Why Is Video Still So Expensive? A Survey of Inference-Efficiency Mechanisms in Video and Audiovisual LLMs
Paper • 2609.10355 • Published • 18
AI & ML interests
Democratizing access to useful AI tools and resources for journalists
YannisTevissen
authored a
paper 21 days ago
irenesolaiman
authored a
paper 3 months ago
YannisTevissen
authored a
paper 4 months ago
1aurent
authored a
paper 6 months ago
1aurent
authored a
paper 8 months ago
Post
4625
🤖 Did you know your voice might be cloned without your consent from just *one sentence* of audio?
That's not great. So with @frimelle , we brainstormed a new idea for developers who want to curb malicious use: ✨The Voice Consent Gate.✨
Details, code, here: https://huggingface.co/blog/voice-consent-gate
That's not great. So with @frimelle , we brainstormed a new idea for developers who want to curb malicious use: ✨The Voice Consent Gate.✨
Details, code, here: https://huggingface.co/blog/voice-consent-gate
- 3 replies
vumichien
authored 2
papers 12 months ago
Post
2996
🤖 As AI-generated content is shared in movies/TV/across the web, there's one simple low-hanging fruit 🍇 to help know what's real: Visible watermarks. With the Gradio team, I've made sure it's trivially easy to add this disclosure to images, video, chatbot text. See how: https://huggingface.co/blog/watermarking-with-gradio
Thanks to the code collab in particular from @abidlabs and Yuvraj Sharma.
Thanks to the code collab in particular from @abidlabs and Yuvraj Sharma.
Post
3093
New work from my socially-minded colleagues at Hugging Face, creating some foundations for AI companionship behavior evaluation.
Evaluation Dataset: AI-companionship/INTIMA
Paper: AI-companionship/INTIMA
Work from @giadap , @frimelle , @yjernite .
Evaluation Dataset: AI-companionship/INTIMA
Paper: AI-companionship/INTIMA
Work from @giadap , @frimelle , @yjernite .
- 2 replies
Post
8568
Thread to gossip during the 
openai GPT-5 livestream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Uu_VJeVVfo. Feel free to post your impressions below!
- 30 replies
Post
493
🤖 ICYMI: Yesterday, Hugging Face and OpenAI partnered to bring open source GPT to the public. This is a Big Deal in "AI world".
0. Common ground setting: OpenAI is the ChatGPT people. An “open source” model is one whose weights are available — that means the model can be “yours”.
1. You don’t have to interact with the company directly, nor give them your interactions, to use the system. The company can't "surveil" you.
2. You can evaluate the unique contributions of their SOTA model much more rigorously than you can when there are collections of models+code behind a closed API. You can find out specifically what the model can and can't do.
3. And you can directly customize it for whatever you'd like. Fine-tuning, wherein you give the model data that's tailored to your use cases and train it some more on that data, is trivial* when you have the model weights.
*Provided you have the compute.
4. You can directly benchmark whatever you'd like. Biases? Energy usage? Strengths/weaknesses? Go for it. You wants it you gots it--this transparency helps people understand SOTA *in general*, not just for this model, but points to, e.g., what's going on with closed Google models as well.
5. One of the most powerful things about "openness" that I've learned is that it cultivates ecosystems of collaborators building on top of one another's brilliance to make systems that are significantly better than they would be if created in isolation.
But, caveat wrt my own philosophy...
6. I do not take it as a given that advancing LLMs is good, and have a lot more to say wrt where I think innovation should focus more. For example, a focus on *data* -- curation, measurement, consent, credit, compensation, safety -- would deeply improve technology for everyone.
7. The transparency this release provides is massive for people who want to *learn* about LLMs. For the next generation of technologists to advance over the current, they MUST be able to learn about what's happening now. (cont...)
0. Common ground setting: OpenAI is the ChatGPT people. An “open source” model is one whose weights are available — that means the model can be “yours”.
1. You don’t have to interact with the company directly, nor give them your interactions, to use the system. The company can't "surveil" you.
2. You can evaluate the unique contributions of their SOTA model much more rigorously than you can when there are collections of models+code behind a closed API. You can find out specifically what the model can and can't do.
3. And you can directly customize it for whatever you'd like. Fine-tuning, wherein you give the model data that's tailored to your use cases and train it some more on that data, is trivial* when you have the model weights.
*Provided you have the compute.
4. You can directly benchmark whatever you'd like. Biases? Energy usage? Strengths/weaknesses? Go for it. You wants it you gots it--this transparency helps people understand SOTA *in general*, not just for this model, but points to, e.g., what's going on with closed Google models as well.
5. One of the most powerful things about "openness" that I've learned is that it cultivates ecosystems of collaborators building on top of one another's brilliance to make systems that are significantly better than they would be if created in isolation.
But, caveat wrt my own philosophy...
6. I do not take it as a given that advancing LLMs is good, and have a lot more to say wrt where I think innovation should focus more. For example, a focus on *data* -- curation, measurement, consent, credit, compensation, safety -- would deeply improve technology for everyone.
7. The transparency this release provides is massive for people who want to *learn* about LLMs. For the next generation of technologists to advance over the current, they MUST be able to learn about what's happening now. (cont...)
- 1 reply
Post
525
🤖 👾 Thanks so much to BBC News and the stellar Suranjana Tewari for having me on to talk about US <—> China relationship in AI, and what it means for AI ethics.
Share Datasets of News Broadcasts
#14 opened over 1 year ago
by 
constantinSch
Post
3189
- 1 reply
fdaudens
updated a
Space over 1 year ago
[Media Reporter Seeking Journalists Who Use AI in Their Work — Even if It’s Under the Radar]
#13 opened over 1 year ago
by 
xeutrope
Post
8190
Today, we're unveiling two new open-source AI robots! HopeJR for $3,000 & Reachy Mini for $300 🤖🤖🤖
Let's go open-source AI robotics!
Let's go open-source AI robotics!
- 7 replies
aiscraper
#4 opened over 1 year ago
by 
cyberconnectbel
Post
4002
It's just become easier to share your apps on the biggest AI app store (aka HF spaces) for unlimited storage, more visibility and community interactions.
Just pick a React, Svelte, or Vue template when you create your space or add
Or follow this link: https://huggingface.co/new-space?sdk=static
Let's build!
Just pick a React, Svelte, or Vue template when you create your space or add
app_build_command: npm run build in your README's YAML and app_file: build/index.html in your README's YAML block.Or follow this link: https://huggingface.co/new-space?sdk=static
Let's build!
- 1 reply