Not everyone can solve this tricky test on their first try. If you take your time, then you’ll probably make it, but if you make it a timed challenge, then things get considerably harder. Try and see if you can solve this one in under 20 seconds!
Below is a number sequence from 1 to 53, but two numbers are missing. Your mission is to find out which ones.
Want a chance to prove your skill?
I have to admit that I didn’t make it on the first try – and neither did my friends. Now it’s your turn. Ready, set, go…
Like I said, I didn’t make it on the first try. But then I had a long second look, and I eventually managed to find the missing numbers!
Below is the answer in two separate images.
The first missing number is 11.
The second missing number is 32.
So if you noticed the numbers 11 and 32 missing, then congratulations – you passed the test!
Share with your friends!


JOURNAL OF TEACHER ACTION RESEARCH 34 Mathematics Word Problem Solving Through Collaborative Action Research Eda Vula, Rajmonda Kurshumlia Abstract: In this study, two researchers, a third-grade teacher and a professor of mathematics education, investigated the.
Action research is a methodology that is considered to be a valuable problem-solving tool in most of the literature on action research. For the teacher in the classroom it can provide opportunities for reflection and improvement, a testing ground for improving the teacher’s practice. Implemented in this way, action research is also seen as.Action Research Proposal: Mathematics Problem-Solving Skill and Reading Comprehension This is an action research proposal which seeks to address the failure of some students to solve and analyze mathematics word problems due to poor reading comprehension.An Action Research The Effect of Computer-based Mathematics on Problem Solving Contact Information: Daisy T. Emanuel. math program have on problem solving. I think fifth grade math students need an extensive background in math, which most of our students do not have.
Mathematical thinking and problem solving.. The study reported here is the third in a series of research articles. Activity of solving math problems in school constitutes an ideal.
Action research improves math instruction Three Suffolk, Virginia, elementary school teachers—Paula Beckett, Deb McIntosh, and Leigh-Ann Byrd—are also new grad-uate-school candidates who have enrolled in the mathematics specialist program at their local university. Upon learning that an action.
In Malaysia, like many other countries, problem solving is one of major aspect in mathematics curriculum which required students to apply and to integrate many mathematical concepts and skills as well as making decision. However, students were reported to have difficulties in mathematics problem solving.
This chapter excerpt describes two problem solving models and describes how to use these as the basis for an action research project.
Improving Math Performance What do you think is the single most important factor in dramatically improving students’ math performance. lesson design provided by the math department which begins daily with a calendar math lesson, a problem-solving lesson, and computation.
Action Research Proposal 2 The purpose of this action research is to improve the basic math skills of algebra I students at North Panola High School. One of the fundamental pieces of algebra is taking a word problem and translating it to an algebraic expression. In order to successfully complete this.
His doctoral research dealt with problem solving and his Problem Solving in Mathematics course is a regular offering at The University of Georgia. Over the years, he has also been involved in various problem solving projects including the U.S.-Japan Joint Seminar on Problem Solving in School Mathematics.
Action Research: Using the Bar Model to Solve Word Problems. (2002), a math congress allows students to share, discuss,. we have equipped students in the past with word problem solving strategies like underlining important texts or listing the “knowns”.
Problem-solving requires practice. When deciding on methods or procedures to use to solve problems, the first thing you will do is look for clues, which is one of the most important skills in solving problems in mathematics. If you begin to solve problems by looking for clue words, you will find that these words often indicate an operation.
The purpose of this study is to find out if meaningful educational activities and the use of a manipulative in those activities might have an impact on student achievement. Using manipulative as cognitive tools should improve the teaching and learning process, and encourage student reflections on retaining the information. It has been claimed that the usage of a manipulative not only increases.
Mathematical problem solving is a core focus in Singapore’s primary and secondary math curriculum, in line with global trends in math education. The ability to solve math problems is seen as a measure of spatial-logical cognitive ability. This means that if students successfully learn how to solve math problems, they will have learned how to.
INCREASING STUDENT LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS WITH THE USE OF COLLABORATIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES Jenna Di Fatta, B.A. Sarah Garcia, B. S. Stephanie Gorman, B. S.
Action research is, fundamentally, a problem-solving technique that may be applied to a wide variety issues and problems across professions. Action research seeks to improve organizational performance through reflective and, often, collaborative analysis of outcomes.
I loved your post about the math problem solving. I just started my Masters in Math and Literacy and was researching ways to improve problem solving in students with disabilities. The process that you shared echoes the research, which suggests to use reading strategies, such as visualizing, restating, and retelling, to have students comprehend the problem.


Lots of folks understand very well what there is a math compass are wanting to know if it is an important tool within their own mathematics instruction arsenal.
The answer is sure, it’s. This software helps teachers get the most from pupils while developing a solid base for mathematics education. Here are a few of the explanations for why it’s of good use for math teachers and pupils .
Context – it’s ways to help students create abilities in certain concepts. The very ideal instance http://fscprc.in.net/how-does-new-math-work-ideas/ of that is when you introduce the idea of addition. They are going to begin to take into consideration if and the way that it should be properly utilized After students have the notion that inclusion has a direct impact on two things.
Software – it is likewise a fantastic method to teach more complex concepts in the class room While a compass can be a tool for producing straightforward concepts. Utilizing the idea of inclusion as a way to support pupils develop mathematics skills will enable them to become adept at math and they will soon be prepared to make solid decisions http://www.8888okt.com/blackjack-arithmetic/ and also build a career inside this subject.
Students have to understand the concept until can be applied by them to keep matters uncomplicated. How can this idea be used by a teacher? Effectively, one means is to find the student to show their mathematics compass with all the concept of addition. Allow the pupil to understand how exactly to apply it and this assists develop more thorough mastery of the concept.
There are a lot of ways. Teachers draw comparisons involving some notions along with your concept they might really like to introduce from the class or can do regular class talks. For example, if your teacher wishes to present contrasts in between mass and gravity, he also could do so with a math compass to explain the notion.
The following strategy is to go the concept utilizing a geometric relationship over. By using a math compass to illustrate the idea A instructor might choose the geometric relationship and introduce it. This assists to show the pupils a product of two unique sets of things could have a positive impact on a set of matters.
Use it sensibly, when you are on the lookout for a means to make utilize of a math compass. Utilize this as an instruction device, but in addition as a means to connect with pupils’ heads to help them know the concepts. At the same moment, students need to see that the notion isn’t brand new. In reality, it is just another means to support students build up the relevant skills they need to excel in this field.


3d polar coordinates to cartesian calculator
- Coordinates Polar coordinates. x : y : r : φ : 3 dimensional coordinates. Cartesian coordinates x : y : z : Spherical coordinates r : θ : φ : Cylindrical coordinates r : φ : z Mathematics Geometry 2D Geometry 3D Vectors Matrices Complex numbers Coordinates Home Features Screenshots Download Help Online help Online calculators ...
- This addition produces a rectangular Cartesian coordinate system consisting of X, Y, and Z. For polar coordinates, there are several different possibilities for describing the third dimension. We could add another axis Z that is perpendicular to the plane formed by r and theta. This addition produces a cylindrical coordinate system consisting of r.
- You can use absolute or relative polar coordinates (distance and angle) to locate points when creating objects. To use polar coordinates to specify a point, enter a distance and an angle separated by an angle bracket (<). By default, angles increase in the counterclockwise direction and decrease in the clockwise direction. To specify a clockwise direction, enter a negative value for the angle ...
- Vectors  At the end of this section you should be able to: Convert a 2D vector from polar form to Cartesian component form and vice versa. Convert a 3D vector into component form when given its coordinates in. Spherical form. Direction angles. Two points. Add together multiple vectors in component form.
- The point A has coordinates (3,0,0), the point B has coordinates, (0,3,0), the point C has coordinates (0,0,7). Find, to 0.1 degrees, the sizes of the angle between the planes OAB and ABC, where O is the origin. Could someone give me an idea of what to do? I've only just introduced myself to cartesian coordinates/vectors in 3 dimensions.
- When using Polar Coordinates, the angle is expressed in degrees counter-clockwise from the 3 o'clock position as shown in the diagram. Switching between Cartesian and Polar Coordinates. Switching between Cartesian and Polar Coordinates is very simple. G16 is used to switch to polar, and G15 is used to switch back to Cartesian coordinates.
- The angle between two planes is equal to a angle between their normal vectors. If A 1 x + B 1 y + C 1 z + D 1 = 0 and A 2 x + B 2 y + C 2 z + D 2 = 0 are a plane equations, then angle between planes can be found using the following formula. cos α =. |A 1 ·A 2 + B 1 ·B 2 + C 1 ·C 2 |. √ A 1 2 + B 1 2 + C 1 2 √ A 2 2 + B 2 2 + C 2 2.
- The Cartesian to Spherical Coordinates calculator computes the spherical coordinates Vector in 3D for a vector given its Cartesian coordinates. INSTRUCTIONS: Enter the following: ( V ): Enter the x, y and z components of V separated by commas (e.g. 3,4,5) Spherical Coordinates (ρ,θ,ϕ): The calculator returns the magnitude of the vector (ρ ...
- In this section we will look at converting integrals (including dA) in Cartesian coordinates into Polar coordinates. The regions of integration in these cases will be all or portions of disks or rings and so we will also need to convert the original Cartesian limits for these regions into Polar coordinates.
Mi hogar mi destino capitulo 20 en espaol tokyvideo gratis
Interior passat b5 5
Trailas de renta near shanghai
Lesotho food facts
Multivariable Calculus • Standards. Standards. As detailed on the syllabus, your assessment grade in this course will be determined by your proficiency on a variety of standards. (This is known as Standards Based Grading.) Below is the list of standards that form the basis for this class, along with guiding questions that address each standard.Cartesian to Polar Coordinates. x = r cos θ. y = r sin θ. Finding r and θ using x and y: 3D Polar Coordinates. 3d polar coordinates or spherical coordinates will have three parameters: distance from the origin and two angles. The 3d-polar coordinate can be written as (r, Φ, θ). Here, R = distance of from the origin
Zhang weijie body worlds
Used carado motorhomes for sale
Rumus kepala ekor hk
Poezii crestine despre incredere
Danfoss ra 2000 thermostatic radiator valves
Pretul dragostei ep 1 dailymotion
Roof tiles cashbuild
Heent objective data
Minijob verdienstgrenze 2020
Fundering voor glazen schuifwand
Plastic pitless adapter
Restored honda sl350 for sale
Setare ora televizor lg
Hamilton railway special pocket watch 23 jewels
Sudori argon strainatate
Podenco jumping fence
Hp spectre x360 specs and price philippines
Costco potranco and 1604


How do crickets ever get laid? Must be a lot of deaf ones.
Even with the speedometer broken, figuring out our speed is simple enough. We just use the stopwatch function on our mobile phones and time how long it takes to travel between two of the markers that are placed at ten kilometre intervals. Then we take that time, convert it into seconds, see how many times that number goes into 3,600 and we have our speed. Don't know why I ever bothered with a speedo in the first place, it's so easy.
And now we have the audible horny cricket noise to let us know when we've passed 85, so that's one set of calculations we don't have to do.
Eventually got to Stokes Inlet by around 10pm. An easy day's drive. Just under a thousand kilometres in around 18.5 hours with several stops along the way for food, wee, photography and to compare hoon tans.
I don't know why everybody doesn't do this trip.


Sacred Geometry, fractal geometry and the Mandelbrot Set form the science that describes the entire natural universe. For millennia, Sacred Geometry was the conceptual truth through which ancient cultures lived their daily lives, built their temples, and plotted their astrological calendars with absolute accuracy up to 2,000 years in advance.
Although sacred geometry and fractal geometry have long been recognized, even as part of the math/science curriculum in schools, it is now re-emerging as a deep understanding that the human race needs if it is to move to a new level of growth and harmonious relationship with the planet.
Ancient cultures, such as the Egyptians, Incans, Mayans, the Early Greeks and many more understood a fundamental truth of life – that nothing is random or detached. Everything in the Universe evolves from a magnificent and precise mathematical equation, and a repetition of patterns inseparable and ever evolving from the whole. Even in the very heart of a rainforest, in the seemingly chaotic growth and tangle of plant stems, trunks, vines and rotting vegetation if untouched by man, all grows and evolves to a precise pattern. In chaos there is order!
The Ancients knew and could see the magnificent universal patterns repeatedin the world around them- spirals of the conch shell; tendrils of a vine; the patters in trees, elephant trunks, octopi tentacle, the end of clouds (fractals), and even the spiralling galaxies. The sacred geometric patterns have been evidenced in ancient cultures on all sides of the planet. The geometric forms such as the circle, triangle, spiral, golden square and rectangle were believed to be sacred and formed the core design of all spiritual structures and art.
Patterns based on the flower of life (precis vesica, or two intersecting circles), spirals, and pyramids graced temples and sacred buildings and formed the basis for spiritual symbols and designs. Temples were not only decorated with these universal designs, but also built in the geometric forms. Forms and shapes included the five platonic solids (cube, tetrahedron, octahedron, dodedahedron, icosahedron), the Golden Spiral, Golden Rectangle Golden Square, Pyramid, Sphere, the tesseract (4 dimensional cube), and the Merkaba (2 conjoining tetrahedrons).
Ancient culttures knew that spaces created within these shapes radiate an energy of harmony. Some spaces such as in the great Pyramid and Stonehenge, have been known to harmonise to sound as well as light, especially within the Kings Chamber.
Beginning with the very core of Sacred Geometry is the mathematical constant, the Golden Ratio, Pi (Phi) ratio, also known as the Golden Cut, or the Golden Mean, is this simple equation – when a line is dissected, the smaller section is equal to the larger section in the same ratio as the larger section is equal to the whole. The mathematical number for Phi is 1.6180339887. This, used by great artists, inventors and builders, is the fundamental truth, which forms the entire universe. Leonardo Da Vinci used this equation in his art ot give beauty and balance to his artworks. Enlosed in every section of a natural form is the blueprint for that form to constantly repeat its pattern on to eternity. Some forms are repetitive, others have a variance of shape, colour, size and are seemingly random, but all are an echo of the original. The magnificent patterns of a butterfly are encoded in a simple formula in its DNA. It is one of the millions of perfect examples of the micro design carrying the formula for the macrocosmic vision.
You have only to look at a pineapple, pine cone, the segments of a monsterio delicio plant fruit and a myriad of plants and flowers to see the magnificent patterns, the geometry prepeated over and over again. Sacred Geometry and the swirling forms of the Mandelbrot set is nature showing us formless reality and eternity. It shows our true essence.
It was in 1980 that mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot discovered the unforgettable shape of the Mandelbrot Set. French mathematician Gaston Julia first glimpsed this from the discovery in 1917 of Julia Sets. These were sets of swirling designs, organic in shape and formed from simple mathematical formulae.
The Mandelbrot set was discovered by putting the original mathematical equations such as Z = Z2 + C into the computer and repeating this many times. The resulting drawings and designs perfectly repeated natural forms, trees, mountains, landscapes, giving rise to the thought that there is a Divine Design, a God or intelligence which allows for choice within that perfect design.
The tiny Buddha/creature shape at the very base of every cycle of fractal design is mimicked throughout nature and is the main design known as fractals. Fractals are a part of the patterns that repeat into infinity and give a new understanding of the Universe. This gives rise to the new understanding that clouds, trees and nature are not simply circles, cylinders and cubes but magnificent constantly repeating patterns, at the base of which is the pattern of the Mandelbrot. Interesting that the name Mandelbrot stems from Mandala or sacred symbol. Perhaps Benoir Mandelbrot chose to bring this to the world, but the pattern of his destiny was already in place.
The beauty of these repeating patterns are recognizable to the collective unconscious. Carl Jung, co-founder of modern Psychology, first theorized the concept of this well of symbols and imagery that is available to the human mind. When viewed, these universal images inspire feelings of harmony, peace and love. To see these patterns and to feel the connectedndess of the universe, it only takes a moment of living in present time, truly observing the now.
Eckhardt Tolle in his book A New Earth, and Deepak Chopra in his book Ageless Body, Timeless Mind both speak of truly living in the moment. It’s in that present moment, in that space between thoughts, you can connect with this Divine Essence. In this moment, you can create your destiny, because every moment is your destiny. In every moment you have choice.
It is in seeing the patterns of the Universe that an artist connects with this essence, and it is in seeing these patterns of the Universe that life’s purpose is understood. Time stops, and healing takes place. In the words of Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Chung: – ‘Be empty – be still- be aware of the Source – in this is the fulfillment of your destiny”!
The magnificent patterns of the Universe are creativity and art in its highest order, and similarly the artist, when recognising these patterns, used this formlula to make drawing simple. An example is when drawing a pineapple or pine cone, the artist recognises that the base of a pineapple is an oval with two opposing spirals forming a grid, into which the pineapple sections are then quickly drawn. The pinecone is formed by one spiral shape on an oval base. When recognising the patterns within nature, drawings are not only given life and beauty, but each drawing captures the essence, the uniqueness of the subject. The same is used for life drawing. Every human form has a rhythm of line and, when redognised by the artist, gives a lyrical quality to the finished work.
The act of creating is an art in itself, and the artist is an instrument through which source flows. When the artist becomes aware of the moment and empties the mind of all pre-conceived ideas on how to draw, he/she will create a clear mind space from “whence will flow art which breathes life”.
“ART IS AN EXPRESSION OF LIFE AND SACRED GEOMETRY IS THE ART OF LIFE ITSELF”
The understanding of the sacred geometry is an understanding of the magnificent consciousness which we are part of. It is the new awakening. Just as the infinity of the Universe unfolds in a myriad of repeating forms and patterns, so too is the human consciousness awakening in a state of egoless enlightenment. Just as the Unisversal life cycles, we are returning in understanding and conscious thought from where we came. Never before has there been the combination of science, quantum physics, mathematics, art and spirituality – bringing together the one truth out of the chaos of a Universe of concepts. Art is an expression of life and sacred geometry is the art of life itself. It echoes the beauty and infinity of the Universe.
This article is the intellectual property of Margaret Girle. For more information contact : email@example.com


Recursion, Incursion, and Hyper-incursion
How do Past and Future inform the present?
What happens in the Present is not only determined by the Past but also by the Future. Karma and Destiny both play a role as to what is going on in your life Now.
- Hyper Incursion
- Discrete Processes
- Cellular Automata
- Fractal Machine
- Turing Machine
- Non Well Founded Set Theory
- Sets as Graphs
- Predetermined Future
- Four Causes of Aristotle
- Material Cause
- Formal Cause
- Efficient Cause
- Final Cause
- Left Computer
- Right Computer
- Parallel Computing
- Fifth and the Fourth in Music Theory
- Bicameral Brain
- Hemispheric Division of Brain
- One, Two, Three. Where is the Fourth?
From GENERATION OF FRACTALS FROM INCURSIVE AUTOMATA, DIGITAL DIFFUSION AND WAVE EQUATION SYSTEMS
The recursion consists of the computation of the future value of the variable vector X(t+l) at time t+l from the values of these variables at present and/or past times, t, t-l, t-2 ….by a recursive function :
X (t+ 1) =f(X(t), X(t-1) …p..)
where p is a command parameter vector. So, the past always determines the future, the present being the separation line between the past and the future.
Starting from cellular automata, the concept of Fractal Machines was proposed in which composition rules were propagated along paths in the machine frame. The computation is based on what I called “INclusive reCURSION”, i.e. INCURSION (Dubois, 1992a- b). An incursive relation is defined by:
X(t+l) =f(…, X (t+l), X(t), X(t-1) ..p..).
which consists in the computation of the values of the vector X(t+l) at time t+l from the values X(t-i) at time t-i, i=1, 2 …. , the value X(t) at time t and the value X(t+j) at time t+j, j=l, 2, …. in function of a command vector p. This incursive relation is not trivial because future values of the variable vector at time steps t+l, t+2 …. must be known to compute them at the time step t+ 1.
In a similar way to that in which we define hyper recursion when each recursive step generates multiple solutions, I define HYPERINCURSION. Recursive computational transformations of such incursive relations are given in Dubois and Resconi (1992, 1993a-b).
I have decided to do this for three reasons. First, in relativity theory space and time are considered as a four-vector where time plays a role similar to space. If time t is replaced by space s in the above definition of incursion, we obtain
X(s+ l) =f( …, X(s+ 1), X(s), X (s-l) …p.).
and nobody is astonished: a Laplacean operator looks like this. Second, in control theory, the engineers control engineering systems by defining goals in the future to compute their present state, similarly to our haman anticipative behaviour (Dubois, 1996a-b). Third, I wanted to try to do a generalisation of the recursive and sequential Turing Machine in looking at space-time cellular automata where the order in which the computations are made is taken into account with an inclusive recursion.
We have already proposed some methods to realise the design of any discrete systems with an extension of the recursion by the concept of incursion and hyperincursion based on the Fractal Machine, a new type of Cellular Automata, where time plays a central role. In this framework, the design of the model of any discrete system is based on incursion relations where past, present and future states variables are mixed in such a way that they define an indivisible wholeness invariant. Most incursive relations can be transformed in different sets of recursive algorithms for computation. In the same way, the hyperincursion is an extension of the hyper recursion in which several different solutions can be generated at each time step. By the hyperincursion, the Fractal Machine could compute beyond the theoretical limits of the Turing Machine (Dubois and Resconi, 1993a-b). Holistic properties of the hyperincursion are related to the Golden Ratio with the Fibonacci Series and the Fractal Golden Matrix (Dubois and Resconi, 1992). An incursive method was developed for the inverse problem, the Newton- Raphson method and an application in robotics (Dubois and Resconi, 1995). Control by incursion was applied to feedback systems (Dubois and Resconi, 1994). Chaotic recursions can be synchronised by incursion (1993b). An incursive control of linear, non- linear and chaotic systems was proposed (Dubois, 1995a, Dubois and Resconi, 1994, 1995). The hyperincursive discrete Lotka-Voiterra equations have orbital stability and show the emergence of chaos (Dubois, 1992). By linearisation of this non-linear system, hyperincursive discrete harmonic oscillator equations give stable oscillations and discrete solutions (Dubois, 1995). A general theory of stability by incursion of discrete equations systems was developed with applications to the control of the numerical instabilities of the difference equations of the Lotka-Volterra differential equations as well as the control of the fractal chaos in the Pearl-Verhulst equation (Dubois and Resconi, 1995). The incursion harmonic oscillator shows eigenvalues and wave packet like in quantum mechanics. Backward and forward velocities are defined in this incursion harmonic oscillator. A connection is made between incursion and relativity as well as the electromagnetic field. The foundation of a hyperincursive discrete mechanics was proposed in relation to the quantum mechanics (Dubois and Resconi, 1993b, 1995).
This paper will present new developments and will show that the incursion and hyper-incursion could be a new tool of research and development for describing systems where the present state of such systems is also a function of their future states. The anticipatory property of incursion is an incremental final cause which could be related to the Aristotelian Final Cause.
Aristotle identified four explicit categories of causation: 1. Material cause; 2. Formal cause; 3. Efficient cause; 4. Final cause. Classically, it is considered that modem physics and mechanics only deal with efficient cause and biology with material cause. Robert Rosen (1986) gives another interpretation and asks why a certain Newtonian mechanical system is in the state (phase) Ix(t) (position), v(t) (velocity)]:
1. Aristotle’s “material cause” corresponds to the initial conditions of the system [x(0), v(0)] at time t=0.
2. The current cause at the present time is the set of constraints which convey to the system an “identity”, allowing it to go by recursion from the given initial phase to the latter phase, which corresponds to what Aristotle called formal cause.
3. What we call inputs or boundary conditions are the impressed forces by the environment, called efficient cause by Aristotle.
As pointed out by Robert Rosen, the first three of Aristotle’s causal categories are tacit in the Newtonian formalism: “the introduction of a notion of final cause into the Newtonian picture would amount to allowing a future state or future environment to affect change of state in the present, and this would be incompatible with the whole Newtonian picture. This is one of the main reasons that the concept of Aristotelian finality is considered incompatible with modern science.
In modern physics, Aristotelian ideas of causality are confused with determinism, which is quite different…. That is, determinism is merely a mathematical statement of functional dependence or linkage. As Russell points out, such mathematical relations, in themselves, carry no hint as to which of their variables are dependent and which are independent.”
The final cause could impress the present state of evolving systems, which seems a key phenomenon in biological systems so that the classical mathematical models are unable to explain many of these biological systems. An interesting analysis of the Final Causation was made by Emst von Glasersfeld (1990). The self-referential fractal machine shows that the hyperincursive field dealing with the final cause could be also very important in physical and computational systems. The concepts of incursion and hyper-incursion deal with an extension of the recursive processes for which future states can determine present states of evolving systems. Incursion is defined as invariant functional relations from which several recursive models with interacting variables can be constructed in terms of diverse physical structures (Dubois & Resconi, 1992, 1993b). Anticipation, viewed as an Aristotelian final cause, is of great importance to explain the dynamics of systems and the semantic information (Dubois, 1996a-b). Information is related to the meaning of data. It is important to note that what is usually called Information Theory is only a communication theory dealing with the communication of coded data in channels between a sender and a receptor without any reference to the semantic aspect of the messages. The meaning of the message can only be understood by the receiver if he has the same cultural reference as the sender of the message and even in this case, nobody can be sure that the receiver understands the message exactly as the sender. Because the message is only a sequential explanation of a non-communicable meaning of an idea in the mind of the sender which can be communicated to the receiver so that a certain meaning emerges in his mind. The meaning is relative or subjective in the sense that it depends on the experiential life or imagination of each of us. It is well- known that the semantic information of signs (like the coding of the signals for traffic) are the same for everybody (like having to stop at the red light at a cross roads) due to a collective agreement of their meaning in relation to actions. But the semantic information of an idea, for example, is more difficult to codify. This is perhaps the origin of creativity for which a meaning of something new emerges from a trial to find a meaning for something which has no a priori meaning or a void meaning.
Mind dynamics seems to be a parallel process and the way we express ideas by language is sequential. Is the sequential information the same as the parallel information? Let us explain this by considering the atoms or molecules in a liquid. We can calculate the average velocity of the particles from in two ways. The first way is to consider one particular particle and to measure its velocity during a certain time. One obtains its mean velocity which corresponds to the mean velocity of any particle of the liquid. The sec- ond way is to consider a certain number of particles at a given time and to measure the velocity of each of them. This mean velocity is equal to the first mean velocity. So there are two ways to obtain the same information. One by looking at one particular element along the time dimension and the other by looking at many elements at the same time. For me, explanation corresponds to the sequential measure and understanding to the parallel measure. Notice that ergodicity is only available with simple physical systems, so in general we can say that there are distortions between the sequential and the parallel view of any phenomenon. Perhaps the brain processes are based on ergodicity: the left hemisphere works in a sequential mode while the right hemisphere works in a parallel mode. The left brain explains while the right brain understands. The two brains arecomplementary and necessary.
Today computer science deals with the “left computer”. Fortunately, the informaticians have invented parallel computers which are based on complex multiplication of Turing Machines. It is now the time to reconsider the problem of looking at the “right computer”. Perhaps it will be an extension of the Fractal Machine (Dubois & Resconi, 1993a).
I think that the sequential way deals with the causality principle while the parallel way deals with a finality principle. There is a paradox: causality is related to the successive events in time while finality is related to a collection of events at a simultaneous time, i.e. out of time.Causality is related to recursive computations which give rise to the local generation of patterns in a synchronic way. Finality is related to incursive or hyperincursive symmetry invariance which gives rise to an indivisible wholeness, a holistic property in a diachronic way. Recursion (and Hyper recursion) is defined in the Sets Theory and Incursion (and Hyperincursion) could be defined in the new framework of the Hypersets Theory (Aczel, 1987; Barwise, Moss, 1991).
If the causality principle is rather well acknowledged, a finality principle is still controversial. It would be interesting to re-define these principles. Causality is defined for sequential events. If x(t) represents a variable at time t, a causal rule x(t+l) = f(x(t)) gives the successive states of the variable x at the successive time steps t, t+l, t+2, … from the recursive functionf(x(t)), starting with an initial state x(0) at time t=0. Defined like this, the system has no degrees of freedom: it is completely determined by the function and the initial condition. No new things can happen for such a system: the whole future is completely determined by its past. It is not an evolutionary system but a developmental system. If the system tends to a stable point, x(t+l) = x(t) and it remains in this state for ever. The variable x can represent a vector of states as a generalisation.
In the same way, I think that determinism is confused with predictability, in modern physics. The recent fractal and deterministic chaos theory (Mandeibrot, 1982; Peitgen, Jurgens, Saupe, 1992) is a step beyond classical concepts in physics. If the function is non-linear, chaotic behaviour can appear, what is called (deterministic) chaos. In this case, determinism does not give an accurate prediction of the future of the system from its initial conditions, what is called sensitivity to initial conditions. A chaotic system loses the memory of its past by finite computation. But it is important to point out that an average value, or bounds within which the variable can take its values, can be known;
it is only the precise values at the successive steps which are not predictable. The local information is unpredictable while the global symmetry is predictable. Chaos can presents a fractai geometry which shows a self-similarity of patterns at any scale.
A well-known fractal is the Sierpinski napkin. The self-similarity of pattems at any scale can be viewed as a symmetry invariance at any scale. An interesting property of such fractals is the fact that the final global pattern symmetry can be completely independent of the local pattern symmetry given as the initial condition of the process from which the fractal is built. The symmetry of the fractal structure, a final cause, can be independent of the initial conditions, a material cause. The formal cause is the local symmetry of the generator of the fractal, independently of its material elements and the efficient cause can be related to the recursive process to generate the fractal. In this particular fractal geometry, the final cause is identical to the final cause. The efficient cause is the making of the fractal and the material cause is just a substrate from which the fractal emerges but this substrate doesn’t play a role in the making.
Finally, the concepts of incursion and hyperincursion can be related to the theory of hypersets which are defined as sets containing themselves. This theory of hypersets is an alternative theory to the classical set theory which presents some problems as the in- completeness of G6del: a formal system cannot explain all about itself and some propositions cannot be demonstrated as true or false (undecidability). Fundamental entities of systems which are considered as ontological could be explain in a non-ontological way by self-referential systems.
Please see my related posts
Key sources of Research
Computing Anticipatory Systems with Incursion and Hyperincursion
Daniel M. DUBOIS
Anticipation in Social Systems:
the Incursion and Communication of Meaning
Daniel M. Dubois
GENERATION OF FRACTALS FROM INCURSIVE AUTOMATA, DIGITAL DIFFUSION AND WAVE EQUATION SYSTEMS
Daniel M. Dubois
Non-wellfounded Set Theory
The Mathematical Intelligencer
volume 13, pages31–41(1991)


What is the factorial of 100 in voice? What is the value of 100 factorial? Well, The approximate value of 100! is 9.3326215443944E + 157. The quantity of zeros toward the finish of 100! is 24. The quantity of digits in 100 factorial is 158.
From here, how do you solve 4 factorials? 4! = 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 24. 7! = 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 5040 .
How much is 100 factorial to speak of? The number of digits in the 100 factorial is 158.
Also, what is the factorial of 100,000? 0
What is the factorial of 20? Answer: The factorial of 20 is 2432902008176640000.
The Factorial of n is denoted by n!
What is the factorial of 100 in voice?
The factorial of a number is the result of the relative multitude of numbers from 1 to that number. Thus, the factorial of 100 is the result of the relative multitude of numbers from 1 to 100. This number is huge, so we’ll utilize Logical Documentation for composing it. The factorial of 100 is 9.332621544e+157.
What is the value of 100 factorial?
100! = 93,326,215,443,944,152,681,699,238,856,266,700,490,715,968,264,381,621,468,592,963,895,217,599,993,229,915,608,941,463,976,156,518,286,253,697,920,827,223,758,251,185,210,916,864,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
How do you solve 5 factorials?
How do you solve 5 factorials? To find the factorial of 5, or 5! Simply use the formula; that is, it multiplies all the integers from 5 to 1. When we use the formula to find 5! We get 120. So 5! = 120 .
How do you compute factorials quickly?
How many zeros are there in 100 factorial?
Therefore, the number of zeros is 100! They will be 24.
Also, how do you solve 5? To find the factorial of 5, or 5! Simply use the formula; that is, it multiplies all the integers from 5 to 1. When we use the formula to find 5! We get 120. So 5! = 120 .
What is the IP value?
In short, pi, which is written as the Greek letter for p, or π, is the ratio of the circumference of any circle to the diameter of that circle. Regardless of the size of the circle, this ratio will always be equal to pi. In decimal structure, the worth of pi is around 3.14.
What is the largest factorial? The largest factorial ever calculated is 170. Stay connected with BYJU’S to learn more about other concepts.
How do you solve 3 factorials?
Factorial addition or multiplication? Yes. I assume you mean that since the factorial of is, an additive factorial of would be. A number in this form is called a triangular number, and the formula is simple.
How big is 52 factorial?
52! is approximately 8.0658e67. To get an exact representation, look at a factorial table or try a “new school” calculator, one that understands long integers.
How are factorial problems solved?
Can you multiply factorials?
Factorials, denoted by a. You can also multiply factorials by hand. The easiest way to do this is to calculate each factor individually and then multiply their products. You can also use specific factorial rules to extract common factors, simplifying the multiplication process.
What are factorials used for? It is common to use factorial functions to compute combinations and permutations. On account of the Factorial, you can likewise compute probabilities.
What is the factorial value?
Factorial, in mathematics, is the product of all positive integers less than or equal to a given positive integer and denoted by that integer and an exclamation point. Thus, the factorial seven is written 7! , which means 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × 7. The zero factorial is defined to be equal to 1.
What are factorials used for? It is common to use factorial functions to compute combinations and permutations. Thanks to the Factorial you can also calculate probabilities.
How are factorials reduced?
Compare the factorials in the numerator and denominator. Expand the largest factorial to include the smaller ones in the sequence. Cancel the common factors between the numerator and the denominator. Rearrange further by multiplying or dividing the leftover articulations.
How do you write the factorial symbol? The factorial (denoted or represented as n!) since a positive number or integer (denoted by n) is the product of all previous positive numbers or equivalents to n (the positive integer). … The notation for a factorial (n!) was introduced in the early 19th century by Christian Kramp, a French mathematician.


Parent Function Of A Parabola. The following figures show the graphs of parent functions: The two halves of the parabola would line up one over.
(in industry, most software will actually denote the. The parabola would have an axis of symmetry of x = 0, and the vertex would be (0, 0). Y = x2, where x ≠ 0.
Share This Page To Google Classroom.
Of this form is y = x2. The equation for the quadratic parent function is. The parent function of a parabola is where are the vertex.
This Article Focuses On The Traits Of The Parent Functions.
Fifteen years teaching and tutoring basic math skills and algebra. This article focuses on the traits of the parent functions. The original graph of a parabolic (quadratic) function has a vertex at (0,0) and shifts left or right by h units and up or.
The Simplest Parabola Is Y = X2, Whose Graph Is Shown At The Right.
The vertex form of a parabola is: Please use the sliders for a, h and k to determine the effect each variable has in transforming the quadratic. For the family of quadratic functions, y = ax2 + bx + c, the simplest function.
Review The First Few Sections Of This Article And Your Own Notes, Then Let’s Try Out Some.
The following figures show the graphs of parent functions: A parent function is a template of domain and range that extends to other members of a function family. The parent functions are a base of functions you should be able to recognize the graph of given the function and the other way around.
This Is The Parent Function Of Exponential Functions.
Here are links to parent function transformations in other sections: A parabola tends to look like a smile or a frown,. If you graph a quadratic function, you get something called a parabola.


November 12, 2019
How can you calculate the required amount of humidification for your factory?
Humidification is affected not only by the dimensions of the room. It is also affected by multiple other parameters such as temperature, ventilation, volume and setup.
Therefore, to pick the perfect humidifier for your industrial environment, it is necessary to know the “required amount of humidification”. This way you will be able to select a humidifier with the right humidification capacity.
You have 2 tools at your disposal that can help you to determine the right quantity of humidity you need to add in a room: the psychrometric chart and a mathematics formula.
You will need to use both of these tools to determine with precision the humidity load that needs to be added to your room to obtain the right humidity level.
- With the psychrometric chart, you know how much quantity of humidity you need to add in order to reach the desired relative humidity level.
- With the formula, you can calculate the exact humidity load needed depending on the characteristics of your room.
How to optimize these tools to find the correct humidification ?
First, let’s look at the psychrometric chart that you can use to determine the required amount of humidification.
This diagram shows the characteristics of “humid air” related to relative and absolute humidity. It helps to understand parameters like dry-bulb temperature (DBT), dew point temperature, absolute humidity, relative humidity, and enthalpy (the total amount of energy in a system).
If you know two of those elements, you can find all the remaining ones using the psychrometric chart.
The psychrometric chart
The psychrometric chart shows how the metrics evolve depending on your parameters.
It shows the dry-bulb temperature (DBT), the absolute humidity, the relative humidity, and the enthalpy at a standard pressure: 101325 Pa. You can figure out any figure of the chart if you know 2 of these parameters.
For example, if you know the current relative humidity and the actual temperature in the room, you can just cross-check both of these values on the graph and find out the absolute humidity of the room.
The mathematics formula to calculate the humidification load
The second tool is the formula to calculate how much humidity you should bring to your room:
- L represents the humidification load (amount of humidity or water) that you should add to the airflow every hour. It is expressed in kg/hour.
- V is the ventilation rate and it represents the number of times that the whole air of the room is changed. It can be expressed in m³/hour and can be calculated by multiplying the volume of the room by the change of air per hour (CAH).
- R represents the air density. It is 1.2 when the temperature is 20 degrees. It is expressed in kg/m³.
- (x1 – x2) represents the difference between the desired humidity levels and the humidity levels of the air we bring in, expressed in kg of water per kg of air: kg/kg. This is the absolute humidity per kilogram of air, also called the humidity ratio on the psychometric graph.
Both the formula and the psychrometric chart can help you find out how you can reach the desired humidity level. Let’s take a concrete example with figures on how you can use both tools accordingly.
How to use the psychrometric chart?
Let’s assume that a room has a temperature of 20 degrees, and a relative humidity of 30%.
- First, you need to find out the amount of water in the air. You can find out by crossing the dry-bulb temperature (DBT) and the relative humidity values on the graph. Mark the crossing point(A). Then you have to report them to the y-axis to find the humidity ratio. The result for 20°C and 30%RH is approximately 4.5 grams of water per kilogram of air.
- Secondly, you must find the amount of water that is needed in the air to reach the humidification needed for your industry.
Let’s say that you want to reach 50%RH. Find the previous crossed point. Then follow the green enthalpy line upward to the 50%RH. Report the second crossing point(B) to the y-axis. In this case, the value is 6 grams of water per kilogram of air.
Remark: you can also notice that the dry-bulb temperature decreased to approximately 16.5 °C.
Now, you know that you have to add 6 – 4.5 = 1.5 grams of water per kilogram of air.
How to calculate the exact amount of humidification needed with the formula?
L = V x R x ( X1 – X2)
We already know that the air density R is 1.2 when the temperature is 20 degrees, and the humidity ratio (X1 – X2) needed to add is 1.5 grams.
Reminder: (X1 – X2) is expressed in kg/kg
L = V x 1.2 x 0.0015
All you have left to do is to calculate the ventilation rate V by multiplying the volume of your room by the change of air per hour.
Moreover, here is an indication of the air change per hour depending on your room’s construction.
If the dimensions of your rooms are 15m x 25m x 2.5m = 937.5m³ and your room has a unit of 1 change of air per hour, then the humidification load will be :
L = 937.5 x 1.2 x 0.0015 = 1.6875 kg/hour
Therefore, in order to reach a relative humidity level of 50% for your room of 937.5m³, you will need a humidifier with a humidifying capacity of 1.7 kg/hour or 1.7 l/hour minimum.
Knowing the exact amount of humidity you need to add for your application and desired humidity level will help you narrow down which humidifier you require.
If you want to use the psychrometric chart you can download it following this link.
If you still have doubts, our engineers can support you with a site survey and determine the best approach for your factory. Book a site visit here


We only had 32 minutes left and I was on question 28 I didn't know what to do but just sit and think what the answer was, I skipped that question and went to the other I needed another paper because it was full of scribbles because I didn't know what to do. Suddenly something just popped in my head I wrote it down and all I had to do is divide the number and than multiply it. I was really forsure that it was right but I had a go.
It was going to an end, "12 minutes left" said matua lewin, I went to question to question it went hard but at the same time I could get the answer. I was upto questoion 40 I only had 1 more to do and it was pretty easy it said What is 3/4 and it showed different types of answers and options. It was really easy and I skipped off to the last question 5 minutes left on the clock. I didn't know the acuall answer to the question I had to think and write it on paper, I still didnt get it and I was still thinking "This is too hard" I said to Matua lewin, He wouldn't help me but game me some advice he just said "Remember on what we worked on Numberlines, Decimals, Dividing, Multiply, Subtraction and addition now its your time to think" I said ok and I dicided to use my doubles and split by using 2 ways.
Tic toc it was the only thing that I had in my head Time was going fast 2 minutes left I hurried myself and quickly had an answer in my head "Should I" I was thinking if it was or not Hmmmm. Only 50 seconds left I clicked it and pressed DONE I was pretty proud of myself that I got to finish the test. We had only had a few seconds to rest our fingers, the boys collected our scrap of paper "and we are done" said matua lewin.
During the test as I said I was pretty nervous I didn;t know if I could do it or not but I just had to so that I can get a better report. I didn't know what to do but just think, at the end I was still nervous because I don;t know if the results will be bad or good. But overall I enjoyed the test and also enjoyed solving them by paper which is pretty weird.


Edward Witten (born August 26, 1951) is an American theoretical physicist and professor of mathematical physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey.
Witten is a researcher in string theory, quantum gravity, supersymmetric quantum field theories, and other areas of mathematical physics.
In addition to his contributions to physics, Witten's work has significantly impacted pure mathematics. In 1990 he became the first and so far the only physicist to be awarded a Fields Medal by the International Mathematical Union. In 2004, Time magazine stated that Witten is widely thought to be the world's smartest living theoretical physicist.


New Essays on Peirce's Mathematical Philosophy
Edited by Matthew E. Moore
This is a collection of new essays on Charles Sanders Peirce's philosophy of mathematics. Peirce is widely regarded as one of the greatest philosophers America has yet produced. The inventor of pragmatism, Peirce is also a seminal figure in the development of modern logic, famed for his discovery (independently of Frege) of the quantifier, and for his pioneering work on the logic of relations. His searching investigations in the “logic of science” have profoundly influenced subsequent work in epistemology and the philosophy of science, and his semiotics (theory of signs) has had a similar impact on the philosophy of language, and also on linguistics and literary theory. Peirce's philosophy of mathematics, by contrast, has received relatively little attention, despite its centrality to his thought, and the depth of his insights into the perennial problems of the subject.
Peirce’s mathematical philosophy is of interest both to Peirce scholars and to philosophers of mathematics. In this volume, eleven philosophers look afresh at this neglected but vital dimension of Peirce’s thought. The essays are wide-ranging in their coverage, with in-depth discussions of such topics as: Peirce’s mathematical ontology; his account of mathematical objectivity; pragmaticism as a philosophy of mathematics, in comparison with the standard approaches to the subject; imagination and hypothesis-making in mathematics; Peircean semiotics and mathematical practice; the place of mathematics in Peirce’s general theory of inquiry; Peirce’s theory of the continuum, reconstructed in terms of category theory and in terms of the “absolute arithmetic continuum”; Peirce’s mathematical and philosophical analyses of topology; his reading and interpretation of Cantor’s set-theoretic writings.
Peirce was truly a mathematical philosopher. He was himself a first-rate mathematician, the most gifted son of Benjamin Peirce, the foremost American mathematician of the time; he often made his philosophical points by means of mathematical arguments and examples; and he believed that philosophy must begin with logic, which rests in turn upon mathematics. Moreover, many of his central concepts—most notably that of continuity—are as much mathematical as they are philosophical. For all of these reasons we cannot fully understand Peirce's philosophy unless we come to grips with the mathematical dimensions of his thought.
Peirce was also an original and important philosopher of mathematics. He was, along with Frege and Hilbert among others, one of the founders of the fields of mathematical logic and foundations of mathematics. His philosophy, like Frege’s and Hilbert’s, grew out of and was informed by his experience as a professional scientist. Unlike Frege and Hilbert, Peirce saw as his primary task the development of a comprehensive metaphysical and epistemological system. He offers distinctive solutions, within the context of that system, to the main problems in the metaphysics and epistemology of mathematics. Peirce's theory of diagrammatic reasoning, formalized in his innovative system of Existential Graphs, provides a persuasive account of how we acquire mathematical knowledge. His distinction between theorematic and corollarial reasoning, a by-product of his theory of diagrammatic reasoning, bears directly on vexed questions about computability and incompleteness, and about the informal character of mathematical knowledge. On the metaphysical side, Peirce offers a sophisticated and nuanced account of the objects of mathematics, such as numbers and sets.
Matthew E. Moore is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Brooklyn College in Brooklyn, New York. He is the editor of the forthcoming Beings of Reason: Selected Writings on Philosophy of Mathematics by Charles Sanders Peirce and a member of the Executive Committee of the Charles S. Peirce Society.


A setup in which a large trader has sold a certain number of American-type derivatives is considered. The large trader’s trades are assumed to have an impact on prices so that he may be tempted to minimize the payoff of the derivative by manipulating the underlying asset.
However, the option holders have the right to exercise the option, turning the pricing problem in a two-player stochastic game. It is shown that the solution of this optimization problem can be described as the solution of a double obstacle variational inequality and the optimal strategy for the large trader and the optimal exercise time for the option holder are obtained. The fact that price manipulation may force the option holders to exercise before the maturity implies that regulators must monitor stock prices and options sellers activity continuously. Our theory gives us the precise time at which a market manipulator will start manipulating prices. We also calculate a maximum number of options that can be sold so that no manipulation strategies are possible in terms of quantities such as the bid-ask spread and the price impact factor. We conclude with a sensitivity analysis in which we compare the timing and size of manipulation interventions by the large trader as well as the optimal exercise region for the options holders for different levels of liquidity.


public static enum NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority extends Enum<NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority>
There are two modes, RELAXED and STRICT:
The default settings for compact notation rounding are Max-Fraction = 0 (round to the nearest integer), Max-Significant = 2 (round to 2 significant digits), and priority RELAXED (choose the constraint that results in more digits being displayed).
Conflicting *minimum* fraction and significant digits are always resolved in the direction that results in more trailing zeros.
Example 1: Consider the number 3.141, with various different settings:
The rounding priority determines how to resolve the conflict when both Max-Fraction and Max-Significant are set. With RELAXED, the less-strict setting (the one that causes more digits to be displayed) will be used; Max-Significant wins. With STRICT, the more-strict setting (the one that causes fewer digits to be displayed) will be used; Max-Fraction wins.
Example 2: Consider the number 8317, with various different settings:
Here, RELAXED favors Max-Fraction and STRICT favors Max-Significant. Note that this larger number caused the two modes to favor the opposite result.
|Enum Constant and Description|
Favor greater precision by relaxing one of the rounding constraints.
Favor adherence to all rounding constraints by producing lower precision.
|Modifier and Type||Method and Description|
Returns the enum constant of this type with the specified name.
Returns an array containing the constants of this enum type, in the order they are declared.
clone, compareTo, equals, finalize, getDeclaringClass, hashCode, name, ordinal, toString, valueOf
public static final NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority RELAXED
public static final NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority STRICT
public static NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority values()
for (NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority c : NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority.values()) System.out.println(c);
public static NumberFormatter.RoundingPriority valueOf(String name)
Copyright © 2016 Unicode, Inc. and others.


Go forward in time to October 2009.
magit is one of those gems that one always discovers late, and then regrets not having started using earlier. If you are an emacs and git user, this is what you are missing to get those perfect commits.
Wonderful article on Ricardo Baeza R., my Professor for Applied Math and Linear Algebra back in the Facultad, awarded now with the Chilean National Prize for Exact Sciences 2009.
Go backwards in time to August 2009.


Rocketship Spark Academy
Spark Academy ranks #1 in math AND #1 in ELA across all students in the 16 schools in the Franklin-McKinley District! Rocketship schools are free, public elementary schools that are committed to putting every student on the path to college. Students at Rocketship schools across the Bay Area make remarkable progress every year. In a single school year, Rocketeers (that's what we call our students) achieve a year and a half of growth in math and reading. Our focus on personalized learning and parent engagement allows us to meet the unique needs of each and every student we serve.
Rocketship schools are community schools. We serve all students including English language learners and students with special needs. We partner closely with parents to create a school that is deeply connected to the community we serve. Join us and together, we will prepare your child for liftoff!
#1 School in both math AND English Language Arts performance among ALL students in the District


One proof of the number's irrationality:
Assume that √2 is a rational number, meaning that there exists an integer a and an integer b in general such that a / b = √2.
Then √2 can be written as an irreducible fraction a / b such that a and b are coprime integers and (a / b)^2 = 2.
It follows that a^2 / b^2 = 2 and a^2 = 2b^2.
Therefore a^2 is even because it is equal to 2b^2. (2b^2 is necessarily even because it is 2 times another whole number and even numbers are multiples of 2.)
It follows that a must be even (as squares of odd integers are never even).
Because a is even, there exists an integer k that fulfills: a = 2k.
Substituting 2k from step 6 for a in the second equation of step 3: 2b^2 = (2k)^2 is equivalent to 2b^2 = 4k^2, which is equivalent to b^2 = 2k^2.
Because 2k^2 is divisible by two and therefore even, and because 2k^2 = b^2, it follows that b^2 is also even which means that b is even.
By steps 5 and 8 a and b are both even, which contradicts that a / b is irreducible as stated in step 2.
released January 1, 2013
Thank you to pat, who recorded several of these. I have no idea how to get in touch with you, nor do I even remember your last name. Also, thanks to Indiana at Secret Pennies Records for releasing the cassettes!


An increasing number of scholars are achieving success with StudyX.
Our math solver uses AI-powered technology to accurately recognize and interpret mathematical expressions and formulas from images, enabling seamless problem-solving from various sources.
Our AI is powered by ChatGPT and GPT4, with code interpreters, offering higher accuracy and providing systematic, step-by-step solutions to mathematical problems. This ensures comprehensive and accurate problem-solving processes.
We offer comprehensive support for a wide range of mathematical problems, leveraging AI capabilities to enhance accuracy and versatility in addressing diverse mathematical challenges.
Offer step-by-step solutions for solving algebraic equations and inequalities, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the problem-solving process.
Provide methods for calculating the area and perimeter of various geometric shapes, facilitating accurate and efficient problem-solving.
Assist with complex calculus problems, including differentiation and integration, through systematic and detailed solutions.
Address trigonometric functions and problems related to triangles, ensuring thorough and accurate problem-solving processes.
Provide assistance with probability and statistics problems, offering detailed explanations and solutions to enhance understanding.
Offer comprehensive support for linear algebra problems, including matrix operations and systems of equations, through systematic and detailed solutions.
Based on our experimental results, StudyX's Math Solver has achieved an accuracy rate exceeding 92%, surpassing the accuracy of GPT-4. Following its release on the GPT Store, StudyX's Math Solver successfully secured a position in the Top 5 of the GPT Store's education ranking.
Our Math Solver is primarily designed for solving algebraic, equations, and mathematical problems and does not include the capability to generate solid geometry figures so far.
Yes, it can provide a step-by-step solution to the problems.
Become a member of StudyX and improve your study experience through StudyX's AI and Community guidance, as well as 7/24 expert assistance.


Topics include the basic concepts of set theory, cardinal numbers, transfinite methods, and a good deal more in 25 Naive Set Theory By: Paul R. Halmos. PATRICK SUPPES—Axiomatic Set Theory. PAUL R. HALMOS—Naive Set Theory. JOHN L. KELLEY —Introduction to Modern Algebra. R. DUBISCH—Student. Halmos Naive Set Theory is a classic and dense little book on axiomatic set theory, from a "naive" perspective. Which is to say, the book won't.
|Author:||Victor Bergstrom Jr.|
|Published:||1 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||37.55 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.85 Mb|
|Uploader:||Victor Bergstrom Jr.|
The Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 2 It is the purpose of this purely expository book to tell the beginning student of advanced mathematics the basic principles and facts of set theory. The treatment is called naive because the language used is the same as that of ordinary informal mathematics.
But as a matter of fact the treatment is axiomatic because the proofs are based on the axioms which are commonly used in the well-known halmos naive set theory.
A comparative study of alternative sets of axioms is not contemplated. The style is almost conversational and makes for pleasant reading.
It halmos naive set theory the drawback that some proofs are not as complete as might be desirable. Only the essential theorems are displayed and the reader should unearth the other ones from the informal explanations.
Monthly 68 4 Having worked both in formal logic and in plain mathematics, Halmos is admirably qualified to write this book.
Book Review: Naive Set Theory (MIRI research guide)
It is possible that he was first prompted to set pen to paper when as a Van Nostrand editor he saw the manuscript of Suppes's Axiomatic Set Theory. In any event the two books form a halmos naive set theory contrasting pair, Suppes's for the careful logician investigating say the independence of the axiom of choice, Halmos's for the mathematician-in-the-street who just wants to stay out of trouble when he does say measure theory.
- Naive Set Theory by Paul R. Halmos
- Halmos Set Theory
- Naive Set Theory: Paul R. Halmos: : Books
- Product Review
It seems halmos naive set theory the reviewer that Halmos should have relaxed his "naive" principles occasionally, at least in his examples. What I got out of it is that set theorists aim to find definitions of intuitive, self-evident concepts using the bare minimum of new constructions.
In some theories this is done. He can even be quite humorous at times — I laughed out loud reading a passage on page As to set theory applied to machine learning, it halmos naive set theory be that what is needed differs from the content of Halmos' book.
I like the book by E.
Naive Set Theory
Axiom of choice The axiom of choice lets you, from any collection of non-empty sets, select an element from every set in the collection. The axiom is necessary to do these kind of "choices" with infinite sets. In finite cases, one can construct functions for the job halmos naive set theory the other axioms.
Though, the axiom of choice often makes the job easier in finite cases so it is used where it isn't necessary.
Zorn's lemma Zorn's lemma is used in similar ways to the axiom of choice - making infinite many choices at once - which perhaps is not very halmos naive set theory considering ZL and AC have been proven to be equivalent.
Well ordering A well-ordered set is a totally ordered set with the extra condition that every non-empty subset of it has a smallest element.
This extra condition is useful halmos naive set theory working with infinite sets. The principle of transfinite induction means that if the presence of all strict predecessors of an element always implies the presence of the element itself, then the set must contain everything.
Why does this matter?
Naive Set Theory (book) - Wikipedia
It halmos naive set theory you can make conclusions about infinite sets beyond w, where mathematical induction isn't sufficient. Transfinite recursion Transfinite recursion is an analogue to the ordinary recursion theorem, in a similar way that transfinite induction is an analogue to mathematical induction - recursive functions for infinite sets beyond w.
In modern lingo, what Halmos calls a "similarity" is an "order isomorphism".
Ordinal numbers The axiom of substitution is called the axiom schema of replacement in modern use.


Réamplification du fichier en cours...
In this lecture I intend to review a few selected recent results on numerical approximations for high-dimensional nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs), nonlinear stochastic ordinary differential equations (SDEs), and high-dimensional nonlinear forward-backward stochastic ordinary differential equations (FBSDEs). Such equations are key ingredients in a number of pricing models that are day after day used in the financial engineering industry to estimate prices of financial derivatives. The lecture includes content on lower and upper error bounds, on strong and weak convergence rates, on Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) processes, on the Heston model, as well as on nonlinear pricing models for financial derivatives. We illustrate our results by several numerical simulations and we also calibrate some of the considered derivative pricing models to real exchange market prices of financial derivatives on the stocks in the American Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) stock market index
Identifiez-vous pour ajouter un commentaire.