Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
uid
stringclasses
10 values
dataset_id
stringclasses
1 value
compute_demand_growth_signal
stringclasses
3 values
datacenter_power_draw_signal
stringclasses
3 values
regional_grid_headroom_signal
stringclasses
3 values
peak_price_signal
stringclasses
3 values
curtailment_or_shed_signal
stringclasses
2 values
ops_summary
stringclasses
10 values
question
stringclasses
1 value
ground_truth_label
stringclasses
2 values
ground_truth_rationale
stringclasses
10 values
outcome_signal
stringclasses
6 values
source_citation
stringclasses
1 value
XSYS01-001
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
low
low
high
low
no
Low growth and ample headroom.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Capacity exceeds demand.
stable
Synthetic
XSYS01-002
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
no
Growth matches capacity.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Within tolerance.
stable
Synthetic
XSYS01-003
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
high
low
high
yes
Demand surges with low headroom and curtailment.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Outpaced infrastructure.
stress_event
Synthetic
XSYS01-004
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
high
high
high
no
Power draw high but grid headroom still high.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Prices spike without headroom constraint.
market_distortion
Synthetic
XSYS01-005
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
moderate
low
high
yes
Compute demand high but power draw muted due to throttling/efficiency.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Demand and draw decoupled.
hidden_constraint
Synthetic
XSYS01-006
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
low
moderate
low
moderate
yes
Low growth but curtailment occurs.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Curtailment unexplained by demand.
anomaly
Synthetic
XSYS01-007
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
high
moderate
moderate
no
High demand and draw but headroom adequate.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Capacity holds.
stable
Synthetic
XSYS01-008
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
moderate
low
high
no
Headroom low but no shed yet.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Pre-collapse signature.
risk
Synthetic
XSYS01-009
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
low
low
moderate
low
no
Baseline.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Baseline coherent.
stable
Synthetic
XSYS01-010
compute-demand-energy-grid-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
moderate
high
low
no
Growth but ample capacity.
Is compute demand vs grid response coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Aligned.
stable
Synthetic

What this repo is for

Detect when compute growth outpaces energy infrastructure.

Flags

rising demand with shrinking grid headroom

curtailment or load shedding events

price spikes that do not match headroom

demand and power draw decouple from throttling

Downloads last month
12