Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?
Paper
•
2010.12725
•
Published
Example metadata can be found below, context represents the prompt that is presented to the model. Database schemas follow the encoding method proposed by Shaw et al (2020).
"query": "SELECT count(*) FROM singer",
"question": "How many singers do we have?",
"context": "How many singers do we have? | concert_singer | stadium : stadium_id, location, name, capacity, highest, lowest, average | singer : singer_id, name, country, song_name, song_release_year, age, is_male | concert : concert_id, concert_name, theme, stadium_id, year | singer_in_concert : concert_id, singer_id",
"db_id": "concert_singer",
Evaluation set: KaggleDBQA/test
Evaluation metrics: [Execution Accuracy]
| Model | Data | Run | Execution Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| T5-3B | semiotic/SynQL-KaggleDBQA | 00 | 0.3514 |
| T5-3B | semiotic/SynQL-KaggleDBQA | 01 | 0.3514 |
| T5-3B | semiotic/SynQL-KaggleDBQA | 02 | 0.3514 |
Base model
google-t5/t5-3b