Provide alternate, better compressed tarballs
- [x] I have searched the [issues](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/issues) for my request and found nothing related and/or helpful
- [x] I have searched the [FAQ](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/wiki/FAQ-and-Troubleshooting) for help
- [x] I have searched the [Wiki](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/wiki) for help

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**

Some of the nerd-font packages can be really large, for example the Iosevka font clocks in at `244MiB` on the latest release.

This can be painful for people who have slow connection and/or limited bandwidth.

**Describe the solution you'd like**

It'd be great if the project can provide alternative tarballs with better compression methods. From my (somewhat limited) research, `zstandard`, `lzip` and `xz` seems to be good contender for that spot.

To test things out, I've decided to go with [VictorMono](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts/releases/download/v3.0.0/VictorMono.zip), which is currently 66MiB with the zip format (and 121MiB uncompressed).

To create the tarballs, I'm using the following commands. I'm also using `plzip` and `pxz`, the parallel versions of `lzip` and `xz` for better compression speed. For zstandard, I'm using the default/reference `zstd` package.

```console
$ du -h VictorMono
121M    VictorMono
$ time tar -I 'zstd --ultra -22 -T10' -cf VictorMono.tar.zst VictorMono
4.53s user 0.16s system 100% cpu 4.672 total
$ time tar -I 'plzip -9 -n10' -cf VictorMono.tar.lz VictorMono
39.18s user 0.24s system 185% cpu 21.217 total
$ time tar -I 'pxz -9 -T10' -cf VictorMono.tar.xz VictorMono
17.00s user 0.22s system 100% cpu 17.090 total
$ du -h VictorMono.*
67M     VictorMono.zip
5.9M    VictorMono.tar.lz
3.8M    VictorMono.tar.xz
4.7M    VictorMono.tar.zst
```

As you can see, the size difference is massive compared to the default zip file!

Some test for decompression speed:

```console
$ time tar --use-compress-program="zstd" -xf VictorMono.tar.zst 
0.04s user 0.08s system 134% cpu 0.093 total
$ time tar --use-compress-program="plzip" -xf VictorMono.tar.lz 
0.82s user 0.09s system 187% cpu 0.488 total
$ time tar --use-compress-program="pxz" -xf VictorMono.tar.xz 
0.26s user 0.07s system 115% cpu 0.284 total
```

`zstd` seems to be performing really well while `xz` and `plzip` required noticeable amount of time to extract.

Given these data, to me it seems like `zstd` would be the ideal choice. It gives compression ratio comparable with the alternatives while still being significantly faster to both decompress *and* compress.

I understand that providing multiple variant of the same archive can add some maintenance burden, but given the fact that producing is a one time effort while there's going to be thousands of people consuming the result - I believe the effort will be well worth it.

* Related article: [Comparison of Compression Algorithms](https://linuxreviews.org/Comparison_of_Compression_Algorithms) (the results on the article more or less lines up with my test as well).

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
(None)

**Additional context**
(None)
