Abstract
On-policy (self) distillation (OPSD) is increasingly adopted for language-model post-training. It strengthens the teacher with privileged information but can induce a privilege illusion: the student learns privilege-dependent behavior it cannot reproduce from its inference-time context, yet behaves as if the training-time privileged information remained available, ultimately degrading performance. In this paper, we identify information asymmetry between the privileged teacher and the student at inference as the root cause of this failure in OPSD. To resolve this asymmetry, we propose Dual-Anchored Policy Distillation (DAPD), a unified framework with two levels of anchoring. Dual-Path Anchoring (DPA) introduces a self-conditioned bridge and aligns reference and rollout behavior along two matched-information paths, preventing privilege-dependent behavior from being transferred to the inference-time student. Dual-Source Anchoring (DSA) applies these paths in both reference-to-rollout and rollout-to-reference directions, reducing reliance on privileged reference guidance while preserving correctness supervision. Extensive experiments show that DAPD significantly alleviates privilege illusion, outperforming OPSD on Qwen3-4B by +2.00 points on average across tasks. Notably, its gains persist across scales, reaching +2.69 at 4B and +2.78 at 32B.
Community
DAPD aligns on-policy and reference behavior under matched information conditions.
I've hit the privilege illusion they describe — student models that ace validation because they learned to lean on teacher-side signals that vanish at inference. The framing here (information asymmetry as root cause) is the right diagnosis. What I'd want to see is how sensitive the dual-anchoring is to the choice of anchor points — does it hold up when the teacher and student architectures diverge more than the paper tests?
Thanks for the thoughtful suggestion. DAPD is currently formulated as on-policy self-distillation, where the teacher and student distributions come from the same policy under different information conditions. We plan to explore the heterogeneous teacher–student setting you proposed. We have also conducted preliminary experiments on OLMo and observed results similar to those on Qwen, suggesting that DAPD is robust across model families. These results and additional experiments will be included in the next revision.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Beyond Absolute Imitation: Anchored Residual Guidance for Privileged On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- Trajectory-Refined Distillation (2026)
- DemoPSD: Disagreement-Modulated Policy Self-Distillation (2026)
- PHF: Privileged Hidden Flow for On-Policy Self-Distillation (2026)
- RP-OPSD: Resolution-Privileged On-Policy Self-Distillation for Multimodal Large Language Models (2026)
- Learning from the Self-future: On-policy Self-distillation for dLLMs (2026)
- Visual Contrastive Self-Distillation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608.01735 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper