Papers
arxiv:2608.15045

MOSS-VL Technical Report

Published on Aug 15
· Submitted by
Pengyu Wang
on Aug 18
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

MOSS-VL is an open vision-language model family enabling real-time interaction by attending to vision via gated cross-attention during generation, using a synthesized interaction corpus and staged curriculum to achieve strong streaming performance with reduced time-to-first-token latency.

We present MOSS-VL, an open vision-language model family that treats real-time interaction -- perceiving while it speaks -- as a first-class capability. It is co-designed across the stack: the language decoder attends to vision only through gated cross-attention, so the model can naturally see incoming frames while generating; a synthesized interaction corpus supervises when to speak, when to stay silent, and when to revise; and a staged curriculum concentrates all real-time-specific training in one light final stage over a strong offline foundation. Offline, MOSS-VL-Instruct is competitive at comparable scale and leads temporal-reasoning video sets. Across four streaming benchmarks, MOSS-VL-Realtime posts the best average on three (second on the fourth) among open-source streaming models, sweeping the three subsets that squarely test proactive behavior -- 66.0 vs. 37.5 for the best baseline on OmniMMI Proactive Alerting. With 11.3B parameters but visual tokens outside the decoded sequence, MOSS-VL widens its time-to-first-token advantage over same-backbone Qwen3-VL-8B from 2.8x to 5.1x as visual context grows. We release all five checkpoints, the training curriculum, and the real-time inference code at https://github.com/OpenMOSS/MOSS-VL.

Community

Paper submitter

MOSS-VL treats real-time interaction — perceiving while it speaks — as a first-class capability: vision enters the decoder only through gated cross-attention, so the model keeps watching incoming frames while it generates. Among open-source streaming models it posts the best average on 3 of 4 streaming benchmarks and sweeps all three proactive subsets (66.0 vs. 37.5 on OmniMMI Proactive Alerting), while widening its TTFT advantage over same-backbone Qwen3-VL-8B from 2.8× to 5.1× as visual context grows. All five checkpoints, the training curriculum, and the real-time inference code are released.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.15045
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 7

Browse 7 models citing this paper

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.15045 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 5

Collections including this paper 1