id int64 | webcast_id string | hearing_title string | hearing_date string | hearing_type string | application_number list | case_id string | case_name string | case_url string | ecli string | type string | document_date string | importance int64 | articles list | respondent_government list | issue string | strasbourg_caselaw string | external_sources string | conclusion string | separate_opinion string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 | 4357218_19052021 | Grzęda v. Poland (no. 43572/18) | 2021-05-19 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"43572/18"
] | 001-216400 | CASE OF GRZĘDA v. POLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216400 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD004357218 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2022-03-15 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"35-3-b",
"41"
] | [
"POL"
] | Constitution ; 2001 Act on the National Council of the Judiciary ; 2011 Act on the National Council of the Judiciary ; 2017 Act Amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary of 2011 and certain other statutes | Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, 21 June 2016;Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, no. 12778/17, § 102, 16 April 2019;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, 23 June 2016;Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 144, 3 March 2020;Bilgen v. Turkey, no. 1571/07, 9 March 2021;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 91, ECHR 2012;Broda and Bojara v. Poland, nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18, 29 June 2021;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852/13 et al., §§ 120-22, 12 October 2017;Camelia Bogdan v. Romania, no. 36889/18, § 70, 20 October 2020;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 54, 25 September 2018;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no. 51160/06, §§ 36 37, 9 July 2013;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628/09, 9 October 2012;Eminağaoğlu v. Turkey, no. 76521/12, § 80, 9 March 2021;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 34, Series A no. 18;Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, 1 December 2020;Gumenyuk and Others v. Ukraine, no. 11423/19, 22 July 2021;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, §§ 118-123, 20 November 2012;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 58, ECHR 1999 II;Juričić v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, 26 July 2011;Kamenos v. Cyprus, no. 147/07, §§ 82 88, 31 October 2017;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 189, 17 May 2016;Károly Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 56665/09, 14 September 2017;Kövesi v. Romania, no. 3594/19, 5 May 2020;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 146, ECHR 2000 XI;Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 5114/09 and 17 others, §§ 118 and 132, 19 January 2017;Loquifer v. Belgium, nos. 79089/13 and 2 others, § 33, 20 July 2021;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 92, ECHR 2006 XIV;McElhinney v. Ireland [GC], no. 31253/96, § 33, ECHR 2001 XI (extracts);Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000 X;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452/14, § 149, 19 December 2018;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982/12, § 118, 15 October 2020;Naït-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357/07, § 106, 15 March 2018;Neves e Silva v. Portugal, 27 April 1989, § 37, Series A no. 153 A;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 199, ECHR 2014;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, §§ 91 and 96, ECHR 2013;Olujić v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, §§ 31-43, 5 February 2009;Paluda v. Slovakia, no. 33392/12, §§ 33-34, 23 May 2017;Paroisse gréco-catholique Lupeni et autres c. Roumanie [GC], no 76943/11, § 71, 29 novembre 2016;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 149, 20 March 2018;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 120-96, 6 November 2018;Reczkowicz v. Poland, no. 43447/19, 22 July 2021;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289/11, 19 September 2017;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 119, ECHR 2005 X;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 148, 22 October 2018;Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC], no. 14305/17, § 269, 22 December 2020;Sturua v. Georgia, no. 45729/05, § 27, 28 March 2017;Thiam v. France, no. 80018/12, §§ 81-82, 18 October 2018;Tosti v. Italy (dec.), no. 27791/06, 12 May 2009;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800/12, 15 September 2015;Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic, 8 April 2021, no. 47621/13;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007 II;Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v. Poland, no. 4907/18, 7 May 2021;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160/12, § 76, 5 April 2018 | Final opinion of 5 May 2017 of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights on Draft Amendments to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and Certain Other Acts of Poland;Recommendation by the Committee Ministers of 17 November 2010 on “Judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities” and Appendix (CM/Rec(2010)12);Plan of Action on Strengthening Judicial Independence and Impartiality adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 April 2016 at the 1253rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies;Resolution 2188 (2017) of 11 October 2017 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe entitled “New threats to the rule of law in the Council of Europe Member States”;Report of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law on the Independence of the Judicial System Part I: the Independence of Judges, adopted at its 82nd Plenary Session (Venice, 12-13 March 2010, CDL-AD(2010)004);Rule of Law Checklist, adopted by European Commission for Democracy Through Law at its 106th Plenary Session (11-12 March 2016, CDL AD(2016)007);Compilation of opinions and reports of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law concerning courts and judges (CDL-PI (2015)001);Opinion of 11 December 2017 of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law on the Draft [2017 Amending Act], on the Draft (2017 Act on the Supreme Court] proposed by the President of Poland, and on the Act on the Organisation of Ordinary Courts (Opinion no. CDL-AD(2017)031);Opinion no. 10 (2007) of 23 November 2007 of the Consultative Council of European Judges on “the Council for the Judiciary at the service of society”;Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) of November 2010 of the Consultative Council of European Judges;Opinion no. 24 of 5 November 2021 of the Consultative Council of European Judges on the Evolution of the Councils for the Judiciary and Their Role in Independent and Impartial Judicial Systems;Opinion of 12 October 2017 of the Bureau of the Consultative Council of European Judges following the request of the Polish National Council of the Judiciary to provide an oipinion with respect to the Draft Act of September 2017 presented by the President of Poland amending the Act on the Polish National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts (CCJE-BU(2017)9REV);Report of 5 April 2018 of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers on his mission to Poland (UN Human Rights Council, document A/HRC/38/38/Add.1.);Report of 28 June 2019 of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on her visit to Poland from 11 to 15 March 2019;Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) Addendum to the Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Poland (Rule 34) (22 June 2018)
(Greco-AdHocRep(2018)3);Reasoned proposal of 20 December 2017 of the European Commission to the Council of the European Union (COM/2017/0360);Resolution of 17 September 2020 of the European Parliament on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law by the Republic of Poland (COM(2017)0835 -2017/0360R(NLE));Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 | Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations;Determination (civil);Dispute);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
201 | 4361111_03122014 | F.G. v. Sweden (no. 43611/11) | 2014-12-03 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"43611/11"
] | 001-140020 | CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140020 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD004361111 | CHAMBER | 2014-01-16 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"3"
] | [
"SWE"
] | No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran) | TRUE | |||
202 | 4361111_03122014 | F.G. v. Sweden (no. 43611/11) | 2014-12-03 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"43611/11"
] | 001-161829 | CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161829 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-03-23 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"3",
"35",
"37",
"37-1",
"37-1-c",
"41"
] | [
"SWE"
] | Chapter 12 section 22 of the Aliens Act ; Director General for Legal Affairs at the Swedish Migration Board’s “general legal position” concerning the methodology for assessing the reliability and credibility of applications for international protection (Rättsligt ställningstagande angående metod för prövningen av tillförlitlighet och trovärdighet, RCI 09/2013)
| A.A. v. Switzerland, no. 58802/12, § 41, 7 January 2014;A.G. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 22107/08, 6 December 2011;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94;Ali Muradi and Selma Alieva v. Sweden (dec.), no 11243/13, §§ 44-45, 25 June 2013;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021/08, § 117, ECHR 2011;Andreyev v. Estonia (dec.), no. 42987/09, 22 January 2013;Atayeva and Burman v. Sweden (striking out), no. 17471/11, §§ 19-24, 31 October 2013;Atsaev v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 14021/10, 7 July 2015;B.Z. v. Sweden (striking out), no. 74352/11, §§ 17 20, 18 December 2012;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, § 110, ECHR 2011;Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, §§ 79 and 86, Series A no. 234-A;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Collins and Akaziebie v. Sweden (dec.), no. 23944/05, 8 March 2007;Etanji v. France (dec.), no. 60411/00, 1 March 2005;Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10, § 81, ECHR 2013;F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621/06, § 72, 20 January 2009;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 179-80, 24 March 2011;H. v. Norway (dec.), no. 51666/13, 17 February 2015;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, §41, Reports 1997 III;Hakizimana v. Sweden (dec.), no. 37913/05, 27 March 2008;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276/99, § 60, ECHR 2001-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, ECHR 2012;I.A. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 76660/12, 27 May 2014;Isman v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 23604/11, 21 January 2014;K.A.B. v. Sweden, no. 886/11, § 67, 5 September 2013;Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015/04, § 99, 19 November 2009;L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, § 108, 15 October 2015;M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 41416/08, §§ 105 and 143, 26 July 2011;M.A. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 28361/12, 19 November 2013;M.E. v. Denmark, no. 58363/10, § 51, 8 July 2014;M.E. v. Sweden, no. 71398/12, §§ 32-33, 26 June 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, ECHR 2011;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 67, ECHR 2005-I;Mamazhonov v. Russia, no. 17239/13, §§ 132 133, 23 October 2014;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, §§ 87-95, ECHR 2008;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 314, ECHR 2014 (extracts);N. v Sweden, no. 23505/09, 20 July 2010;N. v. Finland, no. 38885/02, § 167, 26 July 2005;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 119, 17 July 2008;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 245, ECHR 2012;Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, § 50, 7 May 2014;Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, § 113, 3 October 2013;O.G.O. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 13950/12, 18 February 2014;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, § 261, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ouabour v. Belgium, no. 26417/10, § 65, 2 June 2015;P.Z. and Others v. Sweden (striking out), no. 68194/10, §§ 14-17, 18 December 2012;Pellumbi v. France (dec.), no. 65730/01, 18 January 2005;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827/07, § 52, 9 March 2010;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 55, 1 July 2014;S.F. and Others v. Sweden, no. 52077/10, 15 May 2012;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, ECHR 2008;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 136, 11 January 2007;Sarwari v. Austria (dec.), no. 21662/10, 3 November 2011;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, § 155, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 125, ECHR 2013;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, §§ 214-218, 28 June 2011;T.A. v. Sweden, no. 48866/10, § 37, 19 December 2013;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tukhtamurodov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21762/14, 20 January 2015;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII;Vijayanathan and Pusparajah v. France, 27 August 1992, § 46, Series A no. 241 B;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, §§ 107-108, Series A no. 215;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010/07, § 163, ECHR 2013 | UNCHR handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention on the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees;UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection regarding Religion-Based Refugee Claims;Judgment of the CJEU in Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Y (C-71/11) and Z (C-99/11)
| Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
203 | 4383511_27112013 | S.A.S. v. France (no. 43835/11) | 2013-11-27 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"43835/11"
] | 001-145466 | CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145466 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004383511 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2014-07-01 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"9",
"9-1",
"9-2",
"14",
"14+8",
"14+9",
"34",
"35",
"35-1"
] | [
"FRA"
] | Articles 1, 2 and 3 of the Law of 11 October 2010 “prohibiting the concealment of one’s face in public places” | Ahmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey, no 41135/98, 23 February 2010;Aktas v. France (dec.), no 43563/08, 30 June 2009;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963/99, § 89, 20 June 2002;Anibal Vieira & Filhos LDA and Maria Rosa Ferreira da Costa LDA v. Portugal (dec.), nos. 980/12 and 18385/12, 13 November 2012;Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no 7050/75, report of the Commission of 12 October 1978, DR 19;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no 23459/03, § 122, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378/05, § 34, ECHR 2008;Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I;Cha’are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no 27417/95, ECHR 2000-VII;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, ECHR 1999-III;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 57325/00, §§ 175 and 184-185, ECHR 2007-IV;Dahlab v. Switzerland, no 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V;Deceuninck v. France (dec.), no 47447/08, 13 December 2011;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 41, Series A no 45;El Morsli v. France (dec.), no 15585/06, 4 March 2008;Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10, ECHR 2013;Hadrabová and Others v. the Czech Republic (dec.), nos. 42165/02 and 466/03, 25 September 2007;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no 25;Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no 35222/04, 20 February 2007;Jian v. Romania (dec.), no 46640/99, 30 March 2004;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, Series A no 112, § 42;Kalaç v. Turkey, 1 July 1997, § 27, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 IV;Kara v. the United Kingdom, no 36528/97, 22 October 1998;Kereshashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no 5667/02, 2 May 2006;Kervanci v. France, no 31645/04, 4 December 2008;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, Series A no 260-A;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078/06, § 127, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Köse and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 26625/02, ECHR 2006-II;Kurtulmuş v. Turkey (dec.), no 65500/01, ECHR 2006-II;Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, no 44774/98, 29 June 2004;M. v. the United Kingdom, no 13284/87, 15 October 1987;Mann Singh v. France (dec.), no 24479/07, 11 June 2007;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31, § 27;Maurice v. France [GC], no 11810/03, § 117, ECHR 2005 IX;McFeeley and Others v. the United Kingdom, no 8317/78, 15 May 1980, § 83, Decisions and Reports (DR) 20;Michaud v. France, no 12323/11, ECHR 2012, §§ 51-52;Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no 798/05, 15 September 2009;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no 2512/04, § 73, 12 February 2009;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, §§ 30-34, Series A no 142;Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 23131/03, ECHR 2004 XI;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, 20 September 1994, § 50, Series A no 295-A;Özer v. Turkey (no 2), no 871/08, § 36, 26 January 2010;Philis v. Greece, no 28970/95, 17 October 1996;Phull v. France (dec.), no 35753/03, ECHR 2005 I;Popa v. Romania (dec.), no 4233/09, 18 June 2013, §§ 32-33;Predescu v. Romania, no 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008;Ranjit Singh v. France (dec.), no 27561/08, 30 June 2009;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, ECHR 2003-II;Řehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208/01, 18 May 2004;Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 67, Series A no 263;Serif v. Greece, no 38178/97, § 53, ECHR 1999-IX;Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v. the Netherlands (dec.), 10 July 2012;Sutter v. Switzerland, no 8209/78 of 1 March 1979;Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no 77703/01, § 132, 14 June 2007;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000 X;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-V;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no 19010/07, § 94, ECHR 2013;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, § 44, Reports 1997 II;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 63, Series A no 44 | Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Actio popularis);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief) | TRUE | |
204 | 445510_26062013 | Marguš v. Croatia (no. 4455/10) | 2013-06-26 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"4455/10"
] | 001-114487 | CASE OF MARGUŠ v. CROATIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114487 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD000445510 | CHAMBER | 2012-11-13 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"6-3-c",
"P7-4"
] | [
"HRV"
] | General Amnesty Act of 24 September 1996 | Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004;Balliu v. Albania, no. 74727/01, § 25, 16 June 2005;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 26, Series A no. 86;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 71, ECHR 2000-XII;Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, 7 August 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-III;Gautrin and Others v. France, § 58, 20 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, § 38;Mežnaric v. Croatia, no. 71615/01, § 32, 15 July 2005;Micallef v. Malta, no. 17056/06, §§ 74-75, 15 January 2008;Okkali v. Turkey, no 52067/99, § 76, 17 October 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113/03, ECHR 2009;S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 43, ECHR 2002-V;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 82, ECHR 2009;Turan Cakir v. Belgium, no. 44256/06, § 69, 10 March 2009;Vanyan v. Russia, no. 53203/99, § 63-68, 15 December 2005;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000-XII;Yesil and Sevim v. Turkey, no. 34738/04, § 38, 5 June 2007 | Article 3 § 1 of the Fourth Geneva Convention;Article 4 §§ 1, 2(a) and 13 of the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) of 8 June 1977 | No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence in person);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Acquittal;Conviction) | FALSE |
205 | 445510_26062013 | Marguš v. Croatia (no. 4455/10) | 2013-06-26 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"4455/10"
] | 001-144276 | CASE OF MARGUŠ v. CROATIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144276 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000445510 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2014-05-27 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"3",
"6",
"6-1",
"6-3-c",
"35",
"35-3",
"P7-4"
] | [
"HRV"
] | General Amnesty Act of 24 September 1996 (Official Gazette no. 80/1996, Zakon o općem oprostu) | Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, § 171, Reports 1997-VI;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, § 54, ECHR 2012;Craxi III v. Italy (dec.), no. 63226/00, 14 June 2001;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503/97, § 67, ECHR 2008;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325 A, § 38;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 71, ECHR 2000-XII;El Masri v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” [GC], no. 39630/09, § 182, ECHR 2012;Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, 7 August 1996, § 59, Reports 1996 III;Gradinger v. Austria, 19 May 1994, opinion of the Commission, §§ 67-69, Series A, no. 328-C;Harutyunyan v. Armenia (dec.), no. 34334/04, 7 December 2006;Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, § 50, Series A no. 154;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 86, Reports 1998-I;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 169, ECHR 2012;Okkalı v. Turkey, no 52067/99, § 76, 17 October 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113/03, ECHR 2009;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, §§ 273-74, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, § 97;Romero Martin v. Spain (dec.), no. 32045/03, 12 June 2006;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229/03, § 62, ECHR 2008;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 82, ECHR 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002;Solomou and Others v. Turkey, no. 36832/97, § 63, 24 June 2008;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 48, ECHR 2005-X;Thomann v. Switzerland, 10 June 1996, §§ 35-36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Turan Cakir v. Belgium, no. 44256/06, § 69, 10 March 2009;Vaillant v. France, no. 30609/04, §§ 29-35, 18 December 2008;Yeşil and Sevim v. Turkey, no. 34738/04, § 38, 5 June 2007 | International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Furundžija case, judgment of 10 December 1998;UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment 20, Article 7 (Forty-fourth session, 1992);UN Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations, Lebanon, 1 April 1997;UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31 [80], The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, 26 May 2004;Article 31 § 3 (c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties;Article 6 § 5 of the second Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, relating to the protection of victims of non-international conflicts;Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Gomes Lund v. Brazil (judgment of 24 November 2010, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs);Inter-American Court of Human Rights, The Massacres of El Mozote and Nearby Places v. El Salvador;1949 Geneva Conventions Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War;Article V of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide;Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity;Article 20 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;European Parliament, Resolution A3-0056/93, 12 March 1993;Fifth report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1998/38, 24 December 1997;Article 1 of the American Convention on Human Rights;Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case 10.287 (El Salvador), Report of 24 September 1992, Report on the situation of human rights in El Salvador, Doc. OEA/Ser.L/II.85 Doc. 28 rev. (1 June 1994) and Case 10.480 (El Salvador), Report of 27 January 1999
| Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione temporis);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person) | TRUE |
206 | 4488309_23062015 | Nasr and Ghali v. Italy (no. 44883/09) | 2015-06-23 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"44883/09"
] | 001-113123 | NASR AND GHALI v. ITALY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113123 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-11-22 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"3",
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13"
] | [
"ITA"
] | Communicated | FALSE | ||||
207 | 4488309_23062015 | Nasr and Ghali v. Italy (no. 44883/09) | 2015-06-23 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"44883/09"
] | 001-161247 | CASE OF NASR AND GHALI v. ITALY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161247 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD004488309 | CHAMBER | 2016-02-23 00:00:00 | 2 | [
"1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+5",
"13+8",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] | [
"ITA"
] | Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446/96, §§ 57-59, 2 November 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996 VI;Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 142-147, ECHR 2004 IV (extracts);Baumann v. France, no 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001 V;Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999 IV;Cestaro v. Italy, no 6884/11, 7 April 2015;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 118, Reports 1996 V;Dembele v. Switzerland, no 74010/11, § 33, 24 September 2013;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 70, ECHR 2010;Egmez v. Cyprus, no 30873/96, § 78, ECHR 2000 XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, §§ 137-148, ECHR 2012;Erdal Aslan v. Turkey, nos. 25060/02 and 1705/03, §§ 76-77, 2 December 2008;Hüseyin Şimşek v. Turkey, no 68881/01, §§ 68-70, 20 May 2008;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, § 318, ECHR 2004 VII;İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no 22277/93, § 85, ECHR 2000 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no 25;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, §§ 57 and 87-92, ECHR 2011;Kopylov v. Russia, no 3933/04, § 119, 29 July 2010;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 140, Reports 1998-III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Łatak v. Poland (dec.), no 52070/08, 12 October 2010;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no 22535/93, § 115, ECHR 2000 III;Mamatkoulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 67, ECHR 2005-I;Rafaa v. France, no 25393/10, § 33, 30 May 2013;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, §§ 125-126, ECHR 2008;Saba v. Italy, no 36629/10, §§ 79-80, 1 July 2014;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000 VII;Samoylov v. Russia, no 64398/01, § 39, 2 October 2008;Sapožkovs v. Latvia, no 8550/03, §§ 54-55, 11 February 2014;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 91, Series A no 161;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001 V;Zeynep Özcan v. Turkey, no 45906/99, § 43, 20 February 2007 | Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+5 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | FALSE | ||
208 | 4489810_01072015 | Jeronovičs v. Latvia (no. 44898/10) | 2015-07-01 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"44898/10"
] | 001-114288 | JERONOVIČS v. LATVIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114288 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC004489810 | DECISIONS | 4 | [
"3",
"6",
"13",
"35"
] | [
"LVA"
] | Partly inadmissible | |||||
209 | 4489810_01072015 | Jeronovičs v. Latvia (no. 44898/10) | 2015-07-01 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"44898/10"
] | 001-114334 | JERONOVIČS v. LATVIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114334 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2012-10-09 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"13"
] | [
"LVA"
] | FALSE | |||||
210 | 4489810_01072015 | Jeronovičs v. Latvia (no. 44898/10) | 2015-07-01 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"44898/10"
] | 001-165032 | CASE OF JERONOVIČS v. LATVIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165032 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD004489810 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-07-05 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"3",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"37",
"37-1",
"41"
] | [
"LVA"
] | Sections 393 and 655 to 657 of the Criminal Procedure Law | Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 95, Reports 1996 VI;Aleksentseva and Others v. Russia (nos. 75025/01, 75026/01, 75028/01, 75029/01, 75031/01, 75033/01, 75034/01, 75036/01, 76386/01, 77049/01, 77051/01, 77052/01, 77053/01, 3999/02, 5314/02, 5384/02, 5388/02, 5419/02 and 8192/02, decisions of 4 September 2003, 23 March 2006, and judgment of 17 January 2008, §§ 14-17;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Baybora and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 77116/01, 22 October 2002;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 44, ECHR 2015;Bonomo and Others v. Italy (dec.), nos. 17634/11 and 164 other applications, 9 April 2015;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 114-123, 28 September 2015;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, §§ 66-67, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey, (dec.) no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002;Büyükdağ v. Turkey, no. 28340/95, § 64, 21 December 2000;Canbek v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5286/10, 13 January 2015;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216/05, § 220, ECHR 2015;Denisov v. Russia (dec.), no. 33408/03, 6 May 2004;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 70, ECHR 2000 XII;El-Masri v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 182-185, ECHR 2012;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, ECHR 2010;Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, § 39, 15 November 2007;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 301, ECHR 2011 (extracts);H. v. Iceland (dec.) no. 29785/07, 27 September 2011;Hackett v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34698/04, 10 May 2005;Haralambie v. Romania, no. 21737/03, § 70, 27 October 2009;Harrison and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 44301/13, 44379/13 and 44384/13, § 51, 25 March 2014;Hazar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 62566/00 et seq., 10 January 2002;Ielcean v. Romania (dec.), no. 76048/11, 7 October 2014;Josipović v. Serbia (dec.), no. 18369/07, 4 March 2008;Kelly v. the United Kingdom, no. 10626/83, Commission decision of 7 May 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 42, p. 205;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000 IV;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Musayeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 74239/01, 1 June 2006;Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, § 172, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 123, ECHR 2005 VII;Prystavska v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21287/02, 17 December 2002;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 324, ECHR 2007 II;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 197, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Rezgui v. France (dec.), no. 49859/99, ECHR 2000-XI;Sapeyan v. Armenia, no. 35738/03, § 21, 13 January 2009;Schulz v. Germany (dec.), no. 4800/12, 31 March 2015;Sroka v. Poland (dec.), no. 42801/07, 6 March 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 252, ECHR 2012;Stanimirović v. Serbia, no. 26088/06, § 29, 18 October 2011;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003 VI;Tucka v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (dec.), no. 34586/10, § 14, 18 January 2010;Tuna v. Turkey, no. 22339/03, §§ 58-63, 19 January 2010;Union of Jehovah’s Witnesses and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no. 72874/01, 21 April 2015;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, § 157, ECHR 2009;Volokhy v. Ukraine, no. 23543/02, § 37, 2 November 2006;Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 32567/06, 17 February 2009;Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493/00, ECHR 2003-X;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 74, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00, ECHR 2003-I;Žarković and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 75187/12, 9 June 2015;Žarskis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 33695/03, § 38, 17 March 2009 | Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
211 | 4604314_07012015 | Lambert and Others v. France (no. 46043/14) | 2015-01-07 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"46043/14"
] | 001-155352 | CASE OF LAMBERT AND OTHERS v. FRANCE | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155352 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0605JUD004604314 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2015-06-05 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"34",
"35"
] | [
"FRA"
] | Articles L. 1110-1, 1110-2, 1110-5, 1110-9 and 1110-10, Articles L. 1111-4, 1111-6 and 1111-11 of the Public Health Code ; Act of 22 April 2005 on patients’ rights and end-of-life issues (Leonetti Act) ; Articles R. 4127-37 and R. 4127-38 of the Code of Medical Ethics ; Articles L. 521-2 and R. 625-3 of the Administrative Courts Code | A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no 25579/05, § 237, ECHR 2010;A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no 37956/11, §§ 48-50, 8 January 2013;Ada Rossi and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 55185/08, 16 December 2008;Burke v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 19807/06, 11 July 2006;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014;Ciechońska v. Poland, no 19776/04, § 65, 14 June 2011;Diamante and Pelliccioni v. Saint Marin, no 32250/08, §§ 146-147, 27 September 2011;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05, §§ 54-56, ECHR 2007 I;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no 23458/02, §§ 174-177, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Glass v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 61827/00, 18 March 2003;Haas v. Switzerland, no 31322/07, § 51, ECHR 2011;İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no 22277/93, §§ 54-55, ECHR 2000 VII;Koch v. Germany, no 497/09, 19 July 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-147, Series A no 324;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279/05, § 85, 20 October 2011;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609/06, 18 June 2013;Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 21727/08, 20 January 2009;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 45305/99, ECHR 2000 V;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, ECHR 2002 III;Raw and Others v. France, no 10131/11, §§ 51-52, 7 March 2013;S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. the United Kingdom, no 23715/94, decision of the Commission of 20 May 1996;Sanles Sanles v. Spain (dec.), no 48335/99, ECHR 2000 XI;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, §§ 138-139, ECHR 2000 VIII;Šneersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no 14737/09, § 61, 12 July 2011;Tauira and 18 others v. France, no 28204/95, decision of the Commission of 4 December 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 83-A, p. 131;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 83, ECHR 2009;Vo v. France [GC], no 53924/00, § 89, ECHR 2004 VIII;Y.F. v. Turkey, no 24209/94, § 31, ECHR 2003 IX
| Articles 1, 5, 6 and 9 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Oviedo Convention);Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations drawn up by the Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe;Recommendation CM/Rec(2009)11 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on principles concerning continuing powers of attorney and advance directives for incapacity;Recommendation 1418 (1999) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on protection of the human rights and dignity of the terminally ill and the dying;Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1859 (2012) entitled “Protecting human rights and dignity by taking into account previously expressed wishes of patients” | Preliminary objection allowed (Article 34 - Locus standi);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (Conditional) | TRUE |
212 | 4645411_29062016 | Abu Zubaydah v. Lithuania (no. 46454/11) | 2016-06-29 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"46454/11"
] | 001-115816 | ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115816 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2012-12-14 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"3",
"5",
"5-1-b"
] | [
"LTU"
] | FALSE | |||||
213 | 4645411_29062016 | Abu Zubaydah v. Lithuania (no. 46454/11) | 2016-06-29 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"46454/11"
] | 001-183687 | CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411 | CHAMBER | 2018-05-31 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"13+3",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"46",
"46-1",
"46-2"
] | [
"LTU"
] | A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, §§ 240-241, 2 December 2010;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761/11, 24 July 2014;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, §§ 26-31, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2002 IV;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 233, ECHR 2016;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944/06 and 4 others, 18 December 2012;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004-II;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 VIII;Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 24027/07 and 4 others, § 168, 10 April 2012;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, §§ 59-61, ECHR 2001-XII;Benzer and Others v. Turkey, no. 23502/06, §§ 218-219, 12 November 2013;Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-IV;Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884/11, §§ 205-208, 7 April 2015;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, § 88, 23 February 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001 I;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, ECHR 2012;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 91, ECHR 2010;Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki v. France, nos. 48205/99 and 2 others, § 20, 14 May 2002;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 209, ECHR 2012;Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, no. 7511/13, 24 July 2014;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII;İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 85, ECHR 2000 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 16-18, ECHR 2006 IX;Jeronovičs v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, §§ 107 and 118, 5 July 2016;Kadirova and Others v. Russia, no. 5432/07, § 94, 27 March 2012;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 106, Reports 1998 I;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 92, ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, §§ 123-124, Reports 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000 IV;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, §§ 47 and 56, Series A no. 310;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, ECHR 2000 III;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, §§ 67 and 90, ECHR 2005 I;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005 VII;Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, no. 44883/09, 23 February 2016;Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, § 42, Series A no. 311;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, § 125, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, §§ 149-150, ECHR 2015;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 138, 252-254 and 256, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, ECHR 1999 V;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 375, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 184, ECHR 2009;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001 V | 2007 International Committee of the Red Cross Report;Statement of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on detention of Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners at the US Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, 16 January 2002;Amnesty International, Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay, April 2002;Human Rights Watch, “United States, Presumption of Guilt: Human Rights Abuses of Post-September 11 Detainees”, Vol. 14, No. 4 (G), August 2002;International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, “Anti terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights: Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11”, Report, April 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution no. 1340 (2003) on rights of persons held in the custody of the United States in Afghanistan or Guantánamo Bay (PACE Resolution), 26 June 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’s inquiry – the Marty Inquiry (2006, 2007 and 2011 Marty Reports)
;US Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Report: “Investigation into the Office of Legal Counsel’s Memoranda Concerning Issues Relating to the Central Agency’s Use of ‘Enhanced Interrogation Techniques’ on Suspected Terrorists” (2009 DOJ Report);Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006/22009INI);Statement of the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture (IRCT) of February 2003;UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 29/2006, Mr Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi and 25 other persons v. United States of America, UN Doc. A/HRC/4/40/Add.1 at 103 (2006);Human Rights Watch, “United States: Reports of Torture of Al Qaeda Suspects”, 26 December 2002;Amnesty International Report 2003 – United States of America, 28 May 2003;Amnesty International, “Unlawful detention of six men from Bosnia-Herzegovina in Guantánamo Bay”, 29 May 2003;Amnesty International, “United States of America, The threat of a bad example: Undermining international standards as ‘war on terror’ detentions continue”, 18 August 2003;Amnesty International, “Incommunicado detention/Fear of ill treatment”, 20 August 2003;International Committee of the Red Cross, United States: ICRC President urges progress on detention-related issues, news release 04/03, 16 January 2004;Human Rights Watch - Statement on US Secret Detention Facilities of 6 November 2005;Human Rights Watch – List of Ghost Prisoners Possibly in CIA Custody of 30 November 2005;2010 UN Joint Study (A/HRC/1342) of the Human Rights Council of United Nations Organisation released the “Joint Study on Global Practices in Relation to Secret Detention in the Context of Countering Terrorism of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism” of 19 February 2010;The Fava Inquiry – of the Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (“TDIP”) set up by the European Parliament on 18 January 2006;US authorities’ report prepared by John Helgerson, the CIA Inspector General, in 2004 (2004 CIA Report);CIA background paper on the CIA’s combined interrogation techniques (2004 CIA Background Paper) of 30 December 2004;2014 US Senate Committee Report | Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-1 - Parties to case;Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | FALSE | |
214 | 4647011_18062014 | Parillo v. Italy (no. 46470/11) | 2014-06-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"46470/11"
] | 001-141613 | PARRILLO v. ITALY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141613 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC004647011 | DECISIONS | 3 | [
"8",
"10",
"35",
"35-3",
"P1-1"
] | [
"ITA"
] | Partly inadmissible | |||||
215 | 4647011_18062014 | Parillo v. Italy (no. 46470/11) | 2014-06-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"46470/11"
] | 001-157263 | CASE OF PARRILLO v. ITALY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157263 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0827JUD004647011 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2015-08-27 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"34",
"35",
"35-1"
] | [
"ITA"
] | Section 13 of Law no. 40/2004 of 19 February 2004, in force since 10 March 2004 (“Rules governing medically assisted fertilisation”) | A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, ECHR 2010;Ali Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429/12, 1 July 2014;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 100, ECHR 2000 I;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 129, ECHR 2004 V;Brozicek v. Italy, no. 10964/84, 19 December 1989, § 34, Series A no. 167;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no. 46967/07, § 48, 24 February 2009;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 85, ECHR 2002 VI;Çınar v. Turkey, no. 17864/91, decision of the Commission of 5 September 1994;Costa and Pavan v. Italy, no. 54270/10, 28 August 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 78, ECHR 2007 V;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 41, Series A no. 45;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, ECHR 2007 I;Fretté v. France, no. 36515/97, § 41, ECHR 2002 I;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002 VII;Grišankova and Grišankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 36117/02, ECHR 2003 II (extracts);Hasan Uzun v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10755/13, §§ 25-27, 30 April 2013;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 54, ECHR 1999 II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 42, ECHR 1999 V;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 154, ECHR 2001 VII;Knecht v. Romania, no. 10048/10, 2 October 2012;Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 52, ECHR 2004 IX;Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, § 65, ECHR 2002 I;Leandro Da Silva v. Luxembourg, no. 30273/07, §§ 40 and 42, 11 February 2010;M.C. and Others v. Italy, no. 5376/11, § 47, 3 September 2013;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, 10 September 2010;Melnītis v. Latvia, no. 30779/05, § 50, 28 February 2012;Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002 VIII;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 68, Series A no. 130;P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no. 56547/00, § 114, ECHR 2002 VI;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002 III;S.A.S. v. France ([GC], no. 43835/11, ECHR 2014 (extracts);S.B. and Others v. Belgium (dec.), no. 63403/00, 6 April 2004;S.H. and Others v. Austria ([GC], no. 57813/00, ECHR 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 75, 17 September 2009;Union Alimentaria Sanders SA v. Spain, no. 11681/85, 11 December 1987 DR 54, pp. 101 and 104;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece ([GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 54, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, §§ 52-58, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014;W. v. Germany, no.10785/84, 18 July 1986, Decisions and Reports (DR) 48, p. 104;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 II | Articles 18 and 27 of the “Oviedo Convention”;Opinion no. 15, adopted on 14 November 2000 by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission;Resolution 1352 (2003) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on Human Stem Cell Research;Regulation (EC) No. 1394 / 2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products contain similar provisions | Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) | TRUE |
216 | 4714306_24092014 | Roman Zakharov v. Russia (no. 47143/06) | 2014-09-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47143/06"
] | 001-142532 | ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142532 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"13"
] | [
"RUS"
] | |||||||
217 | 4714306_24092014 | Roman Zakharov v. Russia (no. 47143/06) | 2014-09-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47143/06"
] | 001-159324 | CASE OF ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159324 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1204JUD004714306 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2015-12-04 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] | [
"RUS"
] | Operational-Search Activities Act of 12 August 1995 ; Orders Nos 70 and 538 of the Ministry of Communications ; Code of Criminal Procedure of 18 December 2001 ; Judicial Review Act ; Chapter 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure ; Article 1069 of the Civil Code
| Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 56-58, ECHR 2000 II;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 215, 10 January 2012;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, 28 June 2007;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 131, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Christie v. the United Kingdom, no. 21482/93, Commission decision of 27 June 1994;;Dumitru Popescu v. Romania (no. 2), no. 71525/01, § 71, 26 April 2007;Esbester v. the United Kingdom, no. 18601/91, Commission decision of 2 April 1993;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, §§ 49 and 50, 22 May 2008;Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, §§ 30-35, 10 February 2009;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, 18 May 2010;Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, §§ 45-47, ECHR 2000 V;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 34, Series A no. 28;Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 4), no. 72331/01, § 26, 9 November 2006;L. v. Norway, no. 13564/88, Commission decision of 8 June 1990;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 51, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, §§ 56 and 57, 1 July 2008;Liu v. Russia, no. 42086/05, § 56, 6 December 2007;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Matthews v. the United Kingdom, no. 28576/95, Commission decision of 16 October 1996;Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, §§ 19 and 38, 15 January 2009;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, § 56, ECHR 2002 X;Prado Bugallo v. Spain, no. 58496/00, § 30, 18 February 2003;Redgrave v. the United Kingdom, no. 20271/92, Commission decision of 1 September 1993;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 95, ECHR 2008;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI | Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Actio popularis;Victim);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
218 | 4728715_18042018 | Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287/15) | 2018-04-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47287/15"
] | 001-159751 | ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159751 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"3",
"5",
"5-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Communicated | ||||||
219 | 4728715_18042018 | Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287/15) | 2018-04-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47287/15"
] | 001-168641 | ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168641 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"3",
"5",
"5-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Communicated | ||||||
220 | 4728715_18042018 | Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287/15) | 2018-04-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47287/15"
] | 001-172091 | CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172091 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD004728715 | CHAMBER | 2017-03-14 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-4",
"13",
"13+3",
"35",
"41"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Articles 31 § 8 (b), 33, 38 § 1 and 43 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) ; Article 8 § 1 of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) ; Sections 2, 2(k), 31/A , 66 (2) d, 71/A (1), (2) and (7) of Act no. LXXX of 2007 on Asylum (“the Asylum Act”) ; Government Decree no. 191/2015. (VII.21.) on the definition of safe countries of origin and safe third countries
| Aden Ahmed v. Malta, no. 55352/12, §§ 97-99, 23 July 2013;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 86, ECHR 2007 I;Arat v. Turkey, no. 10309/03, § 46, 10 November 2009;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, §§ 57-58, ECHR 2012;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, § 91, 1 March 2007;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, § 91, 23 February 2012;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 80, 23 February 2017;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, ECHR 2016;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 95, Series A no. 39;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 91, ECHR 2004 IX;H.M. v. Switzerland, no. 39187/98, § 45, ECHR 2002 II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 110, 3 October 2014;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, 15 December 2016;Kholmurodov v. Russia, no. 58923/14, § 84, 1 March 2016;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000 XI;Lokpo and Touré v. Hungary, no. 10816/10, § 22, 20 September 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 223, ECHR 2011;Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290/13, § 100, 26 November 2015;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 69, ECHR 2005 I;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 79, ECHR 2010;Mogoş v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420/02, 6 May 2004;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 79, 9 July 2009;Muminov v. Russia, no. 42502/06, §§ 91-92, 11 December 2008;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 83, ECHR 2016;N.A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 119, 17 July 2008;Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, § 70, 2 March 2006;Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, § 113, 3 October 2013;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827/07, § 52, 9 March 2010;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, §§ 68-71, 24 January 2008;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552/08, § 51, ECHR 2015;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, ECHR 2008;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355/99 and 45357/99, § 47, 27 November 2003;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, ECHR 2012;Stašaitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679/99, § 67, 21 March 2002;Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 73, ECHR 2005‑V;Takush v. Greece, no. 2853/09, § 40, 17 January 2012;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, § 54, 20 September 2011;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006 XII;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I | “Hungary as a country of asylum. Observations on restrictive legal measures and subsequent practice implemented between July 2015 and March 2016” report by the UNHCR (published in May 2016);“Crossing Boundaries: The new asylum procedure at the border and restrictions to accessing protection in Hungary” report by the European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) (prepared on 1 October 2015);“Case Law Fact Sheet: Prevention of Dublin Transfers to Hungary” report by the European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) (prepared in January 2016);Report to the Hungarian Government on its visit to Hungary from 21 to 27 October 2015 by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)
| Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion;Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Serbia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | FALSE |
221 | 4728715_18042018 | Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287/15) | 2018-04-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47287/15"
] | 001-198760 | CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2019-11-21 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-4",
"13",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a",
"41"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Government Decree no. 191/2015. (VII. 21.) on the definition of safe countries of origin and safe third countries | Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, § 222, 2 December 2010;Al Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 78, 21 June 2016;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 48539/99, 28 August 2001;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports 1996 III;Avotiņš v. Latvia [GC], no. 17502/07, § 105, 23 May 2016;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004-III;Babajanov v. Turkey, no. 49867/08, § 43 in fine, 10 May 2016;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 157, ECHR 2005-V;Budrevich v. the Czech Republic, no. 65303/10, § 73, 17 October 2013;Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, §§ 106-10, 5 July 2016;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 96, Reports 1996 V;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00 § 109, ECHR 2007 IV;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 80, 23 February 2017;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A, no. 12;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, 23 March 2016;Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117/13, 5 September 2017;Gahramanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 26291/06, 15 October 2013;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, §§ 53-55, 3 April 2012;Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2002-V;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports 1998 I;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 106, Series A no. 39;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, § 34, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III;Herrmann v. Germany [GC], no. 9300/07, § 38, 26 June 2012;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276/99, § 60, ECHR 2001-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 114, ECHR 2012;I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082/98, §§ 84-87, 9 June 2005;J.R. and Others v. Greece, no. 22696/16, 25 January 2018;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 137-41, ECHR 2001-VII;K.R.S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32733/08, 2 December 2008;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659/07, § 36, 11 October 2016;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, 15 December 2016;Kovačić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574/98 and 2 others, § 194, 3 October 2008;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 123, Reports 1998 III;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762/01, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts);Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 67, ECHR 2005-I;Mogoş v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420/02, 6 May 2004;Mohammadi v. Austria, no. 71932/12, 3 July 2014;Mohammed Hussein and Others v. the Netherlands and Italy (dec.), no. 27725/10, §§ 62-79, 2 April 2013;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, 26 April 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 225, ECHR 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512/04, §§ 93-96, 12 February 2009;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634/04, § 48, 9 November 2010;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738/10, § 193, 13 December 2016;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 27, 24 October 2002;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 114, 20 March 2018;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 68, 24 January 2008;Sabri Güneş v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396/06, § 44, 29 June 2012;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 135, 11 January 2007;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355/99 and 45357/99, § 47, 27 November 2003;Sharifi v. Austria, no. 60104/08, 5 December 2013;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, § 61, ECHR 2007-I;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, §§ 90-91, Series A no. 161;T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43844/98, ECHR 2000-III;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 41, ECHR 2006-XII;Venskutė v. Lithuania, no. 10645/08, § 72, 11 December 2012;Vijayanathan and Pusparajah v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 43 47, Series A no. 241-B;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 103, Series A no. 215;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160/12, § 56, 5 April 2018 | Articles 38 and 39 of the Asylum Procedures Directive;UNHCR report “Serbia as a Country of Asylum: Observations on the Situation of Asylum-Seekers and Beneficiaries of International Protection in Serbia” prepared in August 2012;“Crossing Boundaries: The new asylum procedure at the border and restrictions to accessing protection in Hungary”, report by the European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) prepared on 1 October 2015;Report (SG/Inf(2017)33) of 13 October 2017 of the Ambassador Tomáš Boček, Special Representative of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe on migration and refugees, fact-finding mission of June 2017;Serbian Government’s “Decision Determining the List of Safe Countries of Origin and Safe Third Countries”, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 67/2009, applicable in 2015;Criterion “d” of the 2009 Guidelines on human rights protection in the context of accelerated asylum procedures of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 1 July 2009, section VI;Report to the Hungarian Government on the visit to Hungary carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 21 to 27 October 2015 | Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Serbia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
222 | 4762113_01072020 | Vavřička v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867/14, 73094/14, 19306/15, 19298/15 and 43883/15) | 2020-07-01 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47621/13",
"3867/14",
"73094/14",
"19306/15",
"19298/15",
"43883/15"
] | 001-209039 | CASE OF VAVŘIČKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209039 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2021-04-08 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a"
] | [
"CZE"
] | Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40/1964 Coll., as amended) | Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, § 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, § 110, ECHR 2011;Baytüre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270/09, §§ 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02 and 4 others, §§ 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furdík v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);İbrahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491/12, § 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439/12, §§ 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452/14, § 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, § 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429/03, 15 March 2012 | Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on “Fundamental rights and responsibilities”;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on “the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health” of 17 April 2013 (CRC/C/GC/15) | Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) | TRUE |
223 | 4770808_19022014 | Jaloud v. the Netherlands (no. 47708/08) | 2014-02-19 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47708/08"
] | 001-114929 | JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114929 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-12-06 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2"
] | [
"NLD"
] | FALSE | |||||
224 | 4770808_19022014 | Jaloud v. the Netherlands (no. 47708/08) | 2014-02-19 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"47708/08"
] | 001-148367 | CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2014-11-20 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"1",
"2",
"2-1",
"2-2",
"41"
] | [
"NLD"
] | Article 38 of the Military Criminal Code ; Article 12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure | Al Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021/08, § 77, ECHR 2011;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 202-203, ECHR 2004 II;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia judgment [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482/98, § 41, ECHR 2003 VII;Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 36, Series A no. 247 B;Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, § 69, ECHR 2003 VIII;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 301, ECHR 2011;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 107, ECHR 2001 III (extracts);Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, §§ 238-239, ECHR 2006 VIII;I.J.L. and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 29522/95, 30056/96 and 30574/96, § 112, ECHR 2000 IX;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950/00, § 173, 24 February 2005;K. v. Italy, no. 38805/97, § 21, ECHR 2004 VIII;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 87, Reports 1998-I;Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 93, 4 May 2001;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 74, ECHR 2004 XI;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 149, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 113, ECHR 2001 III;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, § 40, ECHR 2001-VIII;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, ECHR 2007 II;Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000 II;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 223, ECHR 2004 III | MND (SE) (Multinational Division, South East) Memorandum of Understanding;MND (C-S) (Multinational Division, Central-South) Memorandum of Understanding;Article 42 of Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague, 18 October 1907);Geneva Conventions of 1949;United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483;United Nations Security Council Resolution 1511;Coalition Provisional Authority Order no. 28 of 9 March 2003 (“Establishment Of The Iraqi Civil Defense Corps”);Article 6 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility;Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2007, p. 43, § 406 | Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award | TRUE |
225 | 4784808_04092013 | Center for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania (no. 47848/08) | 2013-09-04 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber Judgment hearing | [
"47848/08"
] | 001-113736 | CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113736 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-06-07 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"3",
"5",
"8",
"13",
"13+2",
"13+3",
"13+8",
"14",
"14+2",
"14+3",
"14+5"
] | [
"ROU"
] | Communicated | FALSE | ||||
226 | 4784808_04092013 | Center for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania (no. 47848/08) | 2013-09-04 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber Judgment hearing | [
"47848/08"
] | 001-145577 | CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145577 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004784808 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2014-07-17 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"13",
"13+2",
"34",
"46",
"46-2"
] | [
"ROU"
] | Law no. 487/2002 on Mental Health and the Protection of People with Psychological Disorders (“the Mental Health Act 2002”) | A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 30015/96, §§ 44-45, 27 July 2004;Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 43, 2 November 2004;Ahmet Yıldırım v. Turkey, no. 3111/10, § 72, ECHR 2012;Aizpurua Ortiz and Others v. Spain, no. 42430/05, § 30, 2 February 2010;Aliev v. Georgia, no. 522/04, §§ 44-49, 13 January 2009;Armonienė v. Lithuania, no. 36919/02, § 29, 25 November 2008;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;B. v. Romania (no. 2), no. 1285/03, 19 February 2013;Bazorkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 69481/01, 15 September 2005;Biç and Others v. Turkey, no. 55955/00, §§ 22-23, 2 February 2006;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723/00, §§ 27-31, ECHR 2005 II;Brumărescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, § 20, ECHR 2001 I;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 33, ECHR 2008;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207/03, §§ 65-67, 20 April 2010;Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 92, ECHR 1999 IV;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002 I;Carabulea v. Romania, no. 45661/99, § 108, 13 July 2010;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, ECHR 1999 VI;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 76, Series A no. 12;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548/00, 17 January 2008;Dvořáček and Dvořáčková v. Slovakia, no. 30754/04, § 41, 28 July 2009;Fairfield and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790/04, ECHR 2005 VI;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18;Grădinar v. Moldova, no. 7170/02, 8 April 2008;Ilbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v. Turkey, no. 19986/06, § 35, 10 April 2012;İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000 VII;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jasinskis v. Latvia, no. 45744/08, §59, 21 December 2010;Kaburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 9035/06, §§ 52-53, 19 June 2012;Kamil Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, ECHR 2003 IX;Kaya and Polat v. Turkey (dec.), nos. 2794/05 and 40345/05, 21 October 2008;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 33, Series A no. 28;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, § 89, ECHR 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 50, 30 March 2009;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457/08, §§ 96-100, 15 November 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000 XII;Marie-Louise Loyen and Bruneel v. France, no. 55929/00, 5 July 2005;Mehmet Hatip Dicle v. Turkey, no. 9858/04, § 41, 15 October 2013;Menteş and Others v. Turkey, 28 November 1997, § 107, Reports 1997 VIII;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, ECHR 2009;Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604/01, §§ 31-32, ECHR 2006-X;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, 18 June 2013;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 57, 20 December 2007;Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, no. 10300/83, § 33, 25 August 1987;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 71, ECHR 2004 XII;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, 18 June 2002, § 264;P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 56547/00, 11 December 2001;P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no. 56547/00, ECHR 2002 VI;Parascineti v. Romania, no. 32060/05, §§ 34-38, 13 March 2012,;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, §§ 96-97, ECHR 2002 II;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147/06, 21 September 2010;Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 21727/08, 20 January 2009;Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281 A;Ressegatti v. Switzerland, no. 17671/02, 13 July 2006;S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 23715/94, Commission decision of 20 May 1996;Sanles Sanles v. Spain (dec.), no. 48335/99, ECHR 2000 XI;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999 V;Stojkovic v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, no. 14818/02, § 25, 8 November 2007;Tauira and 18 Others v. France, application no. 28204/95, Commission decision of 4 December 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 83-B, p. 131;The Argeş College of Legal Advisers v. Romania, no. 2162/05, 8 March 2011;The Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia (dec.), no. 9103/04, 22 May 2007;Thévenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, ECHR 200 –III;Timus and Tarus v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 70077/11, § 58, 15 October 2013;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, ECHR 2009;Velcea and Mazăre v. Romania, no. 64301/01, § 138, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41488/98, 18 May 1999;Villa v. Italy, no. 19675/06, § 55, 20 April 2010;Vlad and Others v. Romania, nos. 40756/06, 41508/07 and 50806/07, § 162, 26 November 2013;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, §§ 89 90, ECHR 2004 VIII;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 60, Series A no. 33;Women On Waves and Others v. Portugal, no. 31276/05, § 47, 3 February 2009;X v. France, no. 18020/91, § 26, 31 March 1992;Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 29, ECHR 2003–IX;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 127, Reports 1998 VI;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, ECHR 2001 V | Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Locus standi);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Measures of a general character) | TRUE | |
227 | 487116_26022020 | Hanan v. Germany (no. 4871/16) | 2020-02-26 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"4871/16"
] | 001-166884 | HANAN v. GERMANY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166884 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"13"
] | [
"DEU"
] | Communicated | ||||||
228 | 487116_26022020 | Hanan v. Germany (no. 4871/16) | 2020-02-26 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"4871/16"
] | 001-208279 | CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208279 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2021-02-16 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"1",
"2",
"2-1",
"35",
"35-3-a"
] | [
"DEU"
] | Code of Crimes against International Law ; Code of Criminal Procedure
| Aktaş v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 306, ECHR 2003 V (extracts);Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021/08, ECHR 2011;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, 30 March 2016;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, § 75, ECHR 2001 XII;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, § 121, 27 July 2006;Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos. 71412/01 and 78166/01, 2 May 2007;Chagos Islanders v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35622/04, 11 December 2012;Damayev v. Russia, no. 36150/04, 29 May 2012;Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC], no. 38263/08, §§ 329-332, 21 January 2021;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925/07, 29 January 2019;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, ECHR 2014;Hentschel and Stark v. Germany, no. 47274/15, 9 November 2017;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, ECHR 2014;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, § 201, 5 November 2009;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, ECHR 2006 XIV;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 64, ECHR 2010;Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005‑VII;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 117, ECHR 2018;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, ECHR 2007 II;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Romeo Castaño v. Belgium, no. 8351/17, 9 July 2019;Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101-110, ECHR 1999-IV;Velcea and Mazăre v. Romania, no. 64301/01, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000‑VI | Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter;Rule 158 of the Customary International Humanitarian Law;UN Basic Principles and Guidelines, adopted by General Assembly Resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005 (A/RES/60/147);Human Rights Committee’s General Comment No. 36 on the right to life under Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted on 30 October 2018;Revised version of the Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (“Minnesota Protocol”) published by the Office of the UN High Commissionessr for Human Rights in 2017;Section I, subsection 3, of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Status of Forces Agreement;Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (“the Rome Statute”) entered into force on 1 July 2002
| Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) | TRUE |
229 | 4887608_07032012 | Animal Defenders International c. United Kingdom (no. 48876/08) | 2012-03-07 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"48876/08"
] | 001-111190 | ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111190 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-01-18 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"10"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | FALSE | ||||
230 | 4887608_07032012 | Animal Defenders International c. United Kingdom (no. 48876/08) | 2012-03-07 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"48876/08"
] | 001-119244 | CASE OF ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119244 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0422JUD004887608 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2013-04-22 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ; Television Act 1954 ; Sections 319-321 and 333 of the Communications Act 2003 | Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, § 48, ECHR 2003-VI;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 61-64 ECHR 1999-III;Bowman v. the United Kingdom, 19 February 1998, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, ECHR 2010;Centro Europa 7 S.R.L. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, ECHR 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, ECHR 2007-V;Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-IV;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, ECHR 2007-I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49, Series A no. 24;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, ECHR 2003-VIII;Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005-IX;Informationsverein Lentia and Others v. Austria, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 276;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;Manole and Others v. Moldova, no. 13936/02, § 99, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, Series A no. 169;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, 13 July 2012;Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 60, Series A no. 216;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, ECHR 2002-III;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949/98 and 53134/99, 10 May 2007;Schweizerische Radio- und Fernsehgesellschaft SRG v. Switzerland, no. 34124/06, § 56, 21 June 2012;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) [GC], no. 126/05, 22 May 2012;Société de conception de presse et d’édition and Ponson v. France, no. 26935/05, §§ 57 and 63, 5 March 2009;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, § 101, ECHR 2007-V;TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts);VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001-VI;Vides Aizsardzibas Klubs v. Latvia, no. 57829/00, § 42, 27 May 2004;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports of Decisions and Judgments 1996-V, § 58;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278/00, ECHR 2006-IV | Chapter 13 of the Fifth Report to the Government of the Committee on Standards in Public Life (“the Neill Committee”);The European Platform of Regulatory Authorities (“EPRA”) Survey of 2006;Recommendation R(1999)15 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on measures concerning media coverage of election campaigns | No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) | TRUE |
231 | 4927011_26052021 | Savickis and Others v. Latvia (no. 49270/11) | 2021-05-26 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"49270/11"
] | 001-156290 | SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156290 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"14",
"P1-1"
] | [
"LVA"
] | Communicated | ||||||
232 | 4981209_07072021 | Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium (no. 49812/09) | 2021-07-07 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"49812/09"
] | 001-206214 | CASE OF VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206214 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1110JUD004981209 | CHAMBER | 2020-11-10 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"41"
] | [
"BEL"
] | Section 49 of the Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 9 July 2004 ; Article 1107 of the Judicial Code | A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11, § 133, 15 November 2016;A.P., M.P. and T.P. v. Switzerland, 29 August 1997, § 40, Reports 1997 V;Amirov v. Armenia (dec.), no 25512/06, 18 January 2011;Arnolin and Others v. France, nos. 20127/03 and 24 others, § 76, 9 January 2007;Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) v. the United Kingdom, no 11002/05, § 58, 27 February 2007;Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no 8162/13, §§ 92-94, 8 July 2014;Čepek v. the Czech Republic, no 9815/10, 5 September 2013;Chambaz v. Switzerland, no 11663/04, § 42, 5 April 2012;Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661/07 and 38433/07, §§ 199-207, 12 April 2018;Cimolino v. Italy, no 12532/05, § 45, 22 September 2009;Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France, nos. 65399/01, 65406/01, 65405/01 and 65407/01, 13 October 2005;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no 76639/11, § 146, 25 September 2018;Dimopulos v. Turkey, no 37766/05, § 32, 2 April 2019;Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no 44759/98, § 29, ECHR 2001 VII;Formela v. Poland (dec.), no 31651/08, § 127, 5 February 2019;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I;Georgiou v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 40042/98, 16 May 2000;Gil Sanjuan v. Spain, no 48297/15, § 38, 26 May 2020;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826/03, § 186, 22 May 2012;J.R. v. Belgium, no 56367/09, § 59, 24 January 2017;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619/97, § 69, ECHR 2002 VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no 73053/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no 27;Kovárová v. Slovakia, no 46564/10, § 48, 23 June 2015;Krčmář and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 35376/97, § 39, 3 March 2000;Les Authentiks and Supras Auteuil 91 v. France, nos. 4696/11 and 4703/11, §§ 50-52, 27 October 2016;Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional v. Portugal, no 4687/11, §§ 61-62, 17 May 2016;Lilly France v. France (no 2), no 20429/07, § 51, 25 November 2010;Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, § 31, Reports 1996 I;López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, § 149, 17 October 2019;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09 and 4 others, 31 May 2011;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no 10511/10, § 134, 26 April 2016;National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom 23 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VII;Ndayegamiye-Mporamazina v. Switzerland, no 16874/12, § 39, 5 February 2019;Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, § 23, Reports 1997 I;OGIS-Institut Stanislas, OGEC Saint-Pie X and Blanche de Castille and Others v. France, nos. 42219/98 and 54563/00, 27 May 2004;Optim and Industerre v. Belgium (dec.), no 23819/06, §§ 24-26, 11 September 2012;Papageorgiou v. Greece, 22 October 1997, § 38, Reports 1997 VI;Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999 II;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, Series A no 332;Prikyan and Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 44624/98, § 46, 16 February 2006;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 49, Series A no 301 B;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 35289/11, § 146, 19 September 2017;SCM Scanner de l’Ouest Lyonnais and Others v. France, no 12106/03, § 31, 21 June 2007;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249/03, § 132, 17 September 2009;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, ECHR 2006 V;Skondrianos v. Greece, nos. 63000/00, 74291/01 and 74292/01, §§ 29-30, 18 December 2003;Sträg Datatjänster AB v. Sweden (dec.), no 50664/99, 21 June 2005;Vermeulen v. Belgium, 20 February 1996, § 33, Reports 1996 I;Villnow v. Belgium (dec.), no 16938/05, 29 January 2008;Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 9 others, ECHR 1999 VII | No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | FALSE | |
233 | 4981209_07072021 | Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium (no. 49812/09) | 2021-07-07 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"49812/09"
] | 001-220415 | CASE OF VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220415 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1103JUD004981209 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2022-11-03 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"41"
] | [
"BEL"
] | Article 444 of the 1992 Income Tax Code ; Section 49 of the Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 9 July 2004 ; Articles 2244 and 2251 of the Civil Code ; Section 11 of the Act of 23 March 1999 on the organisation of the courts in tax matters | A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11, 15 November 2016;Advisory opinion on the applicability of statutes of limitation to prosecution, conviction and punishment in respect of an offence constituting, in substance, an act of torture [GC], request no. P16-2021-001, Armenian Court of Cassation, § 72, 26 April 2022;Antia and Khupenia v. Georgia, no. 7523/10, 18 June 2020;Arnolin and Others v. France, nos. 20127/03 and 24 others, § 76, 9 January 2007;Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no. 8162/13, §§ 92-94, 8 July 2014;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III;Borcea v. Romania (dec.), no. 55959/14, § 64, 22 September 2015;Cabourdin v. France, no. 60796/00, § 37, 11 April 2006;Čepek v. the Czech Republic, no. 9815/10, 5 September 2013;Chap Ltd v. Armenia, no. 15485/09, §§ 41 and 44, 4 May 2017;Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661/07 and 38433/07, §§ 199-207, 12 April 2018;Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France, nos. 65399/01 and 3 others, 13 October 2005;Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96 and 4 others, § 149, ECHR 2000 VII;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 146, 25 September 2018;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 46, Series A no. 35;Dimopulos v. Turkey, no. 37766/05, § 45, 2 April 2019;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 82, ECHR 2003-X;Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, ECHR 2001 VII;Georgiou v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40042/98, 16 May 2000;Gestur Jónsson and Ragnar Halldór Hall v. Iceland [GC], nos. 68273/14 and 68271/14, 22 December 2020;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, § 238, 1 December 2020;Guérin v. France, 29 July 1998, § 37, Reports 1998-V;Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, § 39, Series A no. 296-A;Hôpital local Saint Pierre d’Oléron and Others v. France, nos. 18096/12 and 20 others, 8 November 2018;Hussein and Others v. Belgium, no. 45187/12, § 60, 16 March 2021;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 186, 22 May 2012;Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, ECHR 2002 VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27;Legrand v. France, no. 23228/08, §§ 36-40, 26 May 2011;Les Authentiks and Supras Auteuil 91 v. France, nos. 4696/11 and 4703/11, 27 October 2016;Lilly France v. France (no. 2), no. 20429/07, § 51, 25 November 2010;Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, § 31, Reports 1996-I;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 123, 29 November 2016;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09 and 4 others, 31 May 2011;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 134, 26 April 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 243, ECHR 2012;National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 112, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VII;Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, §§ 192 and 195, 25 June 2019;Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, § 23, Reports 1997 I;OGIS-Institut Stanislas, OGEC Saint-Pie X and Blanche de Castille and Others v. France, nos. 42219/98 and 54563/00, 27 May 2004;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, § 137, ECHR 2013;Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II;Petko Petkov v. Bulgaria, no. 2834/06, 19 February 2013;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332;Previti v. Italy (dec.), no. 1845/08, § 80, 12 February 2013;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, 6 November 2018;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289/11, § 146, 19 September 2017;Rivera Vazquez and Calleja Delsordo v. Switzerland, no. 65048/13, 22 January 2019;S.C. Service Benz Com S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 58045/11, §§ 32 33, 4 July 2017;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 132, 17 September 2009;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 126, ECHR 2006-V;Segame SA v. France, no. 4837/06, §§ 56-60, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, § 110, 12 May 2017;Skondrianos v. Greece, nos. 63000/00 and 2 others, §§ 29-30, 18 December 2003;Sträg Datatjänster AB v. Sweden (dec.), no. 50664/99, 21 June 2005;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 49, Series A no. 301-B;Vermeulen v. Belgium, 20 February 1996, § 33, Reports 1996-I;Villnow v. Belgium (dec.), no. 16938/05, 29 January 2008;Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 9 others, § 57, ECHR 1999-VII;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160/12, §§ 76-78, 5 April 2018 | No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
234 | 4987211_28082012 | Tymoshenko v. Ukraine (no. 49872/11) | 2012-08-28 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"49872/11"
] | 001-109460 | TYMOSHENKO v. UKRAINE | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109460 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2012-03-15 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1-b",
"5-3",
"5-4",
"6",
"6-1",
"6-3-b",
"6-3-c",
"6-3-d"
] | [
"UKR"
] | ||||||
235 | 4987211_28082012 | Tymoshenko v. Ukraine (no. 49872/11) | 2012-08-28 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"49872/11"
] | 001-111795 | TYMOSHENKO v. UKRAINE | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111795 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2012-05-31 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1-b",
"5-3",
"5-4",
"6",
"6-1",
"6-3-b",
"6-3-c",
"6-3-d"
] | [
"UKR"
] | FALSE | |||||
236 | 4987211_28082012 | Tymoshenko v. Ukraine (no. 49872/11) | 2012-08-28 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"49872/11"
] | 001-119382 | CASE OF TYMOSHENKO v. UKRAINE | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119382 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430JUD004987211 | CHAMBER | 2013-04-30 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-c",
"5-4",
"5-5",
"18",
"18+5-1-c",
"35"
] | [
"UKR"
] | Act “On the procedure for compensation for damage caused to citizens by the unlawful acts of bodies of enquiry, pre-trial investigation authorities, prosecutor’s offices and courts” | Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, §§ 139-140, 22 December 2008;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII;Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 82, 8 April 2004;Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 60, Series A no. 111;Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 43, ECHR 2002-II;Çagdas Sahin v. Turkey, no. 28137/02, § 34, 11 April 2006;Castravet v. Moldova, no. 23393/05, § 33, 13 March 2007;Cebotari v. Moldova, no. 35615/16, §§ 46 et seq., 13 November 2007;Doronin v. Ukraine, no. 16505/02, § 59, 19 February 2009;Dzwonkowski v. Poland, no. 46702/99, § 51, 12 April 2007;Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729/08, § 79, 4 October 2011;Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70726/01, 19 May 2004;Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649/05, § 117, 7 November 2006;Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, 29 November 2007;Iglin v. Ukraine, no. 39908/05, § 52, 12 January 2012;Ignatenco v. Moldova, no. 36988/07, §§ 77-78, 8 February 2011;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, 15 May 2012;Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, 10 February 2011;Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, §§ 27-28, 14 October 2010;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, 31 May 2011;Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts);Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X;Knyazev v. Russia, no. 25948/05, § 103, 8 November 2007;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95 ECHR 2000-IV;Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 44 et seq., 16 June 2005;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492/11, 3 July 2012;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III;Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919/03, 29 September 2005;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 80, ECHR 2010;Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006;Molodorych v. Ukraine, no. 2161/02, 28 October 2010;Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 40, ECHR 2002-IX;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 233, 21 April 2011;Nešták v. Slovakia, no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007;Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005;Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 80, 13 September 2005;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III;Piryanik v. Ukraine, no. 75788/01, § 20, 19 April 2005;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 211, 13 July 2006;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336;Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, 4 October 2005;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V;Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia [GC], no. 60654/00, § 129, ECHR 2007-II;Solovey and Zozulya v. Ukraine, nos. 40774/02 and 4048/03, 27 November 2008;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 182, 17 January 2012;Svetoslav Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 55861/00, § 76, 7 February 2008;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 1999-IV;Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 73, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts);Visloguzov v. Ukraine, no. 32362/02, § 46, 20 May 2010;Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, §§ 52-55, 6 November 2008 | Report to the Ukrainian Government on the visit to Ukraine carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 29 November to 6 December 2011 [CPT/Inf (2012) 30] | Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority;Reasonably necessary to prevent fleeing);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Violation of Article 18+5-1-c - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority) | TRUE |
237 | 5054108_25112015 | Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09) | 2015-11-25 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"50541/08",
"50571/08",
"50573/08"
] | 001-111388 | IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND OTHER APPLICATIONS | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111388 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC005054108 | DECISIONS | 4 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"6-3-c",
"6-3-d",
"35"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Partly inadmissible | |||||
238 | 5054108_25112015 | Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09) | 2015-11-25 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"50541/08",
"50571/08",
"50573/08"
] | 001-111742 | IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM and 2 other applications | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111742 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2012-05-22 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"6",
"6-1"
] | [
"GBR"
] | FALSE | |||||
239 | 5054108_25112015 | Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09) | 2015-11-25 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"40351/09"
] | 001-118187 | ABDURAHMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-118187 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2010-09-14 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"6"
] | [
"GBR"
] | FALSE | |||||
240 | 5054108_25112015 | Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09) | 2015-11-25 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"50541/08",
"50571/08",
"50573/08",
"40351/09"
] | 001-148676 | CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148676 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108 | CHAMBER | 2014-12-16 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"6",
"6+6-3-c",
"6-1",
"6-3",
"6-3-c"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Paragraph 8 of Schedule 8 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ; Paragraph 6.7 of Code C ; Sections 76 and 78 PACE
| Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660/02, 18 February 2010;Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180/06, 31 October 2013;Beggs v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15499/10, § 124, 16 October 2012;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, § 45, ECHR 2001 X;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 90, 10 March 2009;Çimen v. Turkey, no. 19582/02, § 26, 3 February 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, § 33, 13 October 2009;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, ECHR 2010;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, §§ 37-38, Series A no. 275;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 30663/04, § 42, 18 December 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 41, ECHR 2000 VI;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 77, 20 January 2005;Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31411/07, § 40, 18 January 2011;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268/04, §§ 81-82, 11 December 2008;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, § 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008;Şedal v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38802/08, § 33, 13 May 2014;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, § 67, 26 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, 16 November 2010;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720/02, § 87, 20 September 2012;Yoldaş v. Turkey, no. 27503/04, 23 February 2010 | No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) | TRUE | |
241 | 5054108_25112015 | Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09) | 2015-11-25 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"50541/08",
"50571/08",
"50573/08",
"40351/09"
] | 001-166680 | CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166680 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-09-13 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6+6-3-c",
"6-1",
"6-3",
"6-3-c",
"35",
"41"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Sections 76 § 1 and 78 § 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
| A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, ECHR 2009;Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660/02, 18 February 2010;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, ECHR 2002 IX;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, § 45, ECHR 2001 X;Brusco v. France, no. 1466/07, 14 October 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 89-93, 10 March 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, §§ 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 166-169, ECHR 2010;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, §§ 47-55, ECHR 2000-XII;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, §§ 36-38, Series A no. 275;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 97-100, ECHR 2006 IX;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, §§ 45-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 77, 20 January 2005;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 143, 10 September 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, ECHR 2012;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 262, 21 April 2011;O’Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, § 53, ECHR 2007 III;O’Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550/96, 6 July 1999;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, 24 September 2009;Płonka v. Poland, no. 20310/02, 31 March 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, ECHR 2008;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, §§ 68-69, Reports 1996 VI;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-101, ECHR 2015;Schmid-Laffer v. Switzerland, no. 41269/08, §§ 29 and 39, 16 June 2015;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, § 67, 26 June 2008;Shabelnik v. Ukraine, no. 16404/03, § 52, 19 February 2009;Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201/11, § 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, ECHR 2010;Weh v. Austria, no. 38544/97, 8 April 2004 | Preamble and Article 3 of Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings;Article 21 of the Preamble of Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, adopted on 22 October 2013, covering the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, the right to have third parties informed of detention and the right to communicate with third parties and with consular authorities;Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 55 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda;Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms;Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
| Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
242 | 5135707_14062017 | Naït-Liman v. Switzerland (no. 51357/07) | 2017-06-14 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"51357/07"
] | 001-164470 | CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164470 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707 | CHAMBER | 2016-06-21 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"6",
"6-1"
] | [
"CHE"
] | Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no 35763/97, ECHR 2001 XI;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049/01, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2007 I;Arlewin v. Sweden, no 22302/10, §§ 72 et seq., 1 March 2016;Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273/99, § 49, ECHR 2002 IX;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869/02, § 57, ECHR 2010;Eşim v. Turkey, no 59601/09, § 18, 17 September 2013;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Howald Moor and Others v. Switzerland, nos. 52067/10 and 41072/11, 11 March 2014;Jones and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 34356/06 and 40525/06, 14 January 2014;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports 1998 II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no 176 A;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 131, ECHR 2010;Nusret Kaya and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43750/06, 43752/06, 32054/08, 37753/08 and 60915/08, § 38, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062/07, § 25, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, § 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no 43903/09, § 58, 12 November 2013 | No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) | TRUE | ||
243 | 5135707_14062017 | Naït-Liman v. Switzerland (no. 51357/07) | 2017-06-14 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"51357/07"
] | 001-181789 | CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2018-03-15 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1"
] | [
"CHE"
] | Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations ; Section 3 of the Federal Act on Private International Law of 18 December 1987 (LDIP) (Forum of necessity) | Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inv. v. Switzerland [GC], no 5809/08, ECHR 2016;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049/01, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2007‑I;Arlewin v. Sweden, no 22302/10, § 142, 1 March 2016;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261/12, § 120, ECHR 2016;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no 23459/03, § 122, ECHR 2011;Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273/99, § 49, ECHR 2002 IX;Benthem v. the Netherlands, 23 October 1985, § 32, Series A no 97;Eşim v. Turkey, no 59601/09, § 18, 17 September 2013;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Hämäläinen v. Finland [GC], no 37359/09, §§ 72-75, ECHR 2014;Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, §§ 40-45, Reports 1997 II;Howald Moor and Others v. Switzerland, nos. 52067/10 and 41072/11, §§ 70-71, 11 March 2014;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports 1998‑II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no 176‑A;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 71, ECHR 2016 (extracts)Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no 18030/11, § 138, ECHR 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, § 169, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 131, ECHR 2010;Nusret Kaya and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43750/06, 43752/06, 32054/08, 37753/08 and 60915/08, § 38, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 81, Series A no 52;Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062/07, § 25, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, § 50, Reports 1996 IV;Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no 43903/09, § 58, 12 November 2013 | Resolution 60/147 of the General Assembly of the United Nations of 16 December 2005;Articles 31 § 3 (c) and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969;Articles 5 § 2 and 14 of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984 (States Parties’ jurisdiction in criminal matters and universal civil jurisdiction);General Comment no. 3 (2012) of the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation of Article 14 by States parties (CAT/C.GC/3, 13 December 2012;Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ);Article 16 of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Access to courts);Institute of International Law, Tallinn Session Resolution 2015 entitled “Universal Civil Jurisdiction with regard to Reparation for International Crimes” and its background report | No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) | TRUE |
244 | 5167110_04092012 | Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842/10) | 2012-09-04 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"51671/10",
"36516/10"
] | 001-111187 | LADELE AND McFARLANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111187 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-04-12 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"9",
"9-1",
"14",
"14+9"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | FALSE | ||||
245 | 5167110_04092012 | Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842/10) | 2012-09-04 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"48420/10",
"59842/10"
] | 001-112944 | EWEIDA AND CHAPLIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112944 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-04-12 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"9",
"14",
"14+9"
] | [
"GBR"
] | FALSE | |||||
246 | 5167110_04092012 | Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842/10) | 2012-09-04 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"51671/10",
"36516/10",
"48420/10",
"59842/10"
] | 001-115881 | CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115881 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010 | CHAMBER | 2013-01-15 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"9",
"9-1",
"9-2",
"14",
"14+9",
"35",
"41"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Regulation 3 of the 2003 Regulations | Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, Commission’s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 5;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008;C. v. the United Kingdom, Commission decision of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 61, ECHR 2010;Cha’are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417/95, §§ 73-74, ECHR 2000-VII;D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499/02, §§ 89 and 91, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61319/09, §§ 41-42, 20 March 2012;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jakóbski v. Poland, no. 18429/06, § 44, 7 December 2010;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 37, ECHR 2003-IX;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 31, Series A no. 260-A;Konttinen v. Finland, Commission’s decision of 3 December 1996, Decisions and Reports 87-A, p. 68;Kosteski v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55170/00, § 39, 13 April 2006;Leela Förderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911/00, § 80, 6 November 2008;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1365, § 47;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295, § 47;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, §§ 58-61, ECHR 2011;Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853/99, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-X;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, § 1, ECHR 2003-II;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949/98 and 53134/99, § 35, 10 May 2007;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999 V;Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010/04, 3 December 2009;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Stedman v. the United Kingdom, Commission’s decision of 9 April 1997;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, ECHR 2000-IV;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 44, Series A no. 323;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, §§ 54-55, Series A no. 44;Zaoui v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 41615/98, 18 January 2001 | Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award | TRUE | |
247 | 5280609_18092012 | Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806/09 & 22703/10) | 2012-09-18 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"52806/09",
"22703/10"
] | 001-112348 | VILNES v. NORWAY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112348 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-06-07 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"8",
"8-1",
"34"
] | [
"NOR"
] | FALSE | |||||
248 | 5280609_18092012 | Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806/09 & 22703/10) | 2012-09-18 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"52806/09",
"22703/10"
] | 001-112835 | MULEDAL AND OTHERS v. NORWAY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112835 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2011-06-07 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"8",
"8-1",
"34",
"35"
] | [
"NOR"
] | FALSE | |||||
249 | 5280609_18092012 | Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806/09 & 22703/10) | 2012-09-18 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"52806/09",
"22703/10"
] | 001-138597 | CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138597 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD005280609 | CHAMBER | 2013-12-05 00:00:00 | 2 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"8",
"8-1",
"35",
"41"
] | [
"NOR"
] | Article 121 of the 1967 Diving Regulation ; Articles 3.4 (1) and 3(k) of the 1978 Regulation Appendix | Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 67, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205/07, §§ 56-59, 13 July 2010;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, §§ 57-60, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35605/97, § 40, ECHR 2002 IV;Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, §§ 29 and 30, Series A no. 269;Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423/05, 20534/05, 20678/05, 23263/05, 24283/05 and 35673/05, §§ 157-161, 28 February 2012;López Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, 55, Series A no. 303 C;McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, §§ 98-104, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Muñoz Díaz v. Spain, no. 49151/07, ECHR 2009;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 73, ECHR 1999-II;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 155-169, ECHR 2005 X;Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, §§ 36 to 40, Series A no. 40 | Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman punishment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award | TRUE | |
250 | 529414_18122019 | Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294/14) | 2019-12-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5294/14"
] | 001-146905 | ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146905 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"P1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | |||||||
251 | 529414_18122019 | Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294/14) | 2019-12-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5294/14"
] | 001-173396 | ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173396 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC000529414 | DECISIONS | 4 | [
"34",
"35",
"P1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Admissible | |||||
252 | 529414_18122019 | Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294/14) | 2019-12-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5294/14"
] | 001-189631 | CASE OF ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-189631 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD000529414 | CHAMBER | 2019-01-29 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"34",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Sections 15 and 17/C of the Integration Act | Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, §§ 65 and 66, Series A no. 330 A;Albert and Others v. Hungary (dec.), no. 5294/14, 4 April 2017;Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178/97, 27 June 2000;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 80, ECHR 2012;Credit and Industrial Bank v. the Czech Republic, no. 29010/95, §§ 50 to 52, ECHR 2003 XI (extracts);Dinçer and Others v. Turkey, no. 10435/08, §§ 13 and 14, 3 November 2011;Feldman and Slovyanskyy Bank v. Ukraine, no. 42758/05, §§ 28 and 29, 21 December 2017;G.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 21156/93, § 24, 26 October 2000;Glas Nadezhda EOOD and Anatoliy Elenkov v. Bulgaria, no. 14134/02, § 40, ECHR 2007;Jensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 52620/99, 20 March 2003;Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417/96, ECHR 2002 X (extracts);Petrović v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 30721/15, §§ 15 and 16, 22 June 2017 | No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) | TRUE | |
253 | 529414_18122019 | Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294/14) | 2019-12-18 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5294/14"
] | 001-203850 | CASE OF ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203850 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD000529414 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2020-07-07 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"34",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Act no. CXXXV of 2013 on the Integration of Cooperative Credit Institutions and the Amendment of Certain Laws Regarding Economic Matters ; Act no. CXCVI of 2013 on the Amendment of Certain Laws Regarding the Integration of Cooperative Credit Institutions
| Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, Series A no. 330 A;Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178/97, ECHR 2000-VI;Antilla v. Finland (dec.), no. 16248/10, 19 November 2013;Association SOS Attentats and de Boëry v. France [GC], (dec.), no. 76642/01, § 30, ECHR 2006 XIV;Bayramov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), 23055/03, 14 February 2006;Berlusconi v. Italy [GC], no. 58428/13, § 65, 27 November 2018;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 33, ECHR 2008;Camberrow MM5 AD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 50357/99, 1 April 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 49429/99, 9 September 2004;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 96 and 101, ECHR 2014;Centro Europa 7 S.R.L. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], 38433/09, §§ 92-95, 7 June 2012;COMPANY S. and T. v. Sweden, no. 11189/84, Commission decision of 11 December 1986, Decisions and Reports (DR);Credit and Industrial Bank v. the Czech Republic, no. 29010/95, § 51, 21 October 2003;Dyrwold v. Sweden, no. 12259/86, Commission decision of 7 September 1990;Erbs v. France, no. 23313/94, Commission decision of 18 May 1995;Erduran and Em Export Dış Tic A.Ş. v. Turkey, nos. 25707/05 and 28614/06, §§ 59 -61, 20 November 2018;Feldman and Slovyanskyy Bank v. Ukraine, no. 42758/05, §§ 28-29, 21 December 2017;Fridh and Cifond Aktiebolag v. Sweden, no. 14017/88, Commission decision of 2 July 1992;Gardean and S.C. Grup 95 SA v. Romania, no. 25787/04, §§ 16-18, 1 December 2009;Georgescu and Prodas Holding S.A. v. Romania (dec.), no. 25830/03, 27 May 2014;Gubarev and Serdyukov v. Russia (dec.), no. 42334/06, 18 June 2019;Herrmann v. Germany [GC], no. 9300/07, § 39, 26 June 2012;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287/15, § 173, 21 November 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 100, 4 December 2018;International Bank for Commerce and Development AD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 7031/05, §§ 90-92, 2 June 2016;J.W. v. Poland, no. 27917/95, Commission decision of 11 September 1997;Jafarli and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 36079/06, §§ 38-42, 29 July 2010;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001 VII;Kaplan v. the United Kingdom, no. 7598/76, Commission decision of 14 December 1978;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118/01, §§ 123-126, 15 November 2007;Kind v. Germany, no. 44324/98, Commission decision of 30 March 2000;Kin-Stib and Majkić v. Serbia, no. 12312/05, § 74, 20 April 2010;KIPS DOO and Drekalović v. Montenegro, no. 28766/06, §§ 86-87, 26 June 2018;Lekić v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480/07, §§ 111 and 115, 11 December 2018;Melo Tadeu v. Portugal, no. 27785/10, § 75, 23 October 2014;Nassau Verzerkering Maatschappij N.V. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 57602/09, § 21, 4 October 2011;Offerhaus and Offerhaus v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 35730/97, 16 January 2001;Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417/96, ECHR 2002 X (extracts);Pokis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 528/02, ECHR 2006 XV;Reisner v. Turkey, no. 46815/09, § 45, 21 July 2015;Rysovskyy v.Ukraine, no. 29979/04, §§ 46-49, 20 October 2011;S.C. Bartolo Prod Com SRL and Botomei v. Romania, no. 16294/03, §§ 29-31, 21 February 2012;S.C. Fiercolect Impex S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 26429/07, §§ 38-41, 13 December 2016;S.p.r.l. ANCA and Others v. Belgium, no. 10259/83, Commission decision of 10 December 1984;Shesti Mai Engineering OOD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17854/04, §§ 80-92, 20 September 2011;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 92, 25 July 2002;Soyuer and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 49445/07, 21 June 2011;Tee v. the United Kingdom, no. 26663/95, Commission decision of 28 February 1996;Vesela and Loyka v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 54811/00, 13 December 2005;Vladimirova v. Russia, no. 21863/05, §§ 40-41, 10 April 2018;Vujović and Lipa D.O.O. v. Montenegro, no. 18912/15, §§ 29-30, 20 February 2018;Yarrow and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 9266/81, Commission decision of 18 January 1983, D.R. 30, p. 155;Zülfikari v. Turkey, nos. 6372/05 and 52543/07, § 47, 19 March 2019 | Inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim | TRUE | |
254 | 5308013_16122015 | Béláné Nagy v. Hungary (no. 53080/13) | 2015-12-16 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"53080/13"
] | 001-141194 | BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141194 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"P1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | |||||||
255 | 5308013_16122015 | Béláné Nagy v. Hungary (no. 53080/13) | 2015-12-16 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"53080/13"
] | 001-150998 | CASE OF BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150998 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005308013 | CHAMBER | 2015-02-10 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"35",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996‑IV;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 50, Reports 1996 III;Aunola v. Finland (dec.), no. 30517/96, 15 March 2001;Banfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 6223/04, 18 October 2005;Béla Szabó v. Hungary, no. 37470/06, 9 December 2008;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 73, ECHR 2002 VII;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 81-94, ECHR 2005-VI;Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, ECHR 2004 IX;Lakićević and Others v. Montenegro and Serbia, nos. 27458/06, 37205/06, 37207/06 and 33604/07, § 70, 13 December 2011;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09, 52851/08, 53727/08, 54486/08 and 56001/08, § 62, 31 May 2011;Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373/05, § 39, 15 September 2009;Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, § 71, 28 April 2009;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-74, Series A no. 52;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2005 X;Terazzi S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 27265/95, § 85, 17 October 2002;Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, § 48, Series A no. 70;Wieczorek v. Poland, no. 18176/05, 8 December 2009 | Article 57 § 1(b) of the ILO Convention on Social Security;Ethical guidelines of the WHO’s document on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
| Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
256 | 5308013_16122015 | Béláné Nagy v. Hungary (no. 53080/13) | 2015-12-16 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"53080/13"
] | 001-169663 | CASE OF BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-169663 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD005308013 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-12-13 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"35",
"35-3",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Act no. XX of 1949 on the Constitution ; Article XIX of the Fundamental Law Act no. LXXXI of 1997 on Social-Security Pensions
| Alajos Kiss v. Hungary, no. 38832/06, § 42, 20 May 2010;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 65, ECHR 2007-I;Antoni Lewandowski v. Poland, no. 38459/03, §§ 78 and 82, 2 October 2012;Apostolakis v. Greece, no. 39574/07, §§ 28 and 35, 22 October 2009;Bellet, Huertas and Vialatte v. France (dec.), nos. 40832/98, 40833/98 and 40906/98, 27 April 1999;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, §§ 100-105, ECHR 2000-I;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, §§ 85-89, ECHR 2010;Da Conceição Mateus and Santos Januário v. Portugal (dec.), nos. 62235/12 and 57725/12, § 22, 8 October 2013;Da Silva Carvalho Rico v. Portugal (dec.), no. 13341/14, § 37, 1 September 2015;Domalewski, v. Poland (dec.), no. 34610/97, ECHR 1999 V;Fakas v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 4519/11, §§ 34, 37-43, 48, 3 June 2014;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 87, ECHR 2000 XII;Frimu and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 45312/11, 45581/11, 45583/11, 45587/1 and 45588/11, § 40, 13 December 2012;Gaygusuz v. Austria, no. 17371/90, 16 September 1996, § 41;Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, § 96, 12 May 2015;Goudswaard-Van der Lans v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 75255/01, ECHR 2005-XI;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794/98, §§ 69- 74, ECHR 2002-VII;Grudić v. Serbia, no. 31925/08, 17 April 2012;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, ECHR 1999-II;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 81-94, ECHR 2005 VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 141, ECHR 2001-VII;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461/13, § 156, 17 May 2016;Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, §§ 39-45, ECHR 2004 IX;Klein v. Austria, no. 57028/00, §§ 45-46, 3 March 2011;Kolesnyk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 57116/10, §§ 83, 89 and 91, 3 June 2014;Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, ECHR 2004-IX;Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892/98, §§ 37-42, ECHR 2003-X;Koufaki and ADEDY v. Greece (dec.), nos. 57665/12 and 57657/12, §§ 37 and 39, 7 May 2013;Lakićević and Others v. Montenegro and Serbia, nos. 27458/06, 37205/06, 37207/06 and 33604/07, §§ 70-72, 13 December 2011;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09, 52851/08, 53727/08, 54486/08 and 56001/08, §§ 61-63, 31 May 2011;Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810/03, § 67, ECHR 2005 IX;Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373/05, § 41, 15 September 2009;Müller v. Austria, no. 5849/72, Commission Report of 1 October 1975, DR 3, p. 25, § 30;N.K.M. v. Hungary, no. 66529/11, §§ 49 and 61, 14 May 2013;Panfile v. Roumania (dec.), no. 13902/11, 20 March 2012;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 211, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, § 51, Series A no. 222;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 43, Series A no. 332;R.P. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 38245/08, § 47, 9 October 2012;Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886/05, 28 April 2009;Richardson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 26252/08, 10 April 2012;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, ECHR 2015;Savickas v. Lithuania and Others (dec.), no. 66365/09, 15 October 2013;Skórkiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no. 39860/98, 1 June 1999;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-74, Series A no. 52;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2005-X;Stefanetti and Others v. Italy, nos. 21838/10, 21849/10, 21852/10, 21822/10, 21860/10, 21863/10, 21869/10, and 21870/10, 15 April 2014;Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, § 35, 24 June 2003;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452/02, § 82, ECHR 2011;Sukhanov and Ilchenko v. Ukraine, nos. 68385/10 and 71378/10, §§ 35-39, 26 June 2014;T. v. Sweden, no. 10671/83, decision of the Commission of 4 March 1985, DR 42, pp. 229-232;Valkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 2033/04, 19125/04, 19475/04, 19490/04, 19495/04, 19497/04, 24729/04, 171/05 and 2041/05, 25 October 2011;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, § 96, 25 October 2012;Wieczorek v. Poland, no. 18176/05, 8 December 2009 | Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
257 | 5401210_03102018 | Mihalache v. Romania (no. 54012/10) | 2018-10-03 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"54012/10"
] | 001-122640 | MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122640 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2013-06-19 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"P7-4"
] | [
"ROU"
] | FALSE | |||||
258 | 5401210_03102018 | Mihalache v. Romania (no. 54012/10) | 2018-10-03 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"54012/10"
] | 001-194523 | CASE OF MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194523 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0708JUD005401210 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2019-07-08 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"41",
"P7-4"
] | [
"ROU"
] | Article 18 of the Criminal Code (as in force in August 2008) ; Articles 10 and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (as in force in August 2008) ; Article 87 § 5 of Government Emergency Ordinance no. 195/2002 on road traffic
| A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11, 15 November 2016;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 127, ECHR 2013;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 123-24 and 134, 14 March 2013;Bratyakin v. Russia (dec.), no. 72776/01, 9 March 2006;Bujniţa v. Moldova, no. 36492/02, § 23, 16 January 2007;Bulgakova v. Russia, no. 69524/01, § 39, 18 January 2007;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 143, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, §§ 81-82, Series A no. 22;Escoubet v. Belgium [GC], no. 26780/95, ECHR 1999 VII;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 104, ECHR 2003-X;Fadin v. Russia, no. 58079/00, § 32, 27 July 2006;Gacon v. France, no. 1092/04, § 34 in fine, 22 May 2008;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 29, Series A no. 18;Goncharovy v. Russia, no. 77989/01, 27 November 2008;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10 and 4 others, § 244, 4 March 2014;Grecu v. Romania, no. 75101/01, § 54, 30 November 2006;Harutyunyan v. Armenia (dec.), no. 34334/04, 7 December 2006;Hilda Hafsteinsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 40905/98, § 51, 8 June 2004;Horciag v. Romania (dec.), no. 70982/01, 15 March 2005;Ioan Pop v. Romania (dec.), no. 40301/04, § 25, 28 June 2011;Jóhannesson and Others v. Iceland, no. 22007/11, §§ 48-49 and 61, 18 May 2017;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 51, Series A no. 112;Kadušić v. Switzerland, no. 43977/13, §§ 82 and 84, 9 January 2018;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 179, 17 May 2016;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 68, Series A no. 28;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Lekić v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480/07, § 95, 11 December 2018;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, § 245, 19 December 2017;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-X;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, §§ 118 and 120, 8 November 2016;Marguš v. Croatia [GC], no. 4455/10, §§ 114 and 120, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mulot v. France (dec.), no. 37211/97, 14 December 1999;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, § 62, 30 March 2017;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 114 15 and 118, 15 November 2018;Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 35-39, ECHR 2004-VIII;Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, § 49, Series A no. 73;Ramda v. France, no. 78477/11, § 81, 19 December 2017;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, § 122, 6 November 2018;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552/08, §§ 50 and 64, ECHR 2015;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, §§ 228-229, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 52-56, ECHR 2000 V;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 74, 22 October 2018;Sancaklı v. Turkey, no. 1385/07, § 30, 15 May 2018;Savinskiy v. Ukraine, no. 6965/02, § 25, 28 February 2006;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, § 167, ECHR 2015;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, ECHR 2009;Šimkus v. Lithuania, no. 41788/11, § 47, 13 June 2017;Sismanidis and Sitaridis v. Greece, nos. 66602/09 and 71879/12, § 42, 9 June 2016;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 87, Series A no. 161;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 47-48, ECHR 2005 X;Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517/01 and 77722/01, ECHR 2005 VIII;Storbråten, (dec.), no. 12277/04, 1 February 2007;Sundqvist v. Finland (dec.), no. 75602/01, 22 November 2005;Tomasović v. Croatia, no. 53785/09, § 23, 18 October 2011;Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 2376/03, § 54, 14 January 2010;Vedernikova v. Russia, no. 25580/02, § 30, 12 July 2007 | Explanatory Report on Protocol No. 7 to the Convention;Articles 31, 32 and 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
| Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Reopening of case;Fundamental defect in proceedings;Conviction;Criminal offence);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
259 | 5539113_22032017 | Ramos Nunes De Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal (no. 55391/13) | 2017-03-22 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"55391/13"
] | 001-164449 | CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164449 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005539113 | CHAMBER | 2016-06-21 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"41"
] | [
"PRT"
] | A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509/08, § 64, 27 September 2011;B. and P. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 36337/97 and 35974/97, § 36, ECHR 2001‑III;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575/04, § 90, ECHR 2012;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no 54723/00, § 38, ECHR 2005-II;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429/99, §§ 99-108, ECHR 2005‑XII (extracts);Chevrol v. France, no 49636/99, §§ 77-78, ECHR 2003‑III;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, §§ 33-34, Series A no 325‑A;Döry v. Sweden, no 28394/95, § 37, 12 November 2002;Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no 40908/05, § 59, 16 April 2013;Fey v. Austria, 24 February 1993, §§ 27, 28 and 30, Series A no 255-A;Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999‑I;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 18668/10 and 18698/10, § 122, 4 March 2014;I.D. v. Bulgaria, no 43578/98, § 45, 28 April 2005;Jurisic and Collegium Mehrerau v. Austria, no 62539/00, § 65, 27 July 2006;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35605/97, § 43, ECHR 2002 IV;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no 73797/01, § 119, ECHR 2005‑XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, § 58, Series A no 43;Martinie v. France [GC], no 58675/00, §§ 39-40, ECHR 2006‑VI;Mehmet Emin Şimşek v. Turkey, no 5488/05, §§ 28-31, 28 February 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 74, 15 October 2009;Morice v. France [GC], no 29369/10, § 78, 23 April 2015;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279/05, §§ 49-50, 20 October 2011;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688/04, §§ 67-76, 17 December 2013;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 66-70, Series A no 179;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722/11, ECHR 2013;Olujić v. Croatia, no 22330/05, 5 February 2009;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 32, Reports 1996-III;Pursiheimo v. Finland (dec.), no 57795/00, 25 November 2003;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, §§ 29-30, Series A no 303‑A;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no 65411/01, § 62, ECHR 2006‑XIII;Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no 7984/06, § 43, 20 October 2015;Şahin Karakoç v. Turkey, no 19462/04, § 36, 29 April 2008;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no 60860/00, § 48, 14 November 2006;Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no 64336/01, 25 April 2002;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-IV;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000‑XII
| Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal;Public hearing);Damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | ||
260 | 5539113_22032017 | Ramos Nunes De Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal (no. 55391/13) | 2017-03-22 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"55391/13"
] | 001-187507 | CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187507 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD005539113 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2018-11-06 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a",
"41"
] | [
"PRT"
] | Section 168 of the Status of Judges Act (Law no. 21/85 of 30 July 1985) ; Sections 2, 203, 212 § 3, 215 § 4, 216, 217 § 1, 218 §§ 1 and 2, 266 and 268 § 4 of the Constitution | A. v. Finland (dec.), no 44998/98, 8 January 2004;A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509/08, §§ 63-64, 27 September 2011;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no 27065/05, § 222, 2 December 2010;Adam and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 290/03, 1 September 2005;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, Series A no 58;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48539/99, 28 August 2001;Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no 2), 19 February 1998, § 49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Andersson v. Sweden, no 17202/04, 7 December 2010;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004-III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261/12, ECHR 2016;Batur v. Turkey, (dec.), no 38604/97, 4 July 2000;Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no 64735/14, §§ 51-57, 13 September 2016;Bistrović v. Croatia, no 25774/05, §§ 51-53, 31 May 2007;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 38644/97, 24 November 1998;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 45, Series A no 335-A;Buterlevičiūtė v. Lithuania, no 42139/08, §§ 52-54, 12 January 2016;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755/07, § 70, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429/99, §§ 99-108, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Castillo Algar v. Spain, 28 October 1998, § 45, Reports 1998-VIII;Chevrol v. France, no 49636/99, ECHR 2003 III;Costa v. Portugal (dec.), no 44135/98, 9 December 1999;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no 51160/06, § 35, 9 July 2013;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, Series A no 325-A;Döry v. Sweden, no 28394/95, § 37, 12 November 2002;Družstevní záložna Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 72034/01, § 112, 31 July 2008;Duran and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 38925/97, 4 July 2000;Durand v. France (dec.), no 10212/07, 31 January 2012;Durgun v. Turkey (dec.), no 40751/98, 4 July 2007;Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 47092/99, 3 March 2005;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, Series A no 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 82, ECHR 2003-X;Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no 78117/13, 5 September 2017;Fazia Ali v. the United Kingdom, no 40378/10, § 84, 20 October 2015;Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no 40908/05, § 59, 16 April 2013;Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 73, Reports 1997-I;Fredin v. Sweden (no 2), 23 February 1994, § 22, Series A no 283 A;Galina Kostova v. Bulgaria, no 36181/05, 12 November 2013;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999‐I;Gautrin and Others v. France, 20 May 1998, § 42, Reports 1998-III;Göç v. Turkey [GC], no 36590/97, ECHR 2002-V;Gökden and Karacol v. Turkey, (dec.), no 40535/98, 4 July 2000;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Helmut Blum v. Austria, no 33060/10, § 59, 5 April 2016;I.D. v. Bulgaria, no 43578/98, 28 April 2005;J.L. v. France (dec.), no 17055/90, 5 April 1995;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no 73053/01, ECHR 2006-XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kamenos v. Cyprus, no 147/07, §§ 50-53, 31 October 2017;Kaplan and Karaca v. Turkey (dec.), no 40536/98, 4 July 2000;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC] no 35605/97, ECHR 2002 IV;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98 and 3 others, ECHR 2003-VI;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no 29492/05, § 86, 26 February 2009;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 382, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kurnaz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 36672/97, 7 December 2004;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no 73797/01, ECHR 2005-XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no 43;Letinčić v. Croatia, no 7183/11, §§ 46 and 55-67, 3 May 2016;Linde Falero v. Spain (dec.), no 51535/99, 22 June 2000;Lundevall v. Sweden, no 38629/97, § 39, 12 November 2002;Majski v. Croatia, no 33593/03, § 34, 1 June 2006;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 33071/96, 12 July 2001;Margaretić v. Croatia, no 16115/13, 5 June 2014;Martinie v. France [GC], no 58675/00, ECHR 2006-VI;Mehmet Emin Şimşek v. Turkey, no 5488/05, §§ 29-31, 28 February 2012;Mérigaud v. France, no 32976/04, § 69, 24 September 2009;Messochoritis v. Greece (dec.), no 41867/98, 15 June 2000;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, ECHR 2009;Miller v. Sweden, no 55853/00, 8 February 2005;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 385, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Morice v. France [GC], no 29369/10, 23 April 2015;Moullet v. France (dec.), no 27521/04, 13 September 2007;Müller-Hartburg v. Austria, no 47195/06, 19 February 2013;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279/05, § 49, 20 October 2011;Nicoleta Gheorghe v. Romania, no 23470/05, § 26, 3 April 2012;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688/04, § 59, 17 December 2013;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, §§ 66-70, Series A no 179;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722/11, 9 January 2013, ECHR 2013;Olujić v. Croatia, no 22330/05, § 55, 5 February 2009;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no 48939/99, §§ 141 and 149, ECHR 2004-XII;Ouendeno v. France (dec.), no 18441/91, 2 March 1994;Paluda v. Slovakia, no 33392/12, §§ 33-34, 23 May 2017;Paroisse gréco-catholique Sâmbăta Bihor v. Romania (dec.), no 48107/99, 25 May 2004;Pereira da Silva v. Portugal, no 77050/11, §§ 59-60, 22 March 2016;Perna v. Italy [GC], no 48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Potocka and Others v. Poland, no 33776/96, 4 October 2001, ECHR 2001-X;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 34, Series A no 313;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 32, Reports 1996-III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, ECHR 2018;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, §§ 29-30, Series A no 303 A;Sabri Güneş v. Turkey [GC], no 27396/06, 29 June 2012;Saccoccia v. Austria, no 69917/01, § 73, 18 December 2008;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no 65411/01, 9 November 2006, ECHR 2006 XIII;Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, Series A no 263;Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, 21 July 2011;Speil v. Austria (dec.), no 42057/98, 5 September 2002;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295/99, ECHR 2002-IV;Sturua v. Georgia, no 45729/05, § 28, 28 March 2017;Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no 43800/12, §§ 90, 105 106 and 109, 15 September 2015;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no 60860/00, 14 November 2006;V.M. and Others v. Belgium (striking out) [GC], no 60125/11, § 39, 17 November 2016;Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no 64336/01, 25 April 2002;Vilho Eskelinen others v. Finland, [GC], no 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007 II;Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no 40800/98, 4 July 2000 | Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Public hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
261 | 5550807_13022013 | Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09) | 2013-02-13 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"55508/07",
"29520/09"
] | 001-105727 | JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105727 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC005550807 | DECISIONS | 4 | [
"2",
"3",
"6",
"8",
"13"
] | [
"RUS"
] | Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible | |||||
262 | 5550807_13022013 | Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09) | 2013-02-13 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"55508/07",
"29520/09"
] | 001-110513 | CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110513 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0416JUD005550807 | CHAMBER | 2012-04-16 00:00:00 | 2 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"38",
"41"
] | [
"RUS"
] | Articles 24 and 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Law no. 174-FZ of 18 December 2001) ; Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Rehabilitation Act (Law no. 1761-I of 18 October 1991) ; Section 7 of the State Secrets Act (Law no. 5485-I of 21 July 1993) ; Regulation on preparing State secret information for transfer to foreign states and international organisations (no. 973) ; Articles 78 and 356 of the Criminal Code (Law no. 63-FZ of 13 June 1996) | Açis v. Turkey, no. 7050/05, 1 February 2011;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712/02, 20 October 2009;Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, § 139, 27 July 2006;Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420/01, 2 September 2010;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, 27 November 2007;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562/05, §§ 86 and 94-118, 27 June 2006;Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § § 41-57, ECHR 2002-I;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, 1 July 2010;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, 26 April 2011;Garaudy v. France, (dec.), no. 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, ECHR 2005-XI;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 165, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 210, Series A no. 25;Jularic v. Croatia, no. 20106/06, 20 January 2011;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, etc., § 59, 8 March 2011;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, § 53, Reports 1998-VII;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, § 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II;Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726/01, 25 November 2010;Medova v. Russia, no. 25385/04, § 76, 15 January 2009;Musikhanova and Others v. Russia, no. 27243/03, 4 December 2008;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 110-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, § 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512/04, 12 February 2009;Orban and Others v. France, no. 20985/05, 15 January 2009;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, 18 June 2002;Osmanoglu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 96, 24 January 2008;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465/03, 8 December 2009;Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079/04, § 145, 28 October 2010;Schedko v. Belarus, No. 886/1999, 3 April 2003;Šilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no. 71463/01, 9 April 2009;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 219, ECHR 2005-VIII;;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 70, ECHR 1999-IV;Taymuskhanovy v. Russia, no. 11528/07, § 122, 16 December 2010;Tigran Ayrapetyan v. Russia, no. 75472/01, § 64, 16 September 2010;Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, , ECHR 2000-VI;Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, §§ 50-57, 5 July 2005;Varnava and Others v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, etc., ECHR 2009-...;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 77, ECHR 2000-VI | The Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague, 18 October 1907);The Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Geneva, 27 July 1929);Principle VI in the Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (26 November 1968);Articles 26-28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969);Human Rights Committee’s General Comment No. 31 [80], The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, adopted on 29 March 2004;Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights | Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione temporis;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient | TRUE |
263 | 5550807_13022013 | Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09) | 2013-02-13 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"55508/07",
"29520/09"
] | 001-127684 | CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127684 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2013-10-21 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"34",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"38",
"41"
] | [
"RUS"
] | Section 7 of the State Secrets Act | Açis v. Turkey, no. 7050/05, 1 February 2011;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712/02, 20 October 2009;Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, § 137, 10 May 2007;Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, §§ 258-259, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, §§ 123 and 124, 20 June 2002;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944/06, 8300/07, 50184/07, 332/08 and 42509/10, 18 December 2012;Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;Bajic v. Croatia, no. 41108/10, § 62, 13 November 2012;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, § 139, 27 July 2006;Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420/01, §§ 111-113, 2 September 2010;Bitiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 36156/04, § 106, 23 April 2009;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, 27 November 2007;Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV;Çakir and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 7864/06, 29 April 2010;Crainiceanu and Frumusanu v. Romania, no. 12442/04, 24 April 2012;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-VI;Damayev v. Russia, no. 36150/04, § 97, 29 May 2012;Damir Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 1413/05, §§ 65-68, 24 April 2012;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, §§ 167 et seq., 1 July 2010;Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, § 107, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dimovi v. Bulgaria, no. 52744/07, §§ 36-45, 6 November 2012;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, 26 April 2011;Er and Others v. Turkey, no. 23016/04, §§ 59-60, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, § 190, 29 March 2011;Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, § 184, ECHR 2005-XI;Gutiérrez Dorado and Dorado Ortiz v. Spain (dec.), no. 30141/09, §§ 39-41, 27 March 2012;Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737/04, §§ 45-48, 12 January 2012;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 155, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Inderbiyeva v. Russia, no. 56765/08, § 110, 27 March 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 210, Series A no. 25;Jularic v. Croatia, no. 20106/06, §§ 38 and 45-46, 20 January 2011;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX;Khadzhialiyev and Others v. Russia, no. 3013/04, § 121, 6 November 2008;Khashuyeva v. Russia, no. 25553/07, § 154, 19 July 2011;Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 38, ECHR 2004-IX;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904/07, §§ 110-112, 18 December 2012;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, 8 March 2011;Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157/09, §§ 85-87, 26 July 2011;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, § 40, Reports 1997-II;Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 114, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726/01, § 65, 25 November 2010;Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, §§ 128-129, 24 January 2008;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324;McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, § 151, 28 May 2002;Mladenovic v. Serbia, no. 1099/08, §§ 38-40, 22 May 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania, nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, 13 November 2012;Musayev and Others v. Russia, nos. 57941/00, 58699/00 and 60403/00, § 169, 26 July 2007;Musikhanova and Others v. Russia, no. 27243/03, § 107, 4 December 2008;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, § 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512/04, § 56, 12 February 2009;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002;Osmanoglu v. Turkey, no. 48804/99, § 96, 24 January 2008;Otaševic v. Serbia, no. 32198/07, 5 February 2013;P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669/07, § 58, 24 January 2012;Paçaci and Others v. Turkey, no. 3064/07, §§ 64-66, 8 November 2011;Pastor and Ticlete v. Romania, nos. 30911/06 and 40967/06, 19 April 2011;Poleshchuk v. Russia, no. 60776/00, 7 October 2004;Sabri Günes v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396/06, § 50, 29 June 2012;Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, § 204, 14 March 2013;Sambiyev and Pokayeva v. Russia, no. 38693/04, §§ 74-75, 22 January 2009;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465/03, 8 December 2009;Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079/04, § 145, 28 October 2010;Shakhgiriyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27251/03, §§ 134-140, 8 January 2009;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, 9 April 2009;Stanimirovic v. Serbia, no. 26088/06, §§ 28-29, 18 October 2011;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 253-254, ECHR 2004-III;Tangiyeva. Russia, no. 57935/00, § 104, 29 November 2007;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 219, ECHR 2005-VIII;Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 159, ECHR 2001-III;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 70, ECHR 1999-IV;Tigran Ayrapetyan v. Russia, no. 75472/01, § 64, 16 September 2010;Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, §§ 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI;Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, §§ 50-57, 5 July 2005;Trufin v. Romania, no. 3990/04, §§ 32-34, 20 October 2009;Tuna v. Turkey, no. 22339/03, §§ 57-63, 19 January 2010;Udayeva and Yusupova v. Russia, no. 36542/05, § 82, 21 December 2010;Utsayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 29133/03, §§ 149-153, 29 May 2008;Vagapova and Zubirayev v. Russia, no. 21080/05, §§ 85-86, 26 February 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, ECHR 2009;Velcea and Mazare v. Romania, no. 64301/01, §§ 85-88, 1 December 2009;Velkhiyev and Others v. Russia, no. 34085/06, § 137, 5 July 2011;Yasin Ates v. Turkey, no. 30949/96, § 135, 31 May 2005;Yatsenko v. Ukraine, no. 75345/01, § 40, 16 February 2012;Zubayrayev v. Russia, no. 67797/01, §§ 74-77, 10 January 2008 | Articles 26, 27 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 | Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione temporis;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed | TRUE |
264 | 5603007_30012013 | Fernandez Martinez v. Spain (no. 56030/07) | 2013-01-30 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56030/07"
] | 001-110916 | CASE OF FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ v. SPAIN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110916 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515JUD005603007 | CHAMBER | 2012-05-15 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"35"
] | [
"ESP"
] | Article 16 § 3 of the Constitution ; Canon 805 of the Code of Canon Law | Ahtinen v. Finland, no 48907/99, § 41, 23 September 2008;Bigaeva v. Greece, no 26713/05, § 23, 28 May 2009;Campagnano v. Italy, no 77955/01, § 53, ECHR 2006-V;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957/95, § 90, ECHR 2002-VI;Dahlab v. Switzerland (dec.), no 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05, ECHR 2007-IV;Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no 39293/98, § 38, 29 February 2000;Gatt v. Malta, no 28221/08, § 19, 27 July 2010;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985/96, §§ 62 and 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jusic v. Switzerland, no 4691/06, § 99, 2 December 2010;K.A. and A.D. v. Belgium, no 42758/98 and 45558/99, § 83, 17 February 2005;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774/98, § 108, ECHR 2005-XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128/05, § 38, 20 October 2009;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128/05, § 41, 20 October 2009;Mólka v. Poland (dec.), no 56550/00, ECHR 2006-IV;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no 251-B;Obst v. Germany, no 425/03, 23 September 2010;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III;Rommelfanger v. Germany, no 12242/86, decision of the Commission du 6 September 1989, Decisions and Reports no 62;Schüth v. Germany, no 1620/03, ECHR 2010;Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 43, ECHR 2004-VIII;Siebenhaar v. Germany, no 18136/02, 3 February 2011;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 95, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no 77703/01, § 146, 14 June 2007 | Directive 2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation | Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) | TRUE |
265 | 5603007_30012013 | Fernandez Martinez v. Spain (no. 56030/07) | 2013-01-30 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56030/07"
] | 001-145068 | CASE OF FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ v. SPAIN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145068 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD005603007 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2014-06-12 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"9",
"9-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"11",
"11-1"
] | [
"ESP"
] | Agreement of 3 January 1979 between Spain and the Holy See on education and cultural affairs ; Order of 11 October 1982 on teachers of Catholic religion and ethics in secondary educational centres ; Canons 804 and 805 of the Code of Canon Law ; Article 16 § 3 of the Constitution | Bigaeva v. Greece, no 26713/05, § 23, 28 May 2009;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 1365/07, § 39, 24 April 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957/95, § 90, ECHR 2002 VI;Coster v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24876/94, § 104, 18 January 2001;Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no 25735/94, § 52, ECHR 2000 VIII;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05, §§ 75-76, ECHR 2007 IV;Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no 39293/98, § 38, 29 February 2000;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985/96, ECHR 2000 XI;Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Metropolitan Inokentiy) and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 412/03 and 35677/04, § 10, 22 January 2009;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 55, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 II;Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128/05, 20 October 2009;Martínez Martínez v. Spain, no 21532/08, § 57, 18 October 2011;Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 118, ECHR 2001 XII;Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no 798/05, 15 September 2009;Mółka v. Poland (dec.), no 56550/00, ECHR 2006 IV;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 99, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no 251 B;Obst v. Germany, no 425/03, 23 September 2010;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722/11, § 165-167, ECHR 2013;Özpınar v. Turkey, no 20999/04, §§ 43-48, 19 October 2010;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002 III;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 101-102, ECHR 2008;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no 30943/96, § 68, ECHR 2003 VIII;Schüth v. Germany, no 1620/03, ECHR 2010;Siebenhaar v. Germany, no 18136/02, 3 February 2011;Sindicatul “Păstorul cel Bun” v. Romania [GC], no 2330/09, 9 July 2013;Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no 77703/01, § 146, 14 June 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 104-107, ECHR 2012;W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, §§ 62 and 64, Series A no 121 | No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) | TRUE | |
266 | 5608013_16112016 | Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal (no. 56080/13) | 2016-11-16 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56080/13"
] | 001-166676 | CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166676 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD005608013 | CHAMBER | 2015-12-15 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"41"
] | [
"PRT"
] | Arskaya v. Ukraine, no 45076/05, § 89, 5 December 2013;Asiye Genç v. Turkey, no 24109/07, § 82, 27 January 2015;Bajić v. Croatia, no 41108/10, § 93, 13 November 2012;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no 11562/05, 27 June 2006, § 104;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967/96, ECHR 2002‑I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 96, ECHR 2014;Codarcea v. Romania, no 31675/04, § 104, 2 June 2009;De Santis and Olanda v. Italy (dec.), no 35887/11, § 45, 9 July 2013;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no 59548/00, § 87-98, 17 January 2008;Erikson v. Italy (dec.), no 37900/97, 26 October 1999;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no 61827/00, § 87, ECHR 2004 II;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, § 122, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, §§ 74-78 and 86-92, Reports 1998 I;Kudra v. Croatia, no 13904/07, § 120, 18 December 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Lazzarini and Ghiacci v. Italy (dec.), no 53749/00, 7 November 2002;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no 37703/97, §§ 89‑90, ECHR 2002‑VIII;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, §§ 116-161, ECHR 2001 III;Mehmet Şentürk and Bekir Şentürk v. Turkey, no 13423/09, § 97, ECHR 2013;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 49, ECHR 2009;N.B. v. Slovakia, no 29518/10, §§ 76 à 78, 12 June 2012;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609/06, § 88, 18 June 2013;Oyal v. Turkey, no 4864/05, §§ 74-76, 23 March 2010;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477/99, 4 June 2001;Počkajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774/01, 21 October 2004;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V;Pūpēdis v. Latvia (dec.), no 53631/00, 15 February 2001;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, § 54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997‑VI;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391/99, §§ 286-289 and 323-357, ECHR 2007-II;Scavuzzo-Hager and Others v. Switzerland, no 41773/98, §§ 53-69 and 80-86, 7 February 2006;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, § 195, 9 April 2009;Süleyman Ege v. Turkey, no 45721/09, § 59, 25 June 2013;Trocellier v. France (dec.), no 75725/01, ECHR 2006–XIV;V.C. v. Slovakia, no 18968/07, §§ 107 à 117, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Vo v. France [GC], no 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII;Worm v. Austria (dec.), no 22714/93, 27 November 1995 | Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | ||
267 | 5608013_16112016 | Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal (no. 56080/13) | 2016-11-16 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56080/13"
] | 001-179556 | CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2017-12-19 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41"
] | [
"PRT"
] | Article 64 of the Portuguese Constitution ; Health Act approved by virtue of Law no. 48/90 of 24 August 1990 ; Legislative Decree no. 11/93 of 15 January 1993 which approved the National Health-care System Regulations ; Hospital Management Act established by Legislative Decree no. 19/88 of 21 January 1988 and in force until 2002 ; General Regulations on Hospitals approved by Order no. 48358 of 27 April 1968 ; Legislative Decree no. 291/93 of 24 August 1993 ; Medical Association Statute adopted by Legislative Decree no. 282/77 of 5 July 1977 ; Article 3 of the Disciplinary Regulations for Doctors approved by Legislative Decree no. 217/94 of 20 August 1994 ; Code of Ethics ; Infectious-Diseases Control Plan (1988-98) - Instruction issued by the Directorate General for Health on 23 October 1996 which approved the infectious-diseases control commissions ; National Infectious-Diseases Control Programme adopted on 14 May 1999 which replaced the Infectious-Diseases Control Plan (1988-98) | Altuğ and Others v. Turkey, no. 32086/07, § 73, 30 June 2015;Arskaya v. Ukraine, no. 45076/05, 5 December 2013;Asiye Genç v. Turkey, no. 24109/07, 27 January 2015;Aydoğdu v. Turkey, no. 40448/06, 30 August 2016;Bajić v. Croatia, no. 41108/10, § 90, 13 November 2012;Balcı v. Turkey (dec.), no. 58194/10, § 45, 20 October 2015;Bedir v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25070/02, 2 October 2007;Beiere v. Latvia, no. 30954/05, § 38, 29 November 2011;Besen v. Turkey (dec.), no. 48915/09, § 38 in fine, 19 June 2012;Bilbija and Blažević v. Croatia, no. 62870/13, § 107, 12 January 2016;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, § 106, ECHR 2016;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 55, ECHR 2015;Buksa v. Poland (dec.), no. 75749/13, § 13, 31 May 2016;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562/05, § 105, 27 June 2006;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014;Cevrioğlu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, §§ 54-55, 4 October 2016;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, § 219, ECHR 2001 IV;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548/00, § 86, 17 January 2008;E.M. and Others v. Romania (dec.), no. 20192/07, § 50, 3 June 2014;Elena Cojocaru v. Romania, no. 74114/12, 22 March 2016;Eugenia Lazăr v. Romania, no. 32146/05, §§ 69-70, 16 February 2010;Fernie v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14881/04, 5 January 2006;Gheorghe v. Romania (dec.), no. 19215/04, 22 September 2005;Glass v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 61827/00, 18 March 2003;Gregačević v. Croatia, no. 58331/09, § 35, 10 July 2012;Hizb ut-tahrir and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 31098/08, §§ 58-59, 12 June 2012;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, § 108, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Jeronovičs v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, § 75, ECHR 2016;Jørgensen and Others v. Denmark (dec.), no. 30173/12, § 63, 28 June 2016;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461/13, § 179, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Karpisiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no. 14730/09, 11 December 2012;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904/07, § 107, 18 December 2012;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts);M. v. Turkey, no. 4050/10 (dec), 15 October 2013;Mehmet Şentürk and Bekir Şentürk v. Turkey, no. 13423/09, §§ 104-105, ECHR 2013;Mihu v. Romania, no. 36903/13, §§ 67-68, 1 March 2016;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 260, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, § 69, ECHR 2016;Musayeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 74239/01, 1 June 2006;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, § 62, 30 March 2017;Narin v. Turkey, no. 18907/02, § 49, 15 December 2009;Nitecki v. Poland (dec.), no. 65653/01, 21 March 2002;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 121, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Oyal v. Turkey, no. 4864/05, § 54, 23 March 2010;Panaitescu v. Romania, no. 30909/06, 10 April 2012;Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova (dec.), no. 14462/03, ECHR 2005 I;Perdigão v. Portugal [GC], no. 24768/06, § 87, 16 November 2010;Petrović v. Serbia, no. 40485/08, § 60, 15 July 2014;Počkajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774/01, 21 October 2004;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000 V;Rezgui v. France (dec.), no. 49859/99, ECHR 2000-XI;Rinkūnienė v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 55779/08, 1 December 2009;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 164, ECHR 2015;Sabri Güneş v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396/06, § 29, 29 June 2012;Sayan v. Turkey, no. 81277/12, §§ 111-12, 11 October 2016;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, § 167, ECHR 2015;Sevim Güngör v. Turkey (dec.), no. 75173/01, 14 April 2009;Sieminska v. Poland, no. 37602/97, 29 March 2001;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, § 192, 9 April 2009;Skraskowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 36420/97, 6 April 2000;Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, ECHR 2004 IX (extracts);Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, § 88, 25 September 2012;Trzepalko v. Poland (dec.), no. 25124/09, § 24, 13 September 2011;Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796/10, § 63, 17 March 2016;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, ECHR 2004 VIII;Wiater v. Poland (dec.), no. 42290/08, § 39, 15 May 2012;Z v. Poland, no. 46132/08, §§ 110-12, 13 November 2012;Zafer Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 25774/09, § 46, 21 July 2015 | Recommendation no. R (84) 20 of the Council of Europe concerning the control of infectious diseases | Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
268 | 5640212_08022017 | Correia de Matos v. Portugal (no. 56402/12) | 2017-02-08 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56402/12"
] | 001-182243 | CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182243 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2018-04-04 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6+6-3-c",
"6-1",
"6-3-c"
] | [
"PRT"
] | Articles 32 and 52 of the Constitution ; Preamble and Articles 61, 62, 64, 66 and 361 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) ; Law no. 59/98 of 25 August 1998 ; Law no. 48/2007 of 29 August 2007
| Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 97, ECHR 2009;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Breukhoven v. the Czech Republic, no. 44438/06, § 60, 21 July 2011;Brualla Gómez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 101, ECHR 2014;Correia de Matos v. Portugal (dec.), no. 48188/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Coutant v. France (dec.), no. 17155/03, 24 January 2008;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 27, Series A no. 237 B;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703/11, ECHR 2015;Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 37112/97, § 35, ECHR 2001 XI (extracts);Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 43494/09, §§ 137-138, 6 November 2017;Güney v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40768/06, 17 June 2008;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 97, ECHR 2003 VIII;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09, §§ 249-251, ECHR 2016;Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446/09, §§ 74-75, 27 June 2017;Jemeļjanovs v. Latvia, no. 37364/05, § 89, 6 October 2016;Karpetas v. Greece, no. 6086/10, § 78, 30 October 2012;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, §§ 173-75, ECHR 2005 XIII;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, §§ 138-41 and 143, ECHR 2016;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, §§ 114 and 124, ECHR 2005 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 65, 20 January 2005;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96 and 2 others, § 40, ECHR 2002 VII;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, § 79, 19 November 2015;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 132-139, ECHR 2015;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, §§ 188 and 194, ECHR 2012;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 136, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, §§ 32-36, Series A no. 205;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 164, ECHR 2015;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 97, ECHR 2011;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, § 95, 2 November 2010;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 86, ECHR 2006 II;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 110-115, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Thorgeirson v. Iceland, no. 13778/88, Commission decision of 14 March 1990;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, § 98, 25 October 2012;Weber v. Switzerland, no. 24501/94, Commission decision of 17 May 1995;X v. Finland, no. 34806/04, § 182, ECHR 2012 (extracts);X. v. Norway, no. 5923/72, Commission decision of 30 May 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 3, p. 44;Zdravko Stanev v. Bulgaria, no. 32238/04, § 38, 6 November 2012 | Article 14 § 3 (d) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 31 § 3 (c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties;Articles 3, paragraph 4 and 9 of the Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty, which entered into force in November 2013 (see OJ 2013 L 294, pp. 1 to 12) and was to be transposed by the EU Member States by 27 November 2016;Articles 47(2) and 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
| No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person;Legal assistance of own choosing) | TRUE |
269 | 5666509_12102016 | Károly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665/09) | 2016-10-12 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56665/09"
] | 001-141195 | KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141195 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"9",
"9-1"
] | [
"HUN"
] | |||||||
270 | 5666509_12102016 | Károly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665/09) | 2016-10-12 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56665/09"
] | 001-158946 | CASE OF KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158946 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201JUD005666509 | CHAMBER | 2015-12-01 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"35"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, § 29, Series A no. 58;Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007 I;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93;Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 48, ECHR 2000 IV;Balakin v. Russia, no. 21788/06, § 52, 4 July 2013;Baudler v. Germany (dec.), no. 38254/04, 6 December 2011;Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, § 36, Series A no. 333 B;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2012;Case “relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium” (merits), 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, pp. 33-34, § 9;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 127, ECHR 2015;Dietrich Reuter v. Germany (dec.), nos. 32741/06 and 19568/09, 17 January 2012;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no. 294 B;Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219/07, 9 July 2015;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 110, 3 October 2014;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 159, ECHR 2008;König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 88, Series A no. 27;Le Calvez v. France, 29 July 1998, § 56, Reports 1998 V;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, ECHR 2006 XIV;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 49, Series A no. 327-A;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 74, ECHR 2009;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Müller v. Germany (dec.), no. 12986/04, 6 December 2011;Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, §§ 67-68, ECHR 1999 III;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, ECHR 2005 X;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552/08, § 51, ECHR 2015;Roland Reuter v. Germany (dec.), no. 39775/04, 6 December 2011;Sabeh El Leil v. France [GC], no. 34869/05, § 47, 29 June 2011;Sierpiński v. Poland, no. 38016/07, §§ 87 and 90, 3 November 2009;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 81, Series A no. 52;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 229-230, ECHR 2012;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65542/12, § 120, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, § 61, Reports 1998 IV;Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, §§ 69-71, 25 March 2014;Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 58, 10 August 2006 | Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) | TRUE | ||
271 | 5666509_12102016 | Károly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665/09) | 2016-10-12 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56665/09"
] | 001-177070 | CASE OF KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177070 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD005666509 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2017-09-14 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-3-a"
] | [
"HUN"
] | Section 15 (2) of the 1990 Church Act ; Article 130 (1) f of the Code of Civil Procedure ; Sections 9 and 29 of Statute no. II of 1994 ; Sections 34, 35, 77 and 79 of Statute no. I of 2000 | Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 97, 21 June 2016;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, § 100, 23 June 2016;Béláné Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080/13, § 43, ECHR 2016;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, § 91, ECHR 2016;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 91, ECHR 2012;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, 29 November 2016;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, §§ 49-50, 20 October 2011;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2005 X;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65542/12, § 120, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Z and Others v. the United Kingdom[GC], no. 29392/95, § 89, ECHR 2001 V | Inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae) | TRUE | |
272 | 5692508_13052015 | Bédat v. Switzerland (no. 56925/08) | 2015-05-13 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56925/08"
] | 001-145457 | CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145457 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508 | CHAMBER | 2014-07-01 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] | [
"CHE"
] | Ageyevy v. Russia, no 7075/10, §§ 224-225, 18 April 2013;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 48876/08, § 100, ECHR 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no 39954/08, § 108, 7 February 2012;Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, § 58, Series A no 90;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999 III;Campos Dâmaso v. Portugal, no 17107/05, § 35, 24 April 2008;Dammann v. Switzerland, no 77551/01, § 57, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports 1997-I;Dupuis and Others v. France, no 1914/02, 7 June 2007;Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no 33400/96, § 98, 15 July 2003;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999 I;Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no 12268/03, § 40, 23 July 2009;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49 in fine, Series A no 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no 298;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 59, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 44, Series A no 103;Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no 37698/97, § 36, ECHR 2000 X;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604/01, § 70, ECHR 2006 X;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ormanni v. Italy, no 30278/04, § 59, 17 July 2007;Perna v. Italy [GC], no 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003 V;Pinto Coelho v. Portugal, no 28439/08, § 33, 28 June 2011;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no 313;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005 II;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698/01, ECHR 2007 V;Sürek v. Turkey (no 1) [GC], no 26682/95, ECHR 1999-IV;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no 38432/97, §§ 43 45, ECHR 2001 III;Tourancheau and July v. France, no 53886/00, 24 November 2005;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996 V;Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V | Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) | TRUE | ||
273 | 5692508_13052015 | Bédat v. Switzerland (no. 56925/08) | 2015-05-13 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"56925/08"
] | 001-161898 | CASE OF BÉDAT v. SWITZERLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161898 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD005692508 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-03-29 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"6-2",
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] | [
"CHE"
] | Article 293 of the Swiss Criminal Code ; Code of Criminal Procedure of the Canton of Vaud | Ageyevy v. Russia, no. 7075/10, §§ 224-225, 18 April 2013;Armonienė v. Lithuania, no. 36919/02, § 36, 25 November 2008;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, ECHR 2012;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999 III;Campos Dâmaso v. Portugal, no. 17107/05, 24 April 2008;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 46, Series A no. 236;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004 VI;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, § 91, 10 November 2015;Craxi v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25337/94, § 73, 17 July 2003;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Dupuis and Others v. France, no. 1914/02, § 24, 7 June 2007;E.K. v. Turkey, no. 28496/95, §§ 79-80, 7 February 2002;Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438/04, § 62, 16 April 2009;Flinkkilä and Others v. Finland, no. 25576/04, § 75, 6 April 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999 I;Gouveia Gomes Fernandes and Freitas e Costa v. Portugal, no. 1529/08, § 47, 29 March 2011;Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268/03, 23 July 2009;Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland, no. 21830/09, §§ 54 and 55, ECHR 2015;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 54, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1998-IV;Laranjeira Marques da Silva v. Portugal, no. 16983/06, § 51, 19 January 2010;Leempoel & S.A. ED. Ciné Revue v. Belgium, no. 64772/01, § 72, 9 November 2006;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, § 57, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1998-VII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 46, ECHR 2007-IV;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, 18 January 2011;Morice v. France ([GC], no. 29369/10, 23 April 2015;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, 10 May 2011;Ormanni v. Italy, no. 30278/04, § 59, 17 July 2007;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no. 2034/07, 15 March 2011, § 58, ECHR 2011;Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, 28 September 1999, § 66, ECHR 1999-VI;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, ECHR 2011;Paturel v. France, no. 54968/00, § 42, 22 December 2005;Pentikäinen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882/10, § 87, ECHR 2015;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003 V;Pinto Coelho v. Portugal, no. 28439/08, § 33, 28 June 2011;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147/06 § 40, 21 September 2010;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no. 313;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, § 35, 15 January 2009;Roland Dumas v. France, no. 34875/07, § 43, 15 July 2010;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008;Saaristo and Others v. Finland, no. 184/06, § 61, 12 October 2010;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Société Prisma Presse v. France (dec.), nos. 66910/01 and 71612/01, 1 July 2003;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 78, ECHR 2013;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, ECHR 2007-V;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, ECHR 2001-III;Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999/03, § 144, 12 October 2010;Tourancheau and July v. France, no. 53886/00, 24 November 2005;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, ECHR 2004 VI;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, ECHR 2012;Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, § 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 V;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 23, Series A no. 91 | No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information) | TRUE | |
274 | 5746715_24062020 | Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467/15) | 2020-06-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"57467/15"
] | 001-175517 | SAVRAN v. DENMARK | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175517 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"8",
"8-1"
] | [
"DNK"
] | Communicated | ||||||
275 | 5746715_24062020 | Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467/15) | 2020-06-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"57467/15"
] | 001-196152 | CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-196152 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD005746715 | CHAMBER | 2019-10-01 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"3",
"41"
] | [
"DNK"
] | Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299/12, § 57, 16 April 2013;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, ECHR 2001 I;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, § 115, 23 March 2016;Hamsevic v Denmark (dec.), 25748/15, § 28, 16 May 2017;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166/12, § 127, ECRH 2016;Lopata v. Russia, no. 72250/01, § 168, 13 July 2010;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2008;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 43, ECHR 2008;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058/09, § 88, 14 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium, [GC], no. 41738/10, 13 December 2016;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217/12, § 120, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692/12, 14 April 2015 | Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | ||
276 | 5746715_24062020 | Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467/15) | 2020-06-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"57467/15"
] | 001-214330 | CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214330 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD005746715 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2021-12-07 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"3",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"41"
] | [
"DNK"
] | Section 50a of the Aliens Act ; Articles 16 § 2 and 68 of the Danish Penal Code | A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 47486/06, § 32, 12 January 2010;Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299/12, § 49, 16 April 2013;Azerkane v. the Netherlands, no. 3138/16, § 70, 2 June 2020;Belli and Arquier-Martinez v. Switzerland, no. 65550/13, § 65, 11 December 2018;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, §§ 16 and 37, ECHR 2001 I;Bouchelkia v. France, 29 January 1997, § 41, Reports 1997 I;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, ECHR 2015;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;T.C.E. v. Germany, no. 58681/12, § 54, 1 March 2018;El Ghatet v. Switzerland, no. 56971/10, § 47, 8 November 2016;Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, 13 December 2007;Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160/99, § 26, 13 February 2001;Hamesevic v. Denmark (dec.), no. 25748/15, §§ 31 and 46, 16 May 2017;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039/11 and 358/12, § 111, ECHR 2012 (extracts);I.M. v. Switzerland, no. 23887/16, §§ 62 and 70, 9 April 2019;K.A. v. Switzerland, no. 62130/15, § 41, 7 July 2020;Keles v. Germany, no. 32231/02, §§ 65-66, 27 October 2005;Khan v. Denmark, no. 26957/19, § 79, 12 January 2021;Külekci v. Austria, no. 30441/09, §§ 39 and 51, 1 June 2017;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841/14, 23 October 2018;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, ECHR 2008;Mehemi v. France, 26 September 1997, § 41, Reports 1997 VI;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 29, ECHR 2008;Narjis v. Italy, no. 57433/15, 14 February 2019;Nasri v. France, 13 July 1995, § 44, Series A no. 320 B;Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215/14, § 76, 14 September 2017;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, §§ 141 and 149, ECHR 2004 XII;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058/09, § 88, 14 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738/10, 13 December 2016;Pormes v. the Netherlands, no. 25402/14, § 48, 28 July 2020;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 50, ECHR 2002 III;Radovanovic v. Austria (just satisfaction), no. 42703/98, § 11, 16 December 2004;Radovanovic v. Austria, no. 42703/98, § 37, 22 April 2004;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 87-88, 6 November 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561/14, § 216, 25 June 2020;Saber and Boughassal v. Spain, nos. 76550/13 and 45938/14, 18 December 2018;Shala v. Switzerland, no. 52873/09, § 46, 15 November 2012;Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692/12, § 16, 14 April 2015;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006 XII;Veljkovic-Jukic v. Switzerland, no. 59534/14, § 57, 21 July 2020;Yesthla v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 37115/11, § 32, 15 January 2019;Yildiz v. Austria, no. 37295/97, § 51, 31 October 2002;Yilmaz v. Germany, no. 52853/99, §§ 47-49, 17 April 2003 | No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Turkey);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
277 | 5759208_21102015 | Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592/08) | 2015-10-21 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"57592/08"
] | 001-123857 | HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-123857 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2013-07-10 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"3"
] | [
"GBR"
] | FALSE | |||||
278 | 5759208_21102015 | Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592/08) | 2015-10-21 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"57592/08"
] | 001-150778 | CASE OF HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150778 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203JUD005759208 | CHAMBER | 2015-02-03 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"3",
"35"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ; Section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 ; Chapter 12 of the Indeterminate Sentence Manual (“the Lifer Manual”)
| C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 34, Series A no. 335 C;Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 125, ECHR 2003 XII;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, §§ 46-53, 20 May 2014;Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, §§ 193-198, 18 March 2014;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 102, ECHR 2013;Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, 9 July 2013;Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, § 80, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I | Rules 6, 102.1 and 103.8 of the European Prison Rules;COE Committee of Ministers Resolution 76(2);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(23) (on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(22) (on conditional release);Article 10 § 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the General Comment on that Article
| No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) | TRUE |
279 | 5759208_21102015 | Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592/08) | 2015-10-21 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"57592/08"
] | 001-170347 | CASE OF HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170347 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005759208 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2017-01-17 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"3"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Section 30 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 ; Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 | Bodein v. France, no. 40014/10, 13 November 2014;Čačko v. Slovakia, no. 49905/08, 22 July 2014;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, § 60, Series A no. 181 A;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 121, ECHR 2015;Kronfeldner v. Germany, no. 21906/09, § 59, 19 January 2012;László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, 20 May 2014;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, ECHR 2016;O.H. v. Germany, no. 4646/08, § 118, 24 November 2011;Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, 18 March 2014;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts) | No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) | TRUE | |
280 | 578608_03042013 | Söderman v. Sweden (no. 5786/08 ) | 2013-04-03 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5786/08"
] | 001-111547 | CASE OF E.S. v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111547 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0621JUD000578608 | CHAMBER | 2012-06-21 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"8",
"8-1"
] | [
"SWE"
] | Sections 1-13 of Chapter 6, sections 10a and 17 of Chapter 16 and section 1 of Chapter 23 of the Penal Code ; Chapter 17, section 3 and Chapter 30, section 3 of the Code of Judicial Procedure ; sections 1 and 3 of Chapter 2 of the Tort Liability Act | A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 32, Series A no. 32;Bladh v. Sweden (dec.), no. 46125/06, §§ 23-27, 10 November 2009;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 74, ECHR 2002-VI;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fexler v. Sweden, no. 36801/06, § 44, 13 October 2011;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, 2 December 2008;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, §§70-71, ECHR 2008;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, ECHR 2003-XII;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 109, 10 May 2011;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 104, 7 February 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91 | Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse | No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) | TRUE |
281 | 578608_03042013 | Söderman v. Sweden (no. 5786/08 ) | 2013-04-03 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5786/08"
] | 001-128043 | CASE OF SÖDERMAN v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-128043 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD000578608 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2013-11-12 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"41"
] | [
"SWE"
] | Tort Liability Act ; Chapter 6, Article 7 § 3 and Chapter 16, Article 10a of the Penal Code ; Freedom of the Press Act ; Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression | A v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 60, 14 October 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 32, Series A no. 32;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021/08, § 117, ECHR 2011;Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, no. 71127/01, § 65, 12 June 2008;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, § 64, 27 November 2007;C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692/05, 20 March 2012;Đorđević v. Croatia, no. 41526/10, §§141-43, ECHR 2012;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007 I;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 45-49, ECHR 2008-V;M. and C. v. Romania, no. 29032/04, §§ 112 et seq., 27 September 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, ECHR 2003 XII;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457/08, §§ 109 110, 15 November 2011;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 109, 10 May 2011;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 245, ECHR 2012;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, § 49, 20 October 2011;Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 46, ECHR 2003 III;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, §§ 128-30, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII, §§ 128-30;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 65, ECHR 2002 III;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, 15 January 2009;Sandra Janković v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, § 45, 5 March 2009;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Siliadin v. France, no. 73316/01, § 130, ECHR 2005 VII;Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, ECHR 2012;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010/07, § 163, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001 V | Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award | TRUE | |
282 | 580908_10122014 | Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland (no. 5809/08) | 2014-12-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5809/08"
] | 001-138948 | CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138948 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908 | CHAMBER | 2013-11-26 00:00:00 | 2 | [
"1",
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-3",
"41"
] | [
"CHE"
] | Aït-Mouhoub v. France, 28 October 1998, § 52, Reports 1998-VIII;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021/08, ECHR 2011;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no 61498/08, § 128, ECHR 2010;Al Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, § 137, ECHR 2004-II;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no 52207/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos. 71412/01 and 78166/01, 2 May 2007;Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-IX;Blagojević v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 49032/07, § 46, 9 June 2009;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869/02, §§ 54-55, ECHR 2010;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no 294-B;Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 37112/97, § 33, ECHR 2001-XI;Galić v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 22617/07, § 46, 9 June 2009;Gasparini v. Italy and Belgium (dec.), no 10750/03, 12 May 2009;Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki v. France, nos. 48205/99, 48207/99 and 48209/99, § 20, 14 May 2002;Glor v. Switzerland, no 13444/04, § 48, ECHR 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, §§ 311-312, ECHR 2004-VII;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, § 338, ECHR 2011;Michaud v. France, no 12323/11, § 103, 6 December 2012;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 131, ECHR 2010;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII;Rambus Inv. v. Germany (dec.), no 40382/04, 16 June 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 86, Series A no 161;T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28945/95, § 98, ECHR 2001-V;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083/94, § 59, ECHR 1999-I | Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed | TRUE | ||
283 | 580908_10122014 | Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland (no. 5809/08) | 2014-12-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5809/08"
] | 001-164515 | CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-06-21 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"15",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41"
] | [
"CHE"
] | Aït-Mouhoub v. France, 28 October 1998, § 52, Reports 1998-VIII;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763/97, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021/08, § 76, ECHR 2011;Al Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no 61498/08, § 128, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, § 141, ECHR 2011;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no 37;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004 III;Balmer-Schafroth and Others v. Switzerland, 26 August 1997, §§ 37-38, Reports 1997 IV;Běleš and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273/99, § 49, ECHR 2002-IX;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland ([GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575/04, § 90, ECHR 2012;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 45, Series A no 335-A;Chaudet v. France, no 49037/06, § 37, 29 October 2009;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no 25781/94, § 23, ECHR 2014;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869/02, ECHR 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 57325/00, § 109, ECHR 2007 IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no 34503/97, § 67, ECHR 2008;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no 294 B;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999-I;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no 41723/06, § 54, 3 April 2012;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no 18;Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no 67810/10, § 37, ECHR 2014;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 234-235, ECHR 2012;Liepājnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no 37586/06, § 95, 2 November 2010;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, § 43, Reports 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objection), 23 March 1995, § 75, Series A no 310;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, § 338, ECHR 2011;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 49, Series A no 327 A;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 74, ECHR 2009;Michaud v. France, no 12323/11, §§ 102-104, ECHR 2012;Nada v. Switzerland ([GC], no 10593/08, §§ 177-178, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 88, ECHR 2010;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555/96, ECHR 2005 X;Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, §§ 151 157, 21 July 2011;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 65542/12, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Storck v. Germany, no 61603/00, § 98, ECHR 2005-V;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083/94, § 59, ECHR 1999-I | Articles 25 and 103, Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter;Article 14, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Resolution 1597 (2008) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 23 January 2008;United Nations Security Council Resolution 1730 (2006) of 19 December 2006;Paragraph 23, Resolution 1483 (2003) of the United Nations Security Council of 23 May 2003 under Chapter VII of the UN Charter | Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations);Damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
284 | 5817013_07112017 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) | 2017-11-07 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"58170/13"
] | 001-140713 | BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140713 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"8",
"8-1"
] | [
"GBR"
] | |||||||
285 | 5817013_07112017 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) | 2017-11-07 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"62322/14"
] | 001-150946 | BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150946 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-1"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | ||||||
286 | 5817013_07112017 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) | 2017-11-07 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"24960/15"
] | 001-159526 | 10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159526 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-2",
"14"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | ||||||
287 | 5817013_07112017 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) | 2017-11-07 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"58170/13",
"62322/14",
"24960/15"
] | 001-186048 | CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 | CHAMBER | 2018-09-13 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-3-a"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (“IC Code Practice”) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (“PACE”) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (“SSA”) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (“ISA”) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (“OSA”) | A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, § 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900/06, § 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357/16, 25514/16, 25552/16 and 25597/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612/15, § 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327/11, § 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, § 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, §§ 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, §§ 28–30, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanrıkulu v. Turkey, no. 27473/06, 18 July 2017;Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, § 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752/01, § 65, 22 November 2007;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006‑XI | 2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (“Venice Commission”) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner | Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) | TRUE |
288 | 5817013_07112017 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960/15) | 2017-11-07 00:00:00 | Chamber hearing | [
"58170/13",
"62322/14",
"24960/15"
] | 001-210077 | CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2021-05-25 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"34"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the “IC Code”)
| Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, § 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488/90, § 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, § 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, §§ 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, § 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, §§ 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772/99, §§ 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561/14, § 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332/00, § 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752/01, § 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006‑XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI | Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the “Venice Commission”) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (“FISA”)
| Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) | TRUE |
289 | 5817013_10072019 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) | 2019-07-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"58170/13"
] | 001-140713 | BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140713 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"8",
"8-1"
] | [
"GBR"
] | |||||||
290 | 5817013_10072019 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) | 2019-07-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"62322/14"
] | 001-150946 | BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150946 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-1"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | ||||||
291 | 5817013_10072019 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) | 2019-07-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"24960/15"
] | 001-159526 | 10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159526 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 4 | [
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-2",
"14"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | ||||||
292 | 5817013_10072019 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) | 2019-07-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"58170/13",
"62322/14",
"24960/15"
] | 001-186048 | CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013 | CHAMBER | 2018-09-13 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-3-a"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (“IC Code Practice”) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (“PACE”) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (“SSA”) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (“ISA”) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (“OSA”) | A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, § 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900/06, § 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357/16, 25514/16, 25552/16 and 25597/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612/15, § 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327/11, § 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, § 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, §§ 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, §§ 28–30, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanrıkulu v. Turkey, no. 27473/06, 18 July 2017;Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, § 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752/01, § 65, 22 November 2007;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006‑XI | 2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (“Venice Commission”) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner | Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) | TRUE |
293 | 5817013_10072019 | Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) | 2019-07-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"58170/13",
"62322/14",
"24960/15"
] | 001-210077 | CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2021-05-25 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"34"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the “IC Code”)
| Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, § 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488/90, § 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935/02, § 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, §§ 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839/05, § 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, §§ 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772/99, §§ 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561/14, § 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332/00, § 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752/01, § 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006‑XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI | Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the “Venice Commission”) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (“FISA”)
| Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) | TRUE |
294 | 587808_10062015 | Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom (no. 5878/08) | 2015-06-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5878/08"
] | 001-111334 | ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111334 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2010-09-28 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"2",
"13"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Communicated | FALSE | ||||
295 | 587808_10062015 | Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom (no. 5878/08) | 2015-06-10 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"5878/08"
] | 001-161975 | CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-03-30 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"35"
] | [
"GBR"
] | Offences under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
| A. v. Croatia, no. 55164/08, § 66, 14 October 2010;Akhmadov and Others v. Russia, no. 21586/02, § 101, 14 November 2008;Ali and Ayşe Duran v. Turkey, no. 42942/02, § 66, 8 April 2008;Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, § 192, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Avşar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 393-395, ECHR 2001 VII (extracts);Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457/04, 27 November 2007;Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000 I;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, § 277, 26 April 2011;Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 82, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Golubeva v. Russia, no. 1062/03, § 102, 17 December 2009;Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, §§ 82-89, 14 December 2000;Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, §§ 81-82, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Gürtekin and others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441/13, 68206/13 and 68667/13, 11 March 2014;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, 4 May 2001;İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 2000-VII;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, § 186, ECHR 2014;Kasap and Others v. Turkey, no. 8656/10, § 59, 14 January 2014;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, § 201, 5 November 2009;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2004 XI;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III;Mileusnić and Mileusnić-Espenheim v. Croatia, no. 66953/09, § 66, 19 February 2015;Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005 VII;Oğur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 91-92, ECHR 1999 III;Oláh v. Hungary (dec.), 56558/00, 14 September 2004;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 150, ECHR 2009;Perk v. Turkey, no. 50739/99, § 60, 28 March 2006;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, ECHR 2007 II;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, 9 April 2009;Suleymanova v. Russia, no. 9191/06, § 85, 12 May 2010;Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV;Velcea and Mazăre v. Romania, no. 64301/01, 1 December 2009;Wasilewska and Kałucka v. Poland, nos. 28975/04 and 33406/04, § 52, 23 February 2010;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, §§ 102-104, Reports 1998-VI;Zavoloka v. Latvia, no. 58447/00, § 34, 7 July 2009 | Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) | TRUE | |
296 | 5916612_24022016 | J.K. and Others v. Sweden (no. 59166/12) | 2016-02-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"59166/12"
] | 001-113710 | J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113710 | COMMUNICATEDCASES | 2012-09-18 00:00:00 | 4 | [
"3"
] | [
"SWE"
] | FALSE | |||||
297 | 5916612_24022016 | J.K. and Others v. Sweden (no. 59166/12) | 2016-02-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"59166/12"
] | 001-154980 | CASE OF J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154980 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0604JUD005916612 | CHAMBER | 2015-06-04 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"3",
"35"
] | [
"SWE"
] | A. A. M. v. Sweden, no. 68519/10, § 63, 3 April 2014;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, § 67;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, Reports 1997 VI, p. 2264, § 42;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, § 96;Collins and Akaziebie v. Sweden (dec.), no. 23944/05, 8 March 2007;F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621/06, § 93, 20 January 2009;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, Reports 1997-III;Hakizimana v. Sweden (dec.), no. 37913/05, 27 March 2008;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276/99, § 60, ECHR 2001-II;M.Y.H. and Others v. Sweden, no. 50859/10, § 57, 27 June 2013;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 40, ECHR 2000-;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 67, ECHR 2005-I;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, 17 July 2008;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, ECHR 2008-...;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII | UNHCR position on returns to Iraq of October 2014 | Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iraq) | TRUE | |
298 | 5916612_24022016 | J.K. and Others v. Sweden (no. 59166/12) | 2016-02-24 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"59166/12"
] | 001-165442 | CASE OF J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165442 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0823JUD005916612 | GRANDCHAMBER | 2016-08-23 00:00:00 | 1 | [
"3",
"41"
] | [
"SWE"
] | Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, 19 February 1998, § 45, Reports 1998 I;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 98, Reports 1996-V;Collins and Akaziebie v. Sweden (dec.), no. 23944/05, 8 March 2007;D.N.W. v. Sweden, no. 29946/10, §§ 42 and 45, 6 December 2012;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, ECHR 2016;F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621/06, § 102, 20 January 2009;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276/99, ECHR 2001-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, § 116, ECHR 2012;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000 IV;M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, § 133, ECHR 2013 (extracts);M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 286, ECHR 2011;Müslim v. Turkey, no. 53566/99, §§ 72-76, 26 April 2005;N. v. Finland, no. 38885/02, §§ 154-155, 26 July 2005;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, 17 July 2008;Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636/13, 24034/13, 24334/13 and 24528/13, § 50, 7 May 2014;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827/07, § 55, 9 March 2010;R.J. v. France, no. 10466/11, § 42, 19 September 2013;S.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 19956/06, §§ 69-71, 15 June 2010;S.H.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 60367/10, § 71, 29 January 2013;Saadi v. Italy [GC] no. 37201/06, ECHR 2008;Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345/02, § 49, ECHR 2005 VI;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, 11 January 2007;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, 28 June 2011;T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43844/98, ECHR 2000-III;Venkadajalasarma v. the Netherlands, no. 58510/00, § 63, 17 February 2004 | EU Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (as recast by Directive 2011/95/EU of 13 December 2011);UNHCR Note on Burden and Standard of Proof in Refugee Claims;UNHCR Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status | Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iraq);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE | |
299 | 6012511_25052016 | V.M. and Others v. Belgium (no. 60125/11) | 2016-05-25 00:00:00 | Grand Chamber hearing | [
"60125/11"
] | 001-156243 | CASE OF V.M. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM | https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156243 | ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD006012511 | CHAMBER | 2015-07-07 00:00:00 | 3 | [
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"13",
"13+3",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] | [
"BEL"
] | A.C. and Others v. Spain, no 6528/11, 22 April 2014;Budina v. Russia (dec.), no 45603/05, 18 June 2009;Çelik and İmret v. Turkey, no 44093/98, § 57, 26 October 2004;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, §§ 81-83, ECHR 2002-I;D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 38719/97, § 136, 10 October 2002;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595/06, §§ 68-69, 6 December 2011;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689/07, § 83, ECHR 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, § 202, ECHR 2012;F.H. v. Greece, no 78456/11, §§ 107-111, 31 July 2014;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, ECHR 2007 V;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, ECHR 2012;I.M. v. France, no 9152/09, 2 February 2012;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no 15297/09, § 62, 13 December 2011;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no 27229/95, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2001 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, ECHR 2011;Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. Belgium, no 41442/07, §§ 55 and 63, 19 January 2010;Müslim v. Turkey, no 53566/99, § 85, 26 April 2005;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609/06, §§ 105 and 108, 18 June 2013;Nuri Kurt v. Turkey, no 37038/97, § 116, 29 November 2005;Popov v. France, nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, § 91, 19 January 2012;R.U. v. Greece, no 2237/08, § 77, 7 June 2011;S.H.H. v. the United Kingdom, no 60367/10, § 90, 29 January 2013;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no 1948/04, § 136, 11 January 2007;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643/09, §§ 138-139, 21 October 2014;Singh and Others v. Belgium, no 33210/11, 2 October 2012;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 90, Series A no 161;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, § 283, 28 June 2011;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 114-115, 17 July 2014;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no 29217/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006 XII;Yoh-Ekale Mwanje v. Belgium, no 10486/10, § 106, 20 December 2011 | Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) | TRUE |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.