Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
text
stringlengths
0
914
%%%%%% Triggers %%%%%%
% Stimulus Type
A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4
A = Reinforced 100%
B = Reinforced 100% on congruent
C = Reinforced 100% on incongruent
D = Reinforced 0%
% Stimulus Colour (determines which button to press - L/R randomised)
yellow=1; blue=2;
% Stimulus Congruency
congruent=1; incongruent=2;
%% Stimulus Triggers
Stimulus onset trigger format = Colour:Congruency:Type
e.g., 124 = yellow:incongruent:D
%% Response Triggers
Press Left Correct = 101; Press Right Correct = 102
Press Left Incorrect = 103; Press Right Incorrect = 104
%% Feedback Triggers
-3 Error! = 6
-3! No Response = 7
Correct +1 = 8
No Reward 0 = 9
%% Test/Transfer Triggers
% Stimulus Triggers
Transfer stimulus onset trigger format = Stim 1:Stim 2
e.g., 23 = B vs C
% Response Triggers
(nb optimal is A > B > C > D - but B == C)
Optimal Response Left 1 = 1: Optimal Response Right 2 = 2
Suboptimal Left = 3: Suboptimal Right = 4
Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL)
Preamble
The Open Data Commons – Public Domain Dedication and Licence is a document intended to allow you to freely share, modify, and use this work for any purpose and without any restrictions. This licence is intended for use on databases or their contents (“data”), either together or individually.
Many databases are covered by copyright. Some jurisdictions, mainly in Europe, have specific special rights that cover databases called the “sui generis” database right. Both of these sets of rights, as well as other legal rights used to protect databases and data, can create uncertainty or practical difficulty for those wishing to share databases and their underlying data but retain a limited amount of rights under a “some rights reserved” approach to licensing as outlined in the Science Commons Protocol for Implementing Open Access Data. As a result, this waiver and licence tries to the fullest extent possible to eliminate or fully license any rights that cover this database and data. Any Community Norms or similar statements of use of the database or data do not form a part of this document, and do not act as a contract for access or other terms of use for the database or data.
The position of the recipient of the work
Because this document places the database and its contents in or as close as possible within the public domain, there are no restrictions or requirements placed on the recipient by this document. Recipients may use this work commercially, use technical protection measures, combine this data or database with other databases or data, and share their changes and additions or keep them secret. It is not a requirement that recipients provide further users with a copy of this licence or attribute the original creator of the data or database as a source. The goal is to eliminate restrictions held by the original creator of the data and database on the use of it by others.
The position of the dedicator of the work
Copyright law, as with most other law under the banner of “intellectual property”, is inherently national law. This means that there exists several differences in how copyright and other IP rights can be relinquished, waived or licensed in the many legal jurisdictions of the world. This is despite much harmonisation of minimum levels of protection. The internet and other communication technologies span these many disparate legal jurisdictions and thus pose special difficulties for a document relinquishing and waiving intellectual property rights, including copyright and database rights, for use by the global community. Because of this feature of intellectual property law, this document first relinquishes the rights and waives the relevant rights and claims. It then goes on to license these same rights for jurisdictions or areas of law that may make it difficult to relinquish or waive rights or claims.
The purpose of this document is to enable rightsholders to place their work into the public domain. Unlike licences for free and open source software, free cultural works, or open content licences, rightsholders will not be able to “dual license” their work by releasing the same work under different licences. This is because they have allowed anyone to use the work in whatever way they choose. Rightsholders therefore can’t re-license it under copyright or database rights on different terms because they have nothing left to license. Doing so creates truly accessible data to build rich applications and advance the progress of science and the arts.
This document can cover either or both of the database and its contents (the data). Because databases can have a wide variety of content – not just factual data – rightsholders should use the Open Data Commons – Public Domain Dedication & Licence for an entire database and its contents only if everything can be placed under the terms of this document. Because even factual data can sometimes have intellectual property rights, rightsholders should use this licence to cover both the database and its factual data when making material available under this document; even if it is likely that the data would not be covered by copyright or database rights.
Rightsholders can also use this document to cover any copyright or database rights claims over only a database, and leave the contents to be covered by other licences or documents. They can do this because this document refers to the “Work”, which can be either – or both – the database and its contents. As a result, rightsholders need to clearly state what they are dedicating under this document when they dedicate it.
Just like any licence or other document dealing with intellectual property, rightsholders should be aware that one can only license what one owns. Please ensure that the rights have been cleared to make this material available under this document.
This document permanently and irrevocably makes the Work available to the public for any use of any kind, and it should not be used unless the rightsholder is prepared for this to happen.
Part I: Introduction
The Rightsholder (the Person holding rights or claims over the Work) agrees as follows:
1.0 Definitions of Capitalised Words
“Copyright” – Includes rights under copyright and under neighbouring rights and similarly related sets of rights under the law of the relevant jurisdiction under Section 6.4.
“Data” – The contents of the Database, which includes the information, independent works, or other material collected into the Database offered under the terms of this Document.
“Database” – A collection of Data arranged in a systematic or methodical way and individually accessible by electronic or other means offered under the terms of this Document.
“Database Right” – Means rights over Data resulting from the Chapter III (“sui generis”) rights in the Database Directive (Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases) and any future updates as well as any similar rights available in the relevant jurisdiction under Section 6.4.
“Document” – means this relinquishment and waiver of rights and claims and back up licence agreement.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Singh2018: EEG Parkinson's Classification Dataset with Modified Simon Task

The Singh2018 dataset includes EEG recordings collected during a cognitive control task from 28 individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 28 demographically matched healthy controls. Each participant completed a modified Simon reaction-time task designed to elicit response conflict and error-related cognitive control processes. PD patients participated in two sessions (ON and OFF dopaminergic medication), spaced one week apart, while controls participated in a single session.

EEG was recorded from 60 scalp electrodes using a Brain Vision system at a sampling rate of 500 Hz.

Paper

Singh, A., Richardson, S. P., Narayanan, N., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2018). Mid-frontal theta activity is diminished during cognitive control in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 117, 113-122.

DISCLAIMER: We (DISCO) are NOT the owners or creators of this dataset, but we merely uploaded it here, to support our's (EEG-Bench) and other's work on EEG benchmarking.

Dataset Structure

  • data/ contains the annotated experiment EEG data.
  • scripts/ contains MATLAB scripts used by the authors to process the dataset for their paper's purposes. Included for reference.
  • PD_CONFLICT_VARS.xlsx contains some information about the patients with PD (sex, age, medication status at first recording), as well as their matched control patients.
  • DataDictionary.txt contains information about the naming of the events. Note that the uploader of this dataset is missing confirmation that DataDictionary.txt provides a correct description of event types, though the order and types of events seem to match and highly resemble that of the Albrecht2019 dataset, from which this DataDictionary.txt file was taken.

Filename Format

[PID]_Session_[SESSION]_PDDys_CC.mat

PID is the patient ID (e.g. 801), while SESSION distinguishes different days of recording (can be 1 or 2 for patients with PD and is always 1 for patients without PD). All patients with PID <= 829 have Parkinson's Disease and all patients with PID >= 890 do NOT have Parkinson's Disease and hence belong to the control group.

Fields in each File

A .mat file can be read in python as follows:

from scipy.io import loadmat
filename = "801_Session_2_PDDys_CC.mat"
mat = loadmat(filename, simplify_cells=True)

(A field "fieldname" can be read from mat as mat["fieldname"].)

Then mat contains (among others) the following fields and subfields

  • EEG
    • data: EEG data of shape (#channels, trial_len, #trials). E.g. a recording of 860 trials/epochs with 60 channels, each trial having a duration of 6.5 seconds and a sampling rate of 500 Hz will have shape (60, 3250, 860).
    • event: Contains a list of dictionaries, each entry (each event) having the following description:
      • latency: The onset of the event, measured as the index in the merged time-dimension #trials x trial_len (note #trials being the outer and trial_len being the inner array when merging).
      • type: The type of event. This type will consist of up to 3 digits. In order to decode them, please refer to the Triggers section in DataDictionary.txt. Typically, a trial starts with a Stimulus Trigger, followed by a Response Trigger (or 105 if no response was given, i.e. the patient did not press a button) and then a Feedback Trigger.
    • chanlocs: A list of channel descriptors
    • nbchan: Number of channels
    • trials: Number of trials/epochs in this recording
    • srate: Sampling Rate (Hz)

Additionally, the field and bad_chans lists bad channels of this recording.

License

By the original authors of this work, this work has been licensed under the PDDL v1.0 license (see LICENSE.txt).

Downloads last month
571