins from the total eggs laid per day. \n\nHere's the corrected calculation:\n```python\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n``` \n\nAfter this correction, the code will accurately calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\nThe code is correct and there is no issue with it.\n```\n",
                critique="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\neggs_remaining = max(eggs_remaining, 0)\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "", "code_answer": ""},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="The code is correct and there is no issue with it.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\neggs_remaining = max(eggs_remaining, 0)\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )

    question = "Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs per day. She eats three for breakfast every morning and bakes muffins for her friends every day with 4933828. She sells the remainder at the farmers' market daily for $2 per fresh duck egg. How much in dollars does she make every day at the farmers' market?"

    responses = [
        "eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
        "1. The amount of money earned per day should be a positive number, 0 < 10 million, it's reasonable.\n\n2. Let's check the code:\n\n> eggs_laid_per_day = 16\n> eggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\n> eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\n\nThis correctly defines the number of eggs laid per day, used for breakfast, and used for muffins.\n\n> eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\nThis calculates the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins are accounted for, which is correct.\n\n> money_earned_per_egg = 2\n> money_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nThis calculates the amount of money earned per day at the farmers' market based on the remaining eggs and the price per egg, which is correct.\n\nOverall, the code is correct and provides the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
        "# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day",
        "The above code has a logical error in calculating the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins. The subtraction operation is incorrect because it should be subtracting the eggs used for breakfast and muffins from the total eggs laid per day. \n\nHere's the corrected calculation:\n```python\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining after breakfast and muffins\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n``` \n\nAfter this correction, the code will accurately calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market.",
        "# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
        "The code is correct and there is no issue with it.",
        "# Given values\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_used_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\nmoney_earned_per_egg = 2\n\n# Calculate the total eggs available for sale\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_used_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Ensure the number of eggs remaining is not negative\neggs_remaining = max(eggs_remaining, 0)\n\n# Calculate the money earned per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_earned_per_day = eggs_remaining * money_earned_per_egg\n\nanswer = money_earned_per_day\n```",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="gsm8k",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        examples=GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT,
        prompt=CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
        critique_examples=GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC_NO_TOOL,
        critique_prompt=CRITIC_CRITIQUE_NO_TOOL_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
        max_interactions=7,
        use_tool=False,
    )
    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "math" mode with code interpreter tool.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 0  # Assuming no eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
        total_prompt_tokens=140,
        total_completion_tokens=280,
        total_tokens=420,
        total_prompt_cost=0.00021,
        total_completion_cost=0.00056,
        total_cost=0.0007699999999999999,
        total_prompt_time=7.0,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="1. The amount of money made every day at the farmers' market should be a positive number, -9867630 < 0, which is not reasonable.\n\n2. Let's analyze the code:\n\n- `eggs_laid_per_day = 16`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet's ducks lay per day.\n- `eggs_for_breakfast = 3`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet eats for breakfast every morning.\n- `eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828`: This variable seems to be incorrectly set to a very large number, which doesn't align with the scenario of baking muffins daily. This is likely a mistake.\n- `eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins`: This calculation is incorrect due to the extremely high value of `eggs_used_for_muffins`, leading to a negative value for `eggs_remaining`.\n- `money_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2`: This calculation is based on the incorrect value of `eggs_remaining`, leading to the negative result.\n\nTo correct the code and calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market, we need to adjust the calculation of `eggs_remaining` based on a realistic scenario. Let's assume that Janet uses a certain number of eggs for muffins daily, and the rest are sold at the market.\n\nHere's a revised solution:\n\n",
                external_tool_info={
                    "execution_status": "Done",
                    "code_answer": -9867630,
                },
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="1. The amount of money made every day at the farmers' market should be a positive number, -9867630 < 0, which is not reasonable.\n\n2. Let's analyze the code:\n\n- `eggs_laid_per_day = 16`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet's ducks lay per day.\n- `eggs_for_breakfast = 3`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet eats for breakfast every morning.\n- `eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828`: This variable seems to be incorrectly set to a very large number, which doesn't align with the scenario of baking muffins daily. This is likely a mistake.\n- `eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins`: This calculation is incorrect due to the extremely high value of `eggs_used_for_muffins`, leading to a negative value for `eggs_remaining`.\n- `money_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2`: This calculation is based on the incorrect value of `eggs_remaining`, leading to the negative result.\n\nTo correct the code and calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market, we need to adjust the calculation of `eggs_remaining` based on a realistic scenario. Let's assume that Janet uses a certain number of eggs for muffins daily, and the rest are sold at the market.\n\nHere's a revised solution:\n\n```python\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 6  # Let's assume Janet uses 6 eggs for muffins daily\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0  # Ensure that the number of remaining eggs is non-negative\n\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n``` \n\nIn this revised solution, we have adjusted the number of eggs used for muffins to a more realistic value (6 eggs in this case) and made sure that the calculation of `eggs_remaining` does not result in a negative value. The final amount of money made every day at the farmers' market is then calculated based on the corrected number of remaining eggs.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 12  # Assuming a more reasonable number of eggs used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="There are a few issues with the code provided:\n\n1. The calculation for the number of eggs used for muffins seems incorrect. It states that 12 eggs are used for muffins, but the total number of eggs laid per day is 16. This would mean that only 4 eggs are left for sale, which doesn't align with the final calculation result of $2.\n\n2. The variable names could be more descriptive to enhance code readability.\n\n3. It's unclear what the variable `4933828` represents in the context of the problem. It seems like it might be a typo or irrelevant to the calculation.\n\nHere's an improved version of the code:\n\n",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "Done", "code_answer": 2},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 12  # Assuming a more reasonable number of eggs used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There are a few issues with the code provided:\n\n1. The calculation for the number of eggs used for muffins seems incorrect. It states that 12 eggs are used for muffins, but the total number of eggs laid per day is 16. This would mean that only 4 eggs are left for sale, which doesn't align with the final calculation result of $2.\n\n2. The variable names could be more descriptive to enhance code readability.\n\n3. It's unclear what the variable `4933828` represents in the context of the problem. It seems like it might be a typo or irrelevant to the calculation.\n\nHere's an improved version of the code:\n\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 1  # Assuming 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 for sale\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n\nThis revised code assumes that only 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 eggs for sale, which results in a daily income of $24 at the farmers' market.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4  # Assuming 4 eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="There seems to be a mistake in the calculation of the number of eggs used for muffins. The question states that Janet bakes muffins for her friends every day with some of the eggs, but the code assumes that she uses 4 eggs for muffins. Since the number of eggs used for muffins is not explicitly provided in the question, we should not make assumptions about it.\n\nTo correct this, we can adjust the code to use the actual number of eggs used for muffins as stated in the question. Here's an updated solution:\n\n",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "Done", "code_answer": 18},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4  # Assuming 4 eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There seems to be a mistake in the calculation of the number of eggs used for muffins. The question states that Janet bakes muffins for her friends every day with some of the eggs, but the code assumes that she uses 4 eggs for muffins. Since the number of eggs used for muffins is not explicitly provided in the question, we should not make assumptions about it.\n\nTo correct this, we can adjust the code to use the actual number of eggs used for muffins as stated in the question. Here's an updated solution:\n\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 0  # Assuming no eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n\nThis updated code reflects the fact that no eggs are used for muffins, as specified in the question.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4933828  # Janet bakes muffins with 4933828 eggs for her friends every day\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
                external_tool_info={
                    "execution_status": "Done",
                    "code_answer": -9867630,
                },
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4933828  # Janet bakes muffins with 4933828 eggs for her friends every day\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 6  # Let's assume Janet uses 6 eggs for muffins daily\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0  # Ensure that the number of remaining eggs is non-negative\n\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 12  # Assuming a more reasonable number of eggs used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "Done", "code_answer": 14},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="1. The amount of money made every day at the farmers' market should be a positive number, -9867630 < 0, which is not reasonable.\n\n2. Let's analyze the code:\n\n- `eggs_laid_per_day = 16`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet's ducks lay per day.\n- `eggs_for_breakfast = 3`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet eats for breakfast every morning.\n- `eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828`: This variable seems to be incorrectly set to a very large number, which doesn't align with the scenario of baking muffins daily. This is likely a mistake.\n- `eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins`: This calculation is incorrect due to the extremely high value of `eggs_used_for_muffins`, leading to a negative value for `eggs_remaining`.\n- `money_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2`: This calculation is based on the incorrect value of `eggs_remaining`, leading to the negative result.\n\nTo correct the code and calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market, we need to adjust the calculation of `eggs_remaining` based on a realistic scenario. Let's assume that Janet uses a certain number of eggs for muffins daily, and the rest are sold at the market.\n\nHere's a revised solution:\n\n```python\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 6  # Let's assume Janet uses 6 eggs for muffins daily\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0  # Ensure that the number of remaining eggs is non-negative\n\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n``` \n\nIn this revised solution, we have adjusted the number of eggs used for muffins to a more realistic value (6 eggs in this case) and made sure that the calculation of `eggs_remaining` does not result in a negative value. The final amount of money made every day at the farmers' market is then calculated based on the corrected number of remaining eggs.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 12  # Assuming a more reasonable number of eggs used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 1  # Assuming 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 for sale\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4  # Assuming 4 eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "Done", "code_answer": 24},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There are a few issues with the code provided:\n\n1. The calculation for the number of eggs used for muffins seems incorrect. It states that 12 eggs are used for muffins, but the total number of eggs laid per day is 16. This would mean that only 4 eggs are left for sale, which doesn't align with the final calculation result of $2.\n\n2. The variable names could be more descriptive to enhance code readability.\n\n3. It's unclear what the variable `4933828` represents in the context of the problem. It seems like it might be a typo or irrelevant to the calculation.\n\nHere's an improved version of the code:\n\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 1  # Assuming 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 for sale\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n\nThis revised code assumes that only 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 eggs for sale, which results in a daily income of $24 at the farmers' market.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4  # Assuming 4 eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 0  # Assuming no eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n",
                critique="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4933828  # Janet bakes muffins with 4933828 eggs for her friends every day\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "Done", "code_answer": 26},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There seems to be a mistake in the calculation of the number of eggs used for muffins. The question states that Janet bakes muffins for her friends every day with some of the eggs, but the code assumes that she uses 4 eggs for muffins. Since the number of eggs used for muffins is not explicitly provided in the question, we should not make assumptions about it.\n\nTo correct this, we can adjust the code to use the actual number of eggs used for muffins as stated in the question. Here's an updated solution:\n\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 0  # Assuming no eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n\nThis updated code reflects the fact that no eggs are used for muffins, as specified in the question.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4933828  # Janet bakes muffins with 4933828 eggs for her friends every day\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )
    responses = [
        "eggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
        "1. The amount of money made every day at the farmers' market should be a positive number, -9867630 < 0, which is not reasonable.\n\n2. Let's analyze the code:\n\n- `eggs_laid_per_day = 16`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet's ducks lay per day.\n- `eggs_for_breakfast = 3`: This variable correctly represents the number of eggs Janet eats for breakfast every morning.\n- `eggs_used_for_muffins = 4933828`: This variable seems to be incorrectly set to a very large number, which doesn't align with the scenario of baking muffins daily. This is likely a mistake.\n- `eggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins`: This calculation is incorrect due to the extremely high value of `eggs_used_for_muffins`, leading to a negative value for `eggs_remaining`.\n- `money_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2`: This calculation is based on the incorrect value of `eggs_remaining`, leading to the negative result.\n\nTo correct the code and calculate the amount of money Janet makes every day at the farmers' market, we need to adjust the calculation of `eggs_remaining` based on a realistic scenario. Let's assume that Janet uses a certain number of eggs for muffins daily, and the rest are sold at the market.\n\nHere's a revised solution:\n\n```python\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 6  # Let's assume Janet uses 6 eggs for muffins daily\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\nif eggs_remaining < 0:\n    eggs_remaining = 0  # Ensure that the number of remaining eggs is non-negative\n\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * 2\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n``` \n\nIn this revised solution, we have adjusted the number of eggs used for muffins to a more realistic value (6 eggs in this case) and made sure that the calculation of `eggs_remaining` does not result in a negative value. The final amount of money made every day at the farmers' market is then calculated based on the corrected number of remaining eggs.",
        "# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 12  # Assuming a more reasonable number of eggs used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day",
        "There are a few issues with the code provided:\n\n1. The calculation for the number of eggs used for muffins seems incorrect. It states that 12 eggs are used for muffins, but the total number of eggs laid per day is 16. This would mean that only 4 eggs are left for sale, which doesn't align with the final calculation result of $2.\n\n2. The variable names could be more descriptive to enhance code readability.\n\n3. It's unclear what the variable `4933828` represents in the context of the problem. It seems like it might be a typo or irrelevant to the calculation.\n\nHere's an improved version of the code:\n\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_used_for_muffins = 1  # Assuming 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 for sale\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_used_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n\nThis revised code assumes that only 1 egg is used for muffins, leaving 12 eggs for sale, which results in a daily income of $24 at the farmers' market.",
        "# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4  # Assuming 4 eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
        "There seems to be a mistake in the calculation of the number of eggs used for muffins. The question states that Janet bakes muffins for her friends every day with some of the eggs, but the code assumes that she uses 4 eggs for muffins. Since the number of eggs used for muffins is not explicitly provided in the question, we should not make assumptions about it.\n\nTo correct this, we can adjust the code to use the actual number of eggs used for muffins as stated in the question. Here's an updated solution:\n\n```python\n# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 0  # Assuming no eggs are used for muffins\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```\n\nThis updated code reflects the fact that no eggs are used for muffins, as specified in the question.",
        "# Given data\neggs_laid_per_day = 16\neggs_for_breakfast = 3\neggs_for_muffins = 4933828  # Janet bakes muffins with 4933828 eggs for her friends every day\negg_price = 2  # Price per fresh duck egg\n\n# Calculate the number of eggs remaining to be sold\neggs_remaining = eggs_laid_per_day - eggs_for_breakfast - eggs_for_muffins\n\n# Calculate the money made per day at the farmers' market\nmoney_made_per_day = eggs_remaining * egg_price\n\nanswer = money_made_per_day\n```",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="gsm8k",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        examples=GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT,
        prompt=CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
        critique_examples=GSM8K_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
        critique_prompt=CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_GSM8K,
        max_interactions=7,
        use_tool=True,
    )
    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "code" mode without code interpreter tool.
    inst = {
        "task_id": "HumanEval/0",
        "prompt": 'from typing import List\n\n\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """ Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n    given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n',
        "entry_point": "has_close_elements",
        "canonical_solution": "    for idx, elem in enumerate(numbers):\n        for idx2, elem2 in enumerate(numbers):\n            if idx != idx2:\n                distance = abs(elem - elem2)\n                if distance < threshold:\n                    return True\n\n    return False\n",
        "test": "\n\nMETADATA = {\n    'author': 'jt',\n    'dataset': 'test'\n}\n\n\ndef check(candidate):\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.3) == True\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.05) == False\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.95) == True\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.8) == False\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.1) == True\n    assert candidate([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 1.0) == True\n    assert candidate([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 0.5) == False\n\n",
    }

    question = inst["prompt"]

    tests = f"{inst['test']}\ncheck({inst['entry_point']})"

    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer="\n```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for j, y in enumerate(numbers) if i != j)\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n```\n",
        total_prompt_tokens=60,
        total_completion_tokens=120,
        total_tokens=180,
        total_prompt_cost=9e-05,
        total_completion_cost=0.00023999999999999998,
        total_cost=0.00033,
        total_prompt_time=3.0,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])\n```\n",
                critique="The `has_close_elements` function has a logical error in its implementation. \n\n1. The function mistakenly includes the same pair of elements for comparison, leading to false positives. For example, when checking if `numbers[i]` is close to `numbers[j]` where `i` and `j` are indices in the list, the function should ensure that `i != j` to avoid comparing the same element to itself.\n\n2. The current implementation of the function uses a nested loop to iterate over all possible pairs of elements in the list. However, it does not exclude cases where the same element is compared to itself, resulting in false positives for elements that are the same or very close together.\n\n3. To fix this issue, the function should modify the inner loop to start from `i + 1` instead of `0` to ensure that each pair of elements is unique and avoid comparing an element to itself.\n\nHere's the corrected implementation of the `has_close_elements` function:",
                external_tool_info={},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The `has_close_elements` function has a logical error in its implementation. \n\n1. The function mistakenly includes the same pair of elements for comparison, leading to false positives. For example, when checking if `numbers[i]` is close to `numbers[j]` where `i` and `j` are indices in the list, the function should ensure that `i != j` to avoid comparing the same element to itself.\n\n2. The current implementation of the function uses a nested loop to iterate over all possible pairs of elements in the list. However, it does not exclude cases where the same element is compared to itself, resulting in false positives for elements that are the same or very close together.\n\n3. To fix this issue, the function should modify the inner loop to start from `i + 1` instead of `0` to ensure that each pair of elements is unique and avoid comparing an element to itself.\n\nHere\'s the corrected implementation of the `has_close_elements` function:\n\n```python\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """ Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n    given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n    return any(abs(numbers[i] - numbers[j]) < threshold for i in range(len(numbers)) for j in range(i+1, len(numbers)))\n\n```\n\nAfter correcting the implementation as shown above, the function should now correctly determine if any two elements in the list are closer to each other than the specified threshold.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])\n```\n",
                critique="The implementation of the `has_close_elements` function has a logical error in the comparison of elements. \n\n1. The function incorrectly checks for closeness between all pairs of elements in the list, including pairs of elements that are the same. This is because it doesn't exclude the case where `x` and `y` are the same, leading to false positives.\n\n2. Let's check the code:\n\n> `return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])`\n\nThis line is intended to check if any two elements in the list are closer than the given threshold. However, it doesn't exclude checking the same element against itself, which can lead to incorrect results.\n\nFor example, in the test case `[1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2]` with a threshold of `0.3`, the function returns `True`, even though there are no elements that are closer than `0.3`. This is because it compares the last element `2.2` with itself, which results in a difference of `0.0`, less than the threshold.\n\nOverall, the function's logic needs to be adjusted to exclude comparing an element with itself to avoid false positives in cases where an element is considered \"close\" to itself.\n\nHere's a corrected version of the function:",
                external_tool_info={},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])\n```",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The implementation of the `has_close_elements` function has a logical error in the comparison of elements. \n\n1. The function incorrectly checks for closeness between all pairs of elements in the list, including pairs of elements that are the same. This is because it doesn\'t exclude the case where `x` and `y` are the same, leading to false positives.\n\n2. Let\'s check the code:\n\n> `return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])`\n\nThis line is intended to check if any two elements in the list are closer than the given threshold. However, it doesn\'t exclude checking the same element against itself, which can lead to incorrect results.\n\nFor example, in the test case `[1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2]` with a threshold of `0.3`, the function returns `True`, even though there are no elements that are closer than `0.3`. This is because it compares the last element `2.2` with itself, which results in a difference of `0.0`, less than the threshold.\n\nOverall, the function\'s logic needs to be adjusted to exclude comparing an element with itself to avoid false positives in cases where an element is considered "close" to itself.\n\nHere\'s a corrected version of the function:\n\n```python\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """Check if in the given list of numbers, there are any two numbers closer to each other than the given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for j, y in enumerate(numbers) if i != j)\n```\n\nIn this corrected version, the condition `if i != j` has been added to ensure that an element is not compared against itself when checking for closeness.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer="\n```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for j, y in enumerate(numbers) if i != j)\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n```\n",
                critique="The issue with the `has_close_elements` function is that the condition inside the `any` function is checking all combinations of numbers in the list, including each number with itself. This results in the function returning `True` even if there are no pairs of numbers that are close to each other.\n\nThe correct approach would be to iterate over unique pairs of numbers in the list to avoid comparing a number with itself. This would involve using `itertools.combinations` to generate all unique pairs of indices for the numbers and then checking the absolute difference between the numbers at those indices.\n\nHere's a corrected version of the `has_close_elements` function:",
                external_tool_info={},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for j, y in enumerate(numbers) if i != j)\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n```\n\nIn the corrected function, we\'ve added a condition `if i != j` to ensure that an element is not compared with itself, which resolves the issue of false positives in identifying "close" elements.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='The issue with the `has_close_elements` function is that the condition inside the `any` function is checking all combinations of numbers in the list, including each number with itself. This results in the function returning `True` even if there are no pairs of numbers that are close to each other.\n\nThe correct approach would be to iterate over unique pairs of numbers in the list to avoid comparing a number with itself. This would involve using `itertools.combinations` to generate all unique pairs of indices for the numbers and then checking the absolute difference between the numbers at those indices.\n\nHere\'s a corrected version of the `has_close_elements` function:\n\n```python\nfrom itertools import combinations\n\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """ Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n    given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n\n    return any(abs(numbers[i] - numbers[j]) < threshold for i, j in combinations(range(len(numbers)), 2))\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n``` \n\nThis corrected version iterates over unique pairs of indices using `itertools.combinations` and then checks the absolute difference between the numbers at those indices.',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            ),
        ],
    )
    responses = [
        "```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])\n```",
        'The `has_close_elements` function has a logical error in its implementation. \n\n1. The function mistakenly includes the same pair of elements for comparison, leading to false positives. For example, when checking if `numbers[i]` is close to `numbers[j]` where `i` and `j` are indices in the list, the function should ensure that `i != j` to avoid comparing the same element to itself.\n\n2. The current implementation of the function uses a nested loop to iterate over all possible pairs of elements in the list. However, it does not exclude cases where the same element is compared to itself, resulting in false positives for elements that are the same or very close together.\n\n3. To fix this issue, the function should modify the inner loop to start from `i + 1` instead of `0` to ensure that each pair of elements is unique and avoid comparing an element to itself.\n\nHere\'s the corrected implementation of the `has_close_elements` function:\n\n```python\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """ Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n    given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n    return any(abs(numbers[i] - numbers[j]) < threshold for i in range(len(numbers)) for j in range(i+1, len(numbers)))\n\n```\n\nAfter correcting the implementation as shown above, the function should now correctly determine if any two elements in the list are closer to each other than the specified threshold.',
        "```python\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])\n```",
        'The implementation of the `has_close_elements` function has a logical error in the comparison of elements. \n\n1. The function incorrectly checks for closeness between all pairs of elements in the list, including pairs of elements that are the same. This is because it doesn\'t exclude the case where `x` and `y` are the same, leading to false positives.\n\n2. Let\'s check the code:\n\n> `return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for y in numbers[i+1:])`\n\nThis line is intended to check if any two elements in the list are closer than the given threshold. However, it doesn\'t exclude checking the same element against itself, which can lead to incorrect results.\n\nFor example, in the test case `[1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2]` with a threshold of `0.3`, the function returns `True`, even though there are no elements that are closer than `0.3`. This is because it compares the last element `2.2` with itself, which results in a difference of `0.0`, less than the threshold.\n\nOverall, the function\'s logic needs to be adjusted to exclude comparing an element with itself to avoid false positives in cases where an element is considered "close" to itself.\n\nHere\'s a corrected version of the function:\n\n```python\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """Check if in the given list of numbers, there are any two numbers closer to each other than the given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for j, y in enumerate(numbers) if i != j)\n```\n\nIn this corrected version, the condition `if i != j` has been added to ensure that an element is not compared against itself when checking for closeness.',
        '    return any(abs(x - y) < threshold for i, x in enumerate(numbers) for j, y in enumerate(numbers) if i != j)\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n```\n\nIn the corrected function, we\'ve added a condition `if i != j` to ensure that an element is not compared with itself, which resolves the issue of false positives in identifying "close" elements.',
        'The issue with the `has_close_elements` function is that the condition inside the `any` function is checking all combinations of numbers in the list, including each number with itself. This results in the function returning `True` even if there are no pairs of numbers that are close to each other.\n\nThe correct approach would be to iterate over unique pairs of numbers in the list to avoid comparing a number with itself. This would involve using `itertools.combinations` to generate all unique pairs of indices for the numbers and then checking the absolute difference between the numbers at those indices.\n\nHere\'s a corrected version of the `has_close_elements` function:\n\n```python\nfrom itertools import combinations\n\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    """ Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n    given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    """\n\n    return any(abs(numbers[i] - numbers[j]) < threshold for i, j in combinations(range(len(numbers)), 2))\n\ncheck(has_close_elements)\n``` \n\nThis corrected version iterates over unique pairs of indices using `itertools.combinations` and then checks the absolute difference between the numbers at those indices.',
        "```python\n    import itertools\n    return any(abs(numbers[i] - numbers[j]) < threshold for i, j in itertools.combinations(range(len(numbers)), 2))\n```",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="humaneval",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        examples=HUMANEVAL_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT,
        prompt=CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_HUMANEVAL,
        critique_examples=HUMANEVAL_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC_NO_TOOL,
        critique_prompt=CRITIC_CRITIQUE_NO_TOOL_INSTRUCTION_HUMANEVAL,
        critique_additional_keys={"tests": tests},
        use_tool=False,
        max_interactions=3,
    )

    assert out == gt_out

    # Test "code" mode with code interpreter tool.
    gt_out = CriticOutput(
        answer='\n```python\ndef first_repeated_char(s):\n    char_set = set()\n    for char in s:\n        if char in char_set:\n            return char\n        char_set.add(char)\n    return None\n\n# Testing the function with the provided test cases\nassert first_repeated_char("abcabc") == "a"\nassert first_repeated_char("abc") == None\nassert first_repeated_char("123123") == "1"\n```\n',
        total_prompt_tokens=20,
        total_completion_tokens=40,
        total_tokens=60,
        total_prompt_cost=3e-05,
        total_completion_cost=7.999999999999999e-05,
        total_cost=0.00010999999999999999,
        total_prompt_time=1.0,
        total_time=0.5,
        additional_info=[
            CriticStepOutput(
                answer='\n```python\ndef first_repeated_char(s):\n    char_set = set()\n    for char in s:\n        if char in char_set:\n            return char\n        char_set.add(char)\n    return None\n\n# Testing the function with the provided test cases\nassert first_repeated_char("abcabc") == "a"\nassert first_repeated_char("abc") == None\nassert first_repeated_char("123123") == "1"\n```\n',
                critique="There is no problem with the above code. The function `first_repeated_char` correctly iterates through the characters of the input string, keeping track of seen characters in a set. If a character is encountered that is already in the set, it is returned as the first repeated character. Otherwise, if no repeated characters are found, the function returns None. The function passes the provided test cases successfully.",
                external_tool_info={"execution_status": "Done"},
                answer_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text='def first_repeated_char(s):\n    char_set = set()\n    for char in s:\n        if char in char_set:\n            return char\n        char_set.add(char)\n    return None\n\n# Testing the function with the provided test cases\nassert first_repeated_char("abcabc") == "a"\nassert first_repeated_char("abc") == None\nassert first_repeated_char("123123") == "1"',
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
                critique_response=[
                    Response(
                        input_text="",
                        output_text="There is no problem with the above code. The function `first_repeated_char` correctly iterates through the characters of the input string, keeping track of seen characters in a set. If a character is encountered that is already in the set, it is returned as the first repeated character. Otherwise, if no repeated characters are found, the function returns None. The function passes the provided test cases successfully.",
                        prompt_tokens=10,
                        completion_tokens=20,
                        total_tokens=30,
                        prompt_cost=1.5e-05,
                        completion_cost=3.9999999999999996e-05,
                        total_cost=5.4999999999999995e-05,
                        prompt_time=0.5,
                    )
                ],
            )
        ],
    )
    question = "Write a python function to find the first repeated character in a given string."
    tests = """assert first_repeated_char("abcabc") == "a"
assert first_repeated_char("abc") == None
assert first_repeated_char("123123") == "1\""""

    responses = [
        'def first_repeated_char(s):\n    char_set = set()\n    for char in s:\n        if char in char_set:\n            return char\n        char_set.add(char)\n    return None\n\n# Testing the function with the provided test cases\nassert first_repeated_char("abcabc") == "a"\nassert first_repeated_char("abc") == None\nassert first_repeated_char("123123") == "1"',
        "There is no problem with the above code. The function `first_repeated_char` correctly iterates through the characters of the input string, keeping track of seen characters in a set. If a character is encountered that is already in the set, it is returned as the first repeated character. Otherwise, if no repeated characters are found, the function returns None. The function passes the provided test cases successfully.",
    ]
    agent = Critic(
        llm=MockLLM("gpt-3.5-turbo", responses=responses),
        benchmark="mbpp",
        testing=True,
    )
    out = agent.generate(
        question=question,
        examples=MBPP_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_POT,
        prompt=CRITIC_POT_INSTRUCTION_MBPP,
        critique_examples=MBPP_FEWSHOT_EXAMPLES_CRITIC,
        critique_prompt=CRITIC_CRITIQUE_INSTRUCTION_MBPP,
        additional_keys={"tests": tests},
        critique_additional_keys={"tests": tests},
        use_tool=True,
        max_interactions=3,
    )
    assert out == gt_out
